EastonBlues22
Footballguy
10 team PPR; Must start 2 TEs (can flex a 3rd)
Team A gave: Fleener and 2016 2nd
Team B gave: Ertz and 2016 4th
Team A gave: Fleener and 2016 2nd
Team B gave: Ertz and 2016 4th
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
*** OFFICIAL *** 13/14 Off-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (3 Viewers)
- Thread starter Concept Coop
- Start date
One More Rep
Footballguy
Concept Coop
Footballguy
I'd likely take Gio as well. It would have been a no-brainer pre-Hill, however.Archer said:
Concept Coop
Footballguy
Jeffery is going to be re-signed for top 5 money as a team's #1 (or 1B, next to Marshall). That's a lot of security for his dyansty value. He could go to any team in the league and still be a dyasnty WR1. Cobb needs a top 5 situation to be anywhere near a dyansty WR1. That's a lot of risk, especially considering that GB appears to be playing hardball with him already.
I think the gap between Jeffery and Cobb--for the stated reasons, in addition to injury history--is Hunter, at least.
bigmarc27
Footballguy
I wanted to make a run the next two years and traded Stafford for Peyton. Start 1 QB and my depth chart is now Peyton, Matt Ryan, Foles, and Osweiler. It's an out of character move for me to trade for an aging guy, but I do think I have a top team and he could be the difference.
Concept Coop
Footballguy
Concept Coop
Footballguy
In an attempt to escape purgatory:
12Tm - PPR - QRRWWWTF
Gave: Gronk, Fitz, P. Thomas
Got: M.Evans, T. Richardson, 1st (lock for top 3(as a result of this trade)), 1st (mid/late)
Hard to trade away a 25YO HOF talent, but my hope is that Evans/Gurley(Gordon) are both top 20 dynasty assets this time next season. Didn't have the ammo for a serious reload without moving Gronk.
Gave: Cruz
Got: Beckham, Amaro
12Tm - PPR - QRRWWWTF
Gave: Gronk, Fitz, P. Thomas
Got: M.Evans, T. Richardson, 1st (lock for top 3(as a result of this trade)), 1st (mid/late)
Hard to trade away a 25YO HOF talent, but my hope is that Evans/Gurley(Gordon) are both top 20 dynasty assets this time next season. Didn't have the ammo for a serious reload without moving Gronk.
Gave: Cruz
Got: Beckham, Amaro
bigmarc27
Footballguy
I like both but I'm more down on Gronk than most - burned by him a little too much.
Concept Coop
Footballguy
I love Gronk, and, honestly, would make both deals if I were in the other owners' shoes, too. I've just had a few bad breaks and made a few poor decisions and didn't want to compound them by holding on to a sinking ship.
cstu
Footballguy
Did you get your 1st back? Either way I like that trade a lot for you, but flip Richardson while visions of sugar plums are dancing in people's heads.
Concept Coop
Footballguy
It was my pick. Pointing it out to be fair to the other owner; if he didn't make the deal, the pick would be middle of the pack. I let him know that if I couldn't work out a fair deal for Gronk AND get my pick back--I'd have gone the other way and sold out for one last shot, rebuilding the following year when I had my pick.
Last edited by a moderator:
12-team PPR Dynasty, start 1/2/3/1/flex
Team A gave: Kendall Wright
Team B gave: Pick 1.09
Pick 1.09 was on the clock, and was immediately used to draft Cody Latimer.
Team A gave: Kendall Wright
Team B gave: Pick 1.09
Pick 1.09 was on the clock, and was immediately used to draft Cody Latimer.
Last edited by a moderator:
bigmarc27
Footballguy
I like Latimer a lot... That said, this kinda just seems like someone buying into the hype of an unproven rookie over a really solid/young WR.Edit: Can't fault anyone for going and getting the player they want.
Last edited by a moderator:
Love the first deal.
Not a huge fan of the second but you know your league better than I do
Rather have Wright I think.
Good on the guy selling his pick for a good young player
One More Rep
Footballguy
r0llin_game
Footballguy
Concept Coop said:
Archer said:
steveski said:
Archer said:
JackReacher said:
I'm a bigger Vereen fan than I am of the Balt backfield
Not a Sims fan, nor am I a Kenbrell fan, 2 >>> 3
Could see the Kaep/Peyton side on both ends without knowing rosters. Not a Torrey fan though so I probably lean Kaep side.
Ball is worth more than Sankey by a good sum right now, could change by next year. I'm not a Montee fan either.
I'd rather have the sure fire stud here, but can see dealing Alshon for that. I also think Tre eventually wins the job.
Gio side is probably the right side for the value, but I'd gamble that Sankey could be worth just as much as Gio this time next year, and I'm a buyer of Justin Hunter as well.
That Megatron deal is awful.
Think that's solid value for Gronk/Fitz.
Think Cruz is worth more than just Jace/ODB. Should be able to fetch a bit more.
Also, see that you're in my MFL10 ConceptCoop, gl bud!
I'm relatively agnostic on the trade, (I'm not involved). In my most recent rankings update I had Latimer at 33 and Wright at 32.
The guy giving up Wright already had Dez, Alshon, Patterson, Torrey, and Kelvin Benjamin, so he didn't really need the immediate help at receiver. I also know he's been a big Latimer fan for a while; I'm reasonably certain that Latimer is currently among his top 24 dynasty receivers and Wright is not currently among his top 36. That's a little bit of speculation on my part, but I would be quite surprised if that was not the case. I completely get why he made the trade, and see no problem with it.
thriftyrocker
Footballguy
One More Rep
Footballguy
r0llin_game
Footballguy
Coeur de Lion
Footballguy
eNdblu
Footballguy
Must be training camp bias? I remember Kenbrell Thompkins becoming a first round pick last off season in later rookie drafts.
Bamac
Footballguy
I'm the proud new Gronk owner. To me, this is a pure win-win. Every piece exchanged is more valuable to the new owner than the former one (or at least equal). Likely overpay by me based on consensus prices, but I value Gronk more than the consensus and Delanie Walker was going to be my week 1 starter.
Out of curiosity, who are your nine rookies who are more valuable than both Wright and Latimer?
r0llin_game
Footballguy
B got the better end, by a good margin too
The Fantasy Chef
Footballguy
Made Three Trades Today
First
Gave : Cam Newton, Devonte Freeman, 2.06 redraft not rookie
Got: Matt stafford and Trent Richardson
Second
Gave: first rounder 2015 rookie, Trent Richardson, Kenbral Thompkins
Got: Third rounder 2015 rookie, Monte Ball, Marquise Colston
Third
Gave: Arian Foster
Got: Michael Crabtree
How did I Do?
First
Gave : Cam Newton, Devonte Freeman, 2.06 redraft not rookie
Got: Matt stafford and Trent Richardson
Second
Gave: first rounder 2015 rookie, Trent Richardson, Kenbral Thompkins
Got: Third rounder 2015 rookie, Monte Ball, Marquise Colston
Third
Gave: Arian Foster
Got: Michael Crabtree
How did I Do?
Bamac
Footballguy
First one depends on QB scoring, but I likely prefer Cam side. Second one was a nice win for you. Third one is even, depends on team makeup.
Milkman
Footballguy
I like team B a little better but it's pretty close. Depends how much you like Justin Hunter and how many WR can be started. L. Bell is the best player in the deal but that could easily change by next year and Cooks could be the best player in the deal.
The Fantasy Chef
Footballguy
Its a ppr league and all tds are 6pts
We are changing the passing td to 4 pts but not until the 2015 season
My Roster Is in My SiG
Starting roster consists of:
1qb
2rbs
3 wr/te
1rb/wr/te
1kicker
1defense
The Fantasy Chef
Footballguy
I know I'm a dynasty team but I feel likei put myself in a position to take down the league and added dynast assets in a qb1 an rb1 and a borderline wr1/wr2 type players. But I guess it's all arbitrary to each individuals opinion. I hope a few others look at the three trades.
First one I prefer Cam
Second I like for you
Third is a pick'em based on team needs
I think A could have gotten better haul for Bell.
I like the players he got enough but it is short something or over-valuing AWilliams
Jrodicus
Footballguy
You'll really be sick when I tell you the trades that led up to that:
Shortly after the SB
Give: Calvin, Decker, Moreno, 3.09
Get: Julio, Patterson, 1.01
2 weeks ago:
Give: 1.01, 5.09, Ladarius Green
Get: 1.05 and 2.06
I drafted Evans at 1.05 and traded 2.06 for Harvin.
So, the sum of the trades is:
Give: Calvin, Decker, Ladarius Green, Moreno, 3.09 (ASJ), 5.09 (Seastrunk)
Get: Julio, Patterson, Harvin, Evans
One More Rep
Footballguy
thriftyrocker
Footballguy
I took Benjamin 3 times this summer and they were all 1.9 or later. There's 7 that are clearly better for me - Watkins, Evans, Cooks, Matthews, Benjamin, Sankey, Hyde. There are about 6 more that are similar quality that I'd still prefer - Hill, Lee, Adams, Ebron, Andre Williams. Williams is tough in this format but I still expect him to be more valuable at some point. You've got a couple more RBs that are worth the stab if you have the WR to spare - Freeman, West. I don't dislike Latimer but I view Adams and Lee as similar quality with better opportunity. I don't dislike KW I just focus on upside at WR perhaps sometimes to a fault.
Similar threads
