I'll take the under and wager a buck.As a side-line we should predict how many Super Bowl players the winner has. I'll predict 12.-QG
I'll take the under and wager a buck.As a side-line we should predict how many Super Bowl players the winner has. I'll predict 12.-QG
number 9 number 9 number 9As a side-line we should predict how many Super Bowl players the winner has. I'll predict 12.-QG
FBG kept the scores linked from the past two contests and here is how the cutoffs looked:
Week 18 19 202009 CUTOFF 128.80 117.70 77.452010 CUTOFF 92.75 119.20 52.40The cutpoints were the same (4,000 then 2,000 then 1,000)... but there were far fewer total entries last year (almost 8,900 entries in 2009 and about 6,900 in 2010)(Thanks to BnB for the 2010 numbers)
Even if you consider that there is a possibility that this years' playoff games could feature more scoring than in the past 2 years (read: more FPs)... you have to assume because of the higher salaries in this years' contest that entries won't be as stacked with high-scoring players compared to past years.
I don't want to put it in anyone's head that the following numbers are any more than pure speculation based on the above data... but I think it might be reasonable to think that this week's cutoff may very well be under 90 points. And that next week's cutoff could be close to 100. Alternatively, I do think that Championship Sunday (Week 20)'s cutoff could easily be over 60 points given that we could be looking at the high-scoring/no-defense Packers, Saints and Pats playing that Sunday. Any number of players could be primed for a 30+point effort IMO.
I think the line should be closer to 9.And I'll guess it comes in around 8 or 9 unless either Denver or San Fran (or both) make the superbowl. The better players were just too expensive so I don't think a team will be able to buy 10-12 players of the better teams and leave enough room for them to a) make it to the superbowl round and b) outscore the other superbowl teams.I'll take the under and wager a buck.As a side-line we should predict how many Super Bowl players the winner has. I'll predict 12.-QG
Perhaps they were hoping for fewer entries than the first cut? If that had happened, it might be a significant advantage to purchase only players from the 4 bye teams.17 people eliminated for not reading the rules scoring 0.00 due to ALL players being on bye.
Since my team is still alive and clearly going to advance/win it all, the number is obviously slightly higher -- 14 totalAs a side-line we should predict how many Super Bowl players the winner has. I'll predict 12.-QG
If I'm interpreting these numbers correctly as the cutoffs from last year:Wild Card round: 92.75 Division round: 119.20 Championship round: 52.40It won't take much to get through the Championship round if you've picked the right Super Bowl teams. Should be no problem at all for the 4 best players to score 60+ if you picked a lot of them.I'm more concerned about this week - I have 11 players from the 2 SB teams I predicted (NYG/BAL), and 3 of my other players were eliminated after last week. I'm hoping to get 80+ from the 4 best NYG/BAL players I picked, but that leaves it to the likes of Crabtree and Devery Henderson to get me the rest of the way. More than likely, I'll need a really big day from some of the NYG/BAL players, and since I took all the studs from those two teams, it could happen.Since my team is still alive and clearly going to advance/win it all, the number is obviously slightly higher -- 14 totalAs a side-line we should predict how many Super Bowl players the winner has. I'll predict 12.-QGBut realistically, I think in a best case scenario I'll be screwed Conference Championship week. I'll officially say 9 SB players will be on the contest winner's team. This is my first time in the contest, but looking over past results, I'd say the cost increase that many have complained about this year is going to go a long way towards changing the dynamics of this contest's strategy going forward. With how cost prohibitive it is to load up on top team players, another few layers of luck have been added to what was already a difficult challenge.
Ditto.Took my chance trying to cut it close to squeak by this weekend and I lost.![]()
No offense but I hope you don't make it lol we both have pretty similar GB/BLT squads. I managed to get Flacco and Cobb but still have 9 combined. Anyways if you survive THIS week you're likely safe if GB/BLT advance. I'm in the same boat but can't imagine my teams win AND I don't break 100 so I feel confident.Screwed unless I can snake by with monster efforts from some Balt and GB guys in the 3rd Round. Which... now that I think of it might be possible given the low number of entries this year![]()
Aaron Rodgers $40 0.00
Greg Jennings $21 0.00
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
James Jones $11 0.00
Jermichael Finley $19 0.00
Ray Rice $26 0.00
Anquan Boldin $10 0.00
Ed Dickson $11 0.00
Dennis Pitta $8 0.00
Hakeem Nicks $18 29.50
Jake Ballard $6 4.60
Eddie Royal $2 13.90
Matthew Stafford $20 41.10
Calvin Johnson $15 45.10
Antonio Brown $24 13.80
I was worried about taking too many players on BYE and overselected guys that are dead money now. I made the cut by 80 points and am kicking myself for not going with more NE/GB players.Ditto.Took my chance trying to cut it close to squeak by this weekend and I lost.![]()
LOL my 12 prediction was not meant to be an over/underNo action.-QG

I had a very similiar choice of players. Deion Branch $10 0.00 Joe Flacco $25 0.00 Ray Rice $26 0.00 Lee Evans $3 0.00 Ed Dickson $11 0.00 Dennis Pitta $8 0.00 Baltimore Ravens $10 0.00 Joel Dreessen $7 0.00 Houston Texans $9 16.00 Ryan Grant $7 0.00 Kendall Hunter $5 0.00 Delanie Walker $2 0.00 Robert Meachem $15 21.10 Devery Henderson $11 14.80 Eli Manning $27 33.15 Ahmad Bradshaw $14 11.00 Brandon Jacobs $6 11.00 Victor Cruz $20 4.80 Hakeem Nicks $18 29.50 New York Giants $8 2.00 Titus Young $8 8.10 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL 122.65 CUTOFF 88.60I may have missed it, but I don't know that I've seen anyone else in the thread yet with a NYG-BAL super bowl... thankful for guys like Henderson and Cotchery to help keep me alive this week. Stevan Ridley $7 0.00 Joe Flacco $25 0.00 Ray Rice $26 0.00 Torrey Smith $17 0.00 Anquan Boldin $10 0.00 Ben Tate $9 3.70 Jacoby Jones $4 0.00 John Clay $7 0.10 Jerricho Cotchery $9 10.10 Bernard Scott $4 5.50 Kendall Hunter $5 0.00 Michael Crabtree $9 0.00 Chris Ivory $13 4.70 Devery Henderson $11 14.80 Eli Manning $27 33.15 Ahmad Bradshaw $14 11.00 Brandon Jacobs $6 11.00 Danny Ware $3 2.20 Victor Cruz $20 4.80 Hakeem Nicks $18 29.50 Jake Ballard $6 4.60 ------------------------------------------------TOTAL 101.55 CUTOFF 88.60
You know, I participate in the in-season FBG $20k contest, and I think I have a pretty good grasp of the rules and strategy. But I am a bit vexed with this playoff contest. Does my team have a shot?Wow. Squeaked by by two points.
Tom Brady $36 0.00
BenJarvus Green-Ellis $9 0.00
Kevin Faulk $2 0.00
Deion Branch $10 0.00
Rob Gronkowski $22 0.00
Eric Decker $4 0.90
Hines Ward $9 0.00
Pittsburgh Steelers $9 2.00
Cedric Benson $10 7.70
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
Drew Brees $52 41.20
Darren Sproles $28 22.50
Robert Meachem $15 21.10
Ahmad Bradshaw $14 11.00
Michael Turner $11 5.10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 90.40
CUTOFF 88.60
Very slim chance of going to tiebreakers. We'll be down to 1000 finalists. At best 500 will have the right Super Bowl. Half of those won't have read the rules. That will leave 250 entries. New Orleans alone had 1 qb, 3 rb, 4 wr, 2 te, 1 d, and 1 kicker. Just working off the top of my head, the values were 52, 28, 18, 13, 27, 18, 13, 10, 35, 4, 23, 16 for a total of 257. Those high cap numbers actually force people to take a smaller number of picks of a pool of 12 players, leaving more potential combos on the board.I was thinking today that if we get a Superbowl with commonly chosen teams like NE/GB, there are more than likely going to be dozens of teams who each have the same players, hence the need to use the tiebreakers. I just now read the tiebreaker rules after assuming the first tiebreaker would be "highest score total for all 4 weeks".I think I'm high-middle of the pack in terms of number of players, but I almost submitted a roster of only 12 guys.
Tom Brady $36 0.00 BenJarvus Green-Ellis $9 0.00You know, I participate in the in-season FBG $20k contest, and I think I have a pretty good grasp of the rules and strategy. But I am a bit vexed with this playoff contest. Does my team have a shot?Wow. Squeaked by by two points.
Tom Brady $36 0.00
BenJarvus Green-Ellis $9 0.00
Kevin Faulk $2 0.00
Deion Branch $10 0.00
Rob Gronkowski $22 0.00
Eric Decker $4 0.90
Hines Ward $9 0.00
Pittsburgh Steelers $9 2.00
Cedric Benson $10 7.70
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
Drew Brees $52 41.20
Darren Sproles $28 22.50
Robert Meachem $15 21.10
Ahmad Bradshaw $14 11.00
Michael Turner $11 5.10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 90.40
CUTOFF 88.60
Assuming NFC Champ Game is GB/NOS and AFC Champ Game at least has BAL I think I have a shot of making it to SB week. If 6 players is going to be enough, I'll have to wait and hope for a lot of New Orleans field goals since I don't think a lot of people paid the premium on Kasay.I guess my team isn't too bad...
GB/BAL (37.6% spent on this combo) I have 5 players, but no Rodgers, so I guess I am hoping for
NOS/BAL (62.8% spent on this combo) to have 6 players w/ both QB's + Ray Rice + Torrey Smith + Meachem + Kasay
If HOU gets past BAL and NEP, I'll still have Foster but no AJ would not win it for me
JoJo Silver Mine
This entry is still alive.
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Hernandez $20 0.00
Joe Flacco $25 0.00
Ray Rice $26 0.00
Torrey Smith $17 0.00
Arian Foster $24 31.70
Jacoby Jones $4 0.00
Matt Prater $5 12.00
Denver Broncos $5 7.00
Pittsburgh Steelers $9 2.00
Ryan Grant $7 0.00
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
Drew Brees $52 41.20
Robert Meachem $15 21.10
John Kasay $22 9.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 115.00
CUTOFF 88.60
Only problem is that lots of no fg's means not a lot of Brees TDs. If we both make the finals, I have your Balt players plus Boldin/Evans/Cundiff. That's got to be good for 20 pts. We both have Meachum, so can Brees + Kasey outscore Graham + Colsten + Henderson by 20 pts. That said, you'll definately outscore me this week and are a shoe in to advance to the next round.Assuming NFC Champ Game is GB/NOS and AFC Champ Game at least has BAL I think I have a shot of making it to SB week. If 6 players is going to be enough, I'll have to wait and hope for a lot of New Orleans field goals since I don't think a lot of people paid the premium on Kasay.I guess my team isn't too bad...
GB/BAL (37.6% spent on this combo) I have 5 players, but no Rodgers, so I guess I am hoping for
NOS/BAL (62.8% spent on this combo) to have 6 players w/ both QB's + Ray Rice + Torrey Smith + Meachem + Kasay
If HOU gets past BAL and NEP, I'll still have Foster but no AJ would not win it for me
JoJo Silver Mine
This entry is still alive.
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Hernandez $20 0.00
Joe Flacco $25 0.00
Ray Rice $26 0.00
Torrey Smith $17 0.00
Arian Foster $24 31.70
Jacoby Jones $4 0.00
Matt Prater $5 12.00
Denver Broncos $5 7.00
Pittsburgh Steelers $9 2.00
Ryan Grant $7 0.00
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
Drew Brees $52 41.20
Robert Meachem $15 21.10
John Kasay $22 9.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 115.00
CUTOFF 88.60
Have only seen 1 other team mention Kasay in this thread![]()
Dang dude...that's too painful.went heavy on a GB/Bal super bowl and was eliminated by .30
ThanksTom Brady $36 0.00 BenJarvus Green-Ellis $9 0.00You know, I participate in the in-season FBG $20k contest, and I think I have a pretty good grasp of the rules and strategy. But I am a bit vexed with this playoff contest. Does my team have a shot?Wow. Squeaked by by two points.
Tom Brady $36 0.00
BenJarvus Green-Ellis $9 0.00
Kevin Faulk $2 0.00
Deion Branch $10 0.00
Rob Gronkowski $22 0.00
Eric Decker $4 0.90
Hines Ward $9 0.00
Pittsburgh Steelers $9 2.00
Cedric Benson $10 7.70
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
Drew Brees $52 41.20
Darren Sproles $28 22.50
Robert Meachem $15 21.10
Ahmad Bradshaw $14 11.00
Michael Turner $11 5.10
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 90.40
CUTOFF 88.60
Kevin Faulk $2 0.00
Deion Branch $10 0.00
Rob Gronkowski $22 0.00
Probably looking at Gronk and Brady here. Brady is good for 30+, Gronk is the wildcard. 20 is a good baseline for him. Probably will end up in the 50-60 range.
Eric Decker $4 0.90
hurt?? Likely a donut.
Hines Ward $9 0.00
Pittsburgh Steelers $9 2.00
Cedric Benson $10 7.70
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
A very key player for you. 10 points in the bank.
Drew Brees $52 41.20
Darren Sproles $28 22.50
Robert Meachem $15 21.10
Hard to say v. SF. Brees should be good for 20-25. Sproles and meachum are wildcards. One should get a td and net you 15-20. this trio will get you 40-45
Ahmad Bradshaw $14 11.00
A safe bet for 10 pts, limited upside
Michael Turner $11 5.10
Even with my conservative projections, I think you easily advance. I don't think you have enough horsepower to finish in the money. Most of the NO heavy teams will have you covered with quanity. Even your NE team is missing Welker and Hernadez. That said, no/ne had some mega salaries and I can't see where you could have cut it thinner.
What are the rules of your staff-only competition? I was wondering why the staff entries were so anti-loading-up-on-2-teams.Made it through the first weekend without losing anyone. I can't win anyway, so I get to use a different strategy (only have to beat the other FBG staff guys). Clearly went heavy on NE but hedged with some scoring from with GB or NO if they get that far.Tom Brady $36 0.00 BenJarvus Green-Ellis $9 0.00 Stevan Ridley $7 0.00 Wes Welker $23 0.00 Rob Gronkowski $22 0.00 Arian Foster $24 31.70 Ryan Grant $7 0.00 Jordy Nelson $19 0.00 Chris Ivory $13 4.70 Marques Colston $27 19.00 Jimmy Graham $35 22.00 Eli Manning $27 33.15
Same rules as everyone else, just a lot fewer entries.What are the rules of your staff-only competition? I was wondering why the staff entries were so anti-loading-up-on-2-teams.
What is the penalty for a terrible showing (i.e., getting bounced in the first round, finishing well below the average member entry, etc.)? You owe FBGs free articles for 3 months or something?Same rules as everyone else, just a lot fewer entries.What are the rules of your staff-only competition? I was wondering why the staff entries were so anti-loading-up-on-2-teams.
It seems like some guys didn't bother to read the rules, so they already got bounced. Bad showings = picking up Joe's dry cleaning for a year.What is the penalty for a terrible showing (i.e., getting bounced in the first round, finishing well below the average member entry, etc.)? You owe FBGs free articles for 3 months or something?
Can we name some names here?'David Yudkin said:It seems like some guys didn't bother to read the rules, so they already got bounced. Bad showings = picking up Joe's dry cleaning for a year.'Bad_Mo said:What is the penalty for a terrible showing (i.e., getting bounced in the first round, finishing well below the average member entry, etc.)? You owe FBGs free articles for 3 months or something?
From what I can tell, 3 staffers went heavy on teams that weren't playing in Week 1 of the playoffs. One had GB/NE, one had BAL/SF, and another went crazy for NO players (apparently not realizing only 2 guys could score).They are easily identified in the weekly standings for those that are interested in knowing who they are . . .Can we name some names here?'David Yudkin said:It seems like some guys didn't bother to read the rules, so they already got bounced. Bad showings = picking up Joe's dry cleaning for a year.'Bad_Mo said:What is the penalty for a terrible showing (i.e., getting bounced in the first round, finishing well below the average member entry, etc.)? You owe FBGs free articles for 3 months or something?
I have to assume anyone in the SB that will be my competition has Brees, so that is not so much an issue. It also means teams with a lot of Saints WR's will have fewer TD's too'BassNBrew said:Only problem is that lots of no fg's means not a lot of Brees TDs. If we both make the finals, I have your Balt players plus Boldin/Evans/Cundiff. That's got to be good for 20 pts. We both have Meachum, so can Brees + Kasey outscore Graham + Colsten + Henderson by 20 pts. That said, you'll definately outscore me this week and are a shoe in to advance to the next round.'Jojo the circus boy said:Assuming NFC Champ Game is GB/NOS and AFC Champ Game at least has BAL I think I have a shot of making it to SB week. If 6 players is going to be enough, I'll have to wait and hope for a lot of New Orleans field goals since I don't think a lot of people paid the premium on Kasay.I guess my team isn't too bad...
GB/BAL (37.6% spent on this combo) I have 5 players, but no Rodgers, so I guess I am hoping for
NOS/BAL (62.8% spent on this combo) to have 6 players w/ both QB's + Ray Rice + Torrey Smith + Meachem + Kasay
If HOU gets past BAL and NEP, I'll still have Foster but no AJ would not win it for me
JoJo Silver Mine
This entry is still alive.
18
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aaron Hernandez $20 0.00
Joe Flacco $25 0.00
Ray Rice $26 0.00
Torrey Smith $17 0.00
Arian Foster $24 31.70
Jacoby Jones $4 0.00
Matt Prater $5 12.00
Denver Broncos $5 7.00
Pittsburgh Steelers $9 2.00
Ryan Grant $7 0.00
Jordy Nelson $19 0.00
Drew Brees $52 41.20
Robert Meachem $15 21.10
John Kasay $22 9.00
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL 115.00
CUTOFF 88.60
Have only seen 1 other team mention Kasay in this thread![]()
I had Kasey in several versions but came to the conslusion that odds favored one of Henderson or Meachum outscoring him in the Super Bowl.
The kickers offered great value $ per pt wise. Problem is their downside was too huge to take as a solo play (see Bryant), and their upside still didn't top that of the QB/RB/WR options when you assmebled a combo of players from a team. Basically they're almost worthless on your Super Bowl teams until the last week.
I agree with you, you are going to have a tough road getting to the SB since you are so heavy BAL/NOSThis calls into question everything I read going forward by these bottom 4 dwellers.staff members week 1 scores:Stephen Holloway 170.1Andy Hicks 141.1FBG Henry 125Greg Russell 120.8Entry 100826 105.85Jene Bramel 94.5Jeff Haseley 90.1Did not make cut:Bruce Henderson 79.65Pasquino 63.2Tefertiller 63.2Memphis Foundry 27.35
If we make it to SB, then you have Woodhead and I have NO D/ST. rest the same on NO/NEAlso went NE / NO...with TE at 1.5 ppr, figured I'd grab cheap TE from most teams and hope for 10-15 out of those spots...with 40+ from my 2 Saints and 2 Pats. Spent 5 minutes on this...probably should have taken bgje instead of wood head. Oh well. 18 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tom Brady $36 0.00 Danny Woodhead $7 0.00 Stevan Ridley $7 0.00 Rob Gronkowski $22 0.00 Aaron Hernandez $20 0.00 Ed Dickson $11 0.00 Willis McGahee $6 6.10 Jermichael Finley $19 0.00 Vernon Davis $9 0.00 Drew Brees $52 41.20 Chris Ivory $13 4.70 Marques Colston $27 19.00 Matthew Stafford $20 41.10 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL 107.40 CUTOFF 88.60
If we make it to SB, then you have Woodhead and I have NO D/ST. rest the same on NO/NEAlso went NE / NO...with TE at 1.5 ppr, figured I'd grab cheap TE from most teams and hope for 10-15 out of those spots...with 40+ from my 2 Saints and 2 Pats. Spent 5 minutes on this...probably should have taken bgje instead of wood head. Oh well. 18 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Tom Brady $36 0.00 Danny Woodhead $7 0.00 Stevan Ridley $7 0.00 Rob Gronkowski $22 0.00 Aaron Hernandez $20 0.00 Ed Dickson $11 0.00 Willis McGahee $6 6.10 Jermichael Finley $19 0.00 Vernon Davis $9 0.00 Drew Brees $52 41.20 Chris Ivory $13 4.70 Marques Colston $27 19.00 Matthew Stafford $20 41.10 -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------TOTAL 107.40 CUTOFF 88.60
BoomBoom, looks like you have Woodhead, both NE TEs, Ivory, and Colston to my Welker, Sproles, Meachum, and Graham...that would be an interesting final, too...although I think I'd give the edge to you.Posted 09 January 2012 - 12:35 AMView Poststubby, on 08 January 2012 - 03:25 PM, said:QB - Drew Brees - 52QB - Tom Brady - 36QB - Andy Dalton - 16RB - Darren Sproles - 28RB - Stevan Ridley - 7RB - Brandon Jacobs - 6WR - Wes Welker - 23WR - Hakeem Nicks - 18WR - Robert Meachem - 15TE - Jimmy Graham - 35PK - Shaun Suisham - 14Total value: 250Another entry looking at a NO-NE super bowl. Was counting on the Bengals upset (oops), thus sending Pittsburgh to Baltimore, which I viewed to be a defensive struggle. I think Nicks' last TD just propelled me into next week. Jacobs looks good today, too. Losing only Dalton would be nice, but I'm not counting on a lot of FG against NE. Next week will be close too, with only 7 players starting , and one of those being a kicker....but if somehow I make it to the Super Bowl I really like my chances.Well, scratch that kicker....
If Holloway picked two from all 8 WC teams to score that well that's just as bad in not reading the rules as scoring 27!This calls into question everything I read going forward by these bottom 4 dwellers.staff members week 1 scores:Stephen Holloway 170.1Andy Hicks 141.1FBG Henry 125Greg Russell 120.8Entry 100826 105.85Jene Bramel 94.5Jeff Haseley 90.1Did not make cut:Bruce Henderson 79.65Pasquino 63.2Tefertiller 63.2Memphis Foundry 27.35![]()
My playoff contest teams are mostly focused on players from the 49ers and Ravens. I did not particularly think that these two teams were the favorites, but liked the value of the number of players that you could get combined with the potential to make it all the way.Since both my teams were NOT wild card teams, I selected two players each from the WC teams I expected to win (NY Giants - Eli & Nicks and Bengals - Dalton & Greene) and then added two Lions players (Stafford and Calvin) who I hoped would score well and upset the Saints.Obviously losing four players was not what I hoped for and now I am counting on only six players this weekend as well as wins by my two Super Bowl teams to get me by. Using 20/20 hindight, if I could have know how well Stafford and Calvin would have done, then I would have added a player or two from either the Packers or Patriots rather than the two Bengals.Oh well.If Holloway picked two from all 8 WC teams to score that well that's just as bad in not reading the rules as scoring 27!This calls into question everything I read going forward by these bottom 4 dwellers.staff members week 1 scores:Stephen Holloway 170.1Andy Hicks 141.1FBG Henry 125Greg Russell 120.8Entry 100826 105.85Jene Bramel 94.5Jeff Haseley 90.1Did not make cut:Bruce Henderson 79.65Pasquino 63.2Tefertiller 63.2Memphis Foundry 27.35![]()
I think the biggest problem in your strategy (other than assuming the Bengals would winMy playoff contest teams are mostly focused on players from the 49ers and Ravens. I did not particularly think that these two teams were the favorites, but liked the value of the number of players that you could get combined with the potential to make it all the way.Since both my teams were NOT wild card teams, I selected two players each from the WC teams I expected to win (NY Giants - Eli & Nicks and Bengals - Dalton & Greene) and then added two Lions players (Stafford and Calvin) who I hoped would score well and upset the Saints.Obviously losing four players was not what I hoped for and now I am counting on only six players this weekend as well as wins by my two Super Bowl teams to get me by. Using 20/20 hindight, if I could have know how well Stafford and Calvin would have done, then I would have added a player or two from either the Packers or Patriots rather than the two Bengals.Oh well.
) is the teams you picked for the Super Bowl. You went with two low scoring offenses. Even if you get by this week, you would have trouble with next week. Assume the top 4 seeds win this weekend. If you only have your SB players up against entries who only have GB/NE players, you would have trouble advancing even if SF and Baltimore go to the Super Bowl.this doesn't make any sense - If his 2 teams win they must score to win. Having 4 players in the 2 games should be enough to make it to the finals.I think the biggest problem in your strategy (other than assuming the Bengals would winMy playoff contest teams are mostly focused on players from the 49ers and Ravens. I did not particularly think that these two teams were the favorites, but liked the value of the number of players that you could get combined with the potential to make it all the way.Since both my teams were NOT wild card teams, I selected two players each from the WC teams I expected to win (NY Giants - Eli & Nicks and Bengals - Dalton & Greene) and then added two Lions players (Stafford and Calvin) who I hoped would score well and upset the Saints.Obviously losing four players was not what I hoped for and now I am counting on only six players this weekend as well as wins by my two Super Bowl teams to get me by. Using 20/20 hindight, if I could have know how well Stafford and Calvin would have done, then I would have added a player or two from either the Packers or Patriots rather than the two Bengals.Oh well.) is the teams you picked for the Super Bowl. You went with two low scoring offenses. Even if you get by this week, you would have trouble with next week. Assume the top 4 seeds win this weekend. If you only have your SB players up against entries who only have GB/NE players, you would have trouble advancing even if SF and Baltimore go to the Super Bowl.
I built a similar team, but I threw in Ridley and Grant so I'd have six players count. If it works out, there will be a lot of NO players out there that would get teams through this round and then count 0 next week.this doesn't make any sense - If his 2 teams win they must score to win. Having 4 players in the 2 games should be enough to make it to the finals.I think the biggest problem in your strategy (other than assuming the Bengals would winMy playoff contest teams are mostly focused on players from the 49ers and Ravens. I did not particularly think that these two teams were the favorites, but liked the value of the number of players that you could get combined with the potential to make it all the way.Since both my teams were NOT wild card teams, I selected two players each from the WC teams I expected to win (NY Giants - Eli & Nicks and Bengals - Dalton & Greene) and then added two Lions players (Stafford and Calvin) who I hoped would score well and upset the Saints.Obviously losing four players was not what I hoped for and now I am counting on only six players this weekend as well as wins by my two Super Bowl teams to get me by. Using 20/20 hindight, if I could have know how well Stafford and Calvin would have done, then I would have added a player or two from either the Packers or Patriots rather than the two Bengals.Oh well.) is the teams you picked for the Super Bowl. You went with two low scoring offenses. Even if you get by this week, you would have trouble with next week. Assume the top 4 seeds win this weekend. If you only have your SB players up against entries who only have GB/NE players, you would have trouble advancing even if SF and Baltimore go to the Super Bowl.
It makes sense, except it assumes that the GB and/or NE players would outscore the SF and BAL ones. I think thats a decent sized jump to conclusions, especially considering BAL vs NE and each team's respective defense.this doesn't make any sense - If his 2 teams win they must score to win. Having 4 players in the 2 games should be enough to make it to the finals.I think the biggest problem in your strategy (other than assuming the Bengals would winMy playoff contest teams are mostly focused on players from the 49ers and Ravens. I did not particularly think that these two teams were the favorites, but liked the value of the number of players that you could get combined with the potential to make it all the way.Since both my teams were NOT wild card teams, I selected two players each from the WC teams I expected to win (NY Giants - Eli & Nicks and Bengals - Dalton & Greene) and then added two Lions players (Stafford and Calvin) who I hoped would score well and upset the Saints.Obviously losing four players was not what I hoped for and now I am counting on only six players this weekend as well as wins by my two Super Bowl teams to get me by. Using 20/20 hindight, if I could have know how well Stafford and Calvin would have done, then I would have added a player or two from either the Packers or Patriots rather than the two Bengals.Oh well.) is the teams you picked for the Super Bowl. You went with two low scoring offenses. Even if you get by this week, you would have trouble with next week. Assume the top 4 seeds win this weekend. If you only have your SB players up against entries who only have GB/NE players, you would have trouble advancing even if SF and Baltimore go to the Super Bowl.
I also have the two NY Giant players, IF the Giants can beat the Packers. However, even if I only have four scorers for the semi-final round and they are the two lowest scoring teams remaining, one or two of the Ravens or 49ers could hit big. I could see Ray Rice getting over 150 total yards and scoring multiple TDs and similar possibilities for Frank Gore. In addition to this, I don't have to be the high scorer, just make the cut so that my heavy 49er and Raven roster gets a shot.this doesn't make any sense - If his 2 teams win they must score to win. Having 4 players in the 2 games should be enough to make it to the finals.I think the biggest problem in your strategy (other than assuming the Bengals would winMy playoff contest teams are mostly focused on players from the 49ers and Ravens. I did not particularly think that these two teams were the favorites, but liked the value of the number of players that you could get combined with the potential to make it all the way.Since both my teams were NOT wild card teams, I selected two players each from the WC teams I expected to win (NY Giants - Eli & Nicks and Bengals - Dalton & Greene) and then added two Lions players (Stafford and Calvin) who I hoped would score well and upset the Saints.Obviously losing four players was not what I hoped for and now I am counting on only six players this weekend as well as wins by my two Super Bowl teams to get me by. Using 20/20 hindight, if I could have know how well Stafford and Calvin would have done, then I would have added a player or two from either the Packers or Patriots rather than the two Bengals.Oh well.) is the teams you picked for the Super Bowl. You went with two low scoring offenses. Even if you get by this week, you would have trouble with next week. Assume the top 4 seeds win this weekend. If you only have your SB players up against entries who only have GB/NE players, you would have trouble advancing even if SF and Baltimore go to the Super Bowl.