Whether Kliff Kingsbury is the perfect fit with Murray...I mean, Kingsbury really has zero cred. It’s not a slight on him, but I think he’s being elevated as some type of master fixer of offenses very prematurely. Remember, the best DJ has been was with Bruce Arians...widely regarded as one of the top NFL offensive minds in the game. This isn’t plug and play. Johnson was better once McCoy was fired, but he also didn’t come back to his 2016 self.
This is a point worth emphasizing. Back when Arians called it quits in AZ, one of the questions several posters raised in the dynasty value thread (especially
@FF Ninja) was "do you want DJ without Arians?" and that remains a
very open question to me. I don't see anyone in here predicting a return to 2016, so I don't want to construct a straw man, but that season has served in these discussions as a useful benchmark for what he might approach or approximate in a comeback season. It's also a useful barometer, I think, for his receiving potential, which is what makes him potentially elite imo.
PFF has a great breakdown of DJ's receiving role in 2016, a season during which they rated him as the best receiver in the NFL (regardless of position). A sum of some of the more important numbers (quoting from the article):
Johnson lined up all over the field for the Cardinals this season, not just in the backfield. He spent time split out as a true wideout on both sides of the field, as well as at every slot position you can think of; he was by far the league’s most involved back in the passing game
Johnson led the NFL in targets (107), receptions (80), receiving yards (879) and missed tackles forced in the passing game (27) among running backs, and was some distance clear of the pack in three of those four categories
Most backs—even those that are significant factors in the passing game—are really only used on screen passes, as check-down outlets, or on quick passes over the middle just beyond the line of scrimmage. The average back is targeted just 0.8 yards downfield . . . . [by way of contrast] Johnson . . . had the league’s highest average depth of target among all running backs, at 4.6 yards downfield. When you consider that he still has a chunk of the traditional backfield targets dragging that average down, there is a significant volume of legitimate downfield play in his game that isn’t there for most running backs.
When lined up as a receiver or working downfield on wheel routes, Johnson’s average depth of target was 8.2 yards downfield, more commensurate with a TE or receiver than a running back. Compare that to Pittsburgh’s Le’Veon Bell, who is seen as a similar kind of versatile receiving threat to Johnson, and there is a 3-yard gap in average depth of target . . . .
I expect DJ's receiving role to improve over what it was last year. In response to
@steelers1080's question above, I'd take the over on 70 receptions, but think he'll remain in the 70s. He's a great receiver and it just makes sense for him to serve as a safety valve for a young QB. At the same time, I very much agree that the addition of more potential talent at WR may mean a wider target distribution. But the most important thing to me is what kind of receiving role does he play? His use as a RB + WR (in terms of route tree, alignment, depth of target) under Arians was very unique, even as compared against other RBs with similar skill sets like Bell. His usage was also off the charts. Graham Barfield (NFL.com fantasy writer) wrote that
DJ averaged 31.1 routes per game, with a 19% target share in 2016. He was used similarly in 2015, when he
lined up as a wideout or in the slot 18% of the time (20% of the time in 2016).
The 2018 season is of limited value as a point of contrast because it was a historically awful situation. But we still might glean something from how a change in DJ's receiving role could matter.
According to PFF, Johnson was targeted from the slot or out wide 43% of the time in 2016 and produced 40% of his total receiving yards off those targets. In 2018 his targets dropped way off but, as PFF argues, it's just as important to note that "the
way he was targeted changed:" his targets from the slot or out wide dropped to 21.4%, and his percentage of yards from out wide dropped to 24.9%; his average depth of target dropped from 4.58 yards (in 2016) to 0.60. This is with Byron Leftwich, who learned under Arians, taking over as OC mid season and doing his best to emulate Arians's system. This same PFF article expresses confidence that Kingsbury will use DJ more from the slot as a receiver, and it also has promising projections on his numbers running out of the shotgun (PFF is generally really high on DJ in the new offense). Also, Kingsbury has promised to use DJ
"creatively" and I think he will. He doesn't need a full revival of Arians's 2015/2016 usage, but what kind of approximation -- in terms of alignment and depth of target -- can we really expect?
As for Kingsbury, I can easily see him giving this offense a major jolt in the short term. But I'm a little surprised that the Cardinals offense is getting this much hype (in both FF circles and sports media more generally) given his very unusual path to an NFL head coaching job. Usually when college coaches transition to the league they've had extended success in CFB, and even
then there are persistent questions about whether they're ready to take the next step. Kingsbury by contrast had a losing record at Texas Tech and struggled against the best programs. Things have changed of course. As others have mentioned, the college game is where a lot of offensive innovation is taking place and we're thankfully shedding some of the presumptions about those offenses translating to the NFL. But normally you would think that an organization with a somewhat questionable history of ownership/front office management hiring a fired/losing college head coach who was on his way to being a college coordinator would be getting more scrutiny. I recognize a lot of this is bc of Murray, who I really like. It's also a product, as others have mentioned, of the McVay effect. And it could very much work out; I actually admire AZ for lining things up the way they have. But for it to work out past the early "take the league by storm" phase, Kingsbury would have to be a pretty significant historical outlier.
I'm going to stick by my middle of the road projection. I think DJ has a solid but not spectacular RB1 season and I agree with others here that he's in the upper part of that second tier of players in redraft, all of whom have questions.
For dynasty, I'll also stick by my boring prediction: he recovers
some of his value with a 2019 that is better than 2018 but that doesn't portend a return to elite status, limiting his dynasty value to win-now teams that can benefit from 2-3 years of a solid floor.