- via SleeperBot http://sleeperbot.com/topic/4c9a73da8ecce1a74400010aCadillac Williams (hamstring) was limited in Bucs practice Wednesday
- via SleeperBot http://sleeperbot.com/topic/4c9a73da8ecce1a74400010aCadillac Williams (hamstring) was limited in Bucs practice Wednesday
Wonder if the sb in sbfs stands for SleeperBot?what's SleeperBot? Spam? I'm afraid to click on the link.
Not spam, all you need to know is pick up Huggins.what's SleeperBot? Spam? I'm afraid to click on the link.
Wonder if the sb in sbfs stands for SleeperBot?what's SleeperBot? Spam? I'm afraid to click on the link.
Spam doesn't break news in real-timeWonder if the sb in sbfs stands for SleeperBot?what's SleeperBot? Spam? I'm afraid to click on the link.SleeperBot Fantasy Spam
He trusts Caddy and I would not make much of this hammy. He's had a huge workload and they are probably just giving him a rest.I think it's more about who Morris trusts.
Agreed, but Graham had 6, then 3 carries.He's also fat.I think it's more about who Morris trusts.
Considering his injury history, Caddy is one to watch closely no?He trusts Caddy and I would not make much of this hammy. He's had a huge workload and they are probably just giving him a rest.I think it's more about who Morris trusts.
The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.OK, here's what we knowGraham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chartMorris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB positionGraham has performed for the team in the pastAfter cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins hasThey face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJWhere do you see value here?
Are you in an 8 team league?No, dude, I would pass on all of them. Are you new to the game or something?
I'm sorry but if Chris the Jesus Johnson was limited to 39 yards vs Pitt then I expect Huggins to eat the grass this week. No thanks.The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.OK, here's what we knowGraham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chartMorris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB positionGraham has performed for the team in the pastAfter cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins hasThey face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJWhere do you see value here?
OK, here's what we knowGraham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chartMorris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB positionGraham has performed for the team in the pastAfter cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins hasThey face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJWhere do you see value here?
Our rosters go 17 deepNo, dude, I would pass on all of them. Are you new to the game or something?
I don't agree with this type of thinking.If player X doesn't do it, player Y cannot either. Many factors go into fantasy production. All Huggins needs is 1 dump off pass to take it the distance, which will put him on fantasy radars.Also, hamstrings linger, and Caddy is avg 2.6 yards per carry. He not only sucks, but is injury prone.Even IF he is healthy, if Huggins shows something, he'll carve out some time and become playable as Flex in deep PPR leagues at least, or not more. What happened to all the Huggins love after just 2 weeks?Realize also Huggins was injured last week, now back to full practice.I'm sorry but if Chris the Jesus Johnson was limited to 39 yards vs Pitt then I expect Huggins to eat the grass this week. No thanks.The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.OK, here's what we knowGraham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chartMorris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB positionGraham has performed for the team in the pastAfter cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins hasThey face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJWhere do you see value here?
A posting that has Blount and Lumpkin ahead of huggins is "good posting"?OK, here's what we knowGraham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chartMorris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB positionGraham has performed for the team in the pastAfter cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins hasThey face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJWhere do you see value here?![]()
In dynasty maybe worth an add. I think there are much better bets on most WWs, and the smallest league I play in is a 12-teamer.If Huggins starts I'll be shocked. If he registers above 5 FP I'll be absolutely amazed.Our rosters go 17 deepNo, dude, I would pass on all of them. Are you new to the game or something?. 8th year playing.
I posted it in the other Huggins thread, but I'll mention it in here too:Imagine if Huggy busts off some long TD against the superpower Pittsburgh defense? The hysteria would reach epic levels. I'm praying for this to happen.I don't agree with this type of thinking.If player X doesn't do it, player Y cannot either. Many factors go into fantasy production. All Huggins needs is 1 dump off pass to take it the distance, which will put him on fantasy radars.Also, hamstrings linger, and Caddy is avg 2.6 yards per carry. He not only sucks, but is injury prone.Even IF he is healthy, if Huggins shows something, he'll carve out some time and become playable as Flex in deep PPR leagues at least, or not more. What happened to all the Huggins love after just 2 weeks?Realize also Huggins was injured last week, now back to full practice.I'm sorry but if Chris the Jesus Johnson was limited to 39 yards vs Pitt then I expect Huggins to eat the grass this week. No thanks.The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.OK, here's what we knowGraham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chartMorris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB positionGraham has performed for the team in the pastAfter cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins hasThey face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJWhere do you see value here?
Wonder if the sb in sbfs stands for SleeperBot?what's SleeperBot? Spam? I'm afraid to click on the link.SleeperBot Fantasy Spam
You're still not a first round pick, though.Wonder if the sb in sbfs stands for SleeperBot?what's SleeperBot? Spam? I'm afraid to click on the link.SleeperBot Fantasy Spam
![]()
I agree with you he may not start. But if Caddy sits, he could easily out-do Graham in # of touches.In dynasty maybe worth an add. I think there are much better bets on most WWs, and the smallest league I play in is a 12-teamer.If Huggins starts I'll be shocked. If he registers above 5 FP I'll be absolutely amazed.Our rosters go 17 deepNo, dude, I would pass on all of them. Are you new to the game or something?. 8th year playing.
Hmmm. I thought it was one guy named BlumpkinClifford said:OK, here's what we know
Graham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chart
Morris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB position
Graham has performed for the team in the past
After cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins has
They face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJ
Where do you see value here?
They have the hottest cam girls!BringItOn said:KnowledgeReignsSupreme said:Wonder if the sb in sbfs stands for SleeperBot?Sammy Traveller said:what's SleeperBot? Spam? I'm afraid to click on the link.SleeperBot Fantasy Spam
sbfs said:Agreed, but Graham had 6, then 3 carries.Clifford said:I think it's more about who Morris trusts.
He's also fat.
Don't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?sbfs said:The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Clifford said:OK, here's what we know
Graham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chart
Morris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB position
Graham has performed for the team in the past
After cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins has
They face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJ
Where do you see value here?
Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.
Change the bolded word to will, and I'll agree with you there.sbfs said:I agree with you he may not start.
Only if Graham is injured will Huggins "easily out-do" him.sbfs said:But if Caddy sits, he could easily out-do Graham in # of touches.
NoDon't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?sbfs said:The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Clifford said:OK, here's what we know
Graham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chart
Morris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB position
Graham has performed for the team in the past
After cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins has
They face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJ
Where do you see value here?
Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.
yesNoDon't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?sbfs said:The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Clifford said:OK, here's what we know
Graham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chart
Morris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB position
Graham has performed for the team in the past
After cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins has
They face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJ
Where do you see value here?
Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.
no you dont. rbs can lineup anywhere on the field.yesNoDon't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?sbfs said:The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Clifford said:OK, here's what we know
Graham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chart
Morris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB position
Graham has performed for the team in the past
After cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins has
They face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJ
Where do you see value here?
Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.
Is that even remotely close to what I was saying?..?..."Great" passing game RB's can block.... Average or mediocre ones would typically be able to block as well....I didn't say he couldn't be "used in the passing game". But he'll never be "Great" when he gets trucked every time he has to pass protect... Good receiving RB's generally catching dump off passes, typically coming off a block to do so.. If opposing teams know he's not in to block, or that he can't block, you think he's going to fool anyone?you really think you have to be able to pass protect to be used in the passing game as a running back? You know far less than i thought.
If he's lining up at WR, is he still playing RB?.... Are you suggesting that he'll line up at another position besides RB?no you dont. rbs can lineup anywhere on the field.
You asked, "Don't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?"And I told you No. All running backs in the NFL need to be able to pass block.Is that even remotely close to what I was saying?..?..."Great" passing game RB's can block.... Average or mediocre ones would typically be able to block as well....I didn't say he couldn't be used in the passing game. But he'll never be "Great" when he gets trucked every time he has to pass protect... Good receiving RB's generally catching dump off passes, typically coming off a block to do so.. If opposing teams know he's not in to block, or that he can't block, you think he's going to fool anyone?you really think you have to be able to pass protect to be used in the passing game as a running back? You know far less than i thought.
im saying you dont have to pass block as a running back. Are you seriously not getting this?If he's lining up at WR, is he still playing RB?.... Are you suggesting that he'll line up at another position besides RB?no you dont. rbs can lineup anywhere on the field.
.... And Huggins Pass Blocking abilities are virtually non-existent... Like running through a wall of toilet paper...You asked, "Don't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?"And I told you No. All running backs in the NFL need to be able to pass block.Is that even remotely close to what I was saying?..?..."Great" passing game RB's can block.... Average or mediocre ones would typically be able to block as well....I didn't say he couldn't be used in the passing game. But he'll never be "Great" when he gets trucked every time he has to pass protect... Good receiving RB's generally catching dump off passes, typically coming off a block to do so.. If opposing teams know he's not in to block, or that he can't block, you think he's going to fool anyone?you really think you have to be able to pass protect to be used in the passing game as a running back? You know far less than i thought.
"rbs can lineup anywhere on the field" <means> "you dont have to pass block as a running back"No, of course that's exactly how I understood it..im saying you dont have to pass block as a running back. Are you seriously not getting this?If he's lining up at WR, is he still playing RB?.... Are you suggesting that he'll line up at another position besides RB?no you dont. rbs can lineup anywhere on the field.
i dont care about huggins or his skills. I simply answered your guestion. Good pass catching running backs line up all over the field and are in asset in the passing game. They arent always protecting the qb and splitting out wide after or up the gut and checking back..... And Huggins Pass Blocking abilities are virtually non-existent... Line running through a wall of toilet paper...You asked, "Don't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?"And I told you No. All running backs in the NFL need to be able to pass block.Is that even remotely close to what I was saying?..?..."Great" passing game RB's can block.... Average or mediocre ones would typically be able to block as well....I didn't say he couldn't be used in the passing game. But he'll never be "Great" when he gets trucked every time he has to pass protect... Good receiving RB's generally catching dump off passes, typically coming off a block to do so.. If opposing teams know he's not in to block, or that he can't block, you think he's going to fool anyone?you really think you have to be able to pass protect to be used in the passing game as a running back? You know far less than i thought.
What is to regret ........ the koolaid did not produce ...... Huggins has not seen daylight. Graham is the backup and has produced in the past.sbfs said:You would really trust Earnest Graham to take the full workload over a potential gamechanger? You should at least take a flier on Huggins. Many players gave up too early, and will regret it.
I'm definitely on board to see some Def Leppard-style Hysteria if Huggins actually cranks off some gigantic runs. We deserve that kind of excitement around here.Jayrod said:I posted it in the other Huggins thread, but I'll mention it in here too:Imagine if Huggy busts off some long TD against the superpower Pittsburgh defense? The hysteria would reach epic levels. I'm praying for this to happen.sbfs said:I don't agree with this type of thinking.If player X doesn't do it, player Y cannot either. Many factors go into fantasy production. All Huggins needs is 1 dump off pass to take it the distance, which will put him on fantasy radars.Also, hamstrings linger, and Caddy is avg 2.6 yards per carry. He not only sucks, but is injury prone.Even IF he is healthy, if Huggins shows something, he'll carve out some time and become playable as Flex in deep PPR leagues at least, or not more. What happened to all the Huggins love after just 2 weeks?Realize also Huggins was injured last week, now back to full practice.steelwind said:I'm sorry but if Chris the Jesus Johnson was limited to 39 yards vs Pitt then I expect Huggins to eat the grass this week. No thanks.sbfs said:The value is in the most talented back. Given Huggins, Graham, Blound, and Lumpkin on the free agency, knowing Caddy is injured, you would pass on Huggins in favor of 2 of the others? Come on.Vs PIT, they will almost have to go with a quick RB. Graham doesn't scare anybody. He's a 30 yo career backup goaline back.Huggins is a great asset in the passing game, esp on dump off passes. I would not play him, but he's worth stashing now, unless your league is quite shallow.Clifford said:OK, here's what we knowGraham is ahead of Huggins on the depth chartMorris has explicitly stated that Graham is "Mr Insurance" at the RB positionGraham has performed for the team in the pastAfter cutting Ward, the team brought in two RBs, Blount and Lumpkin, one of whom has shown more at the NFL level than Huggins hasThey face the toughest team in the league against the run, who have thus far completely shut down Turner and CJWhere do you see value here?
Name a Great pass catching RB that can't block....i dont care about huggins or his skills. I simply answered your guestion. Good pass catching running backs line up all over the field and are in asset in the passing game. They arent always protecting the qb and splitting out wide after or up the gut and checking back..... And Huggins Pass Blocking abilities are virtually non-existent... Line running through a wall of toilet paper...You asked, "Don't you have to be able to pass protect to be a "great asset in the passing game" as a RB?"And I told you No. All running backs in the NFL need to be able to pass block.Is that even remotely close to what I was saying?..?..."Great" passing game RB's can block.... Average or mediocre ones would typically be able to block as well....I didn't say he couldn't be used in the passing game. But he'll never be "Great" when he gets trucked every time he has to pass protect... Good receiving RB's generally catching dump off passes, typically coming off a block to do so.. If opposing teams know he's not in to block, or that he can't block, you think he's going to fool anyone?you really think you have to be able to pass protect to be used in the passing game as a running back? You know far less than i thought.
Name a Great pass catching RB that can't block....
Of course, glad I don't have to decide whether to continue to view your worthless posts just so I can see you post good info...Name a Great pass catching RB that can't block....and No.