Ilov80s
Footballguy
Most novels really need a miniseries to do them justice.Although not a cinematic release, I think the miniseries Lonesome Dove is as fine an adaptation of a great novel as I've seen.
Most novels really need a miniseries to do them justice.Although not a cinematic release, I think the miniseries Lonesome Dove is as fine an adaptation of a great novel as I've seen.
It was fine but I wouldn't call it a classic movie and doubt it's on many all time great movie lists.I think Of Mice and Men was well done by Gary Sinise (who directed, produced, and starred in it along with John Malkovich).
especially Dickens. the difference between the films and miniseries is whole nutherMost novels really need a miniseries to do them justice.
You have to take Foxy Brown seriously - it won the Oscar for "Best Merkin"Anyone rolling with Foxy Brown or Big Bad Mama?
For those of you that haven't already and were thinking about it, probably not advisable to google the term merkin at work as I just did. Hi IT guys!You have to take Foxy Brown seriously - it won the Oscar for "Best Merkin"
You're right, but I think many of the miniseries from that classic late 70s/80s period were much better than the books they were based on.Most novels really need a miniseries to do them justice.
I haven't seen Three the Hard Way in decades but it appears to be on YouTubeAnyone rolling with Foxy Brown or Big Bad Mama?
Come on E, that merits at least 3
s.That's an odd comment considering the source. I think Fitzgerald and Melville are our greatest national writers. Strange you would hate them both. Ever read Tender Is The Night or Bachelors of Paradise/Tartarus of Maids?Confession time.
Hated the book. Hated every version of the movie I saw. Even hated the story line in Entourage when he made the movie. There isn't a single thing I like about that story and to this day hate the teacher who made me read it.
Go ahead, attack. Don't care. About the only saving grace of that book is that it isn't nearly as bad as Moby ****. But few things are.
that's why the merkins required scaffolding to constructCome on E, that merits at least 3![]()
![]()
s.
William Devane could really pass as a Kennedy. He can make his voice sound just like a Boston native, and he looks like a Kennedy. I loved him as Greg Sumner on Knots Landing.while we're up in here, was on the fence with "Missiles of October" - great made for TV flick - Devane and Sheen were Jack and Bobby - but figured a TV production would've been a stretch ... it was a remarkable piece of work, had the feeling of live theater, would've loved to see it on B'Way.
I personally love it. More than almost any movie. Stewart is annoying, but Carlotta Valdes, my man. Carlotta Valdes. What's awesome is that Stewart (or Valdes's) house in SF is the same house that Sharon Stone lived in for the filming of Basic Instinct. Kim Novak is unreal in the film.Off to see Vertigo at the theater. I know it’s not 74 but I figure this is the de facto movie thread for the moment. It’s never been a movie I really got the love for. Maybe seeing it at the theater will leave a different impression on me.
I'm with you on this one. It's almost inevitable that a film rated so highly by critics and historians manages to disappoint on some levels. The melodramatic, portentous tone seems dated and the central plot twist is telegraphed. Hitchcock is a master of course and the film is a textbook example of the mechanics of film making. But there are a number of other Hitchcock movies I'd rather watch than Vertigo.Off to see Vertigo at the theater. I know it’s not 74 but I figure this is the de facto movie thread for the moment. It’s never been a movie I really got the love for. Maybe seeing it at the theater will leave a different impression on me.
I think the Carlotta/Stone connection is an urban legend. The building was torn down years ago and the site is now the practice fields for the High School my kids attended.I personally love it. More than almost any movie. Stewart is annoying, but Carlotta Valdes, my man. Carlotta Valdes. What's awesome is that Stewart (or Valdes's) house in SF is the same house that Sharon Stone lived in for the filming of Basic Instinct. Kim Novak is unreal in the film.
How hard was she laughing at you for doing this?Wife and I were talking about this thread. Ending up talking about the best t.v. characters of all time. Another fun conversation.
More at my taste in movies. It's really the only thing we really deeply disagree about.How hard was she laughing at you for doing this?
Oh, wow. I always just assumed from the reports. Still love the imagery of SF, its hills and valleys. Very cool, IMO.I think the Carlotta/Stone connection is an urban legend. The building was torn down years ago and the site is now the practice fields for the High School my kids attended.
Fool me once....that's why the merkins required scaffolding to construct
Won't.Could we please do the lists via PM? Surprise element aside, it really is easier for me. That way I can scroll through the inbox and it keeps it in order as I write names of people who have submitted lists and I don't have to go back through the thread at night.
ETA: I can't stop you from posting your lists in here too, but could you also send it to me via PM?
Maybe that's my problem with Vertigo. Other Hitchcock films, even some of his early British ones like The 39 Steps, feel more modern than Vertigo. The plot of Vertigo and the character of Scottie are obsessed with the past. It's set in the 50s because it was made then but it really doesn't take place there.Oh, wow. I always just assumed from the reports. Still love the imagery of SF, its hills and valleys. Very cool, IMO.
Vertigo is weirdly autobiographical and meta. It seems Hitchcock wanted to write about his passion and fetish for blondes and weakness and wanted to address character; that real people and real characters persist and become what they are. That they have a destiny -- and a past -- is something the movie addresses. It's a trope, that the character takes shape and forms under the watchful eye of the creator, but the trope wasn't so obvious in '54.
I think it's certainly psychological; and like all things psychological, is really about a moment in time of understanding of the human condition. But Hitchcock ties it in to a love story, which grabs me. The brassiere joke with Madge still feels modern, if quaint and a little dated, but yet not. And symbolic. But I've watched The 39 Steps and can't remember much about it because of the condition my condition was in, so maybe you're right. I'm not a film historian, though I do love this thread and others.Maybe that's my problem with Vertigo. Other Hitchcock films, even some of his early British ones like The 39 Steps, feel more modern than Vertigo. The plot of Vertigo and the character of Scottie are obsessed with the past. It's set in the 50s because it was made then but it really doesn't take place there.
I thought briefly about that before and came to the conclusion that these aren't really drafts - so a movie can be on multiple lists.anybody else curious why we're spoilering our lists AND spotlighting the #### out of our faves? i'm down if y'all are - just seems weird
in case we have a ruing, Chinatown is as close to a perfect movie as i have ever seen and G2 is just a very good flick - low 20s tops
).No, but Pam Grier and Angie Dickinson occupied plenty of space in my dirty little kid head.Anyone rolling with Foxy Brown or Big Bad Mama?
A 30 point getter from me if we hit 1966. Another movie "of hers" will be getting high points from me here in 1974....so did "One Million Years B.C." Rachel Welch - but that's not important right now.
Glad to see somebody else recognizing her 1974 movie. I don't think Richard Lester gets enough credit as a director. He had a very strong 20 year run of comedies and action movies that seem effortless.A 30 point getter from me if we hit 1966. Another movie "of hers" will be getting high points from me here in 1974.
Those 2 movies are all timers for me personally, my favorite film representation of that source material (which I love). Funny it didn't come up in the earlier discussion about classic literature in film.Glad to see somebody else recognizing her 1974 movie. I don't think Richard Lester gets enough credit as a director. He had a very strong 20 year run of comedies and action movies that seem effortless.
see him hawking that AARP type insurance these days, he still looks great ... always thought he was gonna break muchmuch bigger .. Sheen, as well.William Devane could really pass as a Kennedy. He can make his voice sound just like a Boston native, and he looks like a Kennedy. I loved him as Greg Sumner on Knots Landing.
I've never read the bookThose 2 movies are all timers for me personally, my favorite film representation of that source material (which I love). Funny it didn't come up in the earlier discussion about classic literature in film.
Devane's toughest role was replacing Robert Conrad as the team captain in Battle of the Network Stars.see him hawking that AARP type insurance these days, he still looks great ... always thought he was gonna break muchmuch bigger .. Sheen, as well.
well, someone had to keep JoAnne Pflug from spilling out her shoulder straps- who better than an ex-prez?Devane's toughest role was replacing Robert Conrad as the team captain in Battle of the Network Stars.
Same here. Swashbuckling for the win. I'd watch that Erol Flynn stuff, etc. But this one was special. When I was a kid I'd always scan the T.V. guide as soon as we got the Sunday paper to see if this was going to be the week's "Movie For A Saturday/Sunday Evening", and I'd watch it every time it was.I've never read the book![]()
But based on the many fine movies based on Dumas, I have to believe it's better movie source material than Proust or Faulkner. I'm a sucker for movies with sword fights. I even liked the wire fu version that came out a few years ago with Milla Jovovich. It's not as good as the Ritz Brothers but few things are.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_the_Network_Starswell, someone had to keep JoAnne Pflug from spilling out her shoulder straps- who better than an ex-prez?
I got Pam Grier coveredAnyone rolling with Foxy Brown or Big Bad Mama?
That would be a great one to see on the big screen. Vertigo fascinates me, but I am not sure if it's one of my favorite Hitchcock. It's hard to rank his movies though. They are like documentaries for me in that there hasn't been one that I can think of that I have not liked and most are very good - great.I have to move my personal rating for Vertigo up. It looked amazing on the big screen, it’s still the best use of color in movie and actually knowing the twists of the movie made it work better imo.
Ever since i first saw Vertigo, i've lived in mortal fear of falling off one of Kim Novak's eyebrowsI have to move my personal rating for Vertigo up. It looked amazing on the big screen, it’s still the best use of color in movie and actually knowing the twists of the movie made it work better imo.
They are probably pretty slippery with all that wet paint.Ever since i first saw Vertigo, i've lived in mortal fear of falling off one of Kim Novak's eyebrows
Wasn't big on Topaz. That's the only outlier thoThat would be a great one to see on the big screen. Vertigo fascinates me, but I am not sure if it's one of my favorite Hitchcock. It's hard to rank his movies though. They are like documentaries for me in that there hasn't been one that I can think of that I have not liked and most are very good - great.
Torn Curtain isn't very good. It's not bad but it's just a generic 60s spy movie without much Hitchcock flair.Wasn't big on Topaz. That's the only outlier tho
Off to see Vertigo at the theater. I know it’s not 74 but I figure this is the de facto movie thread for the moment. It’s never been a movie I really got the love for. Maybe seeing it at the theater will leave a different impression on me.
I actually use The Remains of the Day as my primary example of doing a film adaptation right, so I guess I'm in that group you mention. The book is a favorite of mine, and unlike most adaptations I thought the movie might even be better. A lot of that has to do with just how phenomenal the acting is, though.I think most people liked Remains of the Day but I was really disappointed by it since the book is so good. Room with a View is a pretty damn good adaptation.
It’s definitely slow and the ending is so ambiguous and quick that I have reacted to it differently every time I’ve seen it. This was my 3rd time and knowing it was coming, I liked it more this time.![]()
Saw it Tuesday night at our local AMC theater. Cool to see a classic on the big screen! But I agree. Slow in parts and the ending sucks balls.