DropKick
Footballguy
neither were playing defence at the end, yet the Chiefs D didn’t even have to take the field
These guys get pretty gassed at a certain point.
neither were playing defence at the end, yet the Chiefs D didn’t even have to take the field
The most playoff games ever in one season that ended on the final play of the day happened this year.Dez said:We will probably never see a playoff weekend like we did this weekend ever again.
All 4 games ended on the final play.
Anarchy99 said:Do people just no longer consider defense part of the game? The Bills had the #1 ranked defense. Get a three and out, two first downs, and they could win on a FG.
Jones did more in his rookie season than Brady did in his second (first as a starter). Comparing a rookie QB to the GOAT after 20 years of play is comparing them at the wrong points in time. No one knows what will happen with Jones going forward. A better argument against Jones is that he’s not mobile and it’s much tougher to win by running the football.Hot Sauce Guy said:I was around for that too. Brady >>>>>> Jones.
I was not down on Brady - he was my sleeper the next year & I snagged him in the 8th or 9th round. That was one of my easiest LCG appearances.
Really? I don't see Cincinnati in quite the positive light others do, for sure, but I don't think I'm disrespecting them when I say the Chiefs might hang a forty burger on them.fred_1_15301 said:no way the Chiefs are winning by more than 7 next week
Kinda harsh on Jones considering he's a rookie... Give him a chance.Hot Sauce Guy said:I was around for that too. Brady >>>>>> Jones.
I was not down on Brady - he was my sleeper the next year & I snagged him in the 8th or 9th round. That was one of my easiest LCG appearances.
With another 9 sacks on JoeReally? I don't see Cincinnati in quite the positive light others do, for sure, but I don't think I'm disrespecting them when I say the Chiefs might hang a forty burger on them.
I don't think he's doing that. He's comparing Brady after one year to Jones after one year.Jones did more in his rookie season than Brady did in his second (first as a starter). Comparing a rookie QB to the GOAT after 20 years of play is comparing them at the wrong points in time. No one knows what will happen with Jones going forward. A better argument against Jones is that he’s not mobile and it’s much tougher to win by running the football.
They were excellent... officiating was very good as well - nothing distracting or really controversial and pretty consistent overall. Great weekend for the NFL.The most playoff games ever in one season that ended on the final play of the day happened this year.
And they all happened in 1 weekend.
I get what you're saying, but Tennessee has a really good pass rush that KC doesn't seem to have. Chris Jones and Ingram are their guys, and it doesn't seem like enough.With another 9 sacks on Joe
Not saying he can’t be the guy.Kinda harsh on Jones considering he's a rookie... Give him a chance.
Then prepare better. Call better schemes. Spend more on defensive players. Rotate more players. Give guys more rest during the season. How come it’s only the defensive players get gassed? Do the offensive players not get hit all game or receivers don’t get tired running deep routes?Can you seriously watch that game where 72 points were scored in regulation and suggest that defense is an equal part of the game?
Exactly correct. I was very specific about that.I don't think he's doing that. He's comparing Brady after one year to Jones after one year.
I'll bow out and let him correct the record, but it seems to me that's what he's saying.
Jones as a rookie: 352-521/3801/22/13I don't think he's doing that. He's comparing Brady after one year to Jones after one year.
I'll bow out and let him correct the record, but it seems to me that's what he's saying.
I didn’t say he didn’t. I’m saying what I saw. Statistics can paint any picture you like. Brady passed the eye test. Jones, to this point, doesn’t, to me. It’s an opinion, subject to change with more dataJones did more in his rookie season than Brady did in his second (first as a starter).
I didn’t. I compared their 1st seasons as a starter.Comparing a rookie QB to the GOAT after 20 years of play is comparing them at the wrong points in time.
Okay. I'll let you take it up with him, then.Jones as a rookie: 352-521/3801/22/13
Brady as a rookie: 1-3/6/0/0
looks like 53.5. hope Cincy doesn't try to go conservative thinking it is a good ideaHot Sauce Guy said:Over for sure. I’m hammering it whatever it is.
I’m a little concerned about the “keep Mahomes off the field with 28” plan. Gonna have to go watch the last game they played again to decide.looks like 53.5. hope Cincy doesn't try to go conservative thinking it is a good idea
Incredible.Check out that win probability chart on the left side of the page. Always hard to pinpoint those things, but by my count here were the changes in the last two minutes of regulation:
- 2:00: KC 82.7%
- 1:47: Buff 75.6%
- 1:16: Buff 91.2%
- 1:02: KC 91.5%
- 0:13: Buff 90.5%
- 0:00: Buff 50.1%
Still not a fair fight. Brady had an entire year in the system that Jones didn’t have. I remember Brady the first year as a starter. He was a game manager and BB kept him on a leash with training wheels on.I didn’t say he didn’t. I’m saying what I saw. Statistics can paint any picture you like. Brady passed the eye test. Jones, to this point, doesn’t, to me. It’s an opinion, subject to change with more data
I didn’t. I compared their 1st seasons as a starter.
The Frankman said:I think you're missing the point; whomever team gets the ball first... THE DEFENSE NEEDS TO MAKE A STOP. I don't care if it's the Chiefs, the Bills, the Fighting Illini, the Ramblin' Wreck from Georgia Tech, or Tecmo Bowl Bo Jackson; you have a separate unit that is coached up and makes a lot of money. Go out there and make the opposing offense punt... or even better, do this.
These probabilities are clearly not factoring in the coaches. I said it early in the thread. The Bills were out coached bad in this one. Not to mention how out coaching cost them home field in this game.Check out that win probability chart on the left side of the page. Always hard to pinpoint those things, but by my count here were the changes in the last two minutes of regulation:
- 2:00: KC 82.7%
- 1:47: Buff 75.6% (158.3pt swing)
- 1:16: Buff 91.2%
- 1:02: KC 91.5% (182.7pt swing)
- 0:13: Buff 90.5% (182pt swing)
- 0:00: Buff 50.1%
I don't recall Brady starting as a rookie.Exactly correct. I was very specific about that.
Hot Sauce Guy said:I was around for that too. Brady >>>>>> Jones.
I was not down on Brady - he was my sleeper the next year & I snagged him in the 8th or 9th round. That was one of my easiest LCG appearances.
ignatiusjreilly said:Your three links are a) a play commonly referred to as a "miracle" which also featured what was most likely a forward pass, b) a play on which an offensive lineman returned a kickoff 70 yards, and c) an onside kick (not sure what that has to do with this discussion at all). And that's your evidence that squib kicks are more likely to be successful?
Jones as a rookie: 352-521/3801/22/13
Brady as a rookie: 1-3/6/0/0
I didn’t say he didn’t. I’m saying what I saw. Statistics can paint any picture you like. Brady passed the eye test. Jones, to this point, doesn’t, to me. It’s an opinion, subject to change with more data
I didn’t. I compared their 1st seasons as a starter.
ignatiusjreilly said:Your three links are a) a play commonly referred to as a "miracle" which also featured what was most likely a forward pass, b) a play on which an offensive lineman returned a kickoff 70 yards, and c) an onside kick (not sure what that has to do with this discussion at all). And that's your evidence that squib kicks are more likely to be successful?
I was saying the year after. His 1st year starting.I don't recall Brady starting as a rookie.
and to my eye Jones looks worse.Brady didn't pass the eye test year one or two. He looked like Dilfer
I mentioned the Bills soft division & rebuilding teams & Anarchy showed up to turn it into a Patriots topic.Not sure why Jones is being discussed in this thread but his play won’t matter. Allen had made the Pats D his ##### and will continue to crush them the next few years. Just like KC has made the Bills D their #####.
Ask Bills fans tonight if it matters how good their QB plays. You need to be able to stop the other QB at some point and Pats cannot stop Allen any more than Buf can stop Mahomes.
I can't even begin to wrap my my mind around the argument about OT. Josh Allen and Gabriel Davis won the game in regulation. All this team needed to do was not have its defense completely #### the bed over the last 13 seconds. That was all.The Duff Man said:As a Bills fan I am more mad at the defence and the 13 seconds. If you can’t stop them there you don’t deserve to complain about the overtime rules.
New England needs to get younger and faster defensively. They have been trying to play old, slow, oversized LBs that can’t cover anyone. They have been ok playing North and South but unable to do much going East and West.Not sure why Jones is being discussed in this thread but his play won’t matter. Allen had made the Pats D his ##### and will continue to crush them the next few years. Just like KC has made the Bills D their #####.
Ask Bills fans tonight if it matters how good their QB plays. You need to be able to stop the other QB at some point and Pats cannot stop Allen any more than Buf can stop Mahomes.
I'm not really a person who hates things. I mean, I try to be level-headed. Different things appeal to different people, and if something doesn't appeal to me, I pretty much just move on. Enjoy what you like and leave the rest behind, you know?Check out that win probability chart on the left side of the page. Always hard to pinpoint those things, but by my count here were the changes in the last two minutes of regulation:
- 2:00: KC 82.7%
- 1:47: Buff 75.6% (158.3pt swing)
- 1:16: Buff 91.2%
- 1:02: KC 91.5% (182.7pt swing)
- 0:13: Buff 90.5% (182pt swing)
- 0:00: Buff 50.1%
omgSo my brother turned off the game with 13 seconds left.
He thought I was the biggest liar when I told him what happened after.
![]()
Sorry, IK.I can't even begin to wrap my my mind around the argument about OT. Josh Allen and Gabriel Davis won the game in regulation. All this team needed to do was not have its defense completely #### the bed over the last 13 seconds. That was all.
and to my eye Jones looks worse.
So my brother turned off the game with 13 seconds left.
He thought I was the biggest liar when I told him what happened after.
![]()
What's funny is that the only time I find it all that interesting is in situations like this. I think the first time I discovered it was after the 2014 NFCCG between the Packers and Seahawks (this was before ESPN started integrating it into its Gamecast, so I think it was just posted somewhere and I saw somebody link to it on Twitter.) Anyway, it's fun to see the wild swings like you had in that game and in tonight's game. But I agree in terms of in-game analysis, it's pretty useless. Plus I think you're onto something with the IT department not particularly caring. Because they probably could make it (marginally) more interesting if they allowed people to dig down at a more granular level, download the datasets, etc. But clearly all they want you to do is hover over itI'm not really a person who hates things. I mean, I try to be level-headed. Different things appeal to different people, and if something doesn't appeal to me, I pretty much just move on. Enjoy what you like and leave the rest behind, you know?
That being said, I HATE that probability thing on ESPN. It means absolutely nothing. It serves no purpose. Nobody can do anything with it. It's a dumb program some suit thought would spice up their Gamecast.
They wondered, can we do this? *Checks with IT department, who says, sure, I guess, if you really want to for some reason.* Great, let's get that chart up there!
IT department shrugs and puts it up there before going to Applebees for lunch.
It's about as football-relevant as a weather predictor...for Venus. Oh, it's going to be 880 degrees, up from 805 degrees? How interesting. I HATE HATE HATE that probability thing.
I apologize for the rant.
I can't even begin to wrap my my mind around the argument about OT. Josh Allen and Gabriel Davis won the game in regulation. All this team needed to do was not have its defense completely #### the bed over the last 13 seconds. That was all.
buf punted 4 times ...chiefs twice...you never knowArmy Eye said:So if the Bills won the toss, would the Chiefs have 'played defense'. Or would the Bills have gone right down the field?
Of course you know what would happened. The coin toss decides it.
Like the Giants vs Angels Game 6 in 2002Sorry, IK.
Cross-sport analogy: I remember the Red Sox in 2003. We had Pedro Martinez going on the hill and things went right. We were up 5-2 at the end of seven in Game Seven against the hated Yankees. Our bullpen, much maligned, had been lights out for a month and a half. And Grady Little left Pedro in because he was scared of his bullpen. And the Yankees won. Aaron Boone's home run in extra innings merely cemented a foregone conclusion in most of our minds after the Yankees had tied the score in the eighth, the inning Grady left Pedro in to flail during. They had tied it 5-5, fresh arms waiting in the pen, only to be used during the tie.
After the shock of the game, there was this bleak feeling like a title would never happen. Then, 2004. Sometimes the team you thought was best (like I think that 2003 team was) doesn't win it. Sometimes you come back and figure out what beat you and you come back stronger. The Sox shored up the bullpen and got another starter in Schilling to eat innings so that the rest of the staff was stretched out. They started slower that year, and confusingly so. Seeing their weaknesses, they dealt their franchise player mid-year, and then took off, overcoming that 3-0 series deficit to the Yankees (of all teams) that nobody in baseball had ever overcome. Title. Joy.
I hope that for the Bills next year and that you might take solace in that after a crushing defeat tonight. You'll address the needs, one hopes. You'll adjust the play-calling, one hopes. And when you do, there will be a great deal of joy in a win when you beat Brady and Tampa next year in the SB.
lol - neither did I. I just said I wasn’t sold on Jones, while my point was about optimism for the Bills in part due to the weak division.And mine Brady looked worse. Not even sure why we arguing this, but I didn't bring it up.
Imagine you had a buddy who, after the Bills scored with less than two minutes left, leaned over and said "You know, I'm pretty sure the Bills are gonna win."What's funny is that the only time I find it all that interesting is in situations like this. I think the first time I discovered it was after the 2014 NFCCG between the Packers and Seahawks (this was before ESPN started integrating it into its Gamecast, so I think it was just posted somewhere and I saw somebody link to it on Twitter.) Anyway, it's fun to see the wild swings like you had in that game and in tonight's game. But I agree in terms of in-game analysis, it's pretty useless. Plus I think you're onto something with the IT department not particularly caring. Because they probably could make it (marginally) more interesting if they allowed people to dig down at a more granular level, download the datasets, etc. But clearly all they want you to do is hover over it