badmojo1006
Footballguy
Give me an exampleBut a lot of issues can't be discussed because many times, to get to the root of the problem, it requires some blunt talk. Saying things that might offend certain people.
Give me an exampleBut a lot of issues can't be discussed because many times, to get to the root of the problem, it requires some blunt talk. Saying things that might offend certain people.
MHI - that's a good start.... also the discussion as to MHI as it relates to the mass shootings...mental health issues - like autism, Down's Syndrome? The cost for care to society?
And there are plenty of people who fit the description of alcoholics and can be productive embers of society. Maybe alcoholism that leads to homelessness?
Assisted suicide. The elderly are a drain on society and if they want to end their lives instead of laying in a bed for years, they should be able to. We are getting there, state by state, but it's still not a widely accepted thought.Give me an example
I would put the reluctance to talking about Assisted Suicide mostly to Religious Beliefs. Is that Political Correctness?Assisted suicide. The elderly are a drain on society and if they want to end their lives instead of laying in a bed for years, they should be able to. We are getting there, state by state, but it's still not a widely accepted thought.
Ugh...sorry about your sister. I've heard that als is about the worst way to go. I just watched a recent VICE episode on it. Horrible. My wife and I are prepared to move to a state that allows assisted suicide if we ever have to make that decision. I think the political correctness of it is saying that it is a drain on our heath care/ insurance system. It makes it impersonal but it's the truth. Besides the mental toll on a family, it can devastate them financially. We should all have that choice to avoid leaving that burden on our family.I would put the reluctance to talking about Assisted Suicide mostly to Religious Beliefs. Is that Political Correctness?
But I really agree with you on this matter. I watched my sister die a very slow and painful death from ALS. There were days when i wanted to go into her room at the Convalescent Hospital and put a pillow over her face.
And yet I had a dog (13 years old) and a cat (14 years old) that I had to put down because they were in so much pain and were dying. A simple shot to both of them and it was very peaceful
Mistrust of Gov't - I see this as a symptom, not a cause. What is the cause of the general population mistrusting the gov't? That is the problem we must address.I'm going to add:
mistrust of government - yes, it's been like this forever but we have to be at one of the low points in our countries history
the need for acceptance - so many people want to be someone, be seen, heard, acknowledged.
the lack of good music in the mainstream. - it's out there, but not what tops the charts.
I look forward to the President Dwayne Elizondo Mountain Dew Herbert Camacho administration.What about the issue with those who have higher IQs breeding far less than those who have lower IQs. I'm not sure if studies have been done, but it's fairly obvious that the intellectuals in our society have far few kids than those with lower IQs. Yet technology allows everyone, no matter their genetic potential, to survive and thrive. What happens when the majority of smart people have been bred out of our world?
LOL The problem with globalization again is that it goers against our nature. We are social people, but in a tribal or pack sense. We want our own territories, our own kind. Instinctively we seem our tribes as a possible threat: someone that would take from us our hinting grounds, our women (speaking older cultures here) or our way of supporting our families or our culture. We divide into us and them, usually based on some random factor be it hair color, skin color, language or whatever. Then we see "them" as a threat.A few I've thought of before:
The fragmentation of the world into various nation-states where globalization intersects cultures. I think, at some point, becoming a more connected world where global governmental bodies (with teeth) could unite nation-states and give way to a population that saw themselves as "world" citizens would go a long way to phasing out some long-held prejudices and stereotypes that are variant and found within the borders of states, existing through historical events, religious beliefs, or other sources and perpetuated in part from state isolationism.
I forgot the other one while posting the above. So maybe forgetfulness?
I'm not smart enough to design that system. Neither has anyone else been.It's basic human instinct. It's never going to be curbed. The best society can do is create a system in which most of its members believe they can better achieve those goals through participation and peaceful coexistence.
Let's hear these ideas and how you would try them.There are plenty of ideas. The problem is we do not try them. When finding solutions to problems, debate is not a good method. Trial-and-error is better. There are undoubtedly ideas that will work but will never get tried because they cannot pass the debate phase. Someone will always shoot them down in debate.
It was 1984 HTHNo, but I can see why my post might lead you to think that. My main point, that I missed, is that I think humans need to see themselves as world citizens, as opposed to citizens of their country or state, and that one of the main ways I think we could achieve that is to have some kind of global government that unites nation-states (something more sinngificant than the UN). I'm not imagining an oppressive government, like some out of Orwell's 1986, but something that can start tackling economic, social, and environmental issues at a global level. I do think cultures would become more homogenous overtime, which is certainly a negative outcome, but I think there would be so many more pros that would vastly outweigh that.
Lots of people everywhere struggle to adapt to change but I'm optimistic. I like the overall direction we're heading, new generations are examining old traditions and rejecting the ones found wanting. The biggest opponent to positive change is inertia and, little by little, we're addressing that, too.One big problem we have is that people complain too much and don't enjoy all the greatness we have and all the progress we've made the last 100 years or so. We're on a pretty good trajectory, probably the best (and easiest) time to be alive ever. Enjoy the ride.
I know this might sounds nuts, and it very well maybe be crazy, but I think when (not if, IMO) we discover sentient life outside of Earth, and if that species is significantly more advanced than ours, that this will be a perceived threat and allow us to look past our bitter and illogical prejudices and become more united globally. And I think that will be for the better.LOL The problem with globalization again is that it goers against our nature. We are social people, but in a tribal or pack sense. We want our own territories, our own kind. Instinctively we seem our tribes as a possible threat: someone that would take from us our hinting grounds, our women (speaking older cultures here) or our way of supporting our families or our culture. We divide into us and them, usually based on some random factor be it hair color, skin color, language or whatever. Then we see "them" as a threat.
Where globalization has failed to overcome this tendency is that rather than raising all boats up to a relatively common level, it has raised some boats while sinking others, and has tried to raise some boats which do not have the same values as the boats that sit higher in the water. Globalization almost requires one people, some culture. If Greece and England are too different for the EU to happen, how can the West and the Arab world ever achieve common goals?
I hate to actually get serious on the board, but the overall handling of our service men and women has been horrific. They are paid abysmally, put in nightmarish situations on a regular basis, and face a stunningly ineffective VA after they've been discharged.PTSD of returning veterans - 20+ committing suicide every day!
Globalization is a direct consequence of short term thinking in corporations. The profit next quarter is more important athan a sustainable (not in an eco sense necessarily) business model and long term Creating Shared Value. I see Globalization not as an end stage but a stage in the evolutionary journey.bueno said:LOL The problem with globalization again is that it goers against our nature. We are social people, but in a tribal or pack sense. We want our own territories, our own kind. Instinctively we seem our tribes as a possible threat: someone that would take from us our hinting grounds, our women (speaking older cultures here) or our way of supporting our families or our culture. We divide into us and them, usually based on some random factor be it hair color, skin color, language or whatever. Then we see "them" as a threat.
Where globalization has failed to overcome this tendency is that rather than raising all boats up to a relatively common level, it has raised some boats while sinking others, and has tried to raise some boats which do not have the same values as the boats that sit higher in the water. Globalization almost requires one people, some culture. If Greece and England are too different for the EU to happen, how can the West and the Arab world ever achieve common goals?
nittanylion said:Inch by inch, life is a cinch. Yard by yard, life is very, very hard.
Is there a penis in it?Did anyone mention the gays yet? Every since they were allowed to marry, my sink has been backed up. Coincidence?