What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Michael Strahan berates female reporter (1 Viewer)

Righetti

Footballguy
Strahan gets one to tackle

Confronts reporter over his own words

BY RALPH VACCHIANO

DAILY NEWS SPORTS WRITER

Michael Strahan has been sidelined with a sprained foot but returns to action yesterday when he berates a female reporter for daring to ask questions.

The doors to the Giants' locker room were still in place yesterday. Behind them, though, everything appeared to be coming unhinged.

In one bizarre hour - strange even by the standards the Giants have set over the past week - Tom Coughlin's crew unraveled once again. It started when Plaxico Burress delivered a subtle rip of teammate Michael Strahan, and ended with Strahan delivering a not-so-subtle rant at the media in general while trying to bully a female reporter from ESPN.

Asked about his comments regarding Burress, Strahan demanded that ESPN's Kelly Naqi step to the front of a media pack and "look me in the eye."

And the cause of all the turmoil was Strahan's own words during his regular spot on WFAN on Monday, when he appeared to chastise Burress for quitting on a play during Sunday's Music City Meltdown. When Burress heard that Strahan had said, "You can't give up and you can't quit, because you're not quitting on yourself, you're quitting on us, you're quitting on everybody," it was enough to trigger the latest round of discontent from the Bickering Blue.

"Wow, that's tough for a teammate to come out and say that about you," Burress said after he was read Strahan's comments, word for word, by Naqi. "But if that's the way he feels, that's the way he feels. I'll talk to him about that personally. I'm not going to get into a pushing or shoving match with you guys. I'll just talk to him personally because that's the type of person I am. I wouldn't go on TV or radio and criticize my teammates.

"If that's the way he feels, hey, that's sad."

That response was quickly relayed to Strahan by a member of the Giants' PR staff, and a few minutes later, the defensive end - who usually speaks to the media only on Thursdays - burst into the locker room and began his tirade. First, he singled out Naqi and berated her for not asking questions "in the appropriate manner" and, beckoning her with his index finger, loudly ordered her to come forward and "look me in the eye."

"I know you're going to ask it in a way that there's more division and more of a negative way than what it was, so come here, I want to see your face," Strahan said. "Are you a responsible journalist? Look me in the eye and ask me this question, please, the way that you want to ask it. Come on. Look a man in the eye before you try to kill him or make up something."

Eventually, Strahan was asked if he had spoken to Burress. Strahan said he had, even though Burress insisted he had not. Strahan added, "Do you think one play by Plaxico lost us the game? No."

Then he redirected his rage toward the media at large. "If you want to come here with the negative, you're coming to the wrong guy, because I'm not a negative guy," said Strahan, who is recovering from a sprained foot. "I don't kill my teammates. I'm a man and I talk to my teammates. So if you're going to talk to me, don't stand in the back behind 10 other people. You come here and look me in the eye. And if you're going to ask Plaxico about something, you ask him in the appropriate way, not the negative way so it seems like I'm attacking my teammates, because I don't do that.

"(The WFAN comments are) being portrayed that way because that's the way you guys portray them. We've lost three games in a row. You're not going to do anything positive. That's not how you guys operate. You don't sell papers by being positive. OK? You just don't - especially when a team has lost three games in a row."

Strahan's rage, of course, came seven days after Tiki Barber criticized the Giants' play-calling, six days after it was revealed that Barber was reprimanded by Coughlin, five days after Coughlin fired back at Barber, and three days after the Giants (6-5) blew a 21-point, fourth-quarter lead in Tennessee.

However, despite the turmoil, yesterday actually began with a positively chipper Coughlin press conference. The coach seemed eager and thrilled to announce that defensive end Osi Umenyiora, linebacker Brandon Short and cornerback Sam Madison all might return for Sunday's showdown with the Dallas Cowboys. When asked about Strahan's WFAN rant, Coughlin did say he was "aware that a statement had been made," but added "What I'm trying to do right now, quite frankly, is pull everybody together and encourage, if you will."

Little did Coughlin know how difficult that would be, and what was simmering behind his locker-room doors.

 
Did he grab her chin? :popcorn:

Nice to see Big Blow holding it together so well.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think Strahan needs to worry a LOT less about what a reporter is saying and worry more about his front row seat for the Romo and Barber TD show...........

 
I read a quote by Plaxico that he and Strahan never talked... let me find it.From the Yahoo AP posted story.

Burress on Wednesday said he was unaware of Strahan's comments."I haven't had a conversation with him," Burress said. "If that's the way he feels, hey, I don't talk about my teammates. If that's the way he feels, then that's the way he feels. I know what my motivation is. If that's the way he feels, then that's sad."
 
The boys from the Morning Show in San Diego

just referred to Strahan as a "Gay, Voyeur, Female Basher".

"not that there's anything wrong with that."

 
why is "female" at all relevant here?
It shouldn't be although it was a little ridiculous when Strahan kept saying somethnig along the lines of "I don't do things like that because I'm a MAN... we here are MEN, so we keep it in house and handle it like MEN"He's correct in a general sense that the media is out of control, but in this case, he has only himself to blame for what he said.
 
He threw a reporter under the bus for asking a question about why he threw a teammate under the bus. Not an extremely intelligent decision.

 
this may actually work to bring that team closer together, although I'm not sure whether it will show up on the football field.

Stranger things have happened when it becomes Us vs The World.

 
I read a quote by Plaxico that he and Strahan never talked... let me find it.From the Yahoo AP posted story.

Burress on Wednesday said he was unaware of Strahan's comments."I haven't had a conversation with him," Burress said. "If that's the way he feels, hey, I don't talk about my teammates. If that's the way he feels, then that's the way he feels. I know what my motivation is. If that's the way he feels, then that's sad."
did you read the story in the OP? your quote is up there too
 
I am trying to decide which are the most stupid, imbecilic, contemptible, corrupt, prostituting lowdown degenerates: The Media, or the Giants.

I guess it's the Media, by a nose. :D

 
Last edited by a moderator:
this may actually work to bring that team closer together, although I'm not sure whether it will show up on the football field.

Stranger things have happened when it becomes Us vs The World.
Yeah, I'm sure that Plax is now all motivated to fall on the grenade for Strahan. :loco:
 
I can't bring myself to root for the Cowboys, but arrogant types like Strahan and T.Barber (guys who supposedly want to have TV jobs after they retire) make it impossible to root for the Giants.

 
I am trying to decide which are the most stupid, imbecilic, contemptible, corrupt, prostituting lowdown degenerates: The Media, or the Giants.

I guess it's the Media, by a nose. :D
I'm having trouble figuring this out. Why is anyone thinking the media is to blame here. Did the original story fall more under gossip than solid football reporting? Sure. Is anyone surprised that the media reported it? How could you be? Here's the key for me though:

"Wow, that's tough for a teammate to come out and say that about you," Burress said after he was read Strahan's comments, word for word, by Naqi. "But if that's the way he feels, that's the way he feels. I'll talk to him about that personally. I'm not going to get into a pushing or shoving match with you guys. I'll just talk to him personally because that's the type of person I am. I wouldn't go on TV or radio and criticize my teammates.

"If that's the way he feels, hey, that's sad."

That response was quickly relayed to Strahan by a member of the Giants' PR staff, and a few minutes later, the defensive end - who usually speaks to the media only on Thursdays - burst into the locker room and began his tirade. First, he singled out Naqi and berated her for not asking questions "in the appropriate manner" and, beckoning her with his index finger, loudly ordered her to come forward and "look me in the eye."
Now who's provoking who here? Nobody's claiming she misquoted anyone. Strahan's just bitter because he was held accountable for his words.

Shut up and play.

 
Anyone catch the video of this?Did Strahan follow up this "sack" with his "jumpshot" celebration?That would have been too cool! :popcorn:
Actually, the reporterette collapsed on the ground before Strahan reached her, and Strahan started celebrating about having the reporterette sack record.
 
He's got a point. His original quote reall was portrayed about as negatively as possible:

"You can't give up and you can't quit, because you're not quitting on yourself, you're quitting on us, you're quitting on everybody,"
"(The WFAN comments are) being portrayed that way because that's the way you guys portray them. We've lost three games in a row. You're not going to do anything positive. That's not how you guys operate. You don't sell papers by being positive. OK? You just don't - especially when a team has lost three games in a row."
Then the media smells blood, and we get these lines at the start and finish of the article:
Righetti said:
The doors to the Giants' locker room were still in place yesterday. Behind them, though, everything appeared to be coming unhinged.
Little did Coughlin know how difficult that would be, and what was simmering behind his locker-room doors.
Come on. But this made me :wall:
"Wow, that's tough for a teammate to come out and say that about you," Burress said after he was read Strahan's comments, word for word, by Naqi. "But if that's the way he feels, that's the way he feels. I'll talk to him about that personally. I'm not going to get into a pushing or shoving match with you guys. I'll just talk to him personally because that's the type of person I am. I wouldn't go on TV or radio and criticize my teammates. If that's the way he feels, hey, that's sad."

That response was quickly relayed to Strahan by a member of the Giants' PR staff, and a few minutes later, the defensive end - who usually speaks to the media only on Thursdays - burst into the locker room and began his tirade.
Nice job on the PR front, guy.
 
this may actually work to bring that team closer together, although I'm not sure whether it will show up on the football field.

Stranger things have happened when it becomes Us vs The World.
Yeah, I'm sure that Plax is now all motivated to fall on the grenade for Strahan. :loco:
In the radio show I heard this morning I was pretty sure Strahan made it clear the 2 had spoken since yesterday.Also, Plax was intervewed afterward and reiterated that "team first" line.

 
I actually saw/heard the second portion of Strahan's interview on ESPN last night, and to be perfectly honest, I don't think I'd use the word "rage" to describe any part of it. He seemed pretty calm to me.

Strahan is definitely trying to backstep with regard to the comments he made on WFAN. Those are out there now and can't be taken back. I don't disagree with anything he said, I just don't like to see teammates bash each other in the media. But I really don't know how to take the rest of this piece because as I said, I didn't see any "rage" from Strahan when he made those last statements. I did not, however, see or hear him 'berate' the female reporter and tell her to step up to the camera. He might have very well been filled with rage when he did that.

 
this may actually work to bring that team closer together, although I'm not sure whether it will show up on the football field.

Stranger things have happened when it becomes Us vs The World.
Yeah, I'm sure that Plax is now all motivated to fall on the grenade for Strahan. :loco:
As it turns out, there are no live grenades at most NFL games, and Strahan and Burress are rarely on the field at the same time.
 
I love it when players put the media in their place...honestly. The Media think they are God.
I bet the media thinks the same thing about the players.This reminds me of the old Zeke Mowatt/Lisa Olson incident, except much more family-friendly.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't see what the big deal is here.
:goodposting: If you see the whole video where he calls her over and explains more than once what his issue is it all seems like a whole lotta nothing...it's the small soundbite that sounds over the top...
 
I have mixed feelings about this, personally. First, I think he is right about Plaxico - and another player that was interviewed on camera (Brandon Short, I think) said he agreed with Strahan. He probably shouldn't have stated that on the radio, though.

I am not much of a fan of Strahan, but I am less of a fan of sports media - I am of the opinion that they look to create crises and news more often than simply report it; lockerroom drama draws more viewers, so why not create it - or at least be a catalyst for it - if it does not exist. ESPN is particularly guilty of this; I remember when Bobby Knight recently slapped the chin of Michael Prince, it was all I saw for days. I would watch Sportscenter and while they were pontificating and hand-wringing over the incident, they would play that 0.5 second clip about 30 times in a row from as many different camera angles as possible. Everyone from Prince, to his parents, to the athletic director said it shouldn't have been a big deal, but that didn't stop ESPN from trying to make it so.

So this reporter tries to get Strahan to comment, who won't because it isn't Thursday (whatever that's about), and she immediately runs to Plaxico to try to stir the pot. Strahan was torqued - and I cannot blame him for being so - and decides to confront her. And listening to that whiny twerp Mike Greenberg defend the reporter and demand an apology on the radio this morning just reinforces my bias even more.

Stahan certainly didn't handle this well, and there is the discrepancy of whether or not he spoke to Plaxico about it (Strahan said they talked, Plaxico said they didn't). And of course, it is bad form to call out your teammates in public ... but then again, their coach did the same to Eli and Kiwanuka, so maybe he was just following his lead.

There is plenty of blame to go around - the NY Giants players, the media, the coaches ... the only thing that is certain is that the team is a mess and desparately needs a win against Dallas to right the ship.

Ni ...

 
I have mixed feelings about this, personally. First, I think he is right about Plaxico - and another player that was interviewed on camera (Brandon Short, I think) said he agreed with Strahan. He probably shouldn't have stated that on the radio, though.

I am not much of a fan of Strahan, but I am less of a fan of sports media - I am of the opinion that they look to create crises and news more often than simply report it; lockerroom drama draws more viewers, so why not create it - or at least be a catalyst for it - if it does not exist. ESPN is particularly guilty of this; I remember when Bobby Knight recently slapped the chin of Michael Prince, it was all I saw for days. I would watch Sportscenter and while they were pontificating and hand-wringing over the incident, they would play that 0.5 second clip about 30 times in a row from as many different camera angles as possible. Everyone from Prince, to his parents, to the athletic director said it shouldn't have been a big deal, but that didn't stop ESPN from trying to make it so.

So this reporter tries to get Strahan to comment, who won't because it isn't Thursday (whatever that's about), and she immediately runs to Plaxico to try to stir the pot. Strahan was torqued - and I cannot blame him for being so - and decides to confront her. And listening to that whiny twerp Mike Greenberg defend the reporter and demand an apology on the radio this morning just reinforces my bias even more.

Stahan certainly didn't handle this well, and there is the discrepancy of whether or not he spoke to Plaxico about it (Strahan said they talked, Plaxico said they didn't). And of course, it is bad form to call out your teammates in public ... but then again, their coach did the same to Eli and Kiwanuka, so maybe he was just following his lead.

There is plenty of blame to go around - the NY Giants players, the media, the coaches ... the only thing that is certain is that the team is a mess and desparately needs a win against Dallas to right the ship.

Ni ...
You must be driving yourself nuts, oh great knight who . . . until recently said "Ni".
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So what do some of you media haters think reporters should do while on the job?

Cover flower shows?

The arrogant Giants are kind of an interesting story right now. Let the reporters do their job and stop complaining about it.

 
You must be driving yourself nuts, oh great knight who . . . until recently said "Ni".
I had to beat myself with a herring a dozen times for each time I used the forbidden word ... but I'm feeling much better now, thankyouEcky ecky ecky ecky pikang zoop boing goodem zoo owli zhiv!
 
I love it when players put the media in their place...honestly. The Media think they are God.
The reporters are 0 percent at fault here. What part of this is difficult to understand?
Disagree. For example, this article paints the confrontation as an explosion. People who saw the clip said it seemed like a non issue. Reporters always try to make up issues so they have something to talk about.
 
I don't see what the big deal is here.
The last couple of weeks, all the Giants have talked about is how they can't throw each other under the bus through the media. Then Strahan goes on his weekly show on WFAN and makes the following quote about Burress:"You can't give up. You can't quit. You're not just quitting on yourself, you're quitting on us. I don't understand what his lack of motivation is in those situations. He's too great of a player to look at him and say, "He's a quitter.'"The ESPN reporter, Kelly Naqi, approached Strahan on Wednesday to ask about his comments. Strahan told her he only spoke to reporters on Thursdays. Naqi went to Strahan one-on-one first and it was Strahan that blew her off. She then did the logical thing and asked Burress about his reaction to a teammate making those comments on radio. Then Strahan decides he wants to talk?? He had the chance, face to face, to either retract what he said or defend it. He chose not to. Then later he decides to call out the reporter for not 'manning up'? Hey, someone didn't man up, but it wasn't the reporter.
 
I love it when players put the media in their place...honestly. The Media think they are God.
The reporters are 0 percent at fault here. What part of this is difficult to understand?
Disagree. For example, this article paints the confrontation as an explosion. People who saw the clip said it seemed like a non issue. Reporters always try to make up issues so they have something to talk about.
I know a lot of reporters and none of them "make up" anything.
 
I don't see what the big deal is here.
The last couple of weeks, all the Giants have talked about is how they can't throw each other under the bus through the media. Then Strahan goes on his weekly show on WFAN and makes the following quote about Burress:"You can't give up. You can't quit. You're not just quitting on yourself, you're quitting on us. I don't understand what his lack of motivation is in those situations. He's too great of a player to look at him and say, "He's a quitter.'"The ESPN reporter, Kelly Naqi, approached Strahan on Wednesday to ask about his comments. Strahan told her he only spoke to reporters on Thursdays. Naqi went to Strahan one-on-one first and it was Strahan that blew her off. She then did the logical thing and asked Burress about his reaction to a teammate making those comments on radio. Then Strahan decides he wants to talk?? He had the chance, face to face, to either retract what he said or defend it. He chose not to. Then later he decides to call out the reporter for not 'manning up'? Hey, someone didn't man up, but it wasn't the reporter.
:goodposting:
 
After just a quick read, I can see now why he was arrested for domestic violence. If he acts like that to women in front of the media, just think how he is behind closed doors. :unsure:

 
Did you know if you switch the letters of the word berates you get "Breast" oh yeah and drop an e. In reading the article I don't see where it was an explosion.

 
I don't see what the big deal is here.
The last couple of weeks, all the Giants have talked about is how they can't throw each other under the bus through the media. Then Strahan goes on his weekly show on WFAN and makes the following quote about Burress:"You can't give up. You can't quit. You're not just quitting on yourself, you're quitting on us. I don't understand what his lack of motivation is in those situations. He's too great of a player to look at him and say, "He's a quitter.'"The ESPN reporter, Kelly Naqi, approached Strahan on Wednesday to ask about his comments. Strahan told her he only spoke to reporters on Thursdays. Naqi went to Strahan one-on-one first and it was Strahan that blew her off. She then did the logical thing and asked Burress about his reaction to a teammate making those comments on radio. Then Strahan decides he wants to talk?? He had the chance, face to face, to either retract what he said or defend it. He chose not to. Then later he decides to call out the reporter for not 'manning up'? Hey, someone didn't man up, but it wasn't the reporter.
not at all, she could have waited til tomorrow(at the time). So you don't see her thinking she can't get an interview with him, why don't I just egg him on then and get Plaxico talking?Still this is all garbage. I could care less whether Strahan give some reporter an interview.I could bump probably 20-30 threads with 100s of people here complaining about Plax's attitude. I could probably link to 100 articles about it going back to his Steeler days even. Now Strahan says that and it shakes up the earth? The reaction to this is too much IMO.
 
I love it when players put the media in their place...honestly. The Media think they are God.
The reporters are 0 percent at fault here. What part of this is difficult to understand?
Disagree. For example, this article paints the confrontation as an explosion. People who saw the clip said it seemed like a non issue. Reporters always try to make up issues so they have something to talk about.
Plus if Strahan talks to reporters at certain times normally then that's what he does. It's probably a habit/routine created because of people like that woman. If that woman doesn't like it, tough. There's ton of reporters in NY and nationally that would love a Strahan interview.
 
I love it when players put the media in their place...honestly. The Media think they are God.
The reporters are 0 percent at fault here. What part of this is difficult to understand?
Disagree. For example, this article paints the confrontation as an explosion. People who saw the clip said it seemed like a non issue. Reporters always try to make up issues so they have something to talk about.
I know a lot of reporters and none of them "make up" anything.
It's comforting to know that you're omniscient.
 
I love it when players put the media in their place...honestly. The Media think they are God.
The reporters are 0 percent at fault here. What part of this is difficult to understand?
Disagree. For example, this article paints the confrontation as an explosion. People who saw the clip said it seemed like a non issue. Reporters always try to make up issues so they have something to talk about.
Plus if Strahan talks to reporters at certain times normally then that's what he does. It's probably a habit/routine created because of people like that woman. If that woman doesn't like it, tough. There's ton of reporters in NY and nationally that would love a Strahan interview.
I didn't get the impression at all that "that woman doesn't like it". She tried to get Strahan to discuss the comments HE MADE and he didn't want to. Then later he accuses HER of not looking him in the eye when asking the question?? Hey Mike, how about owning up to the comments you made?Maybe the Giants should just keep their mouths shut and not make comments about teammates? Face it, Strahan goes on radio and questioned Burress' heart. Unprovoked. Don't run away later and accuse the media of creating a story. If Strahan had kept his mouth shut there would be no story.

 
I have mixed feelings about this, personally. First, I think he is right about Plaxico - and another player that was interviewed on camera (Brandon Short, I think) said he agreed with Strahan. He probably shouldn't have stated that on the radio, though.

I am not much of a fan of Strahan, but I am less of a fan of sports media - I am of the opinion that they look to create crises and news more often than simply report it; lockerroom drama draws more viewers, so why not create it - or at least be a catalyst for it - if it does not exist. ESPN is particularly guilty of this; I remember when Bobby Knight recently slapped the chin of Michael Prince, it was all I saw for days. I would watch Sportscenter and while they were pontificating and hand-wringing over the incident, they would play that 0.5 second clip about 30 times in a row from as many different camera angles as possible. Everyone from Prince, to his parents, to the athletic director said it shouldn't have been a big deal, but that didn't stop ESPN from trying to make it so.

So this reporter tries to get Strahan to comment, who won't because it isn't Thursday (whatever that's about), and she immediately runs to Plaxico to try to stir the pot. Strahan was torqued - and I cannot blame him for being so - and decides to confront her. And listening to that whiny twerp Mike Greenberg defend the reporter and demand an apology on the radio this morning just reinforces my bias even more.

Stahan certainly didn't handle this well, and there is the discrepancy of whether or not he spoke to Plaxico about it (Strahan said they talked, Plaxico said they didn't). And of course, it is bad form to call out your teammates in public ... but then again, their coach did the same to Eli and Kiwanuka, so maybe he was just following his lead.

There is plenty of blame to go around - the NY Giants players, the media, the coaches ... the only thing that is certain is that the team is a mess and desparately needs a win against Dallas to right the ship.

Ni ...
You must be driving yourself nuts, oh great knight who . . . until recently said "Ni".
I had to beat myself with a herring a dozen times for each time I used the forbidden word ... but I'm feeling much better now, thankyou

Ecky ecky ecky ecky pikang zoop boing goodem zoo owli zhiv!
Yeah, except the forbidden word is "it" not "the."
 
I have mixed feelings about this, personally. First, I think he is right about Plaxico - and another player that was interviewed on camera (Brandon Short, I think) said he agreed with Strahan. He probably shouldn't have stated that on the radio, though.

I am not much of a fan of Strahan, but I am less of a fan of sports media - I am of the opinion that they look to create crises and news more often than simply report it; lockerroom drama draws more viewers, so why not create it - or at least be a catalyst for it - if it does not exist. ESPN is particularly guilty of this; I remember when Bobby Knight recently slapped the chin of Michael Prince, it was all I saw for days. I would watch Sportscenter and while they were pontificating and hand-wringing over the incident, they would play that 0.5 second clip about 30 times in a row from as many different camera angles as possible. Everyone from Prince, to his parents, to the athletic director said it shouldn't have been a big deal, but that didn't stop ESPN from trying to make it so.

So this reporter tries to get Strahan to comment, who won't because it isn't Thursday (whatever that's about), and she immediately runs to Plaxico to try to stir the pot. Strahan was torqued - and I cannot blame him for being so - and decides to confront her. And listening to that whiny twerp Mike Greenberg defend the reporter and demand an apology on the radio this morning just reinforces my bias even more.

Stahan certainly didn't handle this well, and there is the discrepancy of whether or not he spoke to Plaxico about it (Strahan said they talked, Plaxico said they didn't). And of course, it is bad form to call out your teammates in public ... but then again, their coach did the same to Eli and Kiwanuka, so maybe he was just following his lead.

There is plenty of blame to go around - the NY Giants players, the media, the coaches ... the only thing that is certain is that the team is a mess and desparately needs a win against Dallas to right the ship.

Ni ...
You must be driving yourself nuts, oh great knight who . . . until recently said "Ni".
I had to beat myself with a herring a dozen times for each time I used the forbidden word ... but I'm feeling much better now, thankyou

Ecky ecky ecky ecky pikang zoop boing goodem zoo owli zhiv!
Yeah, except the forbidden word is "it" not "the."
:bag: I'm going to go get another cup of coffee.

 
I have mixed feelings about this, personally. First, I think he is right about Plaxico - and another player that was interviewed on camera (Brandon Short, I think) said he agreed with Strahan. He probably shouldn't have stated that on the radio, though.

I am not much of a fan of Strahan, but I am less of a fan of sports media - I am of the opinion that they look to create crises and news more often than simply report it; lockerroom drama draws more viewers, so why not create it - or at least be a catalyst for it - if it does not exist. ESPN is particularly guilty of this; I remember when Bobby Knight recently slapped the chin of Michael Prince, it was all I saw for days. I would watch Sportscenter and while they were pontificating and hand-wringing over the incident, they would play that 0.5 second clip about 30 times in a row from as many different camera angles as possible. Everyone from Prince, to his parents, to the athletic director said it shouldn't have been a big deal, but that didn't stop ESPN from trying to make it so.

So this reporter tries to get Strahan to comment, who won't because it isn't Thursday (whatever that's about), and she immediately runs to Plaxico to try to stir the pot. Strahan was torqued - and I cannot blame him for being so - and decides to confront her. And listening to that whiny twerp Mike Greenberg defend the reporter and demand an apology on the radio this morning just reinforces my bias even more.

Stahan certainly didn't handle this well, and there is the discrepancy of whether or not he spoke to Plaxico about it (Strahan said they talked, Plaxico said they didn't). And of course, it is bad form to call out your teammates in public ... but then again, their coach did the same to Eli and Kiwanuka, so maybe he was just following his lead.

There is plenty of blame to go around - the NY Giants players, the media, the coaches ... the only thing that is certain is that the team is a mess and desparately needs a win against Dallas to right the ship.

Ni ...
You must be driving yourself nuts, oh great knight who . . . until recently said "Ni".
I had to beat myself with a herring a dozen times for each time I used the forbidden word ... but I'm feeling much better now, thankyou

Ecky ecky ecky ecky pikang zoop boing goodem zoo owli zhiv!
Yeah, except the forbidden word is "it" not "the."
Shush! Show **** some respect!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top