that one i likeR2 52nd pick Dallas takes Jacob Rogers, T, USC
that one i likeR2 52nd pick Dallas takes Jacob Rogers, T, USC
I think I'd like it if I were a Cowboy fan.I see a lot of Curtis Martin in J.J. Isn't a speed merchant, but runs hard, will muck it up, can catch a little, can block a little...doesn't do anything well enough to be a 1st rounder, but does everything well enough to be a starter.I like it a lot. It was a much better pick than if they would have taken Greg Jones like some Dallas fan in another thread wanted. Julius gives them more options with his quickness to get outside and his receiving ability.
I'd have thought the same.But since Marvin Lewis forgets more about successful NFL defense every time he scratches his nuts than I have learned in my life, I'll go ahead and defer to him.I think Cinci should take Schweigert next.**edit** they didn't. Instead they take Williams from Maryland. I hate that pick. Schweigert is a ball-hawk and just the kind of agressive player they need back there.
Fair enough. Maybe they both end up good players. Don't think I'd ever question Marv. I haven't seen Williams play in person and have seen Stu. Stu's impressive. Hope he ends up getting a good opportunity.I'd have thought the same.But since Marvin Lewis forgets more about successful NFL defense every time he scratches his nuts than I have learned in my life, I'll go ahead and defer to him.
Why are people so sure that just b/c a team has a second running back of starting quality that one of those will go. RBs get hurt. A LOT. And in Buffalo's sitch , specifically, McGahee has proved diddly plus squat so far - not even in PRACTICE (he didn't start practicing with the team until a month before the end of the season).Meanwhile, THenry just completed his 2nd 1500 yard rushing season. If you are the Bills, would YOU trade one of those guys? If so, I think you need to examine the words "build for the future a little closer."In that dal/buf trade... surely buf offered one of their rbs instead of next year's no. 1 , don't you think? If so, should Dal have taken one... or demanded one?
This I have no problem pointing to with hilarity and scorn. I say this because while I'm sure SF has done what homework they could, and knows that Shawntae was a workout warrior and thus put up some nice workout numbers, there's still no way they watched every game he ever played at Pitt. I did. And what they just got is one of the most God-awful cover men in the entire NCAA. He'd make Chad Scott look like Deion Sanders.If he ends up as a successful NFL starter, I will fellate a horse.2.26 - SF selects - SHAWNTAE SPENCER - CB - Pitt
Not sure what to make of this either - he brings somethig different than FredT amd Fred T Jr. (Labrandon) to the table, but Chris Fu is a decent short down fullback and Edwards catches the ball out of the backfield well.My guess is the team sees Toefiled as a FredT clone and they want to see something different back there at RB in a couple years.Jax moves up to take Greg Jones. Don't know what to make of that. I guess he'll be a full-on fullback opening holes for Freddy T and Toefield while offering a little change of pace on short yardage and other situations.
Thanks for the input. But the point was they have 2 rbs, Dal has none. Historically, teams are almost always willing to give up a surplus player over their next #1, often used for "building for the future."I was mainly wondering if it has been proposed by either team and if so, which one rejected it.Edit to add: I assume Dallas offered to take him (McGahee or Henry) and was rejected.Why are people so sure that just b/c a team has a second running back of starting quality that one of those will go. RBs get hurt. A LOT. And in Buffalo's sitch , specifically, McGahee has proved diddly plus squat so far - not even in PRACTICE (he didn't start practicing with the team until a month before the end of the season).Meanwhile, THenry just completed his 2nd 1500 yard rushing season. If you are the Bills, would YOU trade one of those guys? If so, I think you need to examine the words "build for the future a little closer."
I understand what you are saying - but, while Dallas might have asked, I will virtually guarantee that both of Buffalo's RBs are untouchable in trade.My point being that McGahee is not "depth" at starter. He hasn't proved he is an NFL back yet. He's had one month of practice with the team. So, unless the Cowboys wanted Joe Burns, they were not getting Buffalo's only starting quality back.Thanks for the input. But the point was they have 2 rbs, Dal has none. Historically, teams are almost always willing to give up a surplus player over their next #1, often used for "building for the future."I was mainly wondering if it has been proposed by either team and if so, which one rejected it.Edit to add: I assume Dallas offered to take him (McGahee or Henry) and was rejected.
About time since they made NE into a dynasty.ahhhh crap,,,,, baltimore corked us.. :cX:
I hear that Hill is a nutcase. Hopefully, he'll undermine what they have going.Hill at DE for NE - that team is now stacked and deep at defensive line. I think Hill will develop over the next year or two into a decent DE, able to be used in a rotation without losing a step from the starter.
Thanks for the effort today....good stuff.rounds 1, 2, and 3 are done
Maybe thats why NYG were so anal about not trading that second rounder to SD today . . .Did I hear that right? Coughlin's daughter had an illegitimate kid by Snee and then COughlin drafts Snee? Was it a shotgun draft pick? Weird..
If he keeps his weight under control he could be a steal.Missed the Steeler pick when it came up, but wanted to drop in and give it a Addresses a desperate need, and even though Starks no longer appears to be an elite prospect, if he can rekindle the fire that put him at the top of the "future prospects" lists a few years ago, he'd represent a nice value here. We'll see, I guess, but when it comes to 3rd rd picks, I think you take a chance. I like it.
Everytime I think about the Patriots Defensive Line I cringe.Hill at DE for NE - that team is now stacked and deep at defensive line. I think Hill will develop over the next year or two into a decent DE, able to be used in a rotation without losing a step from the starter.
Ricky's gonna have problems - luckily the Pats d-backs are probably gonna struggle against Boston , Chambers and McMichael's since they've had their mugging license revoked, and BEST OF ALL - no snowy Foxboro games. Beat the Pats early in the year, and the phins have an excellent chance of exacting a sweep revenge in 2004 when they see the Pats again in December - likely for the division crown.Plus, the Pats ALWAYS struggle the year after they've played in the big game. On point though, their defense will be scary for years to come whie the phins' defense is aging rapidly.Everytime I think about the Patriots Defensive Line I cringe.
I like the pick too, and was lurking to see if anyone else did too this morning.What Dallas got at pick 22 was too good to pass up. Dallas wasn't the only team that wasn't overly impressed with Jackson and may get a top 5 pick next year as a result of it.But just focusing in on Julius Jones, I like him. I watched about half the Notre Dame games last year, and the only guy with speed/skills on that team was Julius. He had a real nice game vs. USC and really the only real threat on a stagnant team.I don't know his father/family, but every game they showed him in the stands. He was always stone faced, really concerned and into the game. I mention this because that kind of personality/work ethic often trickles down into the kid and I believe that Julius Jones will come to Dallas and work real hard to earn that starting spot. Julius Jones, running back from Notre Dame, going into Dallas. It's weird, I've always liked that kid, and didn't really know why. It turns out he's the 1st pick for the Cowboys in 2004. On the records as saying "I like it."Am I the only one who really likes the RB Dallas drafted. He seems to have the two things that Hambrick lacks - tackle breaking and "giddee-up" speed (speed to burst away from the first line defenders).Plus, he seems to glide along the line instead of stopping and cutting - which was how Hanbrick often got stuffed for a loss.
We better ask BGP since he didn't think the draft was covered well yesterday.Should we ressurect this for the final rounds or start a new one?
I wonder if the father is to blame for the sons' inability to "answer the phone" without breaking their hands.I don't know his father/family, but every game they showed him in the stands. He was always stone faced, really concerned and into the game. I mention this because that kind of personality/work ethic often trickles down into the kid and I believe that Julius Jones will come to Dallas and work real hard to earn that starting spot.
There's a thread downstairs for that.Nobody wants to venture a guess as to who the first pick of the second day will be?