that's The Sound Of A Thread weeping
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
A player like Michael would have demanded the football at the 1 with 26 seconds to play. Lynch is a bum.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.
Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
I'm beginning to believe that Christine Michael isn't actually a real person...he's just a legend in the fantasy-world...A player like Michael would have demanded the football at the 1 with 26 seconds to play. Lynch is a bum.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.
Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
He's Kareem Huggins' brother and Dj hackett's cousinI'm beginning to believe that Christine Michael isn't actually a real person...he's just a legend in the fantasy-world...A player like Michael would have demanded the football at the 1 with 26 seconds to play. Lynch is a bum.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael. Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX. Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September. Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.
Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.
Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
I don't know that I agree with this. They don't even use him in the backup roll. They choose to use Turbin. There are plenty of 5 & 6th round players stating in the NFL. A starting or excellent backup OL or DL is much more valuable than a third string RB.Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.
Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Trading him would be rather stupid unless he is some sort of locker room problem.
And there are plenty of 5th and 6th rounders serving you fries in the drive thru.I don't know that I agree with this. They don't even use him in the backup roll. They choose to use Turbin. There are plenty of 5 & 6th round players stating in the NFL. A starting or excellent backup OL or DL is much more valuable than a third string RB.Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.
Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Trading him would be rather stupid unless he is some sort of locker room problem.
That's just it, he's not the backup. Most of us think his talent would be to much to overcome if it was him against Turbin for the long haul but most of us could be wrong. We've certainly not seen any evidence yet to suggest he's ahead of Turbin. I'm not heavily invested in Michaels but I can say I got worried this past off season when Lynch was holding out and Wilson referenced players ready to step up and referenced Turbin.I don't know that I agree with this. They don't even use him in the backup roll. They choose to use Turbin. There are plenty of 5 & 6th round players stating in the NFL. A starting or excellent backup OL or DL is much more valuable than a third string RB.Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.
Rotoworld:
Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.
Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.
Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Trading him would be rather stupid unless he is some sort of locker room problem.
The reasoning is sound. To think he won't have the wear and tear when/if he actually gets a chance he can get paid a lot sure the timing could be right, but is he loving not getting ANY playing time? Absolutely not.Michael should be loving his situation, his body isn't getting beat up for rookie money. He's getting time to learn the nuances of his position. Maybe he gets a chancee to showcase his talents before he's a FA, if not he will sign a 1 year prove it deal if he goes to another team. IMO he stays in SEA and eventually gets his chance after Lynch is wornout or retires.
Does anybody think Turbin can replace Lynch? It's going to take two guys IMO if Lynch misses time.
Very good chance now that he ends up a 27 year old free agent who hasn't had much playing time in 4 years. He won't have much wear and tear but he'll have a hard time getting a big deal.Zyphros said:The reasoning is sound. To think he won't have the wear and tear when/if he actually gets a chance he can get paid a lot sure the timing could be right, but is he loving not getting ANY playing time? Absolutely not.Dezbelief said:Michael should be loving his situation, his body isn't getting beat up for rookie money. He's getting time to learn the nuances of his position. Maybe he gets a chancee to showcase his talents before he's a FA, if not he will sign a 1 year prove it deal if he goes to another team. IMO he stays in SEA and eventually gets his chance after Lynch is wornout or retires.
Does anybody think Turbin can replace Lynch? It's going to take two guys IMO if Lynch misses time.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
It's probably a good idea to sale any player before he suffers a career ending injury.Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
Ummmmm, ok.It's probably a good idea to sale any player before he suffers a career ending injury.Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
I was mainly referring to guys who see a huge spike in value based on hype and not play on the field.That description fits most early 1st round rookie picks before their first season startsJust about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
Except much of the hype was caused by play on the field. Namely his 2013 preseason.I was mainly referring to guys who see a huge spike in value based on hype and not play on the field.
Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
I appreciate you thought Wilson was gonna be really good, but this isn't a "david wilson specific" philosophy that I have. A philosophy that has worked quite well for several years I might add.Except much of the hype was caused by play on the field. Namely his 2013 preseason.I was mainly referring to guys who see a huge spike in value based on hype and not play on the field.
Right, I also thought Lynch would be gone and Michael would for sure start. But when you get a chance to sell for the peak of a guy's value, before he even gets the chance to reach that peak, sell sell sell IMO.Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
i still think there's a 15% chance Lynch walks into Carroll's office, flips him off, walks away and never looks back.
well sure, but it's easy to see the guy's value was at its peak now and noone was offering me 500 bucks anyway. I get your point, i just think it's easier to see in hindsight.Right, I also thought Lynch would be gone and Michael would for sure start. But when you get a chance to sell for the peak of a guy's value, before he even gets the chance to reach that peak, sell sell sell IMO.Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
i still think there's a 15% chance Lynch walks into Carroll's office, flips him off, walks away and never looks back.
If I buy a stock today for 100 bucks that I think will top out at 500 in a month, and someone comes and offers me 500 the day after I buy it, I will sell.
Must have me confused with someone else. I've never owned David Wilson in a FF league.I appreciate you thought Wilson was gonna be really good, but this isn't a "david wilson specific" philosophy that I have. A philosophy that has worked quite well for several years I might add.
Every decision depends on the offer, but people were offering quite a bitwell sure, but it's easy to see the guy's value was at its peak now and noone was offering me 500 bucks anyway. I get your point, i just think it's easier to see in hindsight.
A brief spike might be all it takes. Find that one owner willing to pay the price that the player will likely reach if he actually plays well, then bam. Insta-sell.Must have me confused with someone else. I've never owned David Wilson in a FF league.I appreciate you thought Wilson was gonna be really good, but this isn't a "david wilson specific" philosophy that I have. A philosophy that has worked quite well for several years I might add.
According to DLF, Michael's ADP a year ago was RB19. Not really close to "peak value" for a 23 year old RB.
I think his value might have spiked briefly when rumors of Marshawn's departure gained steam, but that was as premature as this talk of Michael's demise is.
By the same logic now might be a good time to buy Michael if the price were reasonable.well sure, but it's easy to see the guy's value was at its peak now and noone was offering me 500 bucks anyway. I get your point, i just think it's easier to see in hindsight.Right, I also thought Lynch would be gone and Michael would for sure start. But when you get a chance to sell for the peak of a guy's value, before he even gets the chance to reach that peak, sell sell sell IMO.Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.Really regret not selling last spring.
I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
i still think there's a 15% chance Lynch walks into Carroll's office, flips him off, walks away and never looks back.
If I buy a stock today for 100 bucks that I think will top out at 500 in a month, and someone comes and offers me 500 the day after I buy it, I will sell.
62nd player or 62nd RB??By the same logic now might be a good time to buy Michael if the price were reasonable.
ADP on DLF has Michael as the 62nf player overall. Being outside the top 50 maybe you could get him for a 3rd round pick?
62nd is crazy high for him right now.The 62nd player drafted in recent mocks at DLF.
He is the 20th RB overall.
He goes just after Jerick McKinnon and before Bishop Sankey.
For all the talk about his value rising, tanking, etc -- he's been right around RB20-25 for over a year IIRC.The 62nd player drafted in recent mocks at DLF.
He is the 20th RB overall.
He goes just after Jerick McKinnon and before Bishop Sankey.
That's because Michael owners and fans are planted like a tree in their sentiment. Fact of the matter is the "next AD" doesn't sit on the bench for two years, most of it inactive, and behind another back most of the supporters consider mediocre. I'm all for sticking to your opinion but there does come a time where it burns you and I think that has already happened where the price was as high as it could be. I also think taking him that high in dynasty startup is setting ones self up for failure. Lynch is goofy but if the $10 mil reports are true that's a lot of reasons to return and an opportunity he won't see again outside of the NFL. 3 seasons of inactivity is going to lead to quite a bit of disappointment, especially if a 4th back is introduced to the mix which is not entirely out of the realm of possibilities.For all the talk about his value rising, tanking, etc -- he's been right around RB20-25 for over a year IIRC.The 62nd player drafted in recent mocks at DLF.
He is the 20th RB overall.
He goes just after Jerick McKinnon and before Bishop Sankey.
Same thing could be said for the detractors, who have been just as vocal and unwavering for the last ~2 years.That's because Michael owners and fans are planted like a tree in their sentiment.
Which gives him about 2 years before people are claiming he's getting old and his value is on the decline. Dynasty is fickle. Reminds me of when Trung Canidate headed to Washington and everyone would have sold the world for him. Now I think Michael is considerably more talented than that but if Lynch comes back that's at least one more year of being a backup and still having to overcome the trust in Turbin. I'm not saying you would have got it but potentially you could have walked away with two firsts and pulled an Odell Beckham or Jeremy Hill last year then been sitting pretty in this years draft too. I don't see him pulling that weight anymore and while he could demand it again the light at the end of the tunnel is much more dim then previously. Now not talking about 'stock' but actual on field returns I don't see any problem with being stubborn and actually agree with EBF. I held onto Gerhart for years only for him to massively fail me on his first opportunity. It happens, I just don't like when people compare backups to HOF'ers and that happened multiple times in here along with other threads. Some even saying he's better than Marshawn.I don't think you can say a guy's value has peaked until he's either had substantial playing time or is retired. He's 24.
as a Lynch, Turbin, Michael owner I hope he's starting elsewhere next season. In theory yes.I don't think you can say a guy's value has peaked until he's either had substantial playing time or is retired. He's 24.