Hey all,
I tried my hand at analyzing this and seeing what falls out as far as strategy for picking goes. To wit, this is what everyone was bidding into based on points earned (by ranking of players) based on the final stats of the 2002 season:
Edit: The image tag doesn't seem to work correctly, here is
the direct link.
Looking at this, you can see what positions you are going to pay through the nose for and which are "bargains". Not surprisingly you see that RBs and WRs are the ones you will pay the most point production/dollar spent. Which really means that you can afford to skimp a bit on some of the others to buy points at those critical positions. Of course there is the complicating factor of bye weeks and the selection of the "best" guys at each position each week to factor into an already extremely complicated give and take chart above. And before some blockhead says something about projections from this year have no chance of being perfect and following the chart above - yes I know that.
The chart above simply provides a baseline for bidding into.
My personal philosophy was not to buy at the top - at the premiums you are being charged, there is no point in buying something which only has a chance of costing you more in the way of pt./$ than getting a bargain. Too little dollars have to go too far to justify buying any of the top guys at any position. This is tempered by the need for reasonbly highly ranked (and hopefully producing) players who will anchor each position. I did a rough calculation (based on 2002 season) and using some guestimates as to how often players would have a game good enough to be a "starting" player what the percentages would be between each position. I figured that given an "average" team each position over the course of the season would generate the following percentages of points:
QB: 16%
RB: 21%
WR: 32%
TE: 11%
K: 10%
D: 10%
Given those numbers and the chart above I figured to spend a decent bit of money above those percentages for RB and WR production and less than that for the rest. Given those, the need to spread bye weeks (I didn't try and bunch them early, just spread them out - interesting to see which strategy is more effective), and my wish for at least some higher quality starters in each position, here is what I ended up with:
QB:
Brooks (16)
Blesoe (5)
Stewart (3)
Stewart is probably a mistake, but there is a possible advantage in going with a guy not everyone has picked (like Holcombe).
RB:
A. Green (49)
A. Thomas (9)
G. Hearst (6)
O. Smith (6)
As far as the "high priced" RBs go, I like Green's value. The rest are the position I skimped in hopes that someone would step into that RB2 role. You need to take risks to win here, as there are a ton of other players around, and this is my big risk.
WR:
Holt (32)
Driver (22)
D. Jax (17)
J. Reed (7)
Boerigter (3)
A. Bryant (3)
I liked the value of all the top three I chose. The other three all have legitimate shots to have big swings up and down throughout the year, perfect for a format like this.
TE:
Pollard (3)
Crumpler (3)
Given the high pt/$ value of TEs, particularly those that don't cost a whole lot, I feel this is the biggest spot to avoid the Gonzalez and Heap type players - you simply will not maximize your point production that way. Both Pollard and Crumpler should catch lots of balls and give me great return on my $ spent.
K:
Carney (4)
Wilkins (4)
As I wrote in an article last year, FG production from kickers on a year to year basis is essentially random. What you *can* count on is picking kickers from teams with high point production to produce extra points. Therefore I picked kickers from teams with expected high TD totals. I expect both the Saints and Rams to be way up there in the rankings of NFL offense.
D:
Tennessee (4)
New Orleans (4)
I went with two different tacks on defense. Since there is no penalty for points against, it doesn't matter if the defense lets in 50 points a game, as long as they are opportunistic. I picked one (Tennessee) that should be a strong defense this year and gave good sack numbers. I picked New Orleans because of one main reason: BEER MAN. Michael Lewis is undoubtedly the best return guy in the leauge (that return he had in the preseason that was erroneously called back was astounding) and I wanted a guy like that as a wildcard. Doesn't hurt that NO went for speed on defense this year, which likely means a lot of mistakes, but hopefully a lot of takeaways.
We'll see how it pans out. I gave it my best shot!
Sand