The owners of Footballguys.com will be here for 90 minutes to answer a variety of questions.
Few people know this, but David is actually my twin brother so I’ve known him pretty much all my life…. Seriously, I met David at a Fantasy Football convention in Las Vegas. The convention sucked but meeting David made the trip worthwhile. I was a nobody and he was the hot shot owner of mrfootball.com. I think he liked me because while everyone was fawning over how great his site was, I was sort of like “meh”.Well let's get things started. I would welcome you to the site, but you're here every day. I guess I'll just say thanks for taking the time to sit in here tonight.
The first question starts at the beginning:
How did Cheatsheets.net / Footballguys.com get started? How did you guys meet?
I'm the calm twin.Few people know this, but David is actually my twin brother so I’ve known him pretty much all my life…Well let's get things started. I would welcome you to the site, but you're here every day. I guess I'll just say thanks for taking the time to sit in here tonight.
The first question starts at the beginning:
How did Cheatsheets.net / Footballguys.com get started? How did you guys meet?
1. Let go of the ego and realize I couldn’t do it all by myself. 1a. Surround myself with really smart and talented people.Name the five smartest things you two did to grow this into the large website it is now? What were the biggest blunders that you wish you could change?
Like David and Clayton....1. Let go of the ego and realize I couldn’t do it all by myself. 1a. Surround myself with really smart and talented people.Name the five smartest things you two did to grow this into the large website it is now? What were the biggest blunders that you wish you could change?
2. Invest heavily in Visine and Starbucks. The creators of Footballguys have fueled most of the growth in the caffeine and eye care industry.Name the five smartest things you two did to grow this into the large website it is now? What were the biggest blunders that you wish you could change?
Like David and Clayton....1. Let go of the ego and realize I couldn’t do it all by myself. 1a. Surround myself with really smart and talented people.Name the five smartest things you two did to grow this into the large website it is now? What were the biggest blunders that you wish you could change?![]()
3. Focus on what the customer wanted vs what I wanted to give him.4. Don’t dumb down the content. We’re guys. But we’re not stupid. Not all of us.Name the five smartest things you two did to grow this into the large website it is now? What were the biggest blunders that you wish you could change?
5. Stick to my guns with Jeff Garcia before the 2000 season. While everyone was making fun of his lisp, I kept preaching the gospel. He wound up as the #2 QB that year. Blunders next....Name the five smartest things you two did to grow this into the large website it is now? What were the biggest blunders that you wish you could change?
I just goof off.Even after all these years, I'm still amazed at how much time email takes. It may be quick answers. But 500 emails in the mail box take a while.Tell us what an average day looks like for you guys.
I doubt anyone reads everything we do. But according to our hitcount on every feature, there are people that like everything we do. That’s the beauty of things. Read what you like. For some they just want our cheatsheets and upgrade info. Others can’t live without the Random Shots, etc. I think our depth is what separates us from our competition.You are looking to publish 30,000 pages of content this year. Isn't that a tad overkill? Who can possibly read all of it?
You wonder sometimes who reads it all. But just try misspelling Houshmandzadeh and see how many emails you get. Seriously. I don't know how you'd ever know for sure but I know that a ton of our people read every single word.You are looking to publish 30,000 pages of content this year. Isn't that a tad overkill? Who can possibly read all of it?
Don't underestimate payola.I am a good writer and love FF. How does someone get on staff?
Easy. Show us what you can do. I get something just about every day from guys wanting to be on staff. There are two great ways to showcase your stuff#1. Be a regular contributor on our message board forums. Especially the Shark Pool. If there’s a consistent theme among our staff guys it’s that they were all solid message board contributors.I am a good writer and love FF. How does someone get on staff?
Typically by being active on our boards and submitting quality freelance assignments.I am a good writer and love FF. How does someone get on staff?
#2 Submitting articles in our freelance section. We’ve found some great talent there.Hold on and I'll dig out that infoI am a good writer and love FF. How does someone get on staff?
The vision was always to do everything in-house. We realized early on that the boards were a perfect place to screen possible staff as it shows both writing and interaction ability. We also use the freelance writing opportunity to find talent. You are very limited when people give you work that do not work for you. For example, we could get rankings from outsiders, but would likely have trouble getting those same people to do faceoffs, etc. So once we could afford a bigger staff, we moved to bring everything in-house.When Cheatsheets.net and Footballguys.com were getting started, I recall it being a collection of established fantasy info providers who had their own sites consolidating into one location so you could get a consensus of "expert" opinions in one place. Many of those original contributors seem to have gone away. While there have been a few acquisitions along the way bringing in some new blood, most of the new staff members have come from the message boards. I think over half of the folks contributing to your overall rankings are now former message board contributors. At some point did you feel the need to change your approach to what the site would be, or was it always part of the plan to draw replacement staff members from the message board contributors who had demonstrated ability, but had little or no established presence outside of FBGs?
Yes. Once we began building our team, we felt more confident in their information than we did using other sites.When Cheatsheets.net and Footballguys.com were getting started, I recall it being a collection of established fantasy info providers who had their own sites consolidating into one location so you could get a consensus of "expert" opinions in one place. Many of those original contributors seem to have gone away. While there have been a few acquisitions along the way bringing in some new blood, most of the new staff members have come from the message boards. I think over half of the folks contributing to your overall rankings are now former message board contributors. At some point did you feel the need to change your approach to what the site would be, or was it always part of the plan to draw replacement staff members from the message board contributors who had demonstrated ability, but had little or no established presence outside of FBGs?
Posting content is always changing. It’s as good as the members that are there. Typically quality is top-notch in the off-season through late June and then degrades as newer people ramp up to draft their teams. But with that said, I think the Footballguys.com board is leaps and bounds better than all the other FF message boards out there for quality discussion. I strongly believe we have smarter people based on our overall approach (VBD, Draft Dominator, Drinen’s tools, etc). As for what FBG can do, I think as long as we are keeping it clean (PG) and stopping the flame wars before they get started, the smartest posters should stay with us. That has been the formula from the inception.Now, let's talk a little about the boards.Do you feel the overall quality or nature of FF discussion in the Shark Pool has changed over the last several years? If so, in what way, and what do you think has caused it? Are there things you think the FBG staff can do/plan to do to improve the quality of discussion?
I think it’s better than ever. The sheer volume of posters is a two sided sword. You have a bunch of really knowledeable posters who have great opinions to share. With that size though, you also have more “noise” than you’d like. That’s why the Shark Pool is heavily moderated. I understand smack talk and making jokes. But it would quickly get out of control if we didn’t constantly moderate the threads. The Roethlisberger accident was a good example. We had several hundred people reading that thread looking for the news. The Shark Pool wasn't the place to debate helmet laws. But we had to manage that thread heavily to make it useful.Now, let's talk a little about the boards.
Do you feel the overall quality or nature of FF discussion in the Shark Pool has changed over the last several years? If so, in what way, and what do you think has caused it? Are there things you think the FBG staff can do/plan to do to improve the quality of discussion?
We understand the merits to having a subscriber only forum, but we like having a Shark Pool infested with the brightest minds. Splitting things up would kill that dynamic. We know not everyone will subscribe with us. There are lots of reasons for that. But we are hopeful that everyone with good information and discussion points would join the free boards. Costs – The board costs a lot. It runs on two Dual-Xeon dedicated servers (along with using portions of a third for graphics). With the extra memory, RAID setups, 4 GB memory, SCSI hard drives, etc these servers cost us about $900 a month with a managed server plan through The Planet. Additionally, we pay approximately $8,000 a year to have the board moderated and another $7,000 for tech support. Joe and I also spend a lot of time on the boards. So adding all of this up, we spend about $26K a year on the boards. We recoup a tiny bit of that back with advertisements. Despite the huge cost and time sink, we think the boards are very worth it. They provide the community that is Footballguys.The forums seem to have a life of their own sometimes. We know you spend a lot of money and time to keep them a certain way. Can you tell us a bit about the costs, the hassles around the board. Do you feel the cost is worth it? Will these always remain free? Any chance of a forum just for subscribers?
Around 25 thousand a year. The boards are some of the most active message boards on the entire internet. Not just for sports but for all subjects. We could get by with less money but that would mean sacrificing stability. It’s a tech nightmare. The scary part is we’re in uncharted water. My stock answer on tech questions is to tell Keith and David “we aren’t the only guys to ever have this problem with a board this size, what do the other guys do?”. Unfortunately, there aren’t many companies that have these same problems. There’s some pressure too. The board is extremely important for lots of people. It’s goofy but I feel an obligation to keep them stable.The forums seem to have a life of their own sometimes. We know you spend a lot of money and time to keep them a certain way. Can you tell us a bit about the costs, the hassles around the board. Do you feel the cost is worth it? Will these always remain free? Any chance of a forum just for subscribers?
For the subscriber only thing - I understand the desire for a “members only” forum. I won’t do it at least for this year because I love the community that we have now with it free. Fracturing that community is just something I’m not anxious to do.The forums seem to have a life of their own sometimes. We know you spend a lot of money and time to keep them a certain way. Can you tell us a bit about the costs, the hassles around the board. Do you feel the cost is worth it? Will these always remain free? Any chance of a forum just for subscribers?
Pretty much what I said above. I do see it and understand people asking. I just really fear it would fracture what we have. Am I scared to change the Shark Pool? Yeah, I guess I am. I love what we have here now.No really. Is there ever going to be a subscriber section on the boards? I have heard both sides and you may have voiced you opinion, but I missed it.
I doubt it. We don’t want to split up the discussion.No really. Is there ever going to be a subscriber section on the boards? I have heard both sides and you may have voiced you opinion, but I missed it.
Hit the big one on PowerBall and then call me.Say a FBG hits the lotto and decides to buy the board...(ballpark) what's it going to set him back?
We would never sell the board and keep the website. If someone wanted the whole website (forum, Blogger, content, etc), they would need to bring boatloads of cash to even get my attention. It’s simply not something I want to sale. I have enough money. Joe’s #6 I think on the top 200 Forbes list. And frankly I enjoy owning this. If we ever sold we know it would likely not be the place it is today. So all told, I doubt someone could come up with the number I would want. Fanball got $12-$14 million. I know this will sound egotistical, but I wouldn’t sell it for less than $12 million. I am having too much fun owning it.Say a FBG hits the lotto and decides to buy the board...(ballpark) what's it going to set him back?
Not really. David and I both are too young to retire. If I was retired, I’d probably be hanging out on a Football website writing articles and trying to figure out who the Bengals are going with at QB if Palmer gets hurt again. So why not just keep doing what we’re doing? I’m sure it sounds corny but I get a tremendous amount of satisfaction from the site. I very much enjoy what I do everyday.Well that answers my next question:
Any thoughts of selling the whole franchise? What would the asking price be?
Moving on to the future of the site.
What are your plans with the magazine? I would have thought FBG would be looking to drive that segment out of business. What's the strategy here?
On selling the franchise:None. As stated before, I wouldn’t even attend a meeting if someone was offering less than $12 million. I enjoy owning this. There are some people interested in buying us (or buying the rights to all the ad space), but their whole business model is illegal gaming sites. We have no interest in seeing our site plastered with these annoying ads, etc. We are one of the few fantasy football websites that has NEVER taken their money. Their ads are not in our magazine or on the website. This isn’t a morality thing. These businesses are illegal. Sporting News was handed a huge fine this year for taking these dollars.Well that answers my next question:
Any thoughts of selling the whole franchise? What would the asking price be?
Moving on to the future of the site.
What are your plans with the magazine? I would have thought FBG would be looking to drive that segment out of business. What's the strategy here?
Magazine stragegy? It’s a tax write off….Well that answers my next question:
Any thoughts of selling the whole franchise? What would the asking price be?
Moving on to the future of the site.
What are your plans with the magazine? I would have thought FBG would be looking to drive that segment out of business. What's the strategy here?
Simply put I do not think any of the other high-stakes contests deserve to call their champion the best in fantasy football. The payouts after factoring in travel, hotel, add-on costs (co-manager, draft party, etc) make these events financial losers for virtually everyone playing. I believe the FFTOC and its online format is the way to crown future champions. With more decision points every week, I also believe it’s a truer test of skill and not who is lucky enough to get a top 3 draft slot this year. So with our muscle in this industry, we are looking to get 1,000 people to play in the Online Championships of Fantasy Football this year. We believe once we do that, the sky is the limit on how big this can be. We believe in a few short years, our payouts will be the biggest in the industry (despite just a $250 entry fee). And to get there, we have made all FFTOC contests 100% payouts (cash and prizes) this season. It’s an exciting time for us.Tell us about the FFTOC. Why did Footballguys buy a 50% stake into that contest format? What's the long-term goal there?