bulger2holt
Footballguy
Rams ain't going anywhere. Kroenke just wanted public funds from St.Louis and he got them
Looks like the NFL has their 2nd venue picked out for LAThe NFL is having a hard time lining up more than one temporary site in case two teams were to relocate to Los Angeles. The Coliseum is the only venue willing to house a team while a stadium was being built and has made it clear it wants one pro team.While this is a headache for the league, it's not a game changer. Some might surmise that, because there's only one such vacancy, it has to mean the St. Louis Rams are the franchise that will be given the green light to move.http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-la-nfl-coliseum-20150805-story.html
If Kroenke and the Rams are getting public money to build in St. Louis, and the city is willing to go through with a plan that doesn't include an incredible financial addition from Kroenke, NFL bylaws state that Kroenke can not move the team.
The Citizens of St. Louis are still paying for the TWA Dome (now the Ed Jones Dome) that they voted to pay for about 20 years ago. The judge ruled that the tax can be extended without a vote. It's not a new tax. Just a tax that was about to expire that is being extended for this stadium. Still seems like dirty pool, but that's the reasoning...My question here is how the hell can a city make (or even a judge rule that) its denizenship pay for a stadium they didn't even approve?? I'd be livid if I lived there.
I believe I heard the new stadium was going to be heavily funded by a tax on rental cars at the airport?The Citizens of St. Louis are still paying for the TWA Dome (now the Ed Jones Dome) that they voted to pay for about 20 years ago. The judge ruled that the tax can be extended without a vote. It's not a new tax. Just a tax that was about to expire that is being extended for this stadium. Still seems like dirty pool, but that's the reasoning...My question here is how the hell can a city make (or even a judge rule that) its denizenship pay for a stadium they didn't even approve?? I'd be livid if I lived there.
Hotel and rental car tax. It's mostly tourisms taxes. Won't effect the people of STL one bit. It's not a new tax either. They are re-financing the bonds. It's going to actually be a net gain for revenue's for STL according to the financial experts. It's a huge win for the city of STL. The unions are also heavily involved in the building of it. They are pushing hard for it too. Seems everybody is on boardI believe I heard the new stadium was going to be heavily funded by a tax on rental cars at the airport?The Citizens of St. Louis are still paying for the TWA Dome (now the Ed Jones Dome) that they voted to pay for about 20 years ago. The judge ruled that the tax can be extended without a vote. It's not a new tax. Just a tax that was about to expire that is being extended for this stadium. Still seems like dirty pool, but that's the reasoning...My question here is how the hell can a city make (or even a judge rule that) its denizenship pay for a stadium they didn't even approve?? I'd be livid if I lived there.
Rams ain't going anywhere. Kroenke just wanted public funds from St.Louis and he got them
Gee, a whole $187 million? I bet Kroenke can't wait to spend $800 million to keep the Rams in St. Louis now.The stadium is expected to cost $998 million, $187 million of which would come from tax incentives under Missouri governor Jay Nixon's financial plan estimate.
Except KroenkeHotel and rental car tax. It's mostly tourisms taxes. Won't effect the people of STL one bit. It's not a new tax either. They are re-financing the bonds. It's going to actually be a net gain for revenue's for STL according to the financial experts. It's a huge win for the city of STL. The unions are also heavily involved in the building of it. They are pushing hard for it too. Seems everybody is on boardI believe I heard the new stadium was going to be heavily funded by a tax on rental cars at the airport?The Citizens of St. Louis are still paying for the TWA Dome (now the Ed Jones Dome) that they voted to pay for about 20 years ago. The judge ruled that the tax can be extended without a vote. It's not a new tax. Just a tax that was about to expire that is being extended for this stadium. Still seems like dirty pool, but that's the reasoning...My question here is how the hell can a city make (or even a judge rule that) its denizenship pay for a stadium they didn't even approve?? I'd be livid if I lived there.
He might not have a choiceExcept KroenkeHotel and rental car tax. It's mostly tourisms taxes. Won't effect the people of STL one bit. It's not a new tax either. They are re-financing the bonds. It's going to actually be a net gain for revenue's for STL according to the financial experts. It's a huge win for the city of STL. The unions are also heavily involved in the building of it. They are pushing hard for it too. Seems everybody is on boardI believe I heard the new stadium was going to be heavily funded by a tax on rental cars at the airport?The Citizens of St. Louis are still paying for the TWA Dome (now the Ed Jones Dome) that they voted to pay for about 20 years ago. The judge ruled that the tax can be extended without a vote. It's not a new tax. Just a tax that was about to expire that is being extended for this stadium. Still seems like dirty pool, but that's the reasoning...My question here is how the hell can a city make (or even a judge rule that) its denizenship pay for a stadium they didn't even approve?? I'd be livid if I lived there.
The league is not going to push around the second wealthiest owner in the NFL.He might not have a choice
If Kroenke wanted to go toe to toe with the NFL, he has the means to do so and probably win.The league is not going to push around the second wealthiest owner in the NFL.He might not have a choice
What good is being a billionaire if you have to shower with a Dasani bottle? Enjoy California.The league is not going to push around the second wealthiest owner in the NFL.He might not have a choice
500 million from STL from the bondscstu said:bulger2holt said:Rams ain't going anywhere. Kroenke just wanted public funds from St.Louis and he got themGee, a whole $187 million? I bet Kroenke can't wait to spend $800 million to keep the Rams in St. Louis now.In comparison, Inglewood is offering upwards of $100 million in tax breaks.The stadium is expected to cost $998 million, $187 million of which would come from tax incentives under Missouri governor Jay Nixon's financial plan estimate.
500 million from STL from the bondscstu said:bulger2holt said:Rams ain't going anywhere. Kroenke just wanted public funds from St.Louis and he got themGee, a whole $187 million? I bet Kroenke can't wait to spend $800 million to keep the Rams in St. Louis now.In comparison, Inglewood is offering upwards of $100 million in tax breaks.The stadium is expected to cost $998 million, $187 million of which would come from tax incentives under Missouri governor Jay Nixon's financial plan estimate.
250 million in G4
150 million in PSL's
Naming rights
Sounds like it's nearly 1 billion in free money for Stan. He's only on the hook for 200 million
I thought I saw new projections that had Kroenke closer to $400 Mil. Either way, the city is still putting in a large piece on this stadium project.
True but they really screwed up building the dome in the first place. Those were the plans to keep the Cardinals in town so the place was 10 years old already when they started construction. Then they really screwed up when they agreed to such ridiculous terms.Kronke isn't going to pay for a stadium in STL....he's done with that town....they screwed up 3 years ago when he asked to re-do the dome and they offered 200 million when he needed 700 million
Kroenke is going to have a tough time getting the NFL to side with him over the Chargers and Raiders in Carson. 2 > 1Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.
Tough to say. The Rams are further along with the land and building plan.I dont think 3 teams will be in southern california so who gets left out?
They've side with Kroenke on everything else, not sure why they would stop now. Pretty sure Kroenke leaves no matter what.Kroenke is going to have a tough time getting the NFL to side with him over the Chargers and Raiders in Carson. 2 > 1Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.
Oakland probablyI dont think 3 teams will be in southern california so who gets left out?
They forced him to sell his 2 Denver franchises to his wife and son, so no, they haven't sided with him on everything elseThey've side with Kroenke on everything else, not sure why they would stop now. Pretty sure Kroenke leaves no matter what.Kroenke is going to have a tough time getting the NFL to side with him over the Chargers and Raiders in Carson. 2 > 1Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.Oakland probablyI dont think 3 teams will be in southern california so who gets left out?
Too bad he won't have any control over the teams he gave to his wife and son. They really smacked him down there.They forced him to sell his 2 Denver franchises to his wife and son, so no, they haven't sided with him on everything elseThey've side with Kroenke on everything else, not sure why they would stop now. Pretty sure Kroenke leaves no matter what.Kroenke is going to have a tough time getting the NFL to side with him over the Chargers and Raiders in Carson. 2 > 1Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.Oakland probablyI dont think 3 teams will be in southern california so who gets left out?
You missed the point. The point is, he had to follow their rules.massraider said:Too bad he won't have any control over the teams he gave to his wife and son. They really smacked him down there.bulger2holt said:They forced him to sell his 2 Denver franchises to his wife and son, so no, they haven't sided with him on everything elseSt. Louis Bob said:They've side with Kroenke on everything else, not sure why they would stop now. Pretty sure Kroenke leaves no matter what.bulger2holt said:Kroenke is going to have a tough time getting the NFL to side with him over the Chargers and Raiders in Carson. 2 > 1St. Louis Bob said:Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.
Oakland probablybicycle_seat_sniffer said:I dont think 3 teams will be in southern california so who gets left out?
is this because you want the rams back? or you like SD staying in SD potentially
Yep, heard this months ago. I also understand everything at Rams Park is bar coded so it can be quickly and easily moved. THEY'RE GONE.On PFT there was an article by Jim Thomas of the local St. Louis paper. He is reporting from Oxnard, where they will have joint practices with the Cowboys Mon-Tues and their own Wed before the next preseason game.
Incidentally, there was also an article in PFT today in which Jerry Jones expressed his preference for the Inglewood site. He isn't an NFL spokesperson, but could be an influential voice as the most valuable franchise in the league (though not necessarily among the old guard). It also mentioned the Carson bid may be on "life support", and speculated that if the relocation fee plays a role in the decision process, that could favor Kroenke. Thomas, in his article, passed along rumors that the Rams may be scouting sites in the Thousand Oaks area for a permanent practice facility, and that the team has informed their equipment people they will be moving them West.
They finally took these down last week and put up a big Tavon Austin decal.Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.
How odd would it be if Kroenke uses the Raiders' win in court against the NFL to move his team to LA and leave the Raiders SOL?They've side with Kroenke on everything else, not sure why they would stop now. Pretty sure Kroenke leaves no matter what.Kroenke is going to have a tough time getting the NFL to side with him over the Chargers and Raiders in Carson. 2 > 1Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.
Because spamos family wants southern california to be theirs. They have fans up in la already. Dont want to be left just in sdTDorBust said:I still don't understand, why would owners want SD to move?
http://fox5sandiego.com/2015/01/29/san-diego-ranks-as-5th-richest-city-in-u-s/
San Diego will be just fine if they can get a winning product on the field. I would have to assume there is a lot more money to be made in SD than St Louis long term.
Also not sure if the new numbers are out but both Oakland and San Diego with terrible teams have 3x operating income than St Louis.
http://www.forbes.com/nfl-valuations/list/
So again why wouldn't every owner want St Louis to lose their team out of these three?
In Oxnard (google where it is)...for a team that hasn't moved here yet.5K LA Rams fans out of 16 million people in LA? Not too impressed, especially for not having football in 25 years.
I heard this too.Oxnard is a small two field facility adjacent to a Marriott Hotel, with a modest parking lot. It isn't equipped to host 100,000 people.
The lot filled up and many people were no doubt turned away.
What has been the average attendance in St. Louis, 1,100? Not sure where they practice there, Oxnard is about an hour drive North of LA.
I heard in St. Louis they aren't allowing Keep the Rams signs at training camp practices, but Kroenke had no problem with the Bring the Rams Back signs in LA (of course, probably that would be the call of Jerry Jones, but Kroenke could have had input).
Too bad Scottenheimer couldn't have been bar coded for quick and easy moving earlier.
Nah, the NFL WANTS Kroenke in L.A. It won't come to that.How odd would it be if Kroenke uses the Raiders' win in court against the NFL to move his team to LA and leave the Raiders SOL?They've side with Kroenke on everything else, not sure why they would stop now. Pretty sure Kroenke leaves no matter what.Kroenke is going to have a tough time getting the NFL to side with him over the Chargers and Raiders in Carson. 2 > 1Rams are GONE. Heard today that Kronke is giving the Nuggets and Avalanche to his wife to avoid the cross ownership rule. I only hope that his wife divorces him. That would be so great.
It should also be noted that at the stadium there are still big vinyl window decals of Sam Bradford and Jake Long up. They.Don't.Care.
It looks like this 20th year will be my last as a season ticket holder. Kind of looking forward to not having to put up with these a-holes any longer.
In Oxnard (google where it is)...for a team that hasn't moved here yet.5K LA Rams fans out of 16 million people in LA? Not too impressed, especially for not having football in 25 years.