Dinsy Ejotuz
Footballguy
Isn't Project Veritas the outfit run by a felon that's been caught multiple times doctoring video?
Did you notice he didn't ask any of the black people if they thought voter IDs were racist. Just asked black people in NY if they had internet and if they knew where and could get to the DMV.Or you could, just, you know, listen to an actual African-American working to prevent voter suppression who offers rock-solid reasoning as to why Voter ID laws are unfair: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n5RuLno1O8s
But yeah, these cutesy "man on the street" set-ups really get to the heart of the issue. Thanks, I guess.
Hey now, he was merely charged with a felony -- stemming from an incident in which he and 3 cohorts broke into the office of a U.S. Senator with the apparent intent to bug her phone. (I say "apparent" because nothing was proven aside from the fact that when they were caught, they were wearing phony "telephone repairman" uniforms.)Isn't Project Veritas the outfit run by a felon that's been caught multiple times doctoring video?
Yes...yes it is.Isn't Project Veritas the outfit run by a felon that's been caught multiple times doctoring video?
Just multiply x50 for each bus and you'll be closemsommer said:I wonder if someone will tell us how much voter fraud there was in New Hampshire next time around
545 people. Due to a computer glitch. This isn’t a crisis.
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced that eight Iowa counties have more voter registrations than their eligible voting-age population. According to Judicial Watch’s analysis of data released by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) in 2019 and the most recent U.S. Census Bureau’s five-year American Community Survey, eight Iowa counties are on the list of 378 counties nationwide that have more voter registrations than citizens living there who are old enough to vote, i.e., counties where registration rates exceed 100%. These 378 counties combined had about 2.5 million registrations over the 100%-registered mark. In Iowa, there are at least 18,658 “extra names” on the voting rolls in the eight counties at issue.
Under the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 (NVRA), Judicial Watch sent notice-of-violation letters to 19 large counties in five states (California, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Virginia, and Colorado) that it intends to sue unless the jurisdictions take steps to comply with the law and remove ineligible voter registrations. Section 8 of the National Voter Registration Act requires jurisdictions to take reasonable efforts to remove ineligible registrations from its rolls.
Judicial watch cites some data, which is a bit incomplete. Sec of state says they are incorrect but cites no data to refute which is annoying.
This is necessary for Republican state governments to continue their justification for making it harder to vote. And which generally results in suppressing turnout of voters most inclined to vote blue. The United States Senate is sitting on a bill that would greatly enhance the ease of voting because Mitch McConnell admitted that it would result positively for the Democrats.Can’t believe this thread is 48 pages. There isn’t any material/meaningful voter fraud. It’s been demonstrated repeatedly, but folks just hate facts......unless the facts validate their erroneous views.
Mail delivery suspended due to COVID. You must now vote via Fox News app.HOW AM I SUPPOSED TO SUPPRESS THE MAIL!!?
And its one of those sweet polls too.Mail delivery suspended due to COVID. You must now vote via Fox News app.
It's time to just let the centre of this country just begin it's own country...they can do whatever they want then.Georgia House Speaker David Ralston certainly believes that giving everyone the opportunity to vote by mail will lead to widespread cheating by the Dems.
Tl;dr: The Ga Secretary of State is trying to mail ballots to every registered voter in the state. Ralston objects, partly on the grounds that this will increase turnout and “the president said it best, this will be extremely devastating to Republicans and conservatives in Georgia.”
Republicans keep saying the quiet parts out loud.
Georgia House Speaker David Ralston certainly believes that giving everyone the opportunity to vote by mail will lead to widespread cheating by the Dems.
Tl;dr: The Ga Secretary of State is trying to mail ballots to every registered voter in the state. Ralston objects, partly on the grounds that this will increase turnout and “the president said it best, this will be extremely devastating to Republicans and conservatives in Georgia.”
Republicans keep saying the quiet parts out loud.
One of the things that prevents me from being a bigger secessionist is knowing how minorities and liberals will fare in new Flyover Nation. It's unnerving to think about what they'll be up against in a country filled with opponents of full and fair democracy.It's time to just let the centre of this country just begin it's own country...they can do whatever they want then.
Akin to “I’m not a doctor but I’m a person with common sense” type thinking.Can’t believe this thread is 48 pages. There isn’t any material/meaningful voter fraud. It’s been demonstrated repeatedly, but folks just hate facts......unless the facts validate their erroneous views.
One of the things that prevents me from being a bigger secessionist is knowing how minorities and liberals will fare in new Flyover Nation. It's unnerving to think about what they'll be up against in a country filled with opponents of full and fair democracy.
How could there ever be a secession? The vast majority of commerce and wealth is created on the coasts.One of the things that prevents me from being a bigger secessionist is knowing how minorities and liberals will fare in new Flyover Nation. It's unnerving to think about what they'll be up against in a country filled with opponents of full and fair democracy.
News Punch?
Overall, we rate News Punch a Questionable source based on extreme right wing bias and promotion of tin foil hat conspiracies. This website has zero credibility due to routine publishing of fake news
Who cares about the source if the information is a fact. You go on and on about facts. Is the Detroit News allowed by you?News Punch?
The woman is facing charges...but come on with that as a source...why would anyone even be on such a site?
well that's just it...it was caught the system works>>The report notes that 193 absentee voter "Qualified Voter Files" were altered in the computer system. The records show that Hawkins' computer and unique name "made the alterations in the computer system to the QVF for these voters," the complaint says. <<
- This was such a mind numbingly stupid move by this woman it defies description.
But it does demonstrate an effective quality control system.
I would think that yes, Detroit News is allowed. Probably just a good idea to find a reputable source to link to in the future, wouldn't you say?Who cares about the source if the information is a fact. You go on and on about facts. Is the Detroit News allowed by you?
https://www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/oakland-county/2019/09/23/southfield-city-clerk-charged-six-felonies-november-2018-election/2416101001/
If the link posts an article with facts from another source it shouldn’t matter. Op Ed pieces are a different story.I would think that yes, Detroit News is allowed. Probably just a good idea to find a reputable source to link to in the future, wouldn't you say?
OK fair enough.If the link posts an article with facts from another source it shouldn’t matter. Op Ed pieces are a different story.
Yes especially in being consistent. When a poster has, for a while, not even discussed a topic if someone linked NY Times or the Washington Post (both actual reputable sources)...and decried stuff as fake news without actually discussing them...they should not be using Breitbart as a source. And even when he did, I and others still discussed the content as well as the source.I would think that yes, Detroit News is allowed. Probably just a good idea to find a reputable source to link to in the future, wouldn't you say?
Not really...if a source has been deemed questionable at nest for getting facts consistently wrong...it should be pointed out. As was done, with a source to back up why Breitbart was questioned.OK fair enough.
Let it go, your source shtick is weak.Not really...if a source has been deemed questionable at nest for getting facts consistently wrong...it should be pointed out. As was done, with a source to back up why Breitbart was questioned.
Eh there are some differences. I'll just say I'm appreciative you posted the Detroit News. It was an interesting good report & read. And honestly I appreciate your news links.If the link posts an article with facts from another source it shouldn’t matter. Op Ed pieces are a different story.
Agree with this.Donald Trump is a fraud. He claimed 3 million illegal votes in the past election, and whatever team he put on that embarrassed themselves so severely before disbanding without finding ad DAMNED THING.
Trump is the fraud. Clearly when he talks about fraudulent voting he is lying. He's a PROVEN liar on this subject.
Only on stimulus checks.Don's signature on a contract isn't binding to him. That idea has been totally debunked.
Good. Make an example out of him.NEW: The U.S. Attorney's Office and FBI in Philadelphia have announced the guilty plea of a local elections judge, Domenick J. Demuro there who took bribes in exchange for adding ballots to increase the vote totals for certain candidates.
Get out of here with those facts and logic.Fox's Chris Wallace:
"I've done some deep dive into it, there really is no record of massive fraud or even serious fraud from mail-in voting."
"It's being carried out in Republican states, it's being carried out in Democratic states."
https://news.yahoo.com/chris-wallace-demolishes-trump-mail-154810642.html?soc_src=community&soc_trk=tw
It's funny that your misleading link goes to a Youtube rant by a user named @Timcast