Ryan Swope said:
To draft Reed at his ADP (in 12 team leagues, costing you a 7th-9th round pick on average), you have to go all in. You have to assume he'll outplay every player coming before him not named Gronk or Graham, and that nobody else behind him has a chance to beat him out. The fact that Reed is getting drafted before Kyle Rudolph and Zach Ertz (players I think are potential top-5 TEs each) throws a wrench in the first, and I can't justify Reed beating most any TE drafted before him, even if he stays healthy.
My philosophy is never to reach at TE. It's the least productive position past the top 3, and the difference between the TE5 and TE12 was about 2 points per game. Unless you think one of players in this range will elevate their game to the point of breaking into the 10 point per game tier, there's no reason to reach. Taking Reed at his ADP is too high for me, I'd rather wait on him a round or two while grabbing depth, then grab Rudolph or Ertz if I happen to miss out.
I don't understand why drafting Reed as TE8ish/9ish is going "all in," anymore so than drafting any other player. Why do you have to assume he'll outplay guys like Jordan Cameron and Vernon Davis, who go several rounds earlier than him? Even though you want every pick to turn out great, getting a lower return on a cheaper investment doesn't sink your draft or anything.
I also don't really see Reed as a reach this year. I prefer Rudolph slightly, but I have the two of them as the best price-to-value TEs this season, and will be happy to take whichever one I can get. If you're worried about investing in Reed, Rudolph, or Ertz because they're relatively unproven, this is actually a good season for it. With guys like Heath Miller going in the 12th round or later, you can buy a little insurance for them on the cheap. I don't usually like to roster two TEs unless the format dictates it, but it strikes me as more reasonable this year than past years.