What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

GM's thread about nothing (12 Viewers)

I have a bit of family drama going on and would like to see if any of you lawyer-types and/or divorcees-with-kids-types have any insight.My brother is supposed to get married next Saturday. His fiancee has three children from her previous marriage, which ended roughly 3 years ago. Her relationship with her ex is not great, but my understanding is that - for the most part - things have leveled out somewhat for the sake of the children (ages 5, 9, 12). By way of brief background, her ex is a bit of an egomaniac and was baffled from the start that he didn't get full custody and even when he didn't get full custody, he was angry that the judge didn't set up some kind of one week on, one week off arrangement for the kids. The judge even explained to him that an arrangement like that would be hugely disruptive to the children, but he just still cannot comprehend how he doesn't have more time with the kids.He has the kids next weekend (this was not the original plan, they have changed some weekends around to accommodate his schedule) and as of last Friday and he decided that he is not going to allow the children to come to the wedding. Not only that, he has now decided that he wants to pursue getting full custody of the kids. He happens to be dating his attorney, so this won't cost him a penny, whereas it will cost my brother something like $25k to fight it. My brother is willing to fight it, but it just kind of sucks all around.So, back to the more immediate issue: my brother does not want to budge an inch on this wedding - he's paid thousands of dollars, people are flying in and so on. His fiancee, however, refuses to get married without her children there. The oldest child was supposed to sing two songs, the middle was the ringbearer and the youngest was supposed to be a flower girl. All three children are heartbroken.Is there anything that can be done here? If my brother and his fiancee just decide not to hand the kids over on Friday, can they be arrested or anything? There has been some chatter about just having the kids come to my parents' house instead of going to the ex's, but I don't want the sheriff showing up at the wedding to arrest their mother or anything like that.Sometimes I feel really whiskey tango.
1. How is it that they scheduled and planned a wedding without knowing where the kids would be?2. What state?3. My BIL is in a situation where the mother of his son pretty much does whatever she wants with the kid and his schedule. For example, when my nephew started kindergarten it came on Monday after my BIL's weekend. Their agreement was that he takes the kid to school on Mondays. Mom didn't like that so didn't drop him off on Friday. He called the sheriff and was told that they don't get involved in civil/family matters unless the child is in danger. 4. Good on the ex finding a lawyer to date. Maybe Romo could take a mistress who is also an attorney to level the playing field....?
 
Now that I have actually started posting in here among the Jim Tanner titans, I feel secure enough to say that I hate this time when all you East Coasters go to bed and it gets empty. :kicksrock:
Some of us stay up very late, but are busy trying to manage a three-front war with France, Portugal, and the Holy Roman Empire.Medieval II: Total War pretty much devoured my entire day. :bag:
That sounds freaking awesome. I bought that but never played it. I take it you recommend?
I had Rome: Total War (prior version) and burned too many hours to count on that.
 
I have a bit of family drama going on and would like to see if any of you lawyer-types and/or divorcees-with-kids-types have any insight.

My brother is supposed to get married next Saturday. His fiancee has three children from her previous marriage, which ended roughly 3 years ago. Her relationship with her ex is not great, but my understanding is that - for the most part - things have leveled out somewhat for the sake of the children (ages 5, 9, 12).

By way of brief background, her ex is a bit of an egomaniac and was baffled from the start that he didn't get full custody and even when he didn't get full custody, he was angry that the judge didn't set up some kind of one week on, one week off arrangement for the kids. The judge even explained to him that an arrangement like that would be hugely disruptive to the children, but he just still cannot comprehend how he doesn't have more time with the kids.

He has the kids next weekend (this was not the original plan, they have changed some weekends around to accommodate his schedule) and as of last Friday and he decided that he is not going to allow the children to come to the wedding. Not only that, he has now decided that he wants to pursue getting full custody of the kids. He happens to be dating his attorney, so this won't cost him a penny, whereas it will cost my brother something like $25k to fight it. My brother is willing to fight it, but it just kind of sucks all around.

So, back to the more immediate issue: my brother does not want to budge an inch on this wedding - he's paid thousands of dollars, people are flying in and so on. His fiancee, however, refuses to get married without her children there. The oldest child was supposed to sing two songs, the middle was the ringbearer and the youngest was supposed to be a flower girl. All three children are heartbroken.

Is there anything that can be done here? If my brother and his fiancee just decide not to hand the kids over on Friday, can they be arrested or anything? There has been some chatter about just having the kids come to my parents' house instead of going to the ex's, but I don't want the sheriff showing up at the wedding to arrest their mother or anything like that.

Sometimes I feel really whiskey tango.
Crappy situation all around. Nothing to be done about the cost, unfortunately, but (and I have no knowledge of TN law), in the states in which I'm admitted, your fiancee would file an eemergency application for relief (styled an injunction, TRO, emergency order, or whatever TN practice calls it) this week, seeking an order from a judge preventing the ex from keeping the children from the wedding. Needs to be filed ASAP to ensure a hearing early next week. My guess is that just filing the application will scare off the ex; his GF may be his lawyer, but she could get sanctioned if she tries to mount of a defense of his conduct, especially on short notice and without particularly strong legal grounds for doing so.

And actually, let me amend the part about the cost. I would add in a request for attorney fees because the ex's conduct is so inflammatory and harmful to the best interests of the children.

Talk to a family law specialist immediately.
Thank you for this. I figured there had to be some kind of legal avenue, but wasn't sure. I will have him look into it.
I have a bit of family drama going on and would like to see if any of you lawyer-types and/or divorcees-with-kids-types have any insight.

My brother is supposed to get married next Saturday. His fiancee has three children from her previous marriage, which ended roughly 3 years ago. Her relationship with her ex is not great, but my understanding is that - for the most part - things have leveled out somewhat for the sake of the children (ages 5, 9, 12).

By way of brief background, her ex is a bit of an egomaniac and was baffled from the start that he didn't get full custody and even when he didn't get full custody, he was angry that the judge didn't set up some kind of one week on, one week off arrangement for the kids. The judge even explained to him that an arrangement like that would be hugely disruptive to the children, but he just still cannot comprehend how he doesn't have more time with the kids.

He has the kids next weekend (this was not the original plan, they have changed some weekends around to accommodate his schedule) and as of last Friday and he decided that he is not going to allow the children to come to the wedding. Not only that, he has now decided that he wants to pursue getting full custody of the kids. He happens to be dating his attorney, so this won't cost him a penny, whereas it will cost my brother something like $25k to fight it. My brother is willing to fight it, but it just kind of sucks all around.

So, back to the more immediate issue: my brother does not want to budge an inch on this wedding - he's paid thousands of dollars, people are flying in and so on. His fiancee, however, refuses to get married without her children there. The oldest child was supposed to sing two songs, the middle was the ringbearer and the youngest was supposed to be a flower girl. All three children are heartbroken.

Is there anything that can be done here? If my brother and his fiancee just decide not to hand the kids over on Friday, can they be arrested or anything? There has been some chatter about just having the kids come to my parents' house instead of going to the ex's, but I don't want the sheriff showing up at the wedding to arrest their mother or anything like that.

Sometimes I feel really whiskey tango.
1. How is it that they scheduled and planned a wedding without knowing where the kids would be?2. What state?

3. My BIL is in a situation where the mother of his son pretty much does whatever she wants with the kid and his schedule. For example, when my nephew started kindergarten it came on Monday after my BIL's weekend. Their agreement was that he takes the kid to school on Mondays. Mom didn't like that so didn't drop him off on Friday. He called the sheriff and was told that they don't get involved in civil/family matters unless the child is in danger.

4. Good on the ex finding a lawyer to date. Maybe Romo could take a mistress who is also an attorney to level the playing field....?
1.) Believe me, this was my first question (I'm not wild about his fiancee so when I first heard what was going on, all I could think was how this could have been nipped in the bud with better planning). But he wasn't supposed to have them this weekend originally, a few weekends were apparently moved around recently. And I guess because everyone had been playing nice, she never saw this coming.2.) SC

3.) Good info, thanks.

4.) We both have our eyes open for our next spouses. We both kind of screwed up this time around and married for love instead of money. Apparently we got that backwards.

 
'Sweet J said:
YSR's post reminded me how much people can suck sometimes.
No kidding. I have an absolutely horrible relationship with my ex...I HATE her. But it would never enter my mind to try keep my kid from attending ex's wedding.
 
'T Bell said:
'Aerial Assault said:
'Josie Maran said:
'Aerial Assault said:
Now that I have actually started posting in here among the Jim Tanner titans, I feel secure enough to say that I hate this time when all you East Coasters go to bed and it gets empty. :kicksrock:
Some of us stay up very late, but are busy trying to manage a three-front war with France, Portugal, and the Holy Roman Empire.Medieval II: Total War pretty much devoured my entire day. :bag:
That sounds freaking awesome. I bought that but never played it. I take it you recommend?
I had Rome: Total War (prior version) and burned too many hours to count on that.
I think I have that too. :bag: I went through a phase where I bought a lot of warfare games, but then started playing sci-fi strategy and a lot of Warlight, a turn-based Risk-type game, online with other FBGs. We just moved and that did not help with time or my ability to find these games. I need to unpack the last few boxes.
 
'Josie Maran said:
'Aerial Assault said:
Now that I have actually started posting in here among the Jim Tanner titans, I feel secure enough to say that I hate this time when all you East Coasters go to bed and it gets empty. :kicksrock:
Some of us stay up very late, but are busy trying to manage a three-front war with France, Portugal, and the Holy Roman Empire.Medieval II: Total War pretty much devoured my entire day. :bag:
More addictive than Civ 3?
 
'Abraham said:
'YSR said:
I have a bit of family drama going on and would like to see if any of you lawyer-types and/or divorcees-with-kids-types have any insight.

My brother is supposed to get married next Saturday. His fiancee has three children from her previous marriage, which ended roughly 3 years ago. Her relationship with her ex is not great, but my understanding is that - for the most part - things have leveled out somewhat for the sake of the children (ages 5, 9, 12).

By way of brief background, her ex is a bit of an egomaniac and was baffled from the start that he didn't get full custody and even when he didn't get full custody, he was angry that the judge didn't set up some kind of one week on, one week off arrangement for the kids. The judge even explained to him that an arrangement like that would be hugely disruptive to the children, but he just still cannot comprehend how he doesn't have more time with the kids.

He has the kids next weekend (this was not the original plan, they have changed some weekends around to accommodate his schedule) and as of last Friday and he decided that he is not going to allow the children to come to the wedding. Not only that, he has now decided that he wants to pursue getting full custody of the kids. He happens to be dating his attorney, so this won't cost him a penny, whereas it will cost my brother something like $25k to fight it. My brother is willing to fight it, but it just kind of sucks all around.

So, back to the more immediate issue: my brother does not want to budge an inch on this wedding - he's paid thousands of dollars, people are flying in and so on. His fiancee, however, refuses to get married without her children there. The oldest child was supposed to sing two songs, the middle was the ringbearer and the youngest was supposed to be a flower girl. All three children are heartbroken.

Is there anything that can be done here? If my brother and his fiancee just decide not to hand the kids over on Friday, can they be arrested or anything? There has been some chatter about just having the kids come to my parents' house instead of going to the ex's, but I don't want the sheriff showing up at the wedding to arrest their mother or anything like that.

Sometimes I feel really whiskey tango.
1. How is it that they scheduled and planned a wedding without knowing where the kids would be?2. What state?

3. My BIL is in a situation where the mother of his son pretty much does whatever she wants with the kid and his schedule. For example, when my nephew started kindergarten it came on Monday after my BIL's weekend. Their agreement was that he takes the kid to school on Mondays. Mom didn't like that so didn't drop him off on Friday. He called the sheriff and was told that they don't get involved in civil/family matters unless the child is in danger.

4. Good on the ex finding a lawyer to date. Maybe Romo could take a mistress who is also an attorney to level the playing field....?
I am sure Romo can just read a few books this weekend and be a competent attorney by Monday. Or challenge the guy to a sand volleyball game.
 
I was just on my prep period and I saw one of my most obnoxious students walking with his mom in the parking lot. I asked him where he was headed:Kid: Dentist appointment. But don't worry I'll be back in time for 4th period.Me: Oh, good. See you then.Kid's mom looks at me and says "I'm sure you're thrilled about that." :lmao:

 
'YSR said:
I have a bit of family drama going on and would like to see if any of you lawyer-types and/or divorcees-with-kids-types have any insight.My brother is supposed to get married next Saturday. His fiancee has three children from her previous marriage, which ended roughly 3 years ago. Her relationship with her ex is not great, but my understanding is that - for the most part - things have leveled out somewhat for the sake of the children (ages 5, 9, 12). By way of brief background, her ex is a bit of an egomaniac and was baffled from the start that he didn't get full custody and even when he didn't get full custody, he was angry that the judge didn't set up some kind of one week on, one week off arrangement for the kids. The judge even explained to him that an arrangement like that would be hugely disruptive to the children, but he just still cannot comprehend how he doesn't have more time with the kids.He has the kids next weekend (this was not the original plan, they have changed some weekends around to accommodate his schedule) and as of last Friday and he decided that he is not going to allow the children to come to the wedding. Not only that, he has now decided that he wants to pursue getting full custody of the kids. He happens to be dating his attorney, so this won't cost him a penny, whereas it will cost my brother something like $25k to fight it. My brother is willing to fight it, but it just kind of sucks all around.So, back to the more immediate issue: my brother does not want to budge an inch on this wedding - he's paid thousands of dollars, people are flying in and so on. His fiancee, however, refuses to get married without her children there. The oldest child was supposed to sing two songs, the middle was the ringbearer and the youngest was supposed to be a flower girl. All three children are heartbroken.Is there anything that can be done here? If my brother and his fiancee just decide not to hand the kids over on Friday, can they be arrested or anything? There has been some chatter about just having the kids come to my parents' house instead of going to the ex's, but I don't want the sheriff showing up at the wedding to arrest their mother or anything like that.Sometimes I feel really whiskey tango.
This isn't the first time that this sort of problem has popped up between former spouses. They can undoubtedly go into court on an emergency/short notice basis and petition the court to either order that he drop the kids off at the wedding, or simply outright give custody to your future sister-in-law that weekend. Strategically it might be useful long term to put this matter before the court to show what a spiteful C U Next Tuesday former husband is. Judges are human and like to get reads of who the "good guys" and "bad guys" are in a case. Good luck.
 
I feel like there should be an official "Hot Sauce" thread - however I'm too lazy to start one. Besides - I don't start threads, I finish them.

 
'YSR said:
I have a bit of family drama going on and would like to see if any of you lawyer-types and/or divorcees-with-kids-types have any insight.My brother is supposed to get married next Saturday. His fiancee has three children from her previous marriage, which ended roughly 3 years ago. Her relationship with her ex is not great, but my understanding is that - for the most part - things have leveled out somewhat for the sake of the children (ages 5, 9, 12). By way of brief background, her ex is a bit of an egomaniac and was baffled from the start that he didn't get full custody and even when he didn't get full custody, he was angry that the judge didn't set up some kind of one week on, one week off arrangement for the kids. The judge even explained to him that an arrangement like that would be hugely disruptive to the children, but he just still cannot comprehend how he doesn't have more time with the kids.He has the kids next weekend (this was not the original plan, they have changed some weekends around to accommodate his schedule) and as of last Friday and he decided that he is not going to allow the children to come to the wedding. Not only that, he has now decided that he wants to pursue getting full custody of the kids. He happens to be dating his attorney, so this won't cost him a penny, whereas it will cost my brother something like $25k to fight it. My brother is willing to fight it, but it just kind of sucks all around.So, back to the more immediate issue: my brother does not want to budge an inch on this wedding - he's paid thousands of dollars, people are flying in and so on. His fiancee, however, refuses to get married without her children there. The oldest child was supposed to sing two songs, the middle was the ringbearer and the youngest was supposed to be a flower girl. All three children are heartbroken.Is there anything that can be done here? If my brother and his fiancee just decide not to hand the kids over on Friday, can they be arrested or anything? There has been some chatter about just having the kids come to my parents' house instead of going to the ex's, but I don't want the sheriff showing up at the wedding to arrest their mother or anything like that.Sometimes I feel really whiskey tango.
Oh, man. When I read the first sentence I thought for sure I'd have some sober GM advise to pass along, but I honestly don't know what to say here, which is rare. If I had gotten married months after my divorce instead of 2 full years, I bet my ex would have objected to having the kids there. But she mellowed out and gave her blessing when we asked if they could go to Michigan with us for the wedding. For that, I am very thankful.But this just sucks out loud. Obviously, he is using the children to administer his spite, which is wrong and I'm sure the judge in the case would agree. The first thing divorced parents are told is not to use the kids as pawns in parental warfare. That's what he is doing, so maybe the judge can be of some help here? Boy, I'm sorry, buddy. Want me and Romo to kick his asssss?
 
'Aerial Assault said:
'YSR said:
I have a bit of family drama going on and would like to see if any of you lawyer-types and/or divorcees-with-kids-types have any insight.My brother is supposed to get married next Saturday. His fiancee has three children from her previous marriage, which ended roughly 3 years ago. Her relationship with her ex is not great, but my understanding is that - for the most part - things have leveled out somewhat for the sake of the children (ages 5, 9, 12). By way of brief background, her ex is a bit of an egomaniac and was baffled from the start that he didn't get full custody and even when he didn't get full custody, he was angry that the judge didn't set up some kind of one week on, one week off arrangement for the kids. The judge even explained to him that an arrangement like that would be hugely disruptive to the children, but he just still cannot comprehend how he doesn't have more time with the kids.He has the kids next weekend (this was not the original plan, they have changed some weekends around to accommodate his schedule) and as of last Friday and he decided that he is not going to allow the children to come to the wedding. Not only that, he has now decided that he wants to pursue getting full custody of the kids. He happens to be dating his attorney, so this won't cost him a penny, whereas it will cost my brother something like $25k to fight it. My brother is willing to fight it, but it just kind of sucks all around.So, back to the more immediate issue: my brother does not want to budge an inch on this wedding - he's paid thousands of dollars, people are flying in and so on. His fiancee, however, refuses to get married without her children there. The oldest child was supposed to sing two songs, the middle was the ringbearer and the youngest was supposed to be a flower girl. All three children are heartbroken.Is there anything that can be done here? If my brother and his fiancee just decide not to hand the kids over on Friday, can they be arrested or anything? There has been some chatter about just having the kids come to my parents' house instead of going to the ex's, but I don't want the sheriff showing up at the wedding to arrest their mother or anything like that.Sometimes I feel really whiskey tango.
Crappy situation all around. Nothing to be done about the cost, unfortunately, but (and I have no knowledge of TN law), in the states in which I'm admitted, your fiancee would file an eemergency application for relief (styled an injunction, TRO, emergency order, or whatever TN practice calls it) this week, seeking an order from a judge preventing the ex from keeping the children from the wedding. Needs to be filed ASAP to ensure a hearing early next week. My guess is that just filing the application will scare off the ex; his GF may be his lawyer, but she could get sanctioned if she tries to mount of a defense of his conduct, especially on short notice and without particularly strong legal grounds for doing so. And actually, let me amend the part about the cost. I would add in a request for attorney fees because the ex's conduct is so inflammatory and harmful to the best interests of the children. Talk to a family law specialist immediately.
I'm glad you found your way to our little thread, friend. :thumbup:
 
The dot thread was killed off. Pretty funny that it took two months.I think there is more revolt going on there than the NHL thread, which tells you what is more important between sex and hockey.

 
'Stoneys said:
'St. Louis Bob said:
I made an awesome hangover breakfast sandwich this morning. A scrambled egg with leftover taco meat topped with pepper jack cheese on toasted white bread. Really, really good. I wonder if I could sell this idea to the Carls' Jr. / Red Burrito folks.
You scrambled one egg?
Yes, why? It was a farm fresh egg too. True story.
'Sweet J said:
YSR's post reminded me how much people can suck sometimes.
:goodposting: T&P's GBYSR
'Josie Maran said:
'Aerial Assault said:
Now that I have actually started posting in here among the Jim Tanner titans, I feel secure enough to say that I hate this time when all you East Coasters go to bed and it gets empty. :kicksrock:
Some of us stay up very late, but are busy trying to manage a three-front war with France, Portugal, and the Holy Roman Empire.Medieval II: Total War pretty much devoured my entire day. :bag:
More addictive than Civ 3?
I bought Medieval II off of E-Bay a couple of years ago and never even installed it. Did I give it to somebody here? Anyhow, I can't imagine anything being more addictive than Civ.
 
'Stoneys said:
'St. Louis Bob said:
I made an awesome hangover breakfast sandwich this morning. A scrambled egg with leftover taco meat topped with pepper jack cheese on toasted white bread. Really, really good. I wonder if I could sell this idea to the Carls' Jr. / Red Burrito folks.
You scrambled one egg?
Yes, why? It was a farm fresh egg too. True story.
I don't think i could have just one scrambled egg, one over easy, sure, just not one scrambled :shrug:I am a fat ******* so this just may be me.
 
Just got back from lunch at Molly's, for those of you keeping track at home, and we were seated next to 4 very cute young lasses. I'm guessing they are from Chicago since the Blues played the Hawks last night and one of them was wearing a Chicago jersey. Anyhow, I overheard them talking about being hung over but they couldn't have been too far over 21. When they got up to leave, OMG, the butts on theses broads. You could bounce a meteorite off of them. I would have taken a pic but I was with a female friend/client.

Now I'm all hot and bothered. :kicksrock:

 
'Stoneys said:
'St. Louis Bob said:
I made an awesome hangover breakfast sandwich this morning. A scrambled egg with leftover taco meat topped with pepper jack cheese on toasted white bread. Really, really good. I wonder if I could sell this idea to the Carls' Jr. / Red Burrito folks.
You scrambled one egg?
Yes, why? It was a farm fresh egg too. True story.
I don't think i could have just one scrambled egg, one over easy, sure, just not one scrambled :shrug:I am a fat ******* so this just may be me.
I just needed a little something-something to get me going.
 
Just got back from lunch at Molly's, for those of you keeping track at home, and we were seated next to 4 very cute young lasses. I'm guessing they are from Chicago since the Blues played the Hawks last night and one of them was wearing a Chicago jersey. Anyhow, I overheard them talking about being hung over but they couldn't have been too far over 21. When they got up to leave, OMG, the butts on theses broads. You could bounce a meteorite off of them. I would have taken a pic but I was with a female friend/client.Now I'm all hot and bothered. :kicksrock:
This makes me want to pick up Stu and Uni, drive to Austin and just drop stupid money on 6th street, dragging something young and drunk out of there. Hopefully Cos hasn't changed the door codes yet.
 
Just got back from lunch at Molly's, for those of you keeping track at home, and we were seated next to 4 very cute young lasses. I'm guessing they are from Chicago since the Blues played the Hawks last night and one of them was wearing a Chicago jersey. Anyhow, I overheard them talking about being hung over but they couldn't have been too far over 21. When they got up to leave, OMG, the butts on theses broads. You could bounce a meteorite off of them. I would have taken a pic but I was with a female friend/client.Now I'm all hot and bothered. :kicksrock:
This makes me want to pick up Stu and Uni, drive to Austin and just drop stupid money on 6th street, dragging something young and drunk out of there. Hopefully Cos hasn't changed the door codes yet.
I want to go to.Oh yeah, they were wearing yoga pants. :wub:
 
Just got back from lunch at Molly's, for those of you keeping track at home, and we were seated next to 4 very cute young lasses. I'm guessing they are from Chicago since the Blues played the Hawks last night and one of them was wearing a Chicago jersey. Anyhow, I overheard them talking about being hung over but they couldn't have been too far over 21. When they got up to leave, OMG, the butts on theses broads. You could bounce a meteorite off of them. I would have taken a pic but I was with a female friend/client.

Now I'm all hot and bothered. :kicksrock:
Gay guy reaction.
 
'Abraham said:
'phishphan said:
'Abraham said:
It would appear "someone" in "another thread" has posted some "unflattering things" about someone else and it attracted the attention of an "attorney" who is now contacting me via PM.... :eek:
HOW ABOUT A LINK HERE, GUY
I have to go through proper channels, bub. I'm sure you understand. I did email the "attorney" back directing them to my attorney....a man by the name of "Woz", so we can expect that thread in a day or two. :popcorn:
I think that hiring woz as a real life attorney would be the best shtick in the history of the internet.
 
YSR>

1. Family law sucks. It's unpredictable, expensive, and judges tend to just rule by the seat of their pants.

2. Generally a judge will take the best interests of the children into account, so doing something like trying to prevent them from going to their mom's wedding shouldn't be looked on too kindly.

3. The mom was stupid to schedule a wedding for a weekend when she didn't have the kids. She also could probably have called it vacation and given 30 days notice and would have been able to do it. I'm guessing--and only guessing-- based on a strict reading of the custody order she's technically in the wrong here and the ex is going to make this hell because of it.

4. The first judge that says one week on/one week off is disruptive is pretty silly. That's probably the second most typical custody arrangement.

With all that, she needs to get her lawyer to ask for an emergency hearing, or negotiate with the ex to let him see the kids more, which is what he's really leveraging for.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just got back from lunch at Molly's, for those of you keeping track at home, and we were seated next to 4 very cute young lasses. I'm guessing they are from Chicago since the Blues played the Hawks last night and one of them was wearing a Chicago jersey. Anyhow, I overheard them talking about being hung over but they couldn't have been too far over 21. When they got up to leave, OMG, the butts on theses broads. You could bounce a meteorite off of them. I would have taken a pic but I was with a female friend/client.Now I'm all hot and bothered. :kicksrock:
This makes me want to pick up Stu and Uni, drive to Austin and just drop stupid money on 6th street, dragging something young and drunk out of there. Hopefully Cos hasn't changed the door codes yet.
I want to go to.Oh yeah, they were wearing yoga pants. :wub:
God, I love yoga pants on the right girl. :wub:
 
'YSR said:
4.) We both have our eyes open for our next spouses. We both kind of screwed up this time around and married for love instead of money. Apparently we got that backwards.
Let me know if you're ever in the market to marry for incompetence, poor spelling and early onset demensia. :wub:
 
I still can't believe that people get married for a second time.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :goodposting: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao:
I even told Mrs Limp, while proposing, that if the marriage only last a week that she'd be the only person I'd ever marry. Her best friend, 40 / never married, is dating a guy that's already been married twice. I ask him openly in front of her 'you're not actually thinking of doing that again, are you?' about once a month. Which prompts wifefriend to look at me like a Filopina Nurse looks at Tanner
 
'Stoneys said:
'St. Louis Bob said:
I made an awesome hangover breakfast sandwich this morning. A scrambled egg with leftover taco meat topped with pepper jack cheese on toasted white bread. Really, really good. I wonder if I could sell this idea to the Carls' Jr. / Red Burrito folks.
You scrambled one egg?
Yes, why? It was a farm fresh egg too. True story.
I don't think i could have just one scrambled egg, one over easy, sure, just not one scrambled :shrug:I am a fat ******* so this just may be me.
I just needed a little something-something to get me going.
:thumbup: good for you...
 
Drove 2 1/2 hours from Gig Harbor to Portland, interviewed with 11 people over the course of 5.5 hours if you count the happy hour meeting. Got up and drove from Portland to Seattle and had a 2 hour meeting with the owner of that firm, then drove home in rush hour traffic.Total score: 380 miles, 7.5 hours of interviews, 7 hours driving, 0 offers, mild depression.

 
I had that conversation with my wife once...Her: If something ever happened to me or we split up would you get remarried?Me: No. No way.Her? Why? Because I spoiled it for every other woman?Me: Yes. Yes, that's it exactly.

 
Drove 2 1/2 hours from Gig Harbor to Portland, interviewed with 11 people over the course of 5.5 hours if you count the happy hour meeting. Got up and drove from Portland to Seattle and had a 2 hour meeting with the owner of that firm, then drove home in rush hour traffic.Total score: 380 miles, 7.5 hours of interviews, 7 hours driving, 0 offers, mild depression.
Did you at least stop off at Hooters?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top