What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Commissioner Question - Mistake On First Pick? (1 Viewer)

What Do You Do?


  • Total voters
    103

This is getting lots of laughs, but real talk - what do you do here if you're the Commissioner?

Guy drafted Brian Robinson Jr when he meant to take Bijan Robinson.

Let's say it's your local home league.

$50 league entry fee.

What do you do?

Also - NSFW language
No disrespect Joe, but is your next poll "Is the Pope Catholic?" Curious what percentages you anticipated when posting this?

No disrespect possible there. I’ll always ask questions.

In my leagues we would absolutely let him change the pick and then give him a hard time unmercifully.

The results were about what I thought they would be. Although I would not have been surprised if a few more voted to not allow changing the pick.

I guess maybe we differ, but I don’t think it’s a dumb question. I think it actually opens up some interesting thoughts.

Would people feel the same way if the buy in was $100,000?

For the NFL, it’s my understanding when an official Pick Card is turned in, it’s final.

Now, of course, I am not an NFL GM, and my league buy in is not $100,000 so I personally don’t have to make those decisions.

As I said, in my league, I would absolutely let him change it and then roast him over it for years.

But I think it can be an interesting discussion.
I don't think the NFL owners are sorting through player cards on a table to make their pick. My anser stays the same regardless of buy in.
 
50 dollar league ,let it stand, it’s only 50 bucks

League lore

It happened within the two Adrian Pertersons back in the day.
Why does the amount matter? It's an honest mistake and there is no harm in changing it all. It's not like it was there for three rounds and then he says change it where it would affect the draft after the fact. It was the first pick. The mistake was known before anyone else picked. The league fee amount is irrelevant.
 
This is the biggest no brainer question ever. Supposed the same guy instead of drafting Robinson accidentally send a trade offer of Bjian Robinson Instead of Robinson Jr) for Hollywood Brown. Still sticking with you personal accountability stance or does that change when the owner in your division now has Jamar Chase and Bijan?
Appears this was directed my way since I introduced accountability. If I made that mistake...yes I would not expect someone to reverse my mistake.
 
My perspective,I suppose, comes from me accepting accountability for my actions and I would expect no one to reverse it if I made that mistake myself. This has been shaped through a few things in life that perhaps isn't reasonable, but that is why I voted that way.
There is a difference regarding taking responsibility (accountability) for your mistakes and forcing this pick to remain. This is supposed to be a fun activity and it was so obviously an innocent mistake and can be corrected with no impact to anybody else. Everyone knew it was an honest mistake. There is no "accountability" for your actions on this one that has some greater life meaning.

I am with you on being accountable for your actions. But that usually comes with some intent to your actions. A straight honest mistake is forgivable and should be forgiven as also that is part of being a responsible person as well. I just don't see this as a life lesson in making him keep the pick and think there is a bigger life lesson in allowing the pick to be switched.
 
My perspective,I suppose, comes from me accepting accountability for my actions and I would expect no one to reverse it if I made that mistake myself. This has been shaped through a few things in life that perhaps isn't reasonable, but that is why I voted that way.
There is a difference regarding taking responsibility (accountability) for your mistakes and forcing this pick to remain. This is supposed to be a fun activity and it was so obviously an innocent mistake and can be corrected with no impact to anybody else. Everyone knew it was an honest mistake. There is no "accountability" for your actions on this one that has some greater life meaning.

I am with you on being accountable for your actions. But that usually comes with some intent to your actions. A straight honest mistake is forgivable and should be forgiven as also that is part of being a responsible person as well. I just don't see this as a life lesson in making him keep the pick and think there is a bigger life lesson in allowing the pick to be switched.
I would not be trying to teach a life lesson with this. I offered my perspective on why I chose the option I did.
 
I don’t know if it’s that simple. I think it comes down to what is in the rules/constitution of the league. If the league has a set of rules/constitution—it is the duty of each member to know those rules—and it is the duty of the commissioner to enforce them. If a situation arises that is not addressed in the set of rules—generally speaking—the constitution should have a guideline detailing if the resolution is up to the majority vote of the league—and/or the decision of the commish. If this was not addressed in the league constitution and the final decision was on the commish—if I was commish—I would let him change it—but I would also encourage the league to give him a hard time and bust his balls over it. If the league has a constitution where it says “once you pick—it stands”—I think that a commish overriding the established rule set of the league is a bigger problem. If an owner accidentally forgets to take out a player from a starting lineup that is on a bye week—that owner can then argue “hey—you let this other owner change his pick in the case of a clearly honest mistake”…etc.
Part of a commish's job is to understand the situation and apply the rules as intended. I would guarantee that a rule such as "once you pick - it stands" has an intent of you can't change your pick a round later if you realize at that time you made a mistake. The intent would not be to make a pick stand when someone innocently grabbed the wrong sticker and put it on the board and then immediately realized it was the wrong sticker. A good commish would override the letter of the law for the intent of the law and let the guy switch his pick immediately before any other picks were made. I think that is what commish's are for.

Comparing that to a lineup mistake is apples to oranges. Both may be innocent mistakes but trying to change a lineup after the fact has pitfalls like who would you have played in the bye week player's spot? After the games happen you know who scored or didn't so that decision is skewed and now has impacts. Totally different situation.
 
People who want to win so badly they'd force a guy to keep the wrong player picked by mistake in a draft are people I'd never want to be in a league with. I'm sure some mistake scenarios exist that would be harder to navigate and correct, but this is an incredibly easy fix and there's absolutely no reason to not swap the player for the right guy. If I saw this go down IRL in one of my leagues, even if it was against someone else and not myself, I'd 100% walk out on the league immediately. Something like this is just a symptom of an underlying problem that I could pretty much guarantee would suck any and all fun out of it for me.
I don’t know if it’s that simple. I think it comes down to what is in the rules/constitution of the league. If the league has a set of rules/constitution—it is the duty of each member to know those rules—and it is the duty of the commissioner to enforce them. If a situation arises that is not addressed in the set of rules—generally speaking—the constitution should have a guideline detailing if the resolution is up to the majority vote of the league—and/or the decision of the commish. If this was not addressed in the league constitution and the final decision was on the commish—if I was commish—I would let him change it—but I would also encourage the league to give him a hard time and bust his balls over it. If the league has a constitution where it says “once you pick—it stands”—I think that a commish overriding the established rule set of the league is a bigger problem. If an owner accidentally forgets to take out a player from a starting lineup that is on a bye week—that owner can then argue “hey—you let this other owner change his pick in the case of a clearly honest mistake”…etc.
Very few leagues at all have a written set of rules anywhere. I imagine even fewer have a rule that explicitly states "If you pick the wrong guy in a draft, you are stuck with that guy". So while I get your point; I don't believe at this point we are discussing circumstances that are even possible, and if they are, it would account for maybe 1% of fantasy leagues. And even saying we find that 1% where they have written rules, and where this is a written rule; I'd still go back to the fact I wouldn't be in a league like that. If such a league has such a rule, their rule book is likely about as thick as an encyclopedia.

Again... I'm all for competitiveness, and I do like having some rules written in place that people can reference when I'm in a league with some kind of complicated system dynamics that are operating outside what's covered by the host site. Things like how keepers work, how taxi works, how determining draft order works, etc. But a person mistakenly picking the wrong guy in a draft wouldn't be in the top 100 things I'd think of. Typically rules, especially one like this, are the result of repeated issues that drive the necessitation of such a rule. So 1. How many times are people drafting the wrong guy? and 2. How many people are there in said league that made such a big stink about a tiny mistake that someone had to even make that a written rule? It all circles back to pointing at a league full of people that I would not want to play with.

I'm not trying to minimize your points; I actually agree with them in all honesty. A rules a rule, follow the rule. But the only league I've been a part of that's been even close to that detailed and that laden with rules was full of jerks who spent more time pissing and moaning about things than they did enjoying the game. Ironically, they were also the same ones who endlessly tried to find and exploit any loopholes they could to gain an advantage (or create a disadvantage for other leaguemates); thus necessitating an endless supply of new rules each season to prevent others from actively trying to break the integrity of the league like they literally just did the previous season. More than once I had to read something in chat akin to "Well there's no rule against me doing this so you have to let me; but we can fix it in the offseason so no one else can in the future." Walking away from that league was the best decision I ever made in 15+ years of playing fantasy.
 
When I was in high school and we were doing an auction fantasy baseball draft someone nominated Manny Lee for 2 cents and my buddy immediately said 22 cents! He thought it was Mattingly, Don Mattingly. My buddies and I died laughing before letting him take it back.
I'm telling you, I am SO tempted in a short-bench $600 league to nominate Trayveon Williams to see if all of the Henderson simps get jumpy. They even look somewhat alike. But if no one bites I've got a 3-egg omelette on my face.
 
This is the biggest no brainer question ever.

Except that there are actual grown men out there who would throw an actual fit that "card laid is a card played" in fake football.

You know... The "sport" where we pretend to run a franchise because we can't in real life?

Invite casuals into leagues (or perhaps this guy even has a reading comprehension issue) and get shocked at the results.
 
full of jerks who spent more time pissing and moaning about things than they did enjoying the game. Ironically, they were also the same ones who endlessly tried to find and exploit any loopholes they could to gain an advantage (or create a disadvantage for other leaguemates); thus necessitating an endless supply of new rules each season to prevent others from actively trying to break the integrity of the league like they literally just did the previous season. More than once I had to read something in chat akin to "Well there's no rule against me doing this so you have to let me; but we can fix it in the offseason so no one else can in the future." Walking away from that league was the best decision I ever made in 15+ years of playing fantasy.
I hate owners that try and circumvent he intent of the rules. As a commish when an owner tries the "there is no rule against it" I usually quash it by saying the intent of the written rule covers it so no you can't do it. Sometimes there are no rules that cover some oddball thing and if that is the case or it was never thought if then sometimes it will be allowed but if the intent of a rule covers the attempted circumvention it's easy to say now.

But in the end playing with a league full of owners like this is terrible and I wouldn't be in there for long.
 
50 dollar league ,let it stand, it’s only 50 bucks

League lore

It happened within the two Adrian Pertersons back in the day.
Why does the amount matter? It's an honest mistake and there is no harm in changing it all. It's not like it was there for three rounds and then he says change it where it would affect the draft after the fact. It was the first pick. The mistake was known before anyone else picked. The league fee amount is irrelevant.
Because Fantasy is fun and sometimes in life you pay a stupid tax, if I'm with friends, its worth it to have that as a point to roast someone over in perpetuity.

If you're playing with strangers its not for fun. In a contest, you aren't getting that pick back. If you're playing with work people, it turns into an HR issue. If you're playing for crazy cash, with friends, I'd just be more fleixble

And I'm not hard core on it, if you want to give him the pick back I dont really care, I just think its funner to make him take it.
 
This is the biggest no brainer question ever. Supposed the same guy instead of drafting Robinson accidentally send a trade offer of Bjian Robinson Instead of Robinson Jr) for Hollywood Brown. Still sticking with you personal accountability stance or does that change when the owner in your division now has Jamar Chase and Bijan?
Appears this was directed my way since I introduced accountability. If I made that mistake...yes I would not expect someone to reverse my mistake.
If the bank drops $10,000 into your account by mistake you most likely won't be keeping it.

More importantly on this issue, fair competitive balance trumps personal accountability. Unless this league has a balanced schedules, a few teams now draw a team with Robinson Jr as a 1st rounder an extra time.

Last year in the highly competitive Interboard Challange a team mistakenly dropped Jordan Mason. A guy quit the league over this being reversed after dropping all his players. The guy who picked up Mason didn't pitch a fit and proceed to pick up Jennings who went off for 40 pts.
 
I guess I’ll be the devil’s advocate here.

I do agree in a friendly low stakes league that you allow a mulligan on this.

However

If the league rules state “what’s laid is played” or this is a cutthroat high stakes league, then the onus is completely on the selecting owner and any misstep should be upheld. Under those circumstances, the owners need to be double and triple checking their selections before making them and IMO the commissioner would be wrong to bail them out.
 
I don’t know if it’s that simple. I think it comes down to what is in the rules/constitution of the league. If the league has a set of rules/constitution—it is the duty of each member to know those rules—and it is the duty of the commissioner to enforce them. If a situation arises that is not addressed in the set of rules—generally speaking—the constitution should have a guideline detailing if the resolution is up to the majority vote of the league—and/or the decision of the commish. If this was not addressed in the league constitution and the final decision was on the commish—if I was commish—I would let him change it—but I would also encourage the league to give him a hard time and bust his balls over it. If the league has a constitution where it says “once you pick—it stands”—I think that a commish overriding the established rule set of the league is a bigger problem. If an owner accidentally forgets to take out a player from a starting lineup that is on a bye week—that owner can then argue “hey—you let this other owner change his pick in the case of a clearly honest mistake”…etc.
Part of a commish's job is to understand the situation and apply the rules as intended. I would guarantee that a rule such as "once you pick - it stands" has an intent of you can't change your pick a round later if you realize at that time you made a mistake. The intent would not be to make a pick stand when someone innocently grabbed the wrong sticker and put it on the board and then immediately realized it was the wrong sticker. A good commish would override the letter of the law for the intent of the law and let the guy switch his pick immediately before any other picks were made. I think that is what commish's are for.

Comparing that to a lineup mistake is apples to oranges. Both may be innocent mistakes but trying to change a lineup after the fact has pitfalls like who would you have played in the bye week player's spot? After the games happen you know who scored or didn't so that decision is skewed and now has impacts. Totally different situation.
I don’t disagree with you guys—and I explicitly said that if it was not mentioned in the league rules—that if I were commish that I would let him change it. However, I have played in leagues over the years where there was a several page long rule book—which covered more than you can imagine. I would be pretty shocked if others here haven’t played in leagues that didn’t have an extensive set of rules. I don’t know the rules of the league where this mistake occurred. If they have an “in depth” rule book where there was a “once you pick—your pick stands” rule—I would think twice before I “over ruled” the rule book. I would ask for a league vote—and if a heavy majority of the league felt like the pick should stand—it should. If there is no rule that addresses this—if I was a commish—I would certainly let it be corrected.
 
Very few leagues at all have a written set of rules anywhere.
I am not so sure about that. Every league I am in has a written set of rules. You kinda need that for a league. Even if it's the "settings" on an ESPN site. Those are the written rules for the league.
Yeah I wasn't including the settings from host sites in that statement. Also, we are likely to be a biased bunch on FBG msg boards. I'm sure the number of us who have leagues with written out/voted on bylaws and rules is a lot higher than the fantasy community in general haha.
 
This is the biggest no brainer question ever. Supposed the same guy instead of drafting Robinson accidentally send a trade offer of Bjian Robinson Instead of Robinson Jr) for Hollywood Brown. Still sticking with you personal accountability stance or does that change when the owner in your division now has Jamar Chase and Bijan?
Appears this was directed my way since I introduced accountability. If I made that mistake...yes I would not expect someone to reverse my mistake.
If the bank drops $10,000 into your account by mistake you most likely won't be keeping it.

More importantly on this issue, fair competitive balance trumps personal accountability. Unless this league has a balanced schedules, a few teams now draw a team with Robinson Jr as a 1st rounder an extra time.

Last year in the highly competitive Interboard Challange a team mistakenly dropped Jordan Mason. A guy quit the league over this being reversed after dropping all his players. The guy who picked up Mason didn't pitch a fit and proceed to pick up Jennings who went off for 40 pts.
I stated my position on the scenario set out by Joe and the video. Not all the other hypotheticals presented in this thread.

Answering all these other hypotheticals doesn't really help IMO.
 
I’ve seen many picks changed in FFPC high stakes, so I am not understanding the argument of the league buy-in has a role here. Switch the pick and be done with it.

I do lots of auctions and last year I fat fingered a 100$ opening bid instead of 10$. We reversed it, no harm no foul as long as the person making the mistake says so right away. You can’t say something a few picks or rounds later, that would too bad my friend.
 
It's a fairly obvious choice. Some draft sites only show the first initial and a few characters of the last name instead of the full name, position and team name.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top