What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Dolphin Players bullied Jonathan Martin, Richie Incognito SUSPENDED (3 Viewers)

Nobody likes a 24 year old tattle tale/ whistle blower. Only trouble for future teams. Who is going to tell on next? Some dude may snap his jock strap and end up with a sexual harrassement lawsuit.
Here's an idea: Don't snap his jock strap.
They should all watch their language as well and don't "assault" any one on the field either. If you get into a fist fight in practice, or see one, please contact the local police. After all, fiights are illegal
Snapping womens bras in the workplace was no big deal decades ago. Society changes.

Also there's a big difference between what happens on the field and off the field.

 
Nobody likes a 24 year old tattle tale/ whistle blower. Only trouble for future teams. Who is going to tell on next? Some dude may snap his jock strap and end up with a sexual harrassement lawsuit.
We're grown men and women, here, I assume. Have we really resorted to calling him a tattle tale? What's next? A snitch? Because we all live by this backwards pseudo-mafia code, right?
Not we all.

They do.

You can't trust them, then you don't want them.

 
[SIZE=medium]And we'll agree to disagree.[/SIZE]
You seriously don't think the culture of NFL locker-rooms can be changed by external forces? It can be and will. Quickly. Owners would like to avoid paying out big-dollar settlements, if they can help it. They'd also like to avoid having NFL Security and other investigative arms snooping about the premises all the time.
The only way that changes is of the culture of locker rooms changes accross the country beginning at the HS level and every one is on board and supports the change.

In short, it will be as sucessful as the war on drugs.
Sexual assualt was ignored in the high school locker rooms back in the 70s and 80s. I believe that culture has changed.

 
Nobody likes a 24 year old tattle tale/ whistle blower. Only trouble for future teams. Who is going to tell on next? Some dude may snap his jock strap and end up with a sexual harrassement lawsuit.
Here's an idea: Don't snap his jock strap.
They should all watch their language as well and don't "assault" any one on the field either. If you get into a fist fight in practice, or see one, please contact the local police. After all, fiights are illegal
Snapping womens bras in the workplace was no big deal decades ago. Society changes.

Also there's a big difference between what happens on the field and off the field.
The only difference is whats expected and accepted. Fist fights are illegal. Fist fights are fine in sports with no legal reprecussions. if you want to apply your inner-office or dailey rules to sports apply them accorss the board and not where its convienenat and "wrong"

Their boss can call them an #####...mine cant. Which is right?

 
Question for you Doug. Does capital punishment stop violent crimes? Does tax penalties get the rich to pay their fair share or do they just skate around it?
Neither are stopped. but both are hugely curtailed IMHO. That's well reason enough to have laws against those crimes.

You seem to feel if we can get some new rules in place we can curb hazing, maybe that's true. But the larger issue might be getting human beings to treat each other decent without rules in place. Why is it happening in the first place? I don't have the answers btw DB, but I don't want to rush to league wide mandates which is what I was defending in the beginning of this thread and posters were saying "Who's talking about new rules?"Well a couple days later and 21 pages in we have a lot of folks who want to see complete changes in the NFL.
Well, I think it's gotten past the point of discussion about whether there should be new rules. The NFL's hand is already forced, right now -- they must have new rules to combat rookie extortion and workplace harrassment (not "hazing"). Almost all teams haze in some manner (at least singing fight-songs at chow, and such), but what was going on with the Dolphins may well have been unique. Rooks paying for dinners? Common. Vets continually using rookies "as ATMs" per Adam Beasley? Not done elsewhere ... and even if it was, the Dolphins will be the league's example (cf. Saints and Bountygate).
That is pretty arrogant IMO. Still love you Doug ;)

 
Not the point. Bullying isn't the trend. Having someone else fight your battles is.
Individuals can't fight institutions or toxic institutionalized cultures. You're mistaken in thinking this was strictly Martin vs. incognito.

And, as pointed out earlier -- Martin actually is, essentially, fighting his own battle. In court. And that is 100% legit.

 
[SIZE=medium]And we'll agree to disagree.[/SIZE]
You seriously don't think the culture of NFL locker-rooms can be changed by external forces? It can be and will. Quickly. Owners would like to avoid paying out big-dollar settlements, if they can help it. They'd also like to avoid having NFL Security and other investigative arms snooping about the premises all the time.
The only way that changes is of the culture of locker rooms changes accross the country beginning at the HS level and every one is on board and supports the change.

In short, it will be as sucessful as the war on drugs.
Sexual assualt was ignored in the high school locker rooms back in the 70s and 80s. I believe that culture has changed.
Because that was happeneing everywhere and all the time.

Thanks for that comparison.

It would be a change thats good in theoory but would never happen or work in any of our lifetimes.

 
Nobody likes a 24 year old tattle tale/ whistle blower. Only trouble for future teams. Who is going to tell on next? Some dude may snap his jock strap and end up with a sexual harrassement lawsuit.
Here's an idea: Don't snap his jock strap.
They should all watch their language as well and don't "assault" any one on the field either. If you get into a fist fight in practice, or see one, please contact the local police. After all, fiights are illegal
Snapping womens bras in the workplace was no big deal decades ago. Society changes.

Also there's a big difference between what happens on the field and off the field.
The only difference is whats expected and accepted. Fist fights are illegal. Fist fights are fine in sports with no legal reprecussions. if you want to apply your inner-office or dailey rules to sports apply them accorss the board and not where its convienenat and "wrong"

Their boss can call them an #####...mine cant. Which is right?
Their boss used to be able to put their hands on them. That doesn't fly anymore. Things are changing.

 
Nobody likes a 24 year old tattle tale/ whistle blower. Only trouble for future teams. Who is going to tell on next? Some dude may snap his jock strap and end up with a sexual harrassement lawsuit.
We're grown men and women, here, I assume. Have we really resorted to calling him a tattle tale? What's next? A snitch? Because we all live by this backwards pseudo-mafia code, right?
What would you call a 24 year old 6'5" 320 lb man that can't confront a bully so he goes and tells on him? I'm not saying what Incognito did is not out of line, but jeezus this kid sealed his own fate by handling it the way he did. If he thinks this will win him accepatance, I'd argue it will go the other way. Nobody is going to want a team mate that they can't be off color with due to fear that he is going to tell on them.

 
Tons of people said Riley Cooper would never play another down in the NFL because of racist comments. Then he scored a few TDs and everything is fine. This will die down.
Riley Cooper was publicly forgiven by the leadership of his team, Richie has been banned by his team... see the difference

 
The only way that changes is of the culture of locker rooms changes accross the country beginning at the HS level and every one is on board and supports the change.
In short, it will be as sucessful as the war on drugs.
The War on Drugs is a non-sequitir. One has nothing to do with the other. Doesn't add to your point.

From my own observations, HS and college locker rooms typically have lightweight hazing. Of course there's exceptions, and those exceptions will never go away. But I'd submit that the culture of locker rooms has already changed at the lower levels.

Besides, at the NFL level, it was the extortion that made the behavior over the line. It was shaving cream in the helmet or lunchroom pranks. HS and college players don't really have the power or means to extort $100K from teammates.

 
That is pretty arrogant IMO. Still love you Doug ;)
You know what I mean, though, right? It would be like someone commenting in April of 2012 that it's time for healthy debate as to whether the NFL should come down hard on bounties. By that time, obviously, the die was cast.

Same here.

 
And these desk jockeys will be very eager to investigate all the tax-free benefits the Dolphins' veterans have been recieving from the rookies. Incognito's pain is only beginning.
The rookies didn't pay taxes on the money they gave to the veterans?
Doesn't matter if they did. Given the amounts extorted within one calendar year, that's unreported income.
What amount was "extorted" within a calendar year?

If Incognito was keeping the cash for himself, maybe, but getting team meals and trips paid for is not the same thing as a person accepting cash "gifts".

 
I would like to apologize to bigboy for insinuating that he is dense. That was inappropriate. We disagree clearly but I should conduct myself better than that.

 
It would be a change thats good in theoory but would never happen or work in any of our lifetimes.
Maybe there's a misunderstanding here.

The part of locker-room culture that's going to change is rookies serving as the veterans' personal ATMs, chauffeurs, etc.

Dead rat in the locker? Whipped cream in the helmet? Fight song at lunch? That stuff will still go on. It really isn't that hard to draw bright lines around acceptable hazing and way-over-the-line extortion and harrassment.

 
Doug B said:
Bigboy10182000 said:
It would be a change thats good in theoory but would never happen or work in any of our lifetimes.
Maybe there's a misunderstanding here.

The part of locker-room culture that's going to change is rookies serving as the veterans' personal ATMs, chauffeurs, etc.

Dead rat in the locker? Whipped cream in the helmet? Fight song at lunch? That stuff will still go on. It really isn't that hard to draw bright lines around acceptable hazing and way-over-the-line extortion and harrassment.
This is my opinion as well.
 
Dippa said:
If Incognito was keeping the cash for himself, maybe, but getting team meals and trips paid for is not the same thing as a person accepting cash "gifts".
Actually, it is exactly the same thing. Public officials, down here in Corruption Alley, get busted for it all the time.

The amount in question is $100,000, over time, directly from Martin to Incognito. But those aren't the only two names in play. Other rookies paid up, and other veterans accepted money from them. Again, this is not a two-player tiff.

 
Doug B said:
Dondante said:
Not the point. Bullying isn't the trend. Having someone else fight your battles is.
Individuals can't fight institutions or toxic institutionalized cultures. You're mistaken in thinking this was strictly Martin vs. incognito.

And, as pointed out earlier -- Martin actually is, essentially, fighting his own battle. In court. And that is 100% legit.
They can't? And toxic institutionalized cultures? Do you really believe this ####?

 
Two Deep said:
What would you call a 24 year old 6'5" 320 lb man that can't confront a bully so he goes and tells on him? I'm not saying what Incognito did is not out of line, but jeezus this kid sealed his own fate by handling it the way he did. If he thinks this will win him accepatance, I'd argue it will go the other way. Nobody is going to want a team mate that they can't be off color with due to fear that he is going to tell on them.
I don't think acceptance of the Dolphins' locker room is his goal. He may want to play again at some level ... but I'd bet a guy with Martin's options will be just fine living without football just the same.

And once again, this is not one man against a bully. So much more going on, and too many people are ignoring that.

 
The hammer on this is going to be big. And I don't think it's going to be just one player that is punished. Look for Miami to face sanctions far greater than Bountygate. The Commish office will be looking to send a message to every other NFL team here regarding hazing/bullying/extortion.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Doug B said:
Dondante said:
Not the point. Bullying isn't the trend. Having someone else fight your battles is.
Individuals can't fight institutions or toxic institutionalized cultures. You're mistaken in thinking this was strictly Martin vs. incognito.

And, as pointed out earlier -- Martin actually is, essentially, fighting his own battle. In court. And that is 100% legit.
They can't? And toxic institutionalized cultures? Do you really believe this ####?
Do you think there is any problem here? If so, what is it?

 
How many times does it have to be explained? This is not about bullying and this is not about hazing. This is a workplace harassment issue, which is covered by federal employment laws. Martin's "complaint" is against his employer - the NFL and the Dolphins - for not doing anything to stop the harassment and creating a "hostile work environment". Incognito's stupidity is just evidence in support of Martin's claim - nothing more. The Dolphins actions towards Incognito demonstrate that they are in full on damage control and have had an "Oh ****!" moment internally with their lawyers.

Martin does not have to defend himself because he is protected by federal law.

He is not a wuss for choosing to exercise his legal rights.

It couldn't be handled "in house" because the claim is against the house itself for creating the hostile work environment.

The locker room culture does not excuse repeated racial abuse, threats of violence, or extortion. These are professionals being paid to do a job. The same federal laws/protections (not an anti-trust issue) apply to NFL locker rooms, offices, and warehouses.

 
Two Deep said:
What would you call a 24 year old 6'5" 320 lb man that can't confront a bully so he goes and tells on him? I'm not saying what Incognito did is not out of line, but jeezus this kid sealed his own fate by handling it the way he did. If he thinks this will win him accepatance, I'd argue it will go the other way. Nobody is going to want a team mate that they can't be off color with due to fear that he is going to tell on them.
The term "bully" keeps being used as though Incognito is an oversized Jr.High kid lashing out for attention. It's far more than that. Martin was pushed into a desperate situation, and I think we need to get off our high-horses, when we suggest his actions were outside of what we'd have done. Again, this goes beyond Martin not wanting to get beat up once, or Incognito stealing lunch money.

 
How many times does it have to be explained? This is not about bullying and this is not about hazing.

This is a workplace harassment issue, which is covered by federal employment laws. Martin's "complaint" is against his employer - the NFL and the Dolphins - for not doing anything to stop the harassment and creating a "hostile work environment". Incognito's stupidity is just evidence in support of Martin's claim - nothing more. The Dolphins actions towards Incognito demonstrate that they are in full on damage control and have had an "Oh ****!" moment internally with their lawyers.

Martin does not have to defend himself because he is protected by federal law.

He is not a wuss for choosing to exercise his legal rights.

It couldn't be handled "in house" because the claim is against the house itself for creating the hostile work environment.

The locker room culture does not excuse repeated racial abuse, threats of violence, or extortion. These are professionals being paid to do a job. The same federal laws/protections (not an anti-trust issue) apply to NFL locker rooms, offices, and warehouses.
:goodposting:

My highlighting. This post needs to not be buried at the bottom of a page.

 
Dippa said:
If Incognito was keeping the cash for himself, maybe, but getting team meals and trips paid for is not the same thing as a person accepting cash "gifts".
Actually, it is exactly the same thing. Public officials, down here in Corruption Alley, get busted for it all the time.

The amount in question is $100,000, over time, directly from Martin to Incognito. But those aren't the only two names in play. Other rookies paid up, and other veterans accepted money from them. Again, this is not a two-player tiff.
I'm pretty sure public officials have different rules for accepting gifts than normal people and I doubt that's the whole story, but whatever. I just disagree that there is anything to show tax evasion or extortion at this point.

I haven't seen that $100,000 amount outside of this thread, so if there is a link to that, I'd like to see it, but I'm going with that being a rumor at this point. However, apparently it is the obligation of the giver to report it, not the recipient, so it would actually be Martin who would be in trouble for failing to report large gifts. But I think it could be easily argued that the gifts went to pay for multiple people, not a gift to a single person, and I don't see Martin and the rookies being pursued in this case. Not a lawyer though, just my $.02

 
Ministry of Pain said:
Jim Trotter is the source of those nameless GMs...

"Said one personnel man (who's not alone): "Instead of being a man and confronting him, (Martin) acted like a coward and told like a kid."
wait wait wait... Greg Schiano weighed in on this?

 
It couldn't be handled "in house" because the claim is against the house itself for creating the hostile work environment.

The locker room culture does not excuse repeated racial abuse, threats of violence, or extortion. These are professionals being paid to do a job. The same federal laws/protections (not an anti-trust issue) apply to NFL locker rooms, offices, and warehouses.
I have a little window into this: I clerked for a federal judge, and we saw plenty of hostile work environment / harassment claims. I personally wrote several draft opinions in such cases.

It's true, of course, that the same laws govern all work environments. But in my experience federal judges -- right or wrong -- treat these work environments differently. I noticed two areas of inconsistency:

1. Women are more protected than men. The same factual allegations that would allow a woman to get to trial might get a man's claim bounced at summary judgment (or earlier).

2. White collar work environments are more protected than blue collar ones. Judges will downplay certain behavior as "horseplay" or "friendly banter" in a blue collar context, even though that same behavior might create a hostile work environment in an office building.

But from what I've seen, I think Martin would have enough to get to trial and have a good chance to win (although juries are a crapshoot). And that means he'll probably get a decent settlement instead of going to trial.

 
The sad thing to me is how many people are focused on how Martin handled it, as if that is the crux of this problem.

There are better ways Martin could have handled it. And that is about 5% of this issue and saying more than that one sentence about it is probably ignoring the real problem. No one should be in the situation he and the rest of the Dolphins rookies were put in, which went so far it's not fair to call it sports hazing.

Low levels of sports hazing can help build a sense of team. Carrying bags, singing songs, even paying for a single reasonable dinner. From various reports, Dolphins rookies were put in situations that also hideously past that. That is where the 95% of the problem is at. That Martin was less effective at putting a stop to it than Tannehill was, or than the defensive player who is nearly broke now from the veterans making him pay cash to earn his spot in the team's culture isn't really the issue. None of them should have to go through it.

We don't need to even have heard what was in the voicemail to see what was going on was way past the realm of reasonable sports hazing. The financial aspects alone say this wasn't right. This issue isn't about Martin or how he handled it. Obviously no one else put a stop to it either as other players suffered from the same.

 
How many times does it have to be explained? This is not about bullying and this is not about hazing.

This is a workplace harassment issue, which is covered by federal employment laws. Martin's "complaint" is against his employer - the NFL and the Dolphins - for not doing anything to stop the harassment and creating a "hostile work environment". Incognito's stupidity is just evidence in support of Martin's claim - nothing more. The Dolphins actions towards Incognito demonstrate that they are in full on damage control and have had an "Oh ****!" moment internally with their lawyers.

Martin does not have to defend himself because he is protected by federal law.

He is not a wuss for choosing to exercise his legal rights.

It couldn't be handled "in house" because the claim is against the house itself for creating the hostile work environment.

The locker room culture does not excuse repeated racial abuse, threats of violence, or extortion. These are professionals being paid to do a job. The same federal laws/protections (not an anti-trust issue) apply to NFL locker rooms, offices, and warehouses.
:goodposting:

My highlighting. This post needs to not be buried at the bottom of a page.
:goodposting:

 
How many times does it have to be explained? This is not about bullying and this is not about hazing.

This is a workplace harassment issue, which is covered by federal employment laws. Martin's "complaint" is against his employer - the NFL and the Dolphins - for not doing anything to stop the harassment and creating a "hostile work environment". Incognito's stupidity is just evidence in support of Martin's claim - nothing more. The Dolphins actions towards Incognito demonstrate that they are in full on damage control and have had an "Oh ****!" moment internally with their lawyers.

Martin does not have to defend himself because he is protected by federal law.

He is not a wuss for choosing to exercise his legal rights.

It couldn't be handled "in house" because the claim is against the house itself for creating the hostile work environment.

The locker room culture does not excuse repeated racial abuse, threats of violence, or extortion. These are professionals being paid to do a job. The same federal laws/protections (not an anti-trust issue) apply to NFL locker rooms, offices, and warehouses.
:goodposting:

My highlighting. This post needs to not be buried at the bottom of a page.
:goodposting:
:goodposting:


Changed the post's font to Comic Sans for effect.
 
So many of these ex-player and ex-coach talking heads are coming off like absolute phonies. If they were still in the NFL, I highly doubt that there would be all this horrified hand-wringing, expressing supreme empathy for Martin while demanding that justice be done. More likely they would tell Martin to sack up and take his lumps like a man or hit the bricks. But now that they're TV personalities, they have to publicly exhibit the proper amount of indignation and outrage, or risk losing their cushy jobs.

Not saying that any of Incognito's actions are defensible, just that the hypocrisy of the so-called insiders disgusts me.

I think Ditka is the only one I've seen who's keeping it real.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Any idea what kind of financial gain Martin could get for taking this to trial? I would assume he would be black balled from the league if he did something like this, so he could probably forget about another contract.

 
I think if you put a lie detector on Incognito 2 weeks ago and asked if he considered Martin a friend he would say yes. Ask him if Martin was bothered by the stuff he did and he would say no. Is Incognito that clueless, sadly yes he is. Think about it. If anybody ever offended him he would blow sky high in anger. Martin never got mad at him so in Incognito's mind, Martin didn't get mad so it must be OK. Martin on the other hand was very upset and offended but he kept everything inside. That's what causes the bullying in this world. The insensitivity of a neanthathal like Incognito who couldn't see that he was crushing the other sensitive person. Funny part is, I bet Incognito was shocked when Martin threw that tray down. First time he probably saw the anger come out of Martin.

Maybe I'm completely off base but if I'm on to something, this is the same stuff that happens with 2 classmates, 2 co-workers, 2 teammates. It isn't a locker room culture thing. Its a society thing and some people have taken their own lives in such a situation.

 
mr roboto said:
I would like to apologize to bigboy for insinuating that he is dense. That was inappropriate. We disagree clearly but I should conduct myself better than that.
That might be the post of the thread right there. I got mad respect for you doing this, props.

 
So many of these ex-player and ex-coach talking heads are coming off like absolute phonies. If they were still in the NFL, I highly doubt that there would be all this horrified hand-wringing, expressing supreme empathy for Martin while demanding that justice be done. More likely they would tell Martin to sack up and take his lumps like a man or hit the bricks. But now that they're TV personalities, they have to publicly exhibit the proper amount of indignation and outrage, or risk losing their cushy jobs.

Not saying that any of Incognito's actions are defensible, just that the hypocrisy of the so-called insiders disgusts me.

I think Ditka is the only one I've seen who's keeping it real.
You don't think the ex-players and ex-coaches are horrified because they have lived both in the NFL environment and the real world and they understand, unlike some of the current players, that threats, racism, and extortion are not ok? Their perspective gives them more credibility, not less

 
Any idea what kind of financial gain Martin could get for taking this to trial? I would assume he would be black balled from the league if he did something like this, so he could probably forget about another contract.
I think Mr. Martin is going to be compensated adequately for his troubles. And part of the damages awarded would include the obvious loss of income / loss of reputation that came along with having to blow the whistle on this thing. Just a guess, but we could be looking at anywhere between $25 million and $100 million in compensatory damages alone.

What really cracks me up is all the people who criticize Martin for not handling this well, or not "fighting back". Oh he hit em back alright - not in the face but in an area that hurts a whole lot more - in their wallets. Seems to me he is going to come out of this just fine thank you.

 
I guess ESPN got ahold of the interview that MoP referenced earlier where Incognito had talked about Tannehill having to buy them jet skis.

I haven't caught it myself yet, but have seen numerous people comment the same thing about it. Apparently it wasn't Tannehill buying them jet skis... Incognito said he took Tannehill's credit card and used it to buy the jet skis because he felt Tannehill owed the OL for protecting him.

 
Any idea what kind of financial gain Martin could get for taking this to trial? I would assume he would be black balled from the league if he did something like this, so he could probably forget about another contract.
I think Mr. Martin is going to be compensated adequately for his troubles. And part of the damages awarded would include the obvious loss of income / loss of reputation that came along with having to blow the whistle on this thing. Just a guess, but we could be looking at anywhere between $25 million and $100 million in compensatory damages alone.
I'd take that kind of scratch in a heartbeat even though I'd be labeled as a cupcake for the rest of my life.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top