DoubleG
Footballguy
I deleted the post, as I thought he was talking about the one last week.DoubleG - There was no fake to the left. It was a counter pitch.

I deleted the post, as I thought he was talking about the one last week.DoubleG - There was no fake to the left. It was a counter pitch.
ohhhhhhI deleted the post, as I thought he was talking about the one last week.DoubleG - There was no fake to the left. It was a counter pitch.![]()
The Victor Cruz thread is down the hallway on the left.One month wonder ? Really ?I thought he was a 1-day-wonder'Gabbo88 said:The Raiders will never have another great WR Tim Brown retired years ago Moore is like a song that tops the charts for a week or 2, by seasons end people won't even remember who he is, The football Gods haven't been to the Raiders @ Wr since Tim Brown and never will. They might have a guy that has a couple of decent weeks but that s about it. Look how many busts theyve had @ that position the last few years. Moore will just be a one month wonder.
People getting overheated about him, doesn't mean he isn't very good. You can be overrated, and still be good. Look, the fact is, he appears to be their best WR already, or in a 1A/1B situation with Ford. On an team that scored more than the Saints last year. He was a phenom from Day 1 of camp, and we were told, "preseason hype, let's see what he does in the REAL games..."Fair enough. In his second pro game, he goes big, making plays in more than one way, catching short stuff as well as wrenching bombs away from two defenders, not to mention almost coming down with a Hail Mary at the end of the game. You can tell reading the thread who saw the game. Then we were told, "Oh, wait till DHB is healthy! Al Davis won't let Moore get any looks as long as his pet is out there!" The clowns that spit this nonsense out disappeared after the Raiders went to Moore on two of the first three plays. (completion, PI call, BTW.)Moore demonstrated a new way to score, running in a reverse for a TD. He's a 5th round pick, with three games under his belt. Not sure what else people need to see after three games to believe he might be for real. Complete WRs, true WR1's? This is how they look when they are young. Just like this. It seems obvious the game slows down for him, he is never rushed, looking jittery. He is a legitimately good route runner, right now. Saying a kid is a flash in the pan, one week wonder (oh, wait, one MONTH wonder), is silly only because there isn't a shred of evidence that is the case. This isn't Frisman Jackson, catching bombs against broken coverages, and fallen defenders. This kid has done it all so far, and has been since training camp opened. Should we wait and see, before calling him a Hall of Famer? Of course. But as a fantasy owner, you can't. You have to anticipate. If it makes people cranky to see owners of a guy they picked up off the waiver wire get a little excited, maybe its best not to enter the Denarius Moore thread. Good chance I will be bumping this thread for years. Start deleting posts now, irrational doubters! Too late for Gridiron Menace, not too late for you!how long until "Bump Finley" turns into "Bump Moore" ?
Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.PositivesTraining camp buzz - checkProof on Sunday - checkTeam commitment to get him the ball - checkClearly in the top 2 on his team - checkHands - checkTiming - checkRun-after-catch moves - checkYears left to develop - checkNegativesCampbellAl DavisTeam commitment to running the ballNet win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.
There is no 'why'. There is no facts people can point to that would suggest he is going to disappear. There just isn't.'mr roboto said:Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.
Maybe Hakeem Nicks? Not a perfect comparison, because there rarely is one, but all of what you describes applies to Nicks.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.
If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.
Positives
Training camp buzz - check
Proof on Sunday - check
Team commitment to get him the ball - check
Clearly in the top 2 on his team - check
Hands - check
Timing - check
Run-after-catch moves - check
Years left to develop - check
Negatives
Campbell
Al Davis
Team commitment to running the ball
Net win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.
If only someone would have suggested that earlier...Maybe Hakeem Nicks? Not a perfect comparison, because there rarely is one, but all of what you describes applies to Nicks.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.
If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.
Positives
Training camp buzz - check
Proof on Sunday - check
Team commitment to get him the ball - check
Clearly in the top 2 on his team - check
Hands - check
Timing - check
Run-after-catch moves - check
Years left to develop - check
Negatives
Campbell
Al Davis
Team commitment to running the ball
Net win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.
Though he's nowhere near as big, his situation reminds me a bit of Marques Colston coming out.This is clearly a motivational ploy for Tatum Bell.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.
Domo arigatoIf only someone would have suggested that earlier...Maybe Hakeem Nicks? Not a perfect comparison, because there rarely is one, but all of what you describes applies to Nicks.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.
If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.
Positives
Training camp buzz - check
Proof on Sunday - check
Team commitment to get him the ball - check
Clearly in the top 2 on his team - check
Hands - check
Timing - check
Run-after-catch moves - check
Years left to develop - check
Negatives
Campbell
Al Davis
Team commitment to running the ball
Net win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.
That must have been where I got the idea. Otherwise,If only someone would have suggested that earlier...Maybe Hakeem Nicks? Not a perfect comparison, because there rarely is one, but all of what you describes applies to Nicks.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.
If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.
Positives
Training camp buzz - check
Proof on Sunday - check
Team commitment to get him the ball - check
Clearly in the top 2 on his team - check
Hands - check
Timing - check
Run-after-catch moves - check
Years left to develop - check
Negatives
Campbell
Al Davis
Team commitment to running the ball
Net win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.
That must have been where I got the idea. Otherwise,If only someone would have suggested that earlier...Maybe Hakeem Nicks? Not a perfect comparison, because there rarely is one, but all of what you describes applies to Nicks.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.
If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.
Positives
Training camp buzz - check
Proof on Sunday - check
Team commitment to get him the ball - check
Clearly in the top 2 on his team - check
Hands - check
Timing - check
Run-after-catch moves - check
Years left to develop - check
Negatives
Campbell
Al Davis
Team commitment to running the ball
Net win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.![]()
Don't see anywhere near the strength and power of Nicks. Bruce and Harrison are a probably a bit of hyperbole. Possibly 2 HOF's.I see Moore as kind of a cross between Santonio Holmes and a young Lavernaus Coles. I think he could have a very bright future as a WR2.Maybe Hakeem Nicks? Not a perfect comparison, because there rarely is one, but all of what you describes applies to Nicks.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.
If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.
Positives
Training camp buzz - check
Proof on Sunday - check
Team commitment to get him the ball - check
Clearly in the top 2 on his team - check
Hands - check
Timing - check
Run-after-catch moves - check
Years left to develop - check
Negatives
Campbell
Al Davis
Team commitment to running the ball
Net win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.
Nobody makes player comparisons to bad players. He's played 3 games, even comparing him to Holmes is getting ahead of ourselves. I was trying to come up with guys that could do several different things, and weren't physical freaks. The Holmes comparison works. He's a pretty skinny little dude.Don't see anywhere near the strength and power of Nicks. Bruce and Harrison are a probably a bit of hyperbole. Possibly 2 HOF's.Maybe Hakeem Nicks? Not a perfect comparison, because there rarely is one, but all of what you describes applies to Nicks.Trying to come up with a past player comparison, I am going with Isaac Bruce or Marvin Harrison.Funny thing is, there's no freaky measureable people can hang their hat on. Not tall, or muscled up. Fast, but not eye-popping fast. Doesn't even appear overly quick. He kind of glides. But man, he gets open. And his ball skills are the real real. Catches the ball in one smooth motion, in stride. Haven't seen him Heyward-Bey (fight) the ball once.'mr roboto said:Moore is the type of receiver that Campbell really needs. He doesn't have the greatest deep ball and smaller, speed receivers won't give him the confidence to throw it up into tight coverage. I'm pretty sure Campbell will be lobbying for Moore over DHB and will be trusting him more and more as the season progresses.
If he didn't have the runs, I would still be high on this kid. The fact that they want to get him the ball in multiple ways shows me that the Raiders are serious about this kid's abilities and will get him the ball.
Positives
Training camp buzz - check
Proof on Sunday - check
Team commitment to get him the ball - check
Clearly in the top 2 on his team - check
Hands - check
Timing - check
Run-after-catch moves - check
Years left to develop - check
Negatives
Campbell
Al Davis
Team commitment to running the ball
Net win in my opinion. Obviously not top 10 yet, but I can honestly see a Hakeem Nicks type 2nd or 3rd year from him.
Why not? Thomas has only one leg and Crabtree is a bust.Does anyone rank Denarius "the Dragon" Moore ahead of guys like Mike Crabtree and Demaryius Thomas in Dynasty?
The Dragon?
Moore's unofficial combine time was 4.37, as was his pro day 40. I have no idea how his official time at the combine dropped him nearly a tenth of a second, down to 4.45. Given his pro day time of 4.37, a recent history of strange timing issues in Indy and having watched his combine I'm going to say he is sub 4.4 easily. His pedigree as a Texas state High School champ in the 110M-hurdles further validates the dude is plenty fast.Moore is attracting a lot of attention these days:
Moore to offer: Rookie WR providing plenty for upstart Raiders
By Greg Smith NFL Films
Published: Sept. 27, 2011 at 04:20 p.m. Updated: Sept. 27, 2011 at 05:57 p.m.
Denarius Moore is fast. And who likes 'em fast?
The Raiders.
Speed is a prerequisite for any Al Davis receiver (Cliff Branch, Tim Brown, etc, etc, etc.). What's surprising is not Moore's 4.45 wheels, but rather his overall high level of play this early into his rookie season...
I'm on the bandwagon and throwing him in the flex. Hoping Oakland can get going on the ground and Moore can burn the Pats deep for a td at least once.So tempted to start Moore (for the first time) this week. Gotta believe Belichick will be focused on DMac....
D-WOW!Love the dragon nickname
No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
Wow. You sound like a troll. Or you haven't seen Moore play. Or you are inexperienced. "Bad hands?" You've got to be kidding. I would suggest getting rid of the draft position blinders and just assess the player's skill for yourself. Otherwise you will be holding on to a DHB for years thinking he must have elite talent to be drafted seventh overall while everybody else scoops up the real talent capable of performing at the NFL level.No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.
you do realize that just because you missed out on him on the waiver wire doesn't automatically mean he isn't talented, runs bad routes, and has bad hands - right? if you actually go back and watch the games the past two weeks, it's obvious he possesses none of those traits. so i'm sorry you missed out on him, but this subjective nonsense is uncalled for... i'd ask you for some additional information as to why you feel the way you do, but it would be useless. there is nothing out there to back it up. the reason he was drafted in the 5th round is because he was the victim of multiple coaching changes and poor QB play in Tennessee. he was actually successful in the ####ty situation and was still an unknown coming into the draft. believe it or not, there are actually elite players that come from the late rounds in the NFL draft. the round someone is drafted in means nothing... it's what they do with the opportunity playing for the team that took a chance on them.No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.
A troll would not understand if he did not have these bad traits he would of already been a stud with 4.45 speed and would of went way higher than the 5th.Wow. You sound like a troll. Or you haven't seen Moore play. Or you are inexperienced. "Bad hands?" You've got to be kidding. I would suggest getting rid of the draft position blinders and just assess the player's skill for yourself. Otherwise you will be holding on to a DHB for years thinking he must have elite talent to be drafted seventh overall while everybody else scoops up the real talent capable of performing at the NFL level.No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.
Ah. So you really believe the NFL scouts can't make mistakes. I see. The NFL scouts were dead on about these guys below, all drafted in the late rounds, right?Tom BradyA troll would not understand if he did not have these bad traits he would of already been a stud with 4.45 speed and would of went way higher than the 5th.Wow. You sound like a troll. Or you haven't seen Moore play. Or you are inexperienced. "Bad hands?" You've got to be kidding. I would suggest getting rid of the draft position blinders and just assess the player's skill for yourself. Otherwise you will be holding on to a DHB for years thinking he must have elite talent to be drafted seventh overall while everybody else scoops up the real talent capable of performing at the NFL level.No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.
I never wasted my time going after him, so no, I did not get him on ther WW.you do realize that just because you missed out on him on the waiver wire doesn't automatically mean he isn't talented, runs bad routes, and has bad hands - right? if you actually go back and watch the games the past two weeks, it's obvious he possesses none of those traits. so i'm sorry you missed out on him, but this subjective nonsense is uncalled for... i'd ask you for some additional information as to why you feel the way you do, but it would be useless. there is nothing out there to back it up. the reason he was drafted in the 5th round is because he was the victim of multiple coaching changes and poor QB play in Tennessee. he was actually successful in the ####ty situation and was still an unknown coming into the draft. believe it or not, there are actually elite players that come from the late rounds in the NFL draft. the round someone is drafted in means nothing... it's what they do with the opportunity playing for the team that took a chance on them.No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.
should i keep going? and please forgive me if you're just blind... i completely understand if that's the case.
I know low round guys can have a impact. don't get me wrong. and I hope you are right and he blows up for your fantasy team. I think the Raiders just have horrible WR's and any 1 of them on any given day can produce because of it.Ah. So you really believe the NFL scouts can't make mistakes. I see. The NFL scouts were dead on about these guys below, all drafted in the late rounds, right?Tom BradyA troll would not understand if he did not have these bad traits he would of already been a stud with 4.45 speed and would of went way higher than the 5th.Wow. You sound like a troll. Or you haven't seen Moore play. Or you are inexperienced. "Bad hands?" You've got to be kidding. I would suggest getting rid of the draft position blinders and just assess the player's skill for yourself. Otherwise you will be holding on to a DHB for years thinking he must have elite talent to be drafted seventh overall while everybody else scoops up the real talent capable of performing at the NFL level.No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.
Donald Driver
Marques Colston
Mark Bulger
Tony Romo
Kurt Warner
Priest Holmes
Terrell Davis
Rod Smith
Antonio Gates
In Moore's case, you are already seeing talent evaluators admitting they were wrong about the guy. http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_18955325
Your loss if you can't consider the possibility low round picks can, and often do, become stars.
wow.I never wasted my time going after him, so no, I did not get him on ther WW.you do realize that just because you missed out on him on the waiver wire doesn't automatically mean he isn't talented, runs bad routes, and has bad hands - right? if you actually go back and watch the games the past two weeks, it's obvious he possesses none of those traits. so i'm sorry you missed out on him, but this subjective nonsense is uncalled for... i'd ask you for some additional information as to why you feel the way you do, but it would be useless. there is nothing out there to back it up. the reason he was drafted in the 5th round is because he was the victim of multiple coaching changes and poor QB play in Tennessee. he was actually successful in the ####ty situation and was still an unknown coming into the draft. believe it or not, there are actually elite players that come from the late rounds in the NFL draft. the round someone is drafted in means nothing... it's what they do with the opportunity playing for the team that took a chance on them.No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.
should i keep going? and please forgive me if you're just blind... i completely understand if that's the case.
And you just named your problem, you are only going back 2 weeks.
Next week you will be talking about picking up Patric Crayton, who is in my opinion a much better pickup than Moore.the week after that it will be someone else.
I heard his name a lot.. from the Oakland beat writers claiming he was the best player on the field in training camp almost every day. Where were you?No, because he just is not that talented. he runs bad routes. he has bad hands. should I keep going?Well he's only played in 3!Seriously though, why? Just because early season hype doesn't always work out? That's not very compelling.If the Raiders were not playing the Patriots this week I would not give Moore much thought. I want to say he has already had his best 2 games of the year but the way the Patriots defend he could have 1 more. I see him as another guy that people grab after he has his best games and in 2 weeks is cut again and forgot about.
There is a reason he was took in the 5th round and if he was not on such a horribly talented WR core you would of never heard his name.
That being said, Campbell has to throw to somebody this week so I would not be suprised with a 5 catch 80 yard performance.but I also would not be suprised if his name was not mentioned at all.