Detroit Lions 50-1
Matt Stafford has the potential to be a top ten NFL quarterback in the future but he will be growing into his skin in the 2011 NFL season. The Detroit Lions were a good play as underdogs last season but the sportsbooks will be making tighter lines on them in the 2011 NFL season. The Detroit Lions will be in Super Bowl form in one more year.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 2011 season schedule is not released.....so how can one say they have the hardest schedule next year ....been drinking and burning so did I miss somethingPanthers are a terrible bet. They have the hardest schedule in the NFL next year.The 49ers are a good bet depending on the QB they get. Its a good team with the 3rd easiest schedule. Good spot for Harbaugh to come in.
The opponents were released the day the season ended. It's a set roatation.Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 2011 season schedule is not released.....so how can one say they have the hardest schedule next year ....been drinking and burning so did I miss somethingPanthers are a terrible bet. They have the hardest schedule in the NFL next year.The 49ers are a good bet depending on the QB they get. Its a good team with the 3rd easiest schedule. Good spot for Harbaugh to come in.![]()
Strength of schedule doesn't mean a whole lot. Teams change so much from year to year.The opponents were released the day the season ended. It's a set roatation.Correct me if I'm wrong, but the 2011 season schedule is not released.....so how can one say they have the hardest schedule next year ....been drinking and burning so did I miss somethingPanthers are a terrible bet. They have the hardest schedule in the NFL next year.The 49ers are a good bet depending on the QB they get. Its a good team with the 3rd easiest schedule. Good spot for Harbaugh to come in.![]()
actually, it would bring in 0.A $50 bet on the Bucs would bring in 2k...Not too shabby
Becuase the Jets play the Pats who were 14-2 twice.theplayer11 said:How can the Jets SOS be higher than the Pats when the Pats finished first in the division and will be playing another 1st place division teamwhile the Jets play a lower team in that division.
actually, it would be -$50actually, it would bring in 0.A $50 bet on the Bucs would bring in 2k...Not too shabby
hate much? That's a great bet with a qb on teh verge and rookies who had great rookie years at all the skill positions.actually, it would bring in 0.A $50 bet on the Bucs would bring in 2k...Not too shabby
Panthers are nowhere near the worst bet on that board at 300-1. IMO the Pats are a worse bet than the Panthers.Panthers are a terrible bet. They have the hardest schedule in the NFL next year.The 49ers are a good bet depending on the QB they get. Its a good team with the 3rd easiest schedule. Good spot for Harbaugh to come in.
What's so wrong about it, exactly?New York Jets 12-1
Rex Ryan has overcome the handicap of Mark Sanchez as his quarterback the last two seasons. If he does not make a change at quarterback in the 2011 NFL season it will be too much to overcome. This aggressive and hard hitting defense can only do so much to push this team to the next level. At 12-1 the odds are too short on the New York Jets.
![]()
![]()
![]()
That was one of the tidbits I was going to post.Others:New York Jets 12-1
Rex Ryan has overcome the handicap of Mark Sanchez as his quarterback the last two seasons. If he does not make a change at quarterback in the 2011 NFL season it will be too much to overcome. This aggressive and hard hitting defense can only do so much to push this team to the next level. At 12-1 the odds are too short on the New York Jets.
They also benefited greatly from a weak schedule.hate much? That's a great bet with a qb on teh verge and rookies who had great rookie years at all the skill positions.actually, it would bring in 0.A $50 bet on the Bucs would bring in 2k...Not too shabby
are you high? They played in one of the toughest divisions in football that almost had 3 teams in the playoffs (and the one that missed was 10-6)They also benefited greatly from a weak schedule.hate much? That's a great bet with a qb on teh verge and rookies who had great rookie years at all the skill positions.actually, it would bring in 0.A $50 bet on the Bucs would bring in 2k...Not too shabby
because the other two had phenomenal defenses, not so with the falcons.I thought it was odd that the writer denigrates Sanchez (who I don't like) and Flacco (who I do), yet says Matt Ryan is still "developing" as an NFL quarterback. These guys are in the same stage of their careers and all have had success. If he thinks the Jets and Ravens have to ditch their QBs to have a shot at the championship, why not the Falcons, too?
Yes, the Bucs had a cupcake schedule.W Cleveland Browns (5-11) 17-14 W @ Carolina Panthers (2-14) 20-7 L Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4) 13-38 W @ Cincinnati Bengals (4-12) 24-21L New Orleans Saints (11-5) 6-31 W St. Louis Rams (7-9) 18-17 W @ Arizona Cardinals (6-10) 38-35 L @ Atlanta Falcons (13-3) 21-27 W Carolina Panthers (2-14) 31-16 W @ San Francisco 49ers (6-10) 21-0 L @ Baltimore Ravens (12-4) 10-17 L Atlanta Falcons (13-3) 24-28 W @ Washington Redskins (6-10) 17-16 L Detroit Lions (6-10) 20-23W Seattle Seahawks (7-9) 38-15 W @ New Orleans Saints 23-13 (11-5) Their only win against a team .500 or better was Week 17 against the Saints, who had absolutely nothing left to play for.are you high? They played in one of the toughest divisions in football that almost had 3 teams in the playoffs (and the one that missed was 10-6)
Clearly Sanchez is a bust. You spend too much time with your bow up doll.What's so wrong about it, exactly?New York Jets 12-1
Rex Ryan has overcome the handicap of Mark Sanchez as his quarterback the last two seasons. If he does not make a change at quarterback in the 2011 NFL season it will be too much to overcome. This aggressive and hard hitting defense can only do so much to push this team to the next level. At 12-1 the odds are too short on the New York Jets.
![]()
![]()
![]()
SEA was in the conf semis...CLE & Detroit were also much better than their record. really a ciclical argument.Yes, the Bucs had a cupcake schedule.W Cleveland Browns (5-11) 17-14 W @ Carolina Panthers (2-14) 20-7 L Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4) 13-38 W @ Cincinnati Bengals (4-12) 24-21L New Orleans Saints (11-5) 6-31 W St. Louis Rams (7-9) 18-17 W @ Arizona Cardinals (6-10) 38-35 L @ Atlanta Falcons (13-3) 21-27 W Carolina Panthers (2-14) 31-16 W @ San Francisco 49ers (6-10) 21-0 L @ Baltimore Ravens (12-4) 10-17 L Atlanta Falcons (13-3) 24-28 W @ Washington Redskins (6-10) 17-16 L Detroit Lions (6-10) 20-23W Seattle Seahawks (7-9) 38-15 W @ New Orleans Saints 23-13 (11-5) Their only win against a team .500 or better was Week 17 against the Saints, who had absolutely nothing left to play for.are you high? They played in one of the toughest divisions in football that almost had 3 teams in the playoffs (and the one that missed was 10-6)
No.SEA was in the conf semis...CLE & Detroit were also much better than their record. really a ciclical argument.Yes, the Bucs had a cupcake schedule.W Cleveland Browns (5-11) 17-14 W @ Carolina Panthers (2-14) 20-7 L Pittsburgh Steelers (12-4) 13-38 W @ Cincinnati Bengals (4-12) 24-21L New Orleans Saints (11-5) 6-31 W St. Louis Rams (7-9) 18-17 W @ Arizona Cardinals (6-10) 38-35 L @ Atlanta Falcons (13-3) 21-27 W Carolina Panthers (2-14) 31-16 W @ San Francisco 49ers (6-10) 21-0 L @ Baltimore Ravens (12-4) 10-17 L Atlanta Falcons (13-3) 24-28 W @ Washington Redskins (6-10) 17-16 L Detroit Lions (6-10) 20-23W Seattle Seahawks (7-9) 38-15 W @ New Orleans Saints 23-13 (11-5) Their only win against a team .500 or better was Week 17 against the Saints, who had absolutely nothing left to play for.are you high? They played in one of the toughest divisions in football that almost had 3 teams in the playoffs (and the one that missed was 10-6)
Let's try this in a different way. Based on Pro Football Reference's team anaylsis combining offense, defense, point differential, and strength of schedule, the Bucs still were rated as a below average team. Despite their record, they had a -0.6 score in their rating system (0 would be considered average) and TB was ranked as the 17th best team in the league.CLE & Detroit were also much better than their record. really a ciclical argument.
I'll bet those tests are biased towards teams that tend to score a lot, even though in the true measure of a team a win of 17-14 or a win of 35-34 counts equally. I would argue the 17-14 W is actually more impressive, and more indicative of 'playoff success' which is the basis for these odds. The Buccs with Legarrete Blount flat out took the AIR out of many games. By design, they ended up giving each team 3-4 less possessions than the other teams that week. It was always frustrating to start any buccs because you knew that you'd get 3 possessions and 7-10 pts if you had the lead going into the2nd half. That certainly doesn't make them a 'worse team' though those stats would tell you otherwise.They have a helluva yooung coach, and a bunch of young studs at nearly every position Save Wrrr (warrior) who are willing to run through walls for him. They quite possibly have a franchise qb in freeman. I'm mean this sucks for me. I am a lions/falcons fan, so TB has been a rival as long as I can remember, but these guys are ####### good and aren't a 'will fade from the scene' kind of team.Let's try this in a different way. Based on Pro Football Reference's team anaylsis combining offense, defense, point differential, and strength of schedule, the Bucs still were rated as a below average team. Despite their record, they had a -0.6 score in their rating system (0 would be considered average) and TB was ranked as the 17th best team in the league.CLE & Detroit were also much better than their record. really a ciclical argument.
Look, I am not saying TB is a bad team, but their schedule IMO made them look like a better team and influenced their record.For example, if the same trend happened (not beating a single team in a meaningful game with at least a .500 record), if they played the Browns schedule they would have been 5-11.10 wins is 10 wins, but 9 of them were against the sisters of the poor and one was against the Saints (who flat out had nothing to play for).I'll bet those tests are biased towards teams that tend to score a lot, even though in the true measure of a team a win of 17-14 or a win of 35-34 counts equally. I would argue the 17-14 W is actually more impressive, and more indicative of 'playoff success' which is the basis for these odds. The Buccs with Legarrete Blount flat out took the AIR out of many games. By design, they ended up giving each team 3-4 less possessions than the other teams that week. It was always frustrating to start any buccs because you knew that you'd get 3 possessions and 7-10 pts if you had the lead going into the2nd half. That certainly doesn't make them a 'worse team' though those stats would tell you otherwise.They have a helluva yooung coach, and a bunch of young studs at nearly every position Save Wrrr (warrior) who are willing to run through walls for him. They quite possibly have a franchise qb in freeman. I'm mean this sucks for me. I am a lions/falcons fan, so TB has been a rival as long as I can remember, but these guys are ####### good and aren't a 'will fade from the scene' kind of team.My ###-O-Pinion
They didn't have to play that team that just missed the playoffs at 10-6 though.are you high? They played in one of the toughest divisions in football that almost had 3 teams in the playoffs (and the one that missed was 10-6)They also benefited greatly from a weak schedule.hate much? That's a great bet with a qb on teh verge and rookies who had great rookie years at all the skill positions.actually, it would bring in 0.A $50 bet on the Bucs would bring in 2k...Not too shabby
He????Didn't you write this?