What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Chicago Bears Thread*** Ben Johnson hired. The Resurrection Begins! (4 Viewers)

We took a TE in the second round. That is NOT a project round. Shaheen needs to play or this is going to look real bad for Pace. 
Yeah, I was dying for a TE with that second round pick because there were a lot of good ones in this draft.  Was nervous when he was the pick of the bunch, but excited for the potential.  He better work out, 2nd round picks can't be wasted when you are trying to rebuild a team through the draft.

 
Dr. Dan said:
:confused:

14th best in Points allowed per game (20.0)
17th best in Passing yards allowed per game

Hardly "bad"... more like average. 

Minnesota on the other hand:
8th best in Points allowed per game  (19.0... a whole 1 less point)
24th in Passing yards allowed per game
Did you watch the Ravens against the Jags in London? The defense played well against the Browns and the Bengals, two teams really struggling on offense. They got lit up by the Jaguars and pounded by the Steelers, both teams that haven't been lighting it up against anyone else. The Ravens gave up 70 points to the Jags and the Steelers. So yes, I don't care where the Ravens are ranked, the Ravens are a bad defense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
waterworld said:
We took a TE in the second round. That is NOT a project round. Shaheen needs to play or this is going to look real bad for Pace. 
TEs are almost always a project, no matter when they are taken. If you draft a guy who played DIII, then he is more of a project. Hard to imagine he does much of anything until year two or three. 

 
Someone in this thread said week was a good week for Mitch to come in. You were right. Got to sit through first 4 weeks and toughest stretch if schedule and came out 1-3. Perfect spot 

 
Did you watch the Ravens against the Jags in London? The defense played well against the Browns and the Bengals, two teams really struggling on offense. They got lit up by the Jaguars and pounded by the Steelers, both teams that haven't been lighting it up against anyone else. The Ravens gave up 70 points to the Jags and the Steelers. So yes, I don't care where the Ravens are ranked, the Ravens are a bad defense.
Fair point.

I heard somewhere where the Vikings are practically unbeatable if they score 21 points or over within the last 5 or 6 years or something. And it shows this season... they haven't given up more than 20 points once. 

Vikings have a good defense, and I wouldn't be thrilled about trotting out a rookie QB in his first game to them. However, I am not so sure the Ravens have such a terrible defense... someone in another thread was calling them best in the league earlier this season... can't believe within 2 weeks I've read they're the best to they're "bad" 

 
I do expect Trubisky to be an improvement and that should help everyone in offense. He is more capable of going downfield and while I don't expect more passes to Cohen, I think he should have more room to run after catch. Likewise, if Trubisky is more effective, then the offense is on field more and in scoring position more so it helps Howard too.  Tough first matchup, so I am less interested in final results and more interested to see his decision-making, his poise, how quickly he gets rid of the ball, etc.

 
TEs are almost always a project, no matter when they are taken. If you draft a guy who played DIII, then he is more of a project. Hard to imagine he does much of anything until year two or three. 
Absolutely unacceptable from a second round pick. #### like that is why this organization is in the position its in. Throwing high picks in the garbage. 

 
Fair point.

I heard somewhere where the Vikings are practically unbeatable if they score 21 points or over within the last 5 or 6 years or something. And it shows this season... they haven't given up more than 20 points once. 

Vikings have a good defense, and I wouldn't be thrilled about trotting out a rookie QB in his first game to them. However, I am not so sure the Ravens have such a terrible defense... someone in another thread was calling them best in the league earlier this season... can't believe within 2 weeks I've read they're the best to they're "bad" 
I think that we are discovering that a lot of teams are not what they seem. The Bills are leading the AFC east. The Jets are tied with the Patriots. The Patriots have lost two at home. The Rams are leading the NFC West. The Jaguars are tied for first in the AFC South. The Giants and the Chargers are winless. Not what I expected. And I think that we are going to discover that the AFC Central teams aren't very good. Things move fast in the NFL. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
They'd better promote Gentry.  Him and Trubador are like peas and carrots.  I'll bet Shaheen starts getting more on-field time and more targets as well.

Watching Wilson, Prescott and Watson yesterday has me excited to see some moving pockets, bootlegs and misdirection.

Tired of "pure" pocket passers.

 
Is that right? Look at Glennon's stats through 4 games
I’ve seen Glennon throw a touchdown. 

I ain’t see Mitch do jack #### yet.

im rolling out Vikes D/ST anyway, but I feel like there’s a good chance for a dumb mistake. Rookie QBs do not often bust out of the gate with Peyton Manning-esque performances

 
They'd better promote Gentry.  Him and Trubador are like peas and carrots.  I'll bet Shaheen starts getting more on-field time and more targets as well.

Watching Wilson, Prescott and Watson yesterday has me excited to see some moving pockets, bootlegs and misdirection.

Tired of "pure" pocket passers.
Kept Gentry on practice squad and called up Mcbride. Been on team 3 weeks. Smh

 
Absolutely unacceptable from a second round pick. #### like that is why this organization is in the position its in. Throwing high picks in the garbage. 
To be fair, most NFL TEs spend their first 1-2 seasons blocking. 

I realize the position has evolved, and there are exceptions to the rule, but there’s no shame in taking receivers and developing them. The NFL is the elite of the elite - sometimes it takes time for young players to step up to the next level of competition. 

It takes time for the game to slow down, especially at the receiver position. 

Related to FFB, seems like the demand for instant gratification is what drives the phenomenon of the “post hype sleeper”. Amari Cooper is a good example. He’s having a pretty bad year.  Assuming his mediocre season continues he’s, then next year he’ll go from a 2nd round bust to a potential 5th round bargain. 

Back to your post, I don’t consider a 2nd round TE taking time to develop throwing picks in the garbage.  Hopefully he works out for the Bears...FFB can always use more pass catching TEs. ;)  

 
To be fair, most NFL TEs spend their first 1-2 seasons blocking. 

I realize the position has evolved, and there are exceptions to the rule, but there’s no shame in taking receivers and developing them. The NFL is the elite of the elite - sometimes it takes time for young players to step up to the next level of competition. 

It takes time for the game to slow down, especially at the receiver position. 

Related to FFB, seems like the demand for instant gratification is what drives the phenomenon of the “post hype sleeper”. Amari Cooper is a good example. He’s having a pretty bad year.  Assuming his mediocre season continues he’s, then next year he’ll go from a 2nd round bust to a potential 5th round bargain. 

Back to your post, I don’t consider a 2nd round TE taking time to develop throwing picks in the garbage.  Hopefully he works out for the Bears...FFB can always use more pass catching TEs. ;)  
Man, it's 2017. It's unacceptable to use a second round pick on a blocking TE. This kind of stuff is what seperate teams that win with perennial losers like us. 

 
I’ve seen Glennon throw a touchdown. 

I ain’t see Mitch do jack #### yet.

im rolling out Vikes D/ST anyway, but I feel like there’s a good chance for a dumb mistake. Rookie QBs do not often bust out of the gate with Peyton Manning-esque performances
We’ve also seen Glennon turn the ball over 8 times in 4 games so I’m not sure it can get much worse. 

Glennon is leading the NFL in fumbles with 3 lost

He’s tied for 3rd in the NFL in interceptions with 5. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve seen Glennon throw a touchdown. 

I ain’t see Mitch do jack #### yet.

im rolling out Vikes D/ST anyway, but I feel like there’s a good chance for a dumb mistake. Rookie QBs do not often bust out of the gate with Peyton Manning-esque performances
Glennon has been the worst starting qb in the league this year, by a mile.  There's a difference in saying Trubisky will be better than the worst qb in the league and Peyton Manning.  You understand that, right? 

 
That being said, I'd like nothing more than to see him drop back on his first play and throw a bomb to Wheaton.

 
Let's take a look at Manning's rookie year, shall we?

http://www.nfl.com/player/peytonmanning/2501863/gamelogs?season=1998

For the lazy, he was a horrible turnover machine, throwing 3 INTs in each of his first two games and 28 for the season.  This team is equally as bad as that Colts team (3-13).

That's the measuring stick I'm using, not when he was in his prime.

Bears will bring Trubador along slowly.
That's the whole point here. They can protect Mitch, so that's not an issue.  Put him in there and he'll be further ahead in his development by next year than was expected. It's going to end up being a positive for the franchise.  Fox and Loggains will be gone. Pace looks like an idiot with Glennon, but it won't matter if Mitch succeeds. 

 
There really hasn't been any data that proves redshirting a rookie QB helps him in the long run.  I've always thought it would help but it must just be my own personal feeling because I just can't find any info to support it.  It's Biscuit time. 

 
There really hasn't been any data that proves redshirting a rookie QB helps him in the long run.  I've always thought it would help but it must just be my own personal feeling because I just can't find any info to support it.  It's Biscuit time. 
I don't think any reliable data exists. There's no way of knowing if a guy would have turned out better/worse if he started earlier/later than he did, so that chart is pretty meaningless.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think any reliable data exists. There's no way of knowing if a guy would have turned out better/worse if he started earlier/later than he did, so that chart is pretty meaningless.
My thought has now become if you draft a QB in the early first round then he should be playing.

 
My thought has now become if you draft a QB in the early first round then he should be playing.
As long as he can protect himself, sure.  If he can't read a blitz and can't call out protections he can't be on the field.  That's the only reason to be concerned about Trubisky.  In his limited time he looked pretty aware and used his mobility well so as long as he's not getting killed out there then he should be kept out there regardless of the statistics.  Reps reps reps is all that matters right now.

 
As long as he can protect himself, sure.  If he can't read a blitz and can't call out protections he can't be on the field.  That's the only reason to be concerned about Trubisky.  In his limited time he looked pretty aware and used his mobility well so as long as he's not getting killed out there then he should be kept out there regardless of the statistics.  Reps reps reps is all that matters right now.
When the alternative to him playing can't do any of that either you might as well let your second overall pick play and get the experience.  I would feel different about it if Glennon wasn't just about the worst QB the Bears have ever had.

 
When the alternative to him playing can't do any of that either you might as well let your second overall pick play and get the experience.  I would feel different about it if Glennon wasn't just about the worst QB the Bears have ever had.
I'm agreeing with you, as long as he can protect himself.  They don't care if Glennon gets himself killed, he's not their future.  You can't put Trubisky out there though if he can't keep himself upright.  He has to see and feel the rush and get rid of the ball, cover up when he can't, move around the pocket and not take huge hits.  Until he can you trot out Glennon and Sanchez to be sacrificial lambs.

 
I'm agreeing with you, as long as he can protect himself.  They don't care if Glennon gets himself killed, he's not their future.  You can't put Trubisky out there though if he can't keep himself upright.  He has to see and feel the rush and get rid of the ball, cover up when he can't, move around the pocket and not take huge hits.  Until he can you trot out Glennon and Sanchez to be sacrificial lambs.
Good point

 
When the alternative to him playing can't do any of that either you might as well let your second overall pick play and get the experience.  I would feel different about it if Glennon wasn't just about the worst QB the Bears have ever had.
See I disagree completely with this logic. The only consideration should be what's in the best interest of Trubisky and the Bears longer term. If you think that's playing him now, that's what you do. If you think that's sitting him longer, then that's what you do. That really should be the only consideration (obviously it won't be with coaches and front office members on the hot seat, but it should be).

 
Hawkeye21 said:
There really hasn't been any data that proves redshirting a rookie QB helps him in the long run.  I've always thought it would help but it must just be my own personal feeling because I just can't find any info to support it.  It's Biscuit time. 
I guess you guys didn't have time to read the articles I posted on the subject, so here is one of them again (from 2015):

https://www.outkickthecoverage.com/when-to-start-your-rookie-quarterback-050715/

You can go back and look at the other, which is more fantasy-based.

 
Hankmoody said:
I'm agreeing with you, as long as he can protect himself.  They don't care if Glennon gets himself killed, he's not their future.  You can't put Trubisky out there though if he can't keep himself upright.  He has to see and feel the rush and get rid of the ball, cover up when he can't, move around the pocket and not take huge hits.  Until he can you trot out Glennon and Sanchez to be sacrificial lambs.
He's only going to learn how to do that being on the field. He's going to make plenty of mistakes. Everyone does at first. 

 
Hasn't been discussed much but Leno was a great find and has played very well this year. I gave him a really hard time. Was dead wrong. Great to extend him before the season. 

 
He's only going to learn how to do that being on the field. He's going to make plenty of mistakes. Everyone does at first. 
Mostly true, but there's a huge difference between making mistakes and not knowing what you're looking at.  He has gotten a whole lot more prepared watching film and learning what other teams' blitz and rush packages look like and then taking that to practice and having it mocked up for him.  That's why it's valuable to sit a guy the first few games.  Opponents aren't showing their full scheme in preseason.  Now he has 4 weeks of film on Minnesota to go look at and spend 10 days preparing for.  They can get the scout team out there and line it up, show him the keys and reads, and work on the protection calls.  And he's been doing that on a general level for the prior 4 weeks too.  He's far more prepared now than he was in preseason.  Whether or not he's prepared now we can't say, that requires live action to evaluate.  As long as he doesn't get killed he should be out there- he'll make progress quickly enough.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top