Chris Brown (2 Viewers)

[JohnnyU]

I can respect you LHUCKS but you lose points when you post comments like this:

Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible.   

I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

Comments like those tend to not go over very well around here. It comes very close to another infamous quote:

"I'm an important person around here". 

Exactly what I said earlier.He tried the same change the subject strategy on my thread, too.

It's like that Bill Cosby standup routine, when he talks about his kids at bedtime. LHUCKS must love the abuse. "I can't go to bed without a beating !!".

 

[LHUCKS]

I'm not here to sell advice...I give it to many for free.

Luckily, most of us have learned to ignore you.

Keep telling yourself that.

 

[LHUCKS]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion on the topic.

 

[LHUCKS]

If you're such an "Expert Drafter", why do you rely on info from CBS?ANY self-Respecting FBG would NEVER admit to this. July 21 -

Blurb I just read on CBS that appears to echo my sentiments:QUOTE with George on the market, the value of several running backs could be altered this season. Second-year rusher Chris Brown would move up the depth chart and emerge as the Titans' starter, but the team will also look to sign a veteran such as James Stewart, Antowain Smith or Stacey Mack as insurance. Brown and Robert Holcombe are the only two backs on the roster with NFL experience -- Troy Fleming, Vick King and Jarrett Payton are all rookies -- so owners should expect a veteran to be signed and take carries from Brown and limit the rise in his value. At best, the Colorado product will serve as a useful No. 3, flex player or an occasional No. 2 against favorable opponents. Two key words = "At Best"

welcome to the messageboard newb"rely on CBS"

My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

 

[Bovine Swami]

I have Suggs ranked higher than Brown also.The Browns have stated they will NOT be using a RBBC, that makes Suggs a much more likely candidate to be an impact FF RB

I think that's my favorite LHucks quote of the entire thread. :rotflmao: Of course it's not his fault that the Brown's coaches were talking out their butts.Not only was I crazy enough to draft Brown at 2/10, I was also confident enough in him (or ) to trade away Priest Holmes for Westbrook and Harrison.Here's to remembering that this is all supposed to be fun and you sometimes you gotta gamble to win.

 

[LHUCKS]

To all the haters,I did not like Chris Brown for several reasons in the offseason...and it wasn't until it was clear that Eddie George and later A. Smith would not be a factor in addition to Brown's strong preseason showing that I moved him up in my rankings to #18. I would have moved him higher if I thought skinny, upright runners were likely to last an entire season. That being said, I moved him up to 18 before the season started.I still stand by my logic with respect to all of the arguments I've made against Chris Brown in the past. He isn't and probably never will be on any of my fantasy teams.What I find amusing is that some of the most fervent posters on this thread didn't have the balls to put out their own rankings or jump into some of the more well-known "expert" leagues around here. Congratulations...you are one of the several sheep that jumped on the Chris Brown Bandwagon and you may be right about one player...that means nothing to anybody who is well-versed in this hobby. Fantasy football is a game of percentages, guessing right on one player does nothing for those of us who actually know what we're talking about.If you don't agree with my rankings, instead of picking out one player after five weeks that that has outperformed his LHUCKS' ranking...perhaps you should look at my rankings as a whole and come to the realization that I'm simply better than you at this hobby.Or perhaps you can follow the leagues in my sig and ask yourself why I'm undefeated against the FBG staff in addition to the many self-proclaimed experts on these boards in ff survivor leagues.

 

[Foosball God]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion.

At this point I'd take his opinion over yours.

 

[Colin Dowling]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion.

No it doesn't. The fact that you are here often doesn't make you any more or less valuable than anyone else. You're free to discuss whatever you want however you want, but acting like the mere circumstance that you happened upon these boards before someone else allows you to disqualify someone else's opinion not only makes you look foolish, it minimizes the relevance of your own opinions.

People don't like to be talked down to. THats what we have a 14 page thread of people who LOVE that you are wrong about Brown. They'll keep baiting you all season and you'll keep taking it, hook, line, and sinker. And in the end, we'll all have a good laugh about how off-base you were about a player but more importantly, we'll have a good laugh about what a stubborn goof you appear to be...

....all because you talk down to people, and they don't like that.

COlin

 

[LHUCKS]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion.

No it doesn't. The fact that you are here often doesn't make you any more or less valuable than anyone else. You're free to discuss whatever you want however you want, but acting like the mere circumstance that you happened upon these boards before someone else allows you to disqualify someone else's opinion not only makes you look foolish, it minimizes the relevance of your own opinions.

People don't like to be talked down to. THats what we have a 14 page thread of people who LOVE that you are wrong about Brown. They'll keep baiting you all season and you'll keep taking it, hook, line, and sinker. And in the end, we'll all have a good laugh about how off-base you were about a player but more importantly, we'll have a good laugh about what a stubborn goof you appear to be...

....all because you talk down to people, and they don't like that.

COlin

My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

 

[INTERGALACTIC SUPERSTAR]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion.

No it doesn't. The fact that you are here often doesn't make you any more or less valuable than anyone else. You're free to discuss whatever you want however you want, but acting like the mere circumstance that you happened upon these boards before someone else allows you to disqualify someone else's opinion not only makes you look foolish, it minimizes the relevance of your own opinions.

People don't like to be talked down to. THats what we have a 14 page thread of people who LOVE that you are wrong about Brown. They'll keep baiting you all season and you'll keep taking it, hook, line, and sinker. And in the end, we'll all have a good laugh about how off-base you were about a player but more importantly, we'll have a good laugh about what a stubborn goof you appear to be...

....all because you talk down to people, and they don't like that.

COlin

 

[Evilgrin72]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion.

No it doesn't. The fact that you are here often doesn't make you any more or less valuable than anyone else. You're free to discuss whatever you want however you want, but acting like the mere circumstance that you happened upon these boards before someone else allows you to disqualify someone else's opinion not only makes you look foolish, it minimizes the relevance of your own opinions.

People don't like to be talked down to. THats what we have a 14 page thread of people who LOVE that you are wrong about Brown. They'll keep baiting you all season and you'll keep taking it, hook, line, and sinker. And in the end, we'll all have a good laugh about how off-base you were about a player but more importantly, we'll have a good laugh about what a stubborn goof you appear to be...

....all because you talk down to people, and they don't like that.

COlin

This "thumbs-up" is not pointed at LHUCKS, who has never talked down to me, but to all the people who feel like just because someone has a 4 or 5-digit member number, that their opinions and analysis are invalid. Thanks, Colin (#29 by the way, you 3-digit snobs) for articulating this.... I'd have done so myself, but my member number is too high for anyone to take me seriously..

 

[Colin Dowling]

I'm not trying to attack LHUCKS. I've said previously and I'll say it again: He certainly knows a lot about fantasy football and I apprecaite his posting. However, I think that a lot of people here know a lot about fantasy football and disqualifying an opinion that is contrary to one's own without giving it due consideration is generally a bad idea. Also, I'm a lot better at this then he is, and I have the TRUTH on my side - 638 yards and 4 TDs. COLin

 

[JohnnyU]

To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

What makes you think that anyone wants your respect?

 

[LHUCKS]

To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

What makes you think that anyone wants your respect?

What makes you think that anyone doesn't or that I even care if they don't?

 

[BigJim®]

It hurts the ego a bit but what are you going to do, except put the chin straps on and see if you can turn it around.

You could pretend you weren't doing badly and getting it all ###-backwards, and instead insist that we all focus on your brilliance. That strategy seems to have some legs.

:rotflmao: :rotflmao:

 

[Colin Dowling]

To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

What makes you think that anyone wants your respect?

What makes you think that anyone doesn't?

I'm so about to register an alias named "Anyone" so I can come in here and not want your respect.COlin

 

[BassNBrew]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion.

No it doesn't. The fact that you are here often doesn't make you any more or less valuable than anyone else. You're free to discuss whatever you want however you want, but acting like the mere circumstance that you happened upon these boards before someone else allows you to disqualify someone else's opinion not only makes you look foolish, it minimizes the relevance of your own opinions.

People don't like to be talked down to. THats what we have a 14 page thread of people who LOVE that you are wrong about Brown. They'll keep baiting you all season and you'll keep taking it, hook, line, and sinker. And in the end, we'll all have a good laugh about how off-base you were about a player but more importantly, we'll have a good laugh about what a stubborn goof you appear to be...

....all because you talk down to people, and they don't like that.

COlin

This "thumbs-up" is not pointed at LHUCKS, who has never talked down to me, but to all the people who feel like just because someone has a 4 or 5-digit member number, that their opinions and analysis are invalid. Thanks, Colin (#29 by the way, you 3-digit snobs) for articulating this.... I'd have done so myself, but my member number is too high for anyone to take me seriously..

Not invalid, just flawed.

 

[LHUCKS]

To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

What makes you think that anyone wants your respect?

What makes you think that anyone doesn't?

I'm so about to register an alias named "Anyone" so I can come in here and not want your respect.COlin

you missed the ...."or that I even care if they don't."

 

[Evilgrin72]

To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

What makes you think that anyone wants your respect?

What makes you think that anyone doesn't?

I'm so about to register an alias named "Anyone" so I can come in here and not want your respect.COlin

:rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:

 

[Furps]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

 

[RBM]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion.

No it doesn't. The fact that you are here often doesn't make you any more or less valuable than anyone else. You're free to discuss whatever you want however you want, but acting like the mere circumstance that you happened upon these boards before someone else allows you to disqualify someone else's opinion not only makes you look foolish, it minimizes the relevance of your own opinions.

People don't like to be talked down to. THats what we have a 14 page thread of people who LOVE that you are wrong about Brown. They'll keep baiting you all season and you'll keep taking it, hook, line, and sinker. And in the end, we'll all have a good laugh about how off-base you were about a player but more importantly, we'll have a good laugh about what a stubborn goof you appear to be...

....all because you talk down to people, and they don't like that.

COlin

My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.

What in the hell makes someone who plays fantasy football a "legitimate expert"That is really wacked out

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

What in the hell makes someone who plays fantasy football a "legitimate expert"

I had a T-shirt made up and a certificate printed. I also won a yahoo league.

 

[valhallan]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

True, but most people who miss the target this badly on a prospect would admit their mistake and eat crow. LHUCKS doesn't seem able to admit that someone of his obviously superior fantasy football knowledge could possibly be wrong. Instead he chooses to condescend and harp on this respect thing that none of us care about. Quite entertaining

 

[LHUCKS]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

True, but most people who miss the target this badly on a prospect would admit their mistake and eat crow. LHUCKS doesn't seem able to admit that someone of his obviously superior fantasy football knowledge could possibly be wrong. Instead he chooses to condescend and harp on this respect thing that none of us care about. Quite entertaining

There are so many fallacies in this blurb, I'm just going to disregard it.Next?

 

[Eric]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion on the topic.

That is the single most asinine thing I have ever read in my life, bar none. You should be ashamed of yourself.

 

[valhallan]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

True, but most people who miss the target this badly on a prospect would admit their mistake and eat crow. LHUCKS doesn't seem able to admit that someone of his obviously superior fantasy football knowledge could possibly be wrong. Instead he chooses to condescend and harp on this respect thing that none of us care about. Quite entertaining

There are so many fallacies in this blurb, I'm just going to disregard it.Next?

One would "disregard" my post by ignoring it and not responding. Instead you took the time to repost and marginalize it, therefore proving my contention that you're only interested in degrading people. Nice job buddy

 

[LHUCKS]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion on the topic.

That is the single most asinine thing I have ever read in my life, bar none. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Obviously I do not know if I am better than you or anybody else on this board unless I have seen you or anybody else draft...and even then I would probably reserve judgement until I've seen multiple drafts and I knew the expertise level of your leaguemates.Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible. I can say that because I evaluate almost every single "expert" draft that comes across this board and I evaluate my own drafts as well.(as many of the staff here are fully aware of) I almost always do very well in these drafts. If you look at the threads related to the drafts in my sig you'll notice one commonality...many of the participants instantly label my team as one of the top contenders...that is not an accident and it certainly isn't because I kiss ### around here. Four different individuals competing in the WCOFF PMd me and asked me for advice with respect to their drafts this year...with a 2K entry fee I'm pretty sure that their confidence in my abilities didn't come from my "grandstanding" and I'm pretty sure it was backed with results. So if you are wondering where my ff confidence comes from it is my proven success in these expert leagues.My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

 

[Iwannabeacowboybaby!]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

I don't give him anything for saying that Chris Brown wasn't going to be any good this year, prior to his NO. 18 ranking early on. He missed this one. He's got the personality that he's going to give input on a lot, and believe me when he's right on one he'll brag about it.So, I'll give him credit when he deserves, and I'll give him a when he misses. That's the nature of the beast if you're putting your neck on the line. He likes doing it so it's going to work both ways.LOL at you Lhucks for saying the SL3 was a draft that was showing us how not to draft. You are a character man.

 

[LHUCKS]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

True, but most people who miss the target this badly on a prospect would admit their mistake and eat crow. LHUCKS doesn't seem able to admit that someone of his obviously superior fantasy football knowledge could possibly be wrong. Instead he chooses to condescend and harp on this respect thing that none of us care about. Quite entertaining

There are so many fallacies in this blurb, I'm just going to disregard it.Next?

One would "disregard" my post by ignoring it and not responding. Instead you took the time to repost and marginalize it, therefore proving my contention that you're only interested in degrading people. Nice job buddy

And nice job to you on twisting what I said. Stating that your post had fallacies and that I was disregargint your post is nothing near to "degrading"Nice try on the

 

[Evilgrin72]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion on the topic.

That is the single most asinine thing I have ever read in my life, bar none. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Obviously I do not know if I am better than you or anybody else on this board unless I have seen you or anybody else draft...and even then I would probably reserve judgement until I've seen multiple drafts and I knew the expertise level of your leaguemates.Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible. I can say that because I evaluate almost every single "expert" draft that comes across this board and I evaluate my own drafts as well.(as many of the staff here are fully aware of) I almost always do very well in these drafts. If you look at the threads related to the drafts in my sig you'll notice one commonality...many of the participants instantly label my team as one of the top contenders...that is not an accident and it certainly isn't because I kiss ### around here. Four different individuals competing in the WCOFF PMd me and asked me for advice with respect to their drafts this year...with a 2K entry fee I'm pretty sure that their confidence in my abilities didn't come from my "grandstanding" and I'm pretty sure it was backed with results. So if you are wondering where my ff confidence comes from it is my proven success in these expert leagues.My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

:honda:

 

[LHUCKS]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

I don't give him anything for saying that Chris Brown wasn't going to be any good this year, prior to his NO. 18 ranking early on. He missed this one. He's got the personality that he's going to give input on a lot, and believe me when he's right on one he'll brag about it.So, I'll give him credit when he deserves, and I'll give him a when he misses. That's the nature of the beast if you're putting your neck on the line. He likes doing it so it's going to work both ways.

Funny how all the haters on this thread haven't taken the time to go back and take a look at just how good my rankings were...and when I mean good, they are better than any that I recall seeing...anywhere.

 

[Colin Dowling]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

I don't give him anything for saying that Chris Brown wasn't going to be any good this year, prior to his NO. 18 ranking early on. He missed this one. He's got the personality that he's going to give input on a lot, and believe me when he's right on one he'll brag about it.So, I'll give him credit when he deserves, and I'll give him a when he misses. That's the nature of the beast if you're putting your neck on the line. He likes doing it so it's going to work both ways.

Funny how all the haters on this thred haven't taken the time to go back and take a look at just how good my rankings were...and when I mean good, they are better than any that I recall seeing...anywhere.

...except for the part where a top-6 back who could have been had in the 3rd round doesn't appear until #18.COlin

 

[valhallan]

First, I applaud LHUCKS for having the cojones to make the call he did. It appears, thru 5 weeks, that he'll be wrong. Oh well.IMHO, if we flame people (even self-important people) for making predictions out-of-line with the FBG conventional wisdom, folks on these boards will be more apprehensive to make anything but "Priest Holmes or LT2 will be a solid RB1" predictions here. My

True, but most people who miss the target this badly on a prospect would admit their mistake and eat crow. LHUCKS doesn't seem able to admit that someone of his obviously superior fantasy football knowledge could possibly be wrong. Instead he chooses to condescend and harp on this respect thing that none of us care about. Quite entertaining

There are so many fallacies in this blurb, I'm just going to disregard it.Next?

One would "disregard" my post by ignoring it and not responding. Instead you took the time to repost and marginalize it, therefore proving my contention that you're only interested in degrading people. Nice job buddy

And nice job to you on twisting what I said. Stating that your post had fallacies and that I was disregargint your post is nothing near to "degrading"Nice try on the

Wow nice comeback. :rotflmao: You could end this whole thread by showing some humility or you could just continue to show yourself as hard-headed by wasting so much time in here. Good luck

 

[Eric]

Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible. I can say that because I evaluate almost every single "expert" draft that comes across this board and I evaluate my own drafts as well.(as many of the staff here are fully aware of) I almost always do very well in these drafts. If you look at the threads related to the drafts in my sig you'll notice one commonality...many of the participants instantly label my team as one of the top contenders...that is not an accident and it certainly isn't because I kiss ### around here. Four different individuals competing in the WCOFF PMd me and asked me for advice with respect to their drafts this year...with a 2K entry fee I'm pretty sure that their confidence in my abilities didn't come from my "grandstanding" and I'm pretty sure it was backed with results. So if you are wondering where my ff confidence comes from it is my proven success in these expert leagues.My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

Well, you appear to be very much in love with yourself, so I guess you have that going for you...

 

[JohnnyU]

Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible. I can say that because I evaluate almost every single "expert" draft that comes across this board and I evaluate my own drafts as well.(as many of the staff here are fully aware of) I almost always do very well in these drafts. If you look at the threads related to the drafts in my sig you'll notice one commonality...many of the participants instantly label my team as one of the top contenders...that is not an accident and it certainly isn't because I kiss ### around here. Four different individuals competing in the WCOFF PMd me and asked me for advice with respect to their drafts this year...with a 2K entry fee I'm pretty sure that their confidence in my abilities didn't come from my "grandstanding" and I'm pretty sure it was backed with results. So if you are wondering where my ff confidence comes from it is my proven success in these expert leagues.My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

Well, you appear to be very much in love with yourself, so I guess you have that going for you...

I'm sure he loves himself 10 times a day

 

[EastBayFunk]

He isn't and probably never will be on any of my fantasy teams.

Are you going to say the same thing if Brown finishes with 1500 rushing yards and 10+ TD's? At some point you'll have to admit you're wrong and move on.You seem to have a problem with Brown's build. I can understand the concern, but he's not exactly a lightweight at 219 pounds. His height/weight ratio is not ideal, but his overall size is not a concern. He's had a few nagging injuries in his career including the hamstring issues last year, but he doesn't have the troubling history of knee injuries that a lot of other RB's have. He also showed in college that he can handle 300+ carries in a season. Overall it seems to me like this is a case where you're trying to find every conceivable reason to not like Chris Brown. I think you should step back and maybe admit that your initial evaluation of his ability was off base. If you can realize that then maybe you'll stop trying to justify your continued bashing of Brown by making silly claims regarding his prospects.

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible. I can say that because I evaluate almost every single "expert" draft that comes across this board and I evaluate my own drafts as well.(as many of the staff here are fully aware of) I almost always do very well in these drafts. If you look at the threads related to the drafts in my sig you'll notice one commonality...many of the participants instantly label my team as one of the top contenders...that is not an accident and it certainly isn't because I kiss ### around here. Four different individuals competing in the WCOFF PMd me and asked me for advice with respect to their drafts this year...with a 2K entry fee I'm pretty sure that their confidence in my abilities didn't come from my "grandstanding" and I'm pretty sure it was backed with results. So if you are wondering where my ff confidence comes from it is my proven success in these expert leagues.My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

Well, you appear to be very much in love with yourself, so I guess you have that going for you...

I'm sure he loves himself 10 times a day

That makes you really sore.I've heard.

 

[Kleck]

This has turned into a discussion about a board member. No problem if you guys want to take it that way. However, when it ceased to be about Chris Brown it doesn't warrant being in the Shark Pool Anymore.

 

[scoobygang]

Then lock it.Why assume that anyone in the FFA gives two ####s about LHUCKS?

 

[LHUCKS]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion on the topic.

That is the single most asinine thing I have ever read in my life, bar none. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Obviously I do not know if I am better than you or anybody else on this board unless I have seen you or anybody else draft...and even then I would probably reserve judgement until I've seen multiple drafts and I knew the expertise level of your leaguemates.Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible. I can say that because I evaluate almost every single "expert" draft that comes across this board and I evaluate my own drafts as well.(as many of the staff here are fully aware of) I almost always do very well in these drafts. If you look at the threads related to the drafts in my sig you'll notice one commonality...many of the participants instantly label my team as one of the top contenders...that is not an accident and it certainly isn't because I kiss ### around here. Four different individuals competing in the WCOFF PMd me and asked me for advice with respect to their drafts this year...with a 2K entry fee I'm pretty sure that their confidence in my abilities didn't come from my "grandstanding" and I'm pretty sure it was backed with results. So if you are wondering where my ff confidence comes from it is my proven success in these expert leagues.My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

Wow what a ####in loser.

This is a ff board.I have proven success at ff.Because of that, I command respect. If you don't like that...leave the thread.I'm being attacked on multiple fronts here. Did you think I was going to lay down and just absorb the criticism when I know that I'm more knowledgable than 99% of the fantasy football world?Let's leave the personal insults in your second grade classroom.

 

[LHUCKS]

This has turned into a discussion about a board member. No problem if you guys want to take it that way. However, when it ceased to be about Chris Brown it doesn't warrant being in the Shark Pool Anymore.

 

[Eagle Eye]

Asst coach would have been the right move. Then LHUCKS could get some help with his projections.

 

[Statorama]

If he could have avoided injuries, he would have made a pretty good third baseman for the Giants.

 

[shadyridr]

This statement alone should disqualify you from RB evaluation.

And your relative anonymity disqualifies you from having an opinion on the topic.

That is the single most asinine thing I have ever read in my life, bar none. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Obviously I do not know if I am better than you or anybody else on this board unless I have seen you or anybody else draft...and even then I would probably reserve judgement until I've seen multiple drafts and I knew the expertise level of your leaguemates.Frankly I am one of the best drafters on this board of those that I have evaluated...and that is taking the most objective approach possible. I can say that because I evaluate almost every single "expert" draft that comes across this board and I evaluate my own drafts as well.(as many of the staff here are fully aware of) I almost always do very well in these drafts. If you look at the threads related to the drafts in my sig you'll notice one commonality...many of the participants instantly label my team as one of the top contenders...that is not an accident and it certainly isn't because I kiss ### around here. Four different individuals competing in the WCOFF PMd me and asked me for advice with respect to their drafts this year...with a 2K entry fee I'm pretty sure that their confidence in my abilities didn't come from my "grandstanding" and I'm pretty sure it was backed with results. So if you are wondering where my ff confidence comes from it is my proven success in these expert leagues.My point is this...if you don't put out your rankings and/or compete in any of the well-known leagues around here or any other public league where the league participants are legitimate experts, your criticism holds zero water IMO. To earn my respect, at the very least put out your preseason rankings...it takes all of 5 minutes to cut and paste.I have no problem being the NY Yankees of this messageboard...what I will never be is the Chicago Cubs.

Wow what a ####in loser.

This is a ff board.I have proven success at ff.Because of that, I command respect. If you don't like that...leave the thread.I'm being attacked on multiple fronts here. Did you think I was going to lay down and just absorb the criticism when I know that I'm more knowledgable than 99% of the fantasy football world?Let's leave the personal insults in your second grade classroom.

OK now I really think this is and new sig material.

 

[Captain Quinoa]

I have proven success at ff.Because of that, I command respect. If you don't like that...leave the thread.

:rotflmao: Awesome.

 

[Vivian Darkbloom]

:validateme::expurt:

 

[BassNBrew]

Asst coach would have been the right move. Then LHUCKS could get some help with his projections.

:rotflmao:

 

[Kleck]

Then lock it.Why assume that anyone in the FFA gives two ####s about LHUCKS?

Bizarre. Scooby is right again. Sorry, my bad.