David Yudkin
Footballguy
It's a bold strategy, Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for 'em.
I was thinking more along the lines of Half+ on one touch..10 touches for 57 yards is possible, and certainly not unrealistic. 10 touches a lot to give a kid who has never played a real NFL game before.. Reggie Bush only saw 7 touches last night, in a similar role. This kid is no Reggie Bush. And this is no Saints Offense. I still feel pretty strong in my earlier prediction, though I wouldn't be terribly surprised to see a little more.Care to share how you come up with the #'s?I'll make a prediction..10 touches 57yds.1/3 of the yards on one touchMake your prediction, add something to the thread... The above post is yet another veiled attack... Don't carry that nonsense into this thread too. Troll elsewhere...I have a feeling you are about to be wrong yet again about him.5 touches, 35 yards, 0TD's.... That's probably high side...
Good. Both of you please stay cool and drop the back and forth and stick to NFL.JThought so, good luck to you this season.
12 touches and 66 yards, based on what? We're reaching full blown rbbc territory now...I'll post a prediction too Hustler...10/52+2/14 and will have owners, writers, and local media begging for him to get even more touches.
I'm thinking you're itching to try out your sleeper. "or what" - is if you have no other options. If you rank him ahead of your other RBs start him. It's that simple. You want to play a hunch? Go for it. Personally, I don't play hunches. I'd rather much play the odds.Tchula said:Sure Caddy is the starter, but he is banged up and TB says they want to split carries against an anemic Browns D. I see him breaking away for a long TD here and really am tempted to start him over LeSean McCoy at flex. Am I just itching to try out my sleeper here or what?
Means the OP was lucky over good, since there is no legitimate evidence that Huggins is going to recieve that role w/o an injury to Caddilac.In blackjack I can double down on a 15 with the dealer showing 10 and draw a 6, but that is still a terrible percentage play that most of the time will lose me money.What if he goes off for 20 and 150 with 2 TD's, and makes the Caddilac look rusty and broken down?
Caddy was their top RB last year and he had about 200 carries IIRC, next you have a QB that is getting over a thumb injury on his right hand, a rookie go to WR, a team that TB has a chance to beat in Cleveland, you add that up and you have the recipe for a lot of hand offs in this game, enough for Caddy to run it somewhere in the 14-18 carry range and for Huggins to have some touches.Carolina Hustler said:12 touches and 66 yards, based on what? We're reaching full blown rbbc territory now...Ministry of Pain said:I'll post a prediction too Hustler...10/52+2/14 and will have owners, writers, and local media begging for him to get even more touches.
I believe the last time a TB RB had 150 rushing yards and 2 rushing TD in the same game was Warrick Dunn against the Cowboys on 12-03-00 (210 rushing yards, 2 TD).I don't think I would be going out on a limb to suggest that neither Huggins nor Williams will be getting 150/2 this week.What if he goes off for 20 and 150 with 2 TD's, and makes the Caddilac look rusty and broken down?
OP is getting that tingly feeling over his "pot of gold" that is an undiscovered fantasy threat (in his mind) and , like all of us in early season, he is chomping at the bit to be right.Compares to golf, trying to land the Par 5 490 yard green in two shots after your beautiful 280 yard drive to the rough. If you can just carry that lake on the left side with a soaring 210 yard 2 iron, you are indeed, carrying a story the rest of the year to your buddies (even if you 3 put that landed shot!).Swing away with HuggyMeans the OP was lucky over good, since there is no legitimate evidence that Huggins is going to recieve that role w/o an injury to Caddilac.In blackjack I can double down on a 15 with the dealer showing 10 and draw a 6, but that is still a terrible percentage play that most of the time will lose me money.What if he goes off for 20 and 150 with 2 TD's, and makes the Caddilac look rusty and broken down?

Good analogy, except i dont think Caddy would be a dealer showing a 10. I think it would be more like doubling down with a 12 and the dealer showing a 7. Caddy isnt exactly Chris Johnson or Adrian Peterson.Means the OP was lucky over good, since there is no legitimate evidence that Huggins is going to recieve that role w/o an injury to Caddilac.In blackjack I can double down on a 15 with the dealer showing 10 and draw a 6, but that is still a terrible percentage play that most of the time will lose me money.What if he goes off for 20 and 150 with 2 TD's, and makes the Caddilac look rusty and broken down?
You must not hang out in the Shark Pool much during the season.Go ahead and start him instead of starting threads and seeking validation.
I don't think Caddy was intended to be the primary back last season.. If I remember correctly, Ward started the season as RB1... That would account for the limited season total for Caddy.Caddy was their top RB last year and he had about 200 carries IIRC, next you have a QB that is getting over a thumb injury on his right hand, a rookie go to WR, a team that TB has a chance to beat in Cleveland, you add that up and you have the recipe for a lot of hand offs in this game, enough for Caddy to run it somewhere in the 14-18 carry range and for Huggins to have some touches.12 touches and 66 yards, based on what? We're reaching full blown rbbc territory now...I'll post a prediction too Hustler...10/52+2/14 and will have owners, writers, and local media begging for him to get even more touches.
two words are reason enough NOT to start Huggins:Josh FreemanSure Caddy is the starter, but he is banged up and TB says they want to split carries against an anemic Browns D. I see him breaking away for a long TD here and really am tempted to start him over LeSean McCoy at flex. Am I just itching to try out my sleeper here or what?
ERAILED:So far, he has 1 tackle assist... lolAnyone know what position he's playing? DB?


You mean the offensive line? Caddy ran really, really well when he found space, but the o-line is terrible.Zero chance Huggins supplants Caddy, barring injury.he SHOULD get carries next week, what they have right now aint the answer
I must have looked ten times trying to buy what was sold in the pool on Huggins and I just couldn't. Still, far too many loved the guy that I wouldn't be surprised if he has a great game late in the season or somesuch. It was just far too premature and they have a ton of RBs in TampaLOL @ this thread and ANYONE WHO STARTED HUGGINS!!!! :X![]()
LOL @ this thread and ANYONE WHO STARTED HUGGINS!!!!![]()
![]()
epic fail, indeed.The fallacy here was there was something actually wrong with Caddy's performance, speed or health for this week.I must have looked ten times trying to buy what was sold in the pool on Huggins and I just couldn't. Still, far too many loved the guy that I wouldn't be surprised if he has a great game late in the season or somesuch. It was just far too premature and they have a ton of RBs in TampaLOL @ this thread and ANYONE WHO STARTED HUGGINS!!!!![]()
![]()
He played at least 1 play on Def per NFL.Com showing he registered a tackle assist in the stat line. Not 1 offensive play.So did the kid play this week? If so what did he do?
And Huggins had 0 carries in the first game last season as well....I can't see how that relates..Both un-drafted rookies in 09, Foster goes off first game of 2010, Huggins doesn't even see an offensive snap.. Whats your point?Arian Foster had 0 carries last year in his first game.Just saying.
Derrick Ward had the same amount of carries as Huggins yesterday as well.And Huggins had 0 carries in the first game last season as well....I can't see how that relates..Both un-drafted rookies in 09, Foster goes off first game of 2010, Huggins doesn't even see an offensive snap.. Whats your point?Arian Foster had 0 carries last year in his first game.Just saying.
My point is fantasy teams that wrote off Foster last year after one game are really regretting it now.And Huggins had 0 carries in the first game last season as well....I can't see how that relates..Both un-drafted rookies in 09, Foster goes off first game of 2010, Huggins doesn't even see an offensive snap.. Whats your point?Arian Foster had 0 carries last year in his first game.Just saying.
You did the right thing.I'm starting Kareem Huggins.32 team league and my starting RB is Michael Bush.
I'm not going to be around this morning to see if he's playing or not.To the OP, you're f'n crazy.4/19 1/13
IDP Sleeper of the Week for week #2?Carolina Hustler said:He played at least 1 play on Def per NFL.Com showing he registered a tackle assist in the stat line. Not 1 offensive play.Yenrub said:So did the kid play this week? If so what did he do?
You did the right thing.I'm starting Kareem Huggins.![]()
32 team league and my starting RB is Michael Bush.I'm not going to be around this morning to see if he's playing or not.
To the OP, you're f'n crazy.
4/19 1/13
got .8 pts for an assist!wtf is up with Grahamcracker getting 6 carries for 10 yards and our boy Huggins, the next Chris Johnson Arian Foster, not getting a single touch? Fire the head coach.There are plenty of RB's that didn't get a carry the first game of the season. Some will do great things, a very large percent of them will not... I don't see how that is an indicator of any kind..Unwrittenlaw said:My point is fantasy teams that wrote off Foster last year after one game are really regretting it now.And Huggins had 0 carries in the first game last season as well....I can't see how that relates..Both un-drafted rookies in 09, Foster goes off first game of 2010, Huggins doesn't even see an offensive snap.. Whats your point?Arian Foster had 0 carries last year in his first game.Just saying.