'Carolina Hustler said:
To me it's difficult to argue that getting killed because of a beatdown is justice. Although Zimmerman may have had the legal right to shoot Trayvon, I'm pretty sure most people would say that the result was excessive and unwarranted.
I can agree with that. I'm not sure where you draw the line between simple "beatdown" and something that is excessive, or how you can know to what extent this confrontation would have gone if it weren't forcefully stopped.I'm not sure there was any real threat of death, maybe a verbal one, so I don't think death is justified for Trayvon. Being shot may have been justified, but there again, you have different degrees of this alleged crime.. If Zimmerman would have shot and only wounded Trayvon, I don't think anyone would have had seen any issue with that as long as Trayvon was on top of, and pummeling Zimmerman as the story goes and eye witnesses describe..
The death is unfortunate. In my opinion there is no justification in and intentional killing. Was Zimmermans intent to kill Trayvon, or to subdue his attacker? I'd guess the latter.. But getting shot may have been an inevitable conclusion for Trayvon if he was on the bad path that it appears he was on..
I often shoot people point blank in the chest in my attempts to subdue them. Nice to see you're spinning wild fantasies about things no one knows about. Can't wait til you jump on the next person who does that!
If you've ever been trained to use a gun you'd know that center mass is where you're taught to shot someone..Which part is a fantasy?
You guessed that zimn's intent was to subdue his attacker. That's a fantasy. Martina's inevitable date with a bullet, based on stupid HS stuff is another.
Giving both options and leaning towards one or the other is somehow wrong? If someone was on top of me, attacking me, the first thing I'd be thinking would be to get him off, subdue the attack. If I couldn't stop him or get him off, and I had a gun, I'd use it to do so.. Not a far leap.. I also stated another option which I'm not leaning towards. Without knowing for sure one way or another that's the best one could do.
You on the other hand see only the option that Zimmerman was intent on killing an innocent young man.. You leave no openings for it to have been any other way, yet you don't have facts to back that up.. Those facts we will never have..
Lots of young kids on the wrong path end up in gun play.. Being shot at, shooting others.. I didn't say it was inevitable for Trayvon, I said
IF he was on a bad path, it
MAY have been inevitable..
Are you saying it's not possible that he was on the wrong path? Or that it's not possible that guns were in this kids future?
You seem to think having illegal drugs at school and getting suspended multiple times is typical behavior with the only potential reasoning being 'because it happens'.. Teenagers get involved with guns as well, typically the ones that do are also involved with illegal drugs and have troubles at school..