ghostguy123
Footballguy
Addicted to stupid
I was shocked that we not only didn't take Teddy but that we moved-up for Manziel.Browns spent $100,000 on advanced study of quarterbacksPosted by Michael David Smith on May 8, 2014, 12:52 PM EST
As the Cleveland Browns continue to search for a quarterback who would be worth the eight-figure salary that a franchise passer commands, they’ve spent a six-figure sum on trying to identify the best way to choose a quarterback.
According to Sal Paolantonio of ESPN, the Browns commissioned a study of the quarterback position that cost $100,000 and entailed a great deal of research into which qualities go into success at the most important position in football. The study began under former team President Joe Banner and was only recently completed, after Banner left.
The study, which used advanced analytics to examine every quarterback who has played in the last two decades, concluded that the best quarterback in this year’s draft is Teddy Bridgewater of Louisville.
What we don’t know is how much stock the current decision makers put in the study. If Banner thought it was useful but current General Manager Ray Farmer and coach Mike Pettine think the study is a bunch of hooey, then Browns owner Jimmy Haslam basically flushed $100,000 down the toilet.
(Maybe he can make it up by withholding $100,000 worth of rebates from Pilot Flying J customers.) But if the Browns’ brass believes in the study, keep an eye on Bridgewater when the Browns’ second first-round pick comes up, at No. 26.
cmon banananananana.MAC, why the F did they draft this ###### and not Teddy?![]()
We are in trouble?? We have been in trouble for 20 years.Have you guys read this La Canfora article? Holy hell is it damaging.
I know that this guy is a Lombardi shill, but he has lots of inside quotes. Where there's smoke there's fire. We are in trouble...
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/writer/jason-la-canfora/25038103/browns-mess-with-gordon-manziel-starts-with-owner-haslams-mismanagement
Always thought that chart was totally worthless and any GM actually using it is incompetent.no idea how accurate the old pick value chart is anymore, but the Browns could move up to almost #3 with the #12 and #19 on the one i looked at.
well that plus the new rookie wage scale has altered the value of the picks anyway.Always thought that chart was totally worthless and any GM actually using it is incompetent.no idea how accurate the old pick value chart is anymore, but the Browns could move up to almost #3 with the #12 and #19 on the one i looked at.
What might it cost if O'Connell provides some inside info that hints Mariota would be worth drafting or moving-up for?Cleveland Browns zeroing in on Marcus Mariota?
...NFL Media's Albert Breer noted Tuesday that Browns general manager Ray Farmer has "shown a liking" for Oregon prospect Marcus Mariota.
The link to Cleveland doesn't end there. Mariota has been preparing for the draft since mid-January with Kevin O'Connell, who was recently named to Mike Pettine's staff as quarterbacks coach. O'Connell hasn't officially joined the team yet, allowing him to finish his prior commitments, including his work with Mariota.
O'Connell -- who also worked with Johnny Manziel prior to last year's draft -- will arrive in Cleveland with plenty of information for Farmer on the development of Mariota.
Hmnnn.... we believe Mariota will fall in this draft, based on the past as well as whispers coming out already. While many point to the Browns needing to trade up into the Top 5, even Top 2, to get him, it is more likely that they have to worry about the New York Jets at 6 or the St. Louis Rams at 10 the most. We will cover a Mock Draft later that has Mariota falling to #12.
Mariota may not be Andrew Luck, but who is. Fans either want a sure thing, like Luck, in the first round or want the Browns to wait and draft a developmental guy in later rounds. Scarcity, as well as Mariota’s base talent level, makes that a poor choice. We won’t advocate for trading both first rounders to move up for Mariota but a realistic trade to jump up a few spots, say to #9, makes a lot of sense.
haven't done a lot of homework on him, but it would be worth a shot. especially if they don't trade both 1st rounders.Bracie Smathers said:Interesting developments.
- Rumors indicate the Browns are interested in QB Marcus Mariota.
- Kevin O'Connell is the QB coach Pettine wants to replace Dowell Loggains. It has been widely reported O'Connell will join the team but he hasn't officially joined the team yet due to a commitment to help prepare Marcus Mariota for the draft. Once he fulfills that commitment he will officially join the team.
- If we are interested in moving up for Mariota and if things go to plan then O'Connell becomes our QB coach and then we will hold an inside edge on other teams who might be interested in Mariota.
====
Albert Breer ✔ @AlbertBreer Follow
(cont) ... Mariota has been doing QB drills with Kevin O'Connell since mid-January. O'Connell will join the Browns staff as QBs coach soon.
9:21 AM - 10 Feb 2015
Albert BreerVerified account @AlbertBreer 3h3 hours ago
Browns GM Ray Farmer has shown a liking for Mariota. Cleveland has the 12th, 19th overall picks. Obv, Farmer will get good intel from KOC.
Albert Breer ✔ @AlbertBreer Follow
One quick note on O'Connell: He's not been officially hired by Browns yet. He's finishing his prior commitments (one being Mariota) first.
9:28 AM - 10 Feb 2015
====
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000469729/article/cleveland-browns-zeroing-in-on-marcus-mariota
What might it cost if O'Connell provides some inside info that hints Mariota would be worth drafting or moving-up for?Cleveland Browns zeroing in on Marcus Mariota?
...NFL Media's Albert Breer noted Tuesday that Browns general manager Ray Farmer has "shown a liking" for Oregon prospect Marcus Mariota.
The link to Cleveland doesn't end there. Mariota has been preparing for the draft since mid-January with Kevin O'Connell, who was recently named to Mike Pettine's staff as quarterbacks coach. O'Connell hasn't officially joined the team yet, allowing him to finish his prior commitments, including his work with Mariota.
O'Connell -- who also worked with Johnny Manziel prior to last year's draft -- will arrive in Cleveland with plenty of information for Farmer on the development of Mariota.
http://dawgpounddaily.com/2015/02/10/marcus-mariota-strongly-linked-cleveland-browns/
Hmnnn.... we believe Mariota will fall in this draft, based on the past as well as whispers coming out already. While many point to the Browns needing to trade up into the Top 5, even Top 2, to get him, it is more likely that they have to worry about the New York Jets at 6 or the St. Louis Rams at 10 the most. We will cover a Mock Draft later that has Mariota falling to #12.
Mariota may not be Andrew Luck, but who is. Fans either want a sure thing, like Luck, in the first round or want the Browns to wait and draft a developmental guy in later rounds. Scarcity, as well as Mariotas base talent level, makes that a poor choice. We wont advocate for trading both first rounders to move up for Mariota but a realistic trade to jump up a few spots, say to #9, makes a lot of sense.
What do you guys/gals think?
imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8. trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
Can we trade Haslem, Schiener, and Farmer instead?imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8. trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
nope. just gotta hope they learned something from last year.Can we trade Haslem, Schiener, and Farmer instead?imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8. trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
This is not a team that should ever trade their future 1st. Ever.imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8.trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
they flushed a first on Manziel. i'd have no problem spending next year's first on a legit QB prospect.This is not a team that should ever trade their future 1st. Ever.imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8.trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
Only time to even consider is if there is a some Luck type prospect at QB.
Right now, there is not
Then no trade up's. Need quantity. Once they rebuild trust they can start rolling dice again.nope. just gotta hope they learned something from last year.Can we trade Haslem, Schiener, and Farmer instead?imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8. trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
well they traded down last time. they just need to make better picks. doesn't matter how they get there.Then no trade up's. Need quantity. Once they rebuild trust they can start rolling dice again.nope. just gotta hope they learned something from last year.Can we trade Haslem, Schiener, and Farmer instead?imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8. trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
If we can't move up for one of these QBs without giving our 2016 1st, then no thanks.they flushed a first on Manziel.i'd have no problem spending next year's first on a legit QB prospect.This is not a team that should ever trade their future 1st. Ever.imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8.trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
Only time to even consider is if there is a some Luck type prospect at QB.
Right now, there is not
but like i said, haven't watched any film on these QBs yet.
they went 7-9 with a ton of injuries. i will go on record now that there is no way they have a top 5 pick next year.If we can't move up for one of these QBs without giving our 2016 1st, then no thanks.they flushed a first on Manziel.i'd have no problem spending next year's first on a legit QB prospect.This is not a team that should ever trade their future 1st. Ever.imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8.trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
Only time to even consider is if there is a some Luck type prospect at QB.
Right now, there is not
but like i said, haven't watched any film on these QBs yet.
yeah they flushed a 1st on manziel but it was a pick in the 20s. I could easily see this team stink it up at QB for an entire year and get a top 3 pick
Losing the last 5 mainly due to terrible QB play.they went 7-9 with a ton of injuries.i will go on record now that there is no way they have a top 5 pick next year.
How many years would it take for the Cleveland Browns front office to rebuild enough trust to start rolling the dice again?Then no trade up's. Need quantity. Once they rebuild trust they can start rolling dice again.nope. just gotta hope they learned something from last year.Can we trade Haslem, Schiener, and Farmer instead?imo, IF they stay healthy, with Hoyer plus Mariotta, they're easy 8-8.trading next year's first might not be a bad move.I find it hard to fathom getting Mariotta and still having one of the 1sts (likely 19). Were gonna need both to get into the top 6 unless the team wants to gamble on our 2016 1st. Might not be a bad bet either.
i'm assuming they don't let Manziel play. if he's the starter they could pick first overall.Losing the last 5 mainly due to terrible QB play.they went 7-9 with a ton of injuries.
i will go on record now that there is no way they have a top 5 pick next year.
I will go on record that if we have terrible QB play like that all year we will DEFINITELY be picking in the top 5
http://jeffreysboldlygoingnowhere.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Feeling-lucky.pngGuys, how do you see the backfield production being split next year?
When I first saw what was happening I wondered why we hadn't simply hired O'Connell and figured he could not be our QB coach AND be tutoring draft prospects since it could be viewed as tampering or something along those lines.Marcus Mariota being tutored by coach the Browns are hiringPosted by Darin Gantt on February 11, 2015, 7:47 AM EST
As part of the latest collective bargaining agreement, strict limits were placed on the amount of and type of work NFL coaches could do with players in the offseason.
Of course, if they aren’t exactly NFL coaches or NFL players yet, it seems there’s a loophole.
...Although dragging their feet to announce the hiring of his personal tutor might also be the coaching equivalent of text messages from the press box, something that others might take a dim view of, in the interest of competitive balance.
And one of the teams picking ahead of us has calculated how much they 'might' reasonably be able to get from us to move-up.He could help convince the Browns to move up, which doesn't sound like a difficult proposition if Farmer's an enamored of Mariota as reports would lead you to believe. There are quarterback needy teams in the top 5 of this draft, but one of those picks can be had for a reasonable cost coming up from 12.
I'm just not sold on Mariota and was wondering your football takes/insights on what you see of Marcus Mariota.Browns maybe eyeing Mariota; possible trade partner with Redskins?
...If you go by the draft trade chart the Browns would be overpaying by giving up No. 12 (1,200 points) and 19 (875) to move up to the Redskins five hole spot (1,700). Maybe Cleveland would pay a premium for the spot if there is competition for it. Or perhaps some other picks could be swapped to even things out. In any case, if the two parties are motivated there is a deal that could be done.
when I hear something Ill let you guys know.Some damning stuff in there, no doubt.....but considering his sources (which are pretty obvious), I'm sure plenty of that article is a tad bit overblown.
Soulfly, who we drafting?
yes, you were right until you were wrong.Soulfly3 said:when I hear something Ill let you guys know.Some damning stuff in there, no doubt.....but considering his sources (which are pretty obvious), I'm sure plenty of that article is a tad bit overblown.
Soulfly, who we drafting?
was right again last year, until the Bills stepped in last minute.
Yes, that's what I said.yes, you were right until you were wrong.Soulfly3 said:when I hear something Ill let you guys know.Some damning stuff in there, no doubt.....but considering his sources (which are pretty obvious), I'm sure plenty of that article is a tad bit overblown.
Soulfly, who we drafting?
was right again last year, until the Bills stepped in last minute.
Check out the linked video. Its footage from the Bills war room on draft day.Yes, that's what I said.yes, you were right until you were wrong.Soulfly3 said:when I hear something Ill let you guys know.Some damning stuff in there, no doubt.....but considering his sources (which are pretty obvious), I'm sure plenty of that article is a tad bit overblown.
Soulfly, who we drafting?
was right again last year, until the Bills stepped in last minute.
But Pettine publicly admitted what the pick was, until Buffalo came into the frame.
No way we could have turned them down
We're a team that needs an NFL starting-caliber QB which Hoyer isn't.Jeez guys. Sit with Hoyer for a while and find out who you even are.
PFT Report: Browns showing interest in Josh McCownThe Browns have vowed to look high, low and everywhere in between for quarterback options this offseason and Josh McCown is looking for a job after being released by the Buccaneers.
To little surprise, it looks like those two paths will cross. Mary Kay Cabot of the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports that the Browns have expressed interest in McCown’s services. They have not yet set up a visit with the veteran quarterback, but could do so soon.
McCown worked with new Browns offensive coordinator John DeFilippo in 2007 when DeFilippo was the Raiders’ quarterbacks coach. McCown started seven games for Oakland that year, throwing nine touchdowns and 10 interceptions, and Cabot reports that the two men enjoyed working together that season.
McCown has visited the Bills and is expected to meet with at least one team in Indianapolis during the combine before making other visits as he weighs his options around the league. As the only quarterback currently on the open market who could be a starter in 2015, McCown should have several such options available to him.