What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

"Hannibal" the TV show (1 Viewer)

Bob Magaw said:
one of the lab techs looks familiar, i think he was the from canadian comedy series (originally shown in US late '80s to early '90s), kids in the hall...
Correct

 
Gr00vus said:
Bob Magaw said:
mikkelson is a great lecter...

as noted above he was the villain in the bond reboot vehicle, casino royale...

also in viking movie valhalla rising (streaming on netflix), by the director of drive and only god forgives...
Valhalla Rising was one weird movie. Not sure if I liked it or not.

Mikkelson also played Sir Tristan (awesomely IMO) in the Clive Owen/Keira Knightly King Arthur (2004 I think), he also was Perseus's mentor in the 2010 Clash of the Titans. He's been in a ton of Danish stuff too - had a critically acclaimed one called The Hunt in 2012 where he played an innocent but alleged child molester.

Guy's a good actor.
I liked part of it (the score, at times, for one)...the director doesn't make good feelin family films (except the part in drive where albert brooks stabs that guy in the eye with a fork)...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
below sounds like show creator's intention for multi-season (seven, ambitious?) story arc, with planned for seasons 4-5-6 revisting three of the four movies in the franchise...

"Fuller plans for the show to run for seven seasons: the first three consisting of original material, the fourth covering Red Dragon, the fifth The Silence of the Lambs, the sixth Hannibal, and the seventh an original storyline resolving Hannibal's ending."
This is interesting. I havent started watching Season 1 yet, but this has me hoping it lasts for this full run. I think if it makes it to Season 4, there would be more buzz about it and a very good chance of going 7 seasons.

 
not sure how good the ratings are, just know it was picked up for second season.

you make a good point, I agree...

i'm on second to last episode of first (only so far) season... great TV, some of the best I've seen, maybe not breaking bad or the wire, but fills the programming/content void in their absence... great writing and acting... I wasn't sure about the will graham at first, but now I think his casting was fine...

even the side characters like Abel Gideon are well drawn...

I never really watched X-Files except for maybe a few time (even though I liked supernatural, sci fi or horror series like twilight zone, outer limits, star trek and night stalker)... I completely missed Gillian Anderson as lecter's psychiatrist, my wife had to point it out... I guess I hadn't seen her in a while... maybe her acting chops were better than I credited her with... I thought of her as kind of perky, and in this role she is very reserved, composed and almost serene...

POSSIBLE SPOILERS BELOW

lecter doesn't seem too averse to will being dead... he knew he was going to the music shop (or sent him?) despite tobias (not funke!) predicting/warning he would kill those sent after him before disappearing (than again, how would you broach THAT subject)... OTOH, maybe it was a case of wanting Tobias dead at all costs, since he knew his identity, and the death of graham being acceptable trade off as collateral damage... if graham were warned, they would almost certainly have been more likely to take Tobias alive, and he could have talked...

but also by conspiring with his neurologist to withhold diagnosis of a brain infection and let graham continue to think his symptoms were caused by mental illness and possible psychotic break (which i guess is why it became necessary ro murder him), he probably intuits graham's conscious mind will eventually figure out what his subconscious is telling him (not sure if graham has shared elk visions with him, but I think so?)...

a lot of people know lecter's dark side, or he has confided in them... he covered up the girl's murder (but than, i think she figured out he had called her father hobbs, leading to what must be for him an uneasy, potentially treacherous alliance - a tightrope for writers), tobias, gideon, the woman in the great cotard's syndrome episode which connected a few running narrative strands (including dr. chilton)...

I wonder if how they depicted the POV when lecter appeared faceless to the cotard syndrome sufferer is how your perceptions would really be presented to you... I hadn't thought about it, but if I did, it would seem you would see a coherent face, but not recognize it?

but it was a cool attempt to represent what such a person's experience might be like... she didn't see a face at all, but lecter had no way of knowing to what degree, or if she might be capable of reconstructing a retroactive memory... thus the hyperbaric chamber prepped for unwitting self immolation...

graham is a tailor made patsy for lecter to frame with his dissociative condition...

I agree this is as dark a subject matter as I've seen on network TV... much more so than gilligan's island or the brady bunch...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The easiest way to appreciate the greatness of NBC's "Hannibal," which begins its second season tomorrow night at 10, is to look at almost any of the other serial killer dramas that are littering primetime, from CBS' unkillable "Criminal Minds" to FOX's moronic "The Following" to A&E's upcoming Chloe Sevigny-waster "Those Who Kill." There are too many of these shows, and almost all of them get off on the same fetishized scenes of bound-and-gagged victims whimpering while their leering abductor prepares to do something horrible to them, and almost all of them feature heroes who often seem too stupid to function, the better to allow their cackling opponents free rein.HBO's brilliant "True Detective" has managed to sidestep most of these sick, tired landmines by focusing almost entirely on its two heroes and what motivates them, avoiding graphic imagery whenever possible, and leaving its killer as an unseen bogeyman until sometime late in the season.

As the latest story about the most famous, disgusting fictional serial killer of them all, "Hannibal" doesn't have that option. It has to walk right into that terrible minefield to show us the efforts of not only Hannibal the Cannibal, but many of the lesser killers he helps FBI profiler Will Graham hunt and capture. And yet it is so much richer and more thoughtful in both style and substance that it transcends its genre and exposes those other shows as the exploitation garbage that they are.

Adapted from a few passages of Thomas Harris' first Hannibal Lecter novel, "Red Dragon," by writer Bryan Fuller, with a stunning visual style crafted by director David Slade, "Hannibal" is unapologetically graphic nightmare fuel, but presented in such an imaginative way that it almost plays like science fiction. When I spoke with Fuller at the end of the show's low-rated first season(*), he said that with each killer and each crime scene, he aimed for the same "larger-than-life, operatic quality" he found in Harris' books, because real life has too much depressing violence in it, and thus, "the more real the murder is, the less I'm interested in it."

(*) Its ratings compared to "Criminal Minds" or "The Follow" suggest, unfortunately, that there remains a robust public appetite for the trashy version of this kind of story.

So in season 1, we got one killer who used his victims' bodies to grow mushrooms, and another who turned them into angels with wings made of flesh — grisly images that at the same time felt so far removed from reality that they seemed less to be crimes than twisted works of art. It's strange to use the word "beautiful" to describe a show about a cannibal serial killer, and yet "Hannibal" is overflowing with dark beauty. So much thought and care is put into every image, every sound, every single element of the show that you may be startled by how pretty you find it all. Even something as familiar as a cotton swab taking a DNA sample from a human mouth looks like something that could be displayed in a museum. The presentation of Dr. Lecter's food alone is so mouth-watering that it has made me question exactly where I stand on the cannibalism question.

Beyond that, it remains remarkable how Fuller managed to pare away all the baggage Lecter and company have acquired over the decades, through both the various Lecter movies and their many imitators, to get to a dangerous, exciting core. Mads Mikkelsen is an understated, hypnotic Hannibal, absolutely believable as the supervillain the bad doctor has to be for the story to work, yet hinting at unexpected vulnerabilities in the character. (Lecter does terrible things to Will for his own convenience, but there's genuine sadness in his eyes as he talks about what's happened to his "friend.") Hugh Dancy breathed new life into Will Graham, making this a rare Lecter story where his nemesis is at least as compelling, and Laurence Fishburne has been wonderful providing a more vulnerable, human take on Will's FBI boss, Jack Crawford.

At the end of the first season, Fuller pulled off a clever role reversal: Will is framed for Lecter's crimes, imprisoned in the familiar Baltimore psychiatric hospital where the movie versions of Will and Clarice Starling would visit him, while Lecter takes his place as Crawford's top profiler.

It was a memorable final image for the season, putting each man in the same hospital corridor where we always think of them, but on the wrong sides of the bars. But it also set up a a situation that many a show would have difficulty sustaining without making its heroes look like complete incompetents. (Rest in peace, all you murdered FBI agents from "The Following" season 1.) Through the season's first four episodes, though, Fuller and company pull off the balancing act. Putting Will behind bars only sharpens his many edges, while having Lecter actively chasing other serial killers — often taking pointers from them, always with his own agenda — adds an unpredictable new layer to the show's standalone stories. (As happened last year, sometimes Crawford's team catches a killer in an hour, sometimes they need two, and sometimes there's no outside killer at all.) And the season's riveting opening sequence (which NBC has already put online to hype the premiere, though I would advise you watch it within the context of the episode itself) creates a new piece of tension that hangs over everything that follows.

The last thing television needs is more serial killer dramas. But when they're this well made, this smart and creative and unexpectedly funny? Then, yes, more "Hannibal," please.
 
Better Than Silence: Hannibal on NBC is the best Thomas Harris adaptation to date.

There are five movies based on the fictional world that Thomas Harris, over the course of four novels, has populated with FBI agents, colorful serial killers, and, most importantly, the cannibal psychiatrist Hannibal Lecter. One is a cult classic (Manhunter, based on the novel Red Dragon) and one is a classic classic (The Silence of the Lambs, of course). The other three—Hannibal, Red Dragon, and Hannibal Rising—have very little to recommend them. I have a soft spot for the campy fun of Hannibal, but it’s an awful movie that basically turns Hannibal into a superhero. Red Dragon tells the same story as Manhunter, but the results are not nearly as powerful, mostly because Ed Norton can’t come close to matching William Petersen’s haunted Will Graham. Hannibal Rising is a nauseating mess that proves no one needed to see Hannibal’s origin story. It’s basically the second Star Wars trilogy of thrillers.
The NBC series Hannibal, the second season of which premieres this Friday, surely arose from the same motivation that spawned the regrettable post-Silence movies: a money-grubbing yearning to milk Hannibal Lecter for all he’s worth. Yet somehow it has become an engrossing, psychologically dense show that is also visually stunning. Hannibal is the kind of gem seldom found on network TV. It’s more than that, even: It’s the best version of Thomas Harris’ work yet—yes, even better than Manhunter and The Silence of the Lambs.
How is this possible? It probably helps that the show is also the loosest adaptation of Harris’ work so far. Rather than adapt one of the Lecter novels, Hannibal is inspired by events mentioned but not depicted in Red Dragon—specifically, the time before Hannibal was caught, when Will Graham was an active FBI profiler. Avoiding the all-too-familiar Hannibal-in-prison scenario and expanding on intriguing, unexplored events, the show manages to nail the best qualities of Harris’ work: the psychological nuance, the beautiful horror, and the black, black comedy.
The show’s pre-Red Dragon setting is crucial, as it provides the series with its chief asset: FBI profiler Will Graham, played heartbreakingly by Hugh Dancy. Will is a more interesting protagonist than Clarice Starling—or, for that matter, Will Graham in Manhunter. Clarice, while memorably brought to life by Jodie Foster, is too purely good to be all that engaging as a character. Will, on the other hand, the man who eventually catches Hannibal, is as complex as Hannibal himself. He’s also as dark as you can probably get without actually becoming a serial killer.
And one of the show’s creative coups is its depiction of his inner life. Will has an almost supernatural ability to get in the heads of serial killers, and the show dramatizes this ability by presenting mental landscapes in which Will imagines himself committing the actual deeds. This technique, coupled with Dancy’s superb acting, shows how Will’s “talent” is also a horrifying form of self-torture. For Will, the ultimate horror movie is playing in his mind, and he’s the villain. Will’s extreme empathy is one of the key details from Red Dragon that Hannibal expands on and heightens. (Another: Will’s love of dogs. He’s always picking up strays.)
At the heart of Silence are the conversations between Hannibal and Clarice, and the odd, strangely touching bond they create. But Hannibal and Will have an even more intricate and enjoyable relationship, one of the most complex on TV and also the best relationship in any Harris adaptation. As the series begins, Jack Crawford (Laurence Fishburne), the head of the FBI’s Behavioral Sciences division, has pulled Will out of the classroom to help catch Garrett Jacob Hobbs, the Minnesota Shrike, a serial killer who has been murdering young brunettes. Will does catch—and has to kill—the Shrike. Jack knows that this sort of trauma jeopardizes Will’s mental health, and that’s where Hannibal comes in: He’s there to support Will. This, of course, is a bit like bringing in the Coyote to support a wounded Road Runner. Gradually, a serial killer and the guy who can think like a serial killer become the ultimate frenemies, and their multilayered, darkly humorous, highly open-to-interpretation conversations are delicious. The show smartly plunders some of the better lines from Red Dragon, such as a letter from Hannibal to Will that becomes dialogue on the show: “When you were so depressed after you shot Mr. Garrett Jacob Hobbs to death, it wasn’t the act that got you down, was it? Really, didn’t you feel bad because killing him felt so good?”
The Will/Hannibal dynamic is not the only interesting relationship on the series. Jack forms a bizarre triangle with the central twosome, an awkward state of affairs made highly watchable thanks to Fishburne’s understated performance. And the conversations between Hannibal and his own psychiatrist, Dr. Bedelia Du Maurier—played with icy cool by Gillian Anderson—nearly steal the show: On the couch talking to Du Maurier, Hannibal offers manipulations wrapped in honesty wrapped in more manipulations.
What about Hannibal himself? I won’t say that Mads Mikkelsen is better than Anthony Hopkins in the role. But he is subtler, letting the audience’s knowledge of the character fill in the blanks that he sometimes gives us, and relishing the character’s life as a doctor, cook, and—much to his own surprise—friend. Showrunner Bryan Fuller has compared Hannibal to Frasier Crane, which helps explain why these great FBI minds don’t suspect what’s in Hannibal’s meals. (Which are, like everything on the show, gorgeous—the show is a foodie’s dream. It’s also a dream analyst’s dream, with its mind-shaking visuals and Lynchian strangeness.) Mikkelsen has rescued Lecter from the hamminess of Anthony Hopkins’ post-Silence performances, proving that it is possible to consume larger servings of the man without ruining the not-so-good doctor. It doesn’t hurt that this version of Lecter is new and fresh: He’s a practicing psychiatrist, a practicing cannibal, a prolific serial killer, and the most popular dinner party host in town. This is a Hannibal we’ve never seen before, and it’s a treat.
Naturally, Hannibal isn’t perfect. As is too often the case, the female characters are less developed than the men, with the exception of Anderson’s Du Maurier. Dr. Alana Bloom (Caroline Dhavernas) is a conflicted friend/love interest for Will, but so far the show’s writers seem more confused than the character. Dhavernas has shown she has real acting chops, so I’m optimistic that Bloom will become more vital and necessary in the new season. Tabloid writer Freddie Lounds (Lara Jean Chorostecki) is one-note, but she has shown some potential to be more. It would also be nice to see more of Jack Crawford’s wife, Phyllis, played by the terrific Gina Torres.
Male-centrism aside, Hannibal, in addition to improving on Silence and Manhunter, also has one up on most TV dramas, for a simple and refreshing reason: The ending is not in doubt. We don’t have to wonder whether Hannibal will go to jail, die, or suffer some less predictable end. We know exactly where he’s headed: Dr. Chilton’s asylum, so he can exchange pleasantries with Clarice. And we don’t have to wonder what will happen to Will either: He’s going to catch Hannibal. (There is talk that the show might eventually adapt the events of Red Dragon and even Silence, but we know how they end, too.) Without incessant finale speculation, it’s easier to enjoy every minute along the way. I wish more TV shows would find a way around finale anxiety. Hannibal dodges it completely.
And with that bullet dodged, we shouldn’t be surprised to see Thomas Harris’ ideas shine brighter on the small screen. In the post-Sopranos age, it is probably easier to successfully adapt novels—even as freely as Hannibal does—on the small screen. Their details can be more patiently unfolded over numerous episodes, rather than condensed into two hours or so. It has become a cliché to say that prestige dramas are novelistic, but it’s true: The episodes are like chapters, and there’s plenty of room for minor characters. With that in mind, it was probably just a matter of time before a TV version of Thomas Harris surpassed the cinematic creations, however good they were.
Sorry, Clarice.
 
This show is very twisted. Love it. Just wish it wasn't buried on a network's Friday night lineup. If this was an HBO Sunday show, the buzz would be enormous.

 
The fact that this has been moved to Friday night, in conjunction with the flash-forward in the 1st episode of this season, means that Season 2 is the last one, no?

 
The fact that this has been moved to Friday night, in conjunction with the flash-forward in the 1st episode of this season, means that Season 2 is the last one, no?
God, NBC is worthless. If this show were on HBO or Showtime or AMC, it'd be a jewel in the crown. NBC decides to put it in their f'ng dumpster.

 
The fact that this has been moved to Friday night, in conjunction with the flash-forward in the 1st episode of this season, means that Season 2 is the last one, no?
Not particularly. Expectations on Friday are lower and since it's a co-production NBC needs even less ratings to break even.

 
The fact that this has been moved to Friday night, in conjunction with the flash-forward in the 1st episode of this season, means that Season 2 is the last one, no?
Not exactly. Not a good sign but not a portent of doom either. This show lives in a strange middle ground in the TV world. NBC is kind of renting it from an international production consortium in a unique arrangement. The threshold for NBC to profit is incredibly low, basically, any viewers put the deal in the black. It's just a matter of whether the network thinks it has something even more profitable to replace it with on the bench, and even so they could still move Hannibal to the summer doldrums where it only has to out-profit a rerun of Dateline to stay alive. This is the kind of show that can be dropped anywhere in the schedule and live off of people's DVRs finding wherever it lands.

As far as the opening:

Crawford finding out the "truth" about Hannibal, if that's what the opening implies, does not mean the show ends. Hannibal getting exposed does not end the series, the plan, IIRC, is to run through the events of Manhunter/Red Dragon, Silence of the Lambs, and maybe even beyond (Hannibal back on the loose after Silence and the events of the Ray Liotta movie) if the show runs that long.
 
Indeed. Too bad there are seven people watching this show.
idiots NBC exec's figured Dracula was a bust, Grimm is doing well so the Grimm crowd will stay to watch.. :rolleyes:

Problem is, if the "Grimm Crowd" wasn't watching at the beginning, this isn't the type of show you can just jump into mid-season.

 
Indeed. Too bad there are seven people watching this show.
idiots NBC exec's figured Dracula was a bust, Grimm is doing well so the Grimm crowd will stay to watch.. :rolleyes:

Problem is, if the "Grimm Crowd" wasn't watching at the beginning, this isn't the type of show you can just jump into mid-season.
If this show, which would be bigger than "True Detective", "Bates Motel", or "American Horror Story" if it were handled properly on a cable network, gets axed because of the idiots at the network, it will be a travishamockery.

 
Still a fan. Rooting for a long run.

But a weird thing about the last episode. Will told the doc to look for a "subtle clue" that the killer would have left behind on the muralist-killer's corpse. She hit on the thread holes covering up the punctures or whatever. Then she looks and the guy is missing a kidney. How was that not noticed in autopsy? Or, at least, wouldn't Hannibal have expected that to be noticed? Is a missing organ supposed to be a subtle clue? Or did I misunderstand something?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Indeed. Too bad there are seven people watching this show.
I'm one of the seven, this show is pretty damn good. I do worry about the move to Friday, but maybe it'll catch on with DVR folks and we'll get some more seasons.

Also agree with Homer, maybe the cable networks will be interested if NBC blows it. Problem of course is that transferring contracts and rights in Hollywood is a #####.

 
Still a fan. Rooting for a long run.

But a weird thing about the last episode. Will told the doc to look for a "subtle clue" that the killer would have left behind on the muralist-killer's corpse. She hit on the thread holes covering up the punctures or whatever. Then she looks and the guy is missing a kidney. How was that not noticed in autopsy? Or, at least, wouldn't Hannibal have expected that to be noticed? Is a missing organ supposed to be a subtle clue? Or did I misunderstand something?
My wife and I discussed the exact same thing.

 
Sarnoff said:
Still a fan. Rooting for a long run.

But a weird thing about the last episode. Will told the doc to look for a "subtle clue" that the killer would have left behind on the muralist-killer's corpse. She hit on the thread holes covering up the punctures or whatever. Then she looks and the guy is missing a kidney. How was that not noticed in autopsy? Or, at least, wouldn't Hannibal have expected that to be noticed? Is a missing organ supposed to be a subtle clue? Or did I misunderstand something?
Yeah, that seemed totally off to me. Really out of character for the show.

Still a great episode though. Too bad we're gonna lose Asia Doc*...she was kind of interesting.

*I'm just assuming here. I don't see how Hannibal maintains his anonymity if she makes it out alive.

 
I know there's probably some borderline racism in what I'm about to say...but for anyone who has watched "Banshee"...tell me honestly...Dr. Beverly Katz looks EXACTLY like the Asian dude from Banshee...with a wig a bit of makeup.

It's so strikingly exact that it takes me out of the story for a bit...thankfully it has kinda resolved itself though.

 
It is really remarkable the ways in which "Hannibal" manages to be simultaneously restrained and cuckoo bananas in an episode like "Futamono."On the one hand, it's an episode where Dr. Lecter turns one murder victim into a human tree, guts another and hangs him with fish hooks, forces Abel Gideon to eat his own amuptated (and cooked-in-clay!) leg, and features the shocking last-second revelation that Miriam Lass is alive (minus the arm Hannibal chopped off to taunt Jack). Oh, and there's also the matter of Will imagining himself growing a massive set of antlers when Hannibal comes to visit him at the hospital. It's an hour full of insane, baroque imagery, even by "Hannibal" standards, and mixed with huge plot twists that feel genuinely surprising and fun rather than a contrivance to make people want to see the next episode immediately.

But on the other hand, Bryan Fuller and company are sure taking their sweet time in this elaborate game between Hannibal and Will, with Jack and Gideon and Alana and Dr. Chilton all as players in their own way. There's an overt nod to the screen legend of the character when Chilton coins the "Hannibal the Cannibal" nickname, and a winking one when Hannibal mentions the census taker who once woke him from his slumber (the rest of that story was explained in perhaps the most famous line from "Silence of the Lambs"), and Jack certainly allows for the possibility that Will is correct about Hannibal being the Ripper and eating his victims. But it's also clear here that Hannibal is several moves ahead of either Agent Crawford or Will Graham, and that the Hannibal/Jack kitchen brawl is still a ways into the future.

After going on another murder spree in order to host another dinner party, for instance, Hannibal also manages to make sure that Jack is served animal meat(*) in case he thought to get it tested. He seduces Dr. Bloom — succeeding in an area where Will failed — and (after apparently drugging her to sleep deeply) is able to use her as his alibi for Gideon's abduction from the hospital. For a moment, it seems as if Jack and his forensics guys have outwitted Lecter and found Miriam without his knowledge, but the way the rescue scene is intercut with Hannibal playing his harpsichord, I'm guessing this is just the latest movement in the composition he spends much of the episode writing and discussing. In a straightforward situation, Miriam would identify Dr. Lecter as the man who kidnapped her and took her arm, but without having seen episode 7, my guess is she has a very different story to tell — assuming such a long time of confinement and physical and emotional torture hasn't simply wiped away all traces the promising young agent Jack once mentored.

(*) Which makes me wonder if all the food at that meal was animal, just in case, while Hannibal has a fridge full of pre-made human meals to enjoy over the coming weeks.

I really can't overstate how well-crafted every piece of the show is at this point. Tree Man is among the more haunting murder tableaux the show has given us (how I'd love to be a fly on the wall as Fuller and company brainstorm what objects a human body can be made to resemble in death), but all the visuals are dazzling, whether special effects like Will's enormous antlers or Lecter's musical notes turning into flowers on Tree Man, or simply the composition of shots and the way everything is seamlessly edited together to enhance the story. (Note how quickly we jump to a close-up of Alana's face right after Will asks Jack, "Who does he have to kill before you open your eyes?")

There are probably some storytelling things I should be questioning, like whether the Chesapeake Ripper's ongoing activities should be enough to cast doubt over Will's guilt, whether or not anyone believes Hannibal to be the Ripper. But the acting, the writing, the directing, the music and everything else is just so beautiful and evocative that at a certain point in each episode (other than an unusual dud like the courtroom show), I feel less like I'm watching it than that I'm being immersed in it.
 
This is the best show on network TV right now. The beautifully dark imagery, visuals, music, acting, writing and everything else is just top notch.

 
This show is incredible. A little slow in story development, but that might also be the culture we live in now (need answers immediately rather than having to wait). This may be due to the fact that I tried to watch last week's episode while slightly distracted, but did it seem to jump around in the story?

Next week looks incredible.

 
One of the best aspects of the show is how they've gone just enough off the reservation when comparing the show to the Books/Movies that you really have no idea where they are headed..

Last weeks "killing" of Dr. Chilton really was a "wait.. Did they really just do that?? :jawdrop: " moment..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One of the best aspects of the show is how they've gone just enough off the reservation when comparing the show to the Books/Movies that you really have no idea where they are headed..

Last weeks "killing" of Dr. Chilton really was a "wait.. Did they really just do that?? :jawdrop: " moment..
:goodposting: That was an oh #### moment to say the least.

 
The guy sewed into the stomach of the horse was the first murder that was actually more gruesome than artistic.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top