What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Christine Michael (1 Viewer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not what I was hoping to wake up to this morning.... It hurts the most since I am 1-2 pieces away from really contending after a long rebuild and CMike was a big part of that.

 
Beginning of year it looked like Lynch would be gone. A lot has changed since then. Lynch has held up incredibly. For his style of play, to not miss hardly any time for injury is truly remarkable. Obviously Michael's value takes a huge hit. He won't be traded because he's not getting paid anything. Have to hold and maybe Lynch will get hurt next year.

 
The guy has arguably been the top all-around RB in the NFL if you look at the last three years as a whole and Seattle has (potentially) won two titles on his back, so it makes sense from that standpoint. He's 29 years old with 2,000+ career carries though, so you have to figure that he'll be joining the Steven Jackson/MJD club at some point in the near future. Disappointing for Michael though because if it happens then it pushes any potential payoff back indefinitely. It's playing out like a Michael Turner situation when I'd hoped it would only be 1-2 years of waiting.

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
 
Perhaps Lynch pulls a Barry Sanders and disappears... Not likely but Lynch is a bit of an odd hawk...

They have to sign Russel Wilson this off season too..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
A player like Michael would have demanded the football at the 1 with 26 seconds to play. Lynch is a bum.

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
A player like Michael would have demanded the football at the 1 with 26 seconds to play. Lynch is a bum.
I'm beginning to believe that Christine Michael isn't actually a real person...he's just a legend in the fantasy-world...

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael. Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX. Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September. Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
A player like Michael would have demanded the football at the 1 with 26 seconds to play. Lynch is a bum.
I'm beginning to believe that Christine Michael isn't actually a real person...he's just a legend in the fantasy-world...
He's Kareem Huggins' brother and Dj hackett's cousin

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.
Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.

Trading him would be rather stupid unless he is some sort of locker room problem.

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.
Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.

Trading him would be rather stupid unless he is some sort of locker room problem.
I don't know that I agree with this. They don't even use him in the backup roll. They choose to use Turbin. There are plenty of 5 & 6th round players stating in the NFL. A starting or excellent backup OL or DL is much more valuable than a third string RB.

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.
Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.

Trading him would be rather stupid unless he is some sort of locker room problem.
I don't know that I agree with this. They don't even use him in the backup roll. They choose to use Turbin. There are plenty of 5 & 6th round players stating in the NFL. A starting or excellent backup OL or DL is much more valuable than a third string RB.
And there are plenty of 5th and 6th rounders serving you fries in the drive thru.

just doesnt make sense to deal him for a peanut

 
Forget the controversy on those footballs used in the Patriots / Colts game - the true deflategate revolves around the air leaking out of the short term dynasty value for Christine Michael.

Rotoworld:

Christine Michael did not touch the football in Super Bowl XLIX.

Despite mammoth talent, the Seahawks were never able to carve out a role for Michael in their 2014 offense behind Marshawn Lynch. Lynch is expected to be signed to an extension shortly, further closing the window for Michael in Dynasty leagues. The 2013 second-round pick is under contract through 2016. Michael turned 24 years old this past September.

Feb 1 - 10:29 PM
Why not trade the guy if they sign Lynch. They won't get the worth of a second round pick they dropped on Michaels, but they aren't getting it now either.
Because whatever pick they get (5th, 6th??) isn't worth having a potential excellent backup.

Trading him would be rather stupid unless he is some sort of locker room problem.
I don't know that I agree with this. They don't even use him in the backup roll. They choose to use Turbin. There are plenty of 5 & 6th round players stating in the NFL. A starting or excellent backup OL or DL is much more valuable than a third string RB.
That's just it, he's not the backup. Most of us think his talent would be to much to overcome if it was him against Turbin for the long haul but most of us could be wrong. We've certainly not seen any evidence yet to suggest he's ahead of Turbin. I'm not heavily invested in Michaels but I can say I got worried this past off season when Lynch was holding out and Wilson referenced players ready to step up and referenced Turbin.

Also think they might get at least a little better than a 5th or 6th. If he was available and I was connecting the dots I'd think Atlanta would make sense in terms of team need and familiarity but we have no idea if Quinn is even high on Michaels.

But not to get away from the main point, his value is going to take a hit if/when Lynch is extended. And as ghostguy stated, the best possible outcome for Michaels owners is that he gets upset and becomes a bad locker room guy and moans and groans his way out of town. Selfishly I want to see this happen but really can't blame him. Must be tough not getting a chance a play,especially when he all the other second round pick RB's from his draft class all have had their chances. Honestly if he's not upset it would make me question how much he likes football or he is just happy to collect his paycheck.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Michael should be loving his situation, his body isn't getting beat up for rookie money. He's getting time to learn the nuances of his position. Maybe he gets a chancee to showcase his talents before he's a FA, if not he will sign a 1 year prove it deal if he goes to another team. IMO he stays in SEA and eventually gets his chance after Lynch is wornout or retires.

Does anybody think Turbin can replace Lynch? It's going to take two guys IMO if Lynch misses time.

 
Michael should be loving his situation, his body isn't getting beat up for rookie money. He's getting time to learn the nuances of his position. Maybe he gets a chancee to showcase his talents before he's a FA, if not he will sign a 1 year prove it deal if he goes to another team. IMO he stays in SEA and eventually gets his chance after Lynch is wornout or retires.

Does anybody think Turbin can replace Lynch? It's going to take two guys IMO if Lynch misses time.
The reasoning is sound. To think he won't have the wear and tear when/if he actually gets a chance he can get paid a lot sure the timing could be right, but is he loving not getting ANY playing time? Absolutely not.

 
Zyphros said:
Dezbelief said:
Michael should be loving his situation, his body isn't getting beat up for rookie money. He's getting time to learn the nuances of his position. Maybe he gets a chancee to showcase his talents before he's a FA, if not he will sign a 1 year prove it deal if he goes to another team. IMO he stays in SEA and eventually gets his chance after Lynch is wornout or retires.

Does anybody think Turbin can replace Lynch? It's going to take two guys IMO if Lynch misses time.
The reasoning is sound. To think he won't have the wear and tear when/if he actually gets a chance he can get paid a lot sure the timing could be right, but is he loving not getting ANY playing time? Absolutely not.
Very good chance now that he ends up a 27 year old free agent who hasn't had much playing time in 4 years. He won't have much wear and tear but he'll have a hard time getting a big deal.

 
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.

 
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
It's probably a good idea to sale any player before he suffers a career ending injury.

 
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
It's probably a good idea to sale any player before he suffers a career ending injury.
Ummmmm, ok.

I was moreso saying to sell when guys skyrocket in value based off hype and not actual playing time.

 
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
That description fits most early 1st round rookie picks before their first season starts
I was mainly referring to guys who see a huge spike in value based on hype and not play on the field.

I dont usually include rookies in that.

 
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.

i still think there's a 15% chance Lynch walks into Carroll's office, flips him off, walks away and never looks back.

 
I was mainly referring to guys who see a huge spike in value based on hype and not play on the field.
Except much of the hype was caused by play on the field. Namely his 2013 preseason.
I appreciate you thought Wilson was gonna be really good, but this isn't a "david wilson specific" philosophy that I have. A philosophy that has worked quite well for several years I might add.

Gerhart was another last year.

And as for Wilson, if you want to get specific about him, his value rose to damn near 1st round start up values. Immediate sell when that happened IMO.

 
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.

i still think there's a 15% chance Lynch walks into Carroll's office, flips him off, walks away and never looks back.
Right, I also thought Lynch would be gone and Michael would for sure start. But when you get a chance to sell for the peak of a guy's value, before he even gets the chance to reach that peak, sell sell sell IMO.

If I buy a stock today for 100 bucks that I think will top out at 500 in a month, and someone comes and offers me 500 the day after I buy it, I will sell.

 
Yeah, even though I didn't want to, very happy I traded him right after taking him in my rookie draft. With an excess of QBs with Brees, Stafford, Wilson, and Kaep, I was offered Foster and 2 future picks (turned into J. Hill and CJ Mosley) for Stafford and Michael.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.

i still think there's a 15% chance Lynch walks into Carroll's office, flips him off, walks away and never looks back.
Right, I also thought Lynch would be gone and Michael would for sure start. But when you get a chance to sell for the peak of a guy's value, before he even gets the chance to reach that peak, sell sell sell IMO.

If I buy a stock today for 100 bucks that I think will top out at 500 in a month, and someone comes and offers me 500 the day after I buy it, I will sell.
well sure, but it's easy to see the guy's value was at its peak now and noone was offering me 500 bucks anyway. I get your point, i just think it's easier to see in hindsight.

 
I appreciate you thought Wilson was gonna be really good, but this isn't a "david wilson specific" philosophy that I have. A philosophy that has worked quite well for several years I might add.
Must have me confused with someone else. I've never owned David Wilson in a FF league.

According to DLF, Michael's ADP a year ago was RB19. Not really close to "peak value" for a 23 year old RB.

I think his value might have spiked briefly when rumors of Marshawn's departure gained steam, but that was as premature as this talk of Michael's demise is.

 
well sure, but it's easy to see the guy's value was at its peak now and noone was offering me 500 bucks anyway. I get your point, i just think it's easier to see in hindsight.
Every decision depends on the offer, but people were offering quite a bit

 
I appreciate you thought Wilson was gonna be really good, but this isn't a "david wilson specific" philosophy that I have. A philosophy that has worked quite well for several years I might add.
Must have me confused with someone else. I've never owned David Wilson in a FF league.

According to DLF, Michael's ADP a year ago was RB19. Not really close to "peak value" for a 23 year old RB.

I think his value might have spiked briefly when rumors of Marshawn's departure gained steam, but that was as premature as this talk of Michael's demise is.
A brief spike might be all it takes. Find that one owner willing to pay the price that the player will likely reach if he actually plays well, then bam. Insta-sell.

Again, this is mostly RB speficic for me.

 
Really regret not selling last spring.
Just about any time you can sell for a nice haul on a player who is nothing but hype to that point, it's usually a good idea to do it (see David Wilson and Lamar Miller the year before, even though Miller has been ok, but he was fetching more than he is worth now for sure), especially with RBs.

I liked Michael last offseason a a good amount, but the hauls he was getting were no brainers.
Not sure about that. As a michael owner it looked very probable that he was going to take over as a starter in 2015. A lot's changed since then, what are you gonna do.

i still think there's a 15% chance Lynch walks into Carroll's office, flips him off, walks away and never looks back.
Right, I also thought Lynch would be gone and Michael would for sure start. But when you get a chance to sell for the peak of a guy's value, before he even gets the chance to reach that peak, sell sell sell IMO.

If I buy a stock today for 100 bucks that I think will top out at 500 in a month, and someone comes and offers me 500 the day after I buy it, I will sell.
well sure, but it's easy to see the guy's value was at its peak now and noone was offering me 500 bucks anyway. I get your point, i just think it's easier to see in hindsight.
By the same logic now might be a good time to buy Michael if the price were reasonable.

ADP on DLF has Michael as the 62nf player overall. Being outside the top 50 maybe you could get him for a 3rd round pick?

 
You are likely correct that people who value Michael as the 62nd player would not be willing to sell him for a 3rd round draft pick.

I wouldn't want to give up much more than that for him at this point. I like a lot of players drafted after Michael in those six mocks more than him also.

 
The 62nd player drafted in recent mocks at DLF.

He is the 20th RB overall.

He goes just after Jerick McKinnon and before Bishop Sankey.
For all the talk about his value rising, tanking, etc -- he's been right around RB20-25 for over a year IIRC.
That's because Michael owners and fans are planted like a tree in their sentiment. Fact of the matter is the "next AD" doesn't sit on the bench for two years, most of it inactive, and behind another back most of the supporters consider mediocre. I'm all for sticking to your opinion but there does come a time where it burns you and I think that has already happened where the price was as high as it could be. I also think taking him that high in dynasty startup is setting ones self up for failure. Lynch is goofy but if the $10 mil reports are true that's a lot of reasons to return and an opportunity he won't see again outside of the NFL. 3 seasons of inactivity is going to lead to quite a bit of disappointment, especially if a 4th back is introduced to the mix which is not entirely out of the realm of possibilities.

 
I doubt they add a 4th...not if they're spending $10M on Lynch and not with roster limitations...no reason to. That said, Turbin will only be around 1 more season...he will leave given they will likely add a younger RB vs extending him.

I own CM and if Lynch is extended, then I'll have a decision to make. If I hold on to him, it will be for the long term expecting his chance to come with free agency in a couple of years (yes, a long time, but my league really hordes RBs)... I wouldn't pay a lot for him, but I'm also not giving him away...jmho.

 
That's because Michael owners and fans are planted like a tree in their sentiment.
Same thing could be said for the detractors, who have been just as vocal and unwavering for the last ~2 years.

The reality is that not much has changed since Michael was drafted. Lynch is still around and playing at such a high level that the team has a strong incentive to keep him in the fold. I wouldn't blame that on Michael because it's beyond his control. I don't believe in judging players for opportunities that they never had. It's why I never bailed off the Aaron Rodgers bandwagon or held Michael Turner's quiet San Diego years against him. When you have a legend in his prime on the depth chart in front of you, you're a bit player by default. No fault of yours.

I've got a bunch of guys on my dynasty rosters in a similar situation where they've had promising talent mixed with murky opportunity (Christine Michael, Jonathan Stewart, Michael Dyer, Toby Gerhart). At the end of the day, if you believe in the guy's talent then you hold him until he gets a chance to show what he can do. You can't necessarily know how and when it will happen, but if he's good enough to thrive then it will happen eventually. That being the case, all this chatter about Lynch is really missing the point. If Michael is legit, he will get an extended chance to prove it somewhere and sometime.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think you can say a guy's value has peaked until he's either had substantial playing time or is retired. He's 24.
Which gives him about 2 years before people are claiming he's getting old and his value is on the decline. Dynasty is fickle. Reminds me of when Trung Canidate headed to Washington and everyone would have sold the world for him. Now I think Michael is considerably more talented than that but if Lynch comes back that's at least one more year of being a backup and still having to overcome the trust in Turbin. I'm not saying you would have got it but potentially you could have walked away with two firsts and pulled an Odell Beckham or Jeremy Hill last year then been sitting pretty in this years draft too. I don't see him pulling that weight anymore and while he could demand it again the light at the end of the tunnel is much more dim then previously. Now not talking about 'stock' but actual on field returns I don't see any problem with being stubborn and actually agree with EBF. I held onto Gerhart for years only for him to massively fail me on his first opportunity. It happens, I just don't like when people compare backups to HOF'ers and that happened multiple times in here along with other threads. Some even saying he's better than Marshawn.

 
I never understood the hype.

Everybody talking about Lynch, the guy has not passed up Turbin as the # 2 in two years he's managed to be the 3rd back and has been deactivated at times.

There is no explaining away him not passing up Turbin, other than he's just an okay back with allot of hype.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think you can say a guy's value has peaked until he's either had substantial playing time or is retired. He's 24.
In theory yes.

But they way he was hyped up and some of the trades made for him were at prices as though he already put up a nice season. His ADP may not have been considered a peak, but there were plenty of people out there willing to dish out a nice haul for him.

In those situations, it's an easy sell for me each and every time. Even if you are wrong and he becomes a stud it won't kill you because you are getting a good amount of value in return. And each time it pans out like a Wilson, you score huge.

It's pretty safe to say that more often than not a guy who spikes in value without any regular season on field play is more likely to be worth less than that spiked value shortly after.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top