What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

*** Official 2009 Denver Broncos Offseason Thread *** (1 Viewer)

A 2-0 start is nice, but not at all that surprising, given that Cincinnati and Cleveland were the two opponents. But we Broncos fans have seen plenty of 2-0 starts go quickly by the wayside in recent years, so I am not at all excited about this team yet. The defense looks better, yes, but I am gonna wait and see how they do against Dallas, New England and San Diego in a few weeks before deciding how improved they really are.

 
A 2-0 start is nice, but not at all that surprising, given that Cincinnati and Cleveland were the two opponents. But we Broncos fans have seen plenty of 2-0 starts go quickly by the wayside in recent years, so I am not at all excited about this team yet. The defense looks better, yes, but I am gonna wait and see how they do against Dallas, New England and San Diego in a few weeks before deciding how improved they really are.
:rolleyes: I think the team needed to get out to a fast start to forget all the that went on this offseason. The fact that they have a brutal 8 game stretch right around the corner puts a little more emphasis on the fast start too. Either way, it's nice to see some promise from a team that many had as pegged to be one of the worst in the league this year. The defense (front 7 in particular) has been the real eye opener. If they can keep it up, they should be able to give their offense a chance against the better teams on the schedule.
 
For Bronco fans the 2-0 start is going to be over-emphasized. Anyone who looked at their schedule had to think 3-0 was a realistic possibility even after the drama.

What I think Bronco fans should be really excited about is the way SD has looked. The AFC West looks to be up for grabs and another 8-8 winner may be on the horizon.

 
I picked up their defense for week 2 against Cleveland. I think I'll keep rolling with them for week 3 In Oakland the way Russell looked.

Moreno looks like he's on pace to start around week 4. Though Buckhalter is playing great.

Its amazing how many starts Orton has in the NFL. Ok, he's good for the defense, but he's horrible for fantasy.

 
I picked up their defense for week 2 against Cleveland. I think I'll keep rolling with them for week 3 In Oakland the way Russell looked.

Moreno looks like he's on pace to start around week 4. Though Buckhalter is playing great.

Its amazing how many starts Orton has in the NFL. Ok, he's good for the defense, but he's horrible for fantasy.
1st in points against so far (6.5 per game). Obviously the season is only 2 games in, but this is a vast improvement over last year's version already. We'll see how they hold up the rest of the year, but they have been very impressive thus far.
 
Love being 4-0 and all but still want to cry when I think about where we could be going with Cutler under center.

Half the time Orton looks so unsure, frozen in the pocket, while Cutler would be rolling to his right scampering in for the td or passing it across his body...

Such a shame, Cutler, with this D and we could be talking SB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
True, but how many INTs has Cutler thrown? How many has Orton thrown?
I will give you that, but the problem is ALL Orton can do is 'manage' the game.I don't see WR's catching the ball in stride for much YAC. Marshal's TD example aside, that was mostly Marshal.
 
Love being 4-0 and all but still want to cry when I think about where we could be going with Cutler under center.Half the time Orton looks so unsure, frozen in the pocket, while Cutler would be rolling to his right scampering in for the td or passing it across his body...Such a shame, Cutler, with this D and we could be talking SB.
hey man your team is undefeated after four games. they're coming off a win against dallas, who came into the game with the no. one rushing O and a nice D. why think negative? why can't your team think SB? i can understand thinkind WWCutlerD but ortons ok enough to feel good about.
 
Love being 4-0 and all but still want to cry when I think about where we could be going with Cutler under center.Half the time Orton looks so unsure, frozen in the pocket, while Cutler would be rolling to his right scampering in for the td or passing it across his body...Such a shame, Cutler, with this D and we could be talking SB.
hey man your team is undefeated after four games. they're coming off a win against dallas, who came into the game with the no. one rushing O and a nice D. why think negative? why can't your team think SB? i can understand thinkind WWCutlerD but ortons ok enough to feel good about.
I usually am positive but I live in Lion-land and had to watch 3 hrs of Cutler followed by 3 hrs of Orton. :goodposting:
 
so I'm going to go on the record in Mid March and project a 5 win season for 2009, give or take. Optimism right now is at an all time low.
early October now and I'm revising to an 8 win season at the floor. 4-0 right now with three games left vs oak and KC. Broncos win those and one other and you've got 8 wins. VERY impressed with this D. Stout vs the run, scoring D is phenomenal, getting some nice turnovers, FANTASTIC rush, Champ still playing at a very high level, Dawkins bringing both the energy and the hits...man, this D is more than I could have dreamed it could be. I didn't believe in it this far based on the caliber of the competition, but they did a very nice job vs Dallas today.The O still feels like they haven't figured things out yet, and I'm getting nervous. Orton has some serious accuracy problems. He's making good reads and decisions (from what I can see), but the ball isn't getting where it needs to go. I'm hoping that as the finger heals, he gains some accuracy. i don't think we need pin-point accuracy, just a slight improvement would make a world of difference. 0 int's and 4-0 so I'm not complaining.Running game - overall it looked very good. Short yardage usage remains a quesiton mark to me. They couldn't get it done last week vs oak, they struggled with short yardage today. I have no idea why they had a DL running lead blocker on a critical 4th and one play - dude tripped, and never made it to Brookings, who absolutely blew up the play. I hope Buckhalter is OK, but I'm selfishly looking forward to see what Moreno could do if he had 20-25 carries.McD has got to find a way to get Royal involved. When he does that, everyone who is dropping Royal will look silly. I don't know why it hasn't happened yet, but I'm positive it will.
 
moleculo said:
It's a good day to be a Bronco fan.
:shock: I wanted to reserve judgment on all the offseason moves and it was hard trying to figure out WTF was going on some of the time. Well it looks like there was a method to all the madness. Five wins won't clinch the playoffs, but this team is on the right track.
 
I am sure many Broncos fans, like myself, are tired of seeing them lose to the Chargers, so it will be interesting to see how this improved team does against the flailing Chargers next Monday. The Broncos are riding high at 5-0, while the Chargers are probably lucky to be 2-2. This game is there for the taking, even with it being in San Diego. It isn't the end of the world if they lose, but it would be nice to see them come out of San Diego with a win for once. IIRC, it hasn't happened since '05.

 
I am sure many Broncos fans, like myself, are tired of seeing them lose to the Chargers, so it will be interesting to see how this improved team does against the flailing Chargers next Monday. The Broncos are riding high at 5-0, while the Chargers are probably lucky to be 2-2. This game is there for the taking, even with it being in San Diego. It isn't the end of the world if they lose, but it would be nice to see them come out of San Diego with a win for once. IIRC, it hasn't happened since '05.
actually the chargers are unlucky to not be 3-1. That balt game was very winnableyour boys have impressed me so far this year, nice win at home vs NE.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And they could have lost the Oakland game. They could be 1-3. It goes both ways. What matters is they are 2-2. :fishing:

What's great is you know Chargers fans were thinking, "Gah, another slow start, but the AFC West is so crappy, they can eventually get things going, and still win the division." That probably will not be the case. Norv and his team aren't gonna be able to backdoor their way to an 8-8 division title this year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Despite the "could be"s surrounding the Chargers, ultimately they're a 2-2 team that's played like a 2-2 team. Their total scoring margin for the season is -1, which just screams 2-2.

 
And they could have lost the Oakland game. They could be 1-3. It goes both ways. What matters is they are 2-2. :DWhat's great is you know Chargers fans were thinking, "Gah, another slow start, but the AFC West is so crappy, they can eventually get things going, and still win the division." That probably will not be the case. Norv and his team aren't gonna be able to backdoor their way to an 8-8 division title this year.
pretty sure you guys choked it away last year with the lead in the division, the chargers just won when they had to.If SD wins on Monday its 5-1 and 3-2. Harldy a giant lead
 
Regardless of who did what last year, or what the lead will be after Monday night, you are missing my main point, which is that 8-8 ain't gonna get it down in the AFC West this year. So far, the Chargers don't look any better than they did last year (when they were 8-8). On the flip side, the Broncos arguably have a much more difficult schedule on paper from this point on than the Chargers do.

 
And they could have lost the Oakland game. They could be 1-3. It goes both ways. What matters is they are 2-2. :unsure:What's great is you know Chargers fans were thinking, "Gah, another slow start, but the AFC West is so crappy, they can eventually get things going, and still win the division." That probably will not be the case. Norv and his team aren't gonna be able to backdoor their way to an 8-8 division title this year.
pretty sure you guys choked it away last year with the lead in the division, the chargers just won when they had to.If SD wins on Monday its 5-1 and 3-2. Harldy a giant lead
It's not the lead the Chargers should be concerned about. It's how the respective teams have looked on the field.
Regardless of who did what last year, or what the lead will be after Monday night, you are missing my main point, which is that 8-8 ain't gonna get it down in the AFC West this year. So far, the Chargers don't look any better than they did last year (when they were 8-8). On the flip side, the Broncos arguably have a much more difficult schedule on paper from this point on than the Chargers do.
That "difficult schedule on paper" is overrated, and mostly a product of preseason hype. Copy/pasting from another thread:
Denver's upcoming schedule:mad: San Diego (2-2)BYE@ Baltimore (3-2)Vs. Pittsburgh (3-2)@ Washington (2-3)Vs. San Diego (2-2)Vs. NYGiants (5-0)@ Kansas City (0-5)@ Indy (5-0)Vs. Oakland (1-4)@ Philly (4-1)Vs. Kansas City (0-5)Total record of remaining opponents: 27-26Record of previous opponents (not counting games against Denver): 12-8
If Denver splits with SD and beats Wash/KC/Oak/KC, then Denver's 10-6 even if they lose to Baltimore/Pitt/NYG/Indy/Philly. For SD to match Denver at 10-6 (again, assuming a split), they'd need to go 7-3 against their remaining schedule. Doable, but difficult given they have the Giants, Eagles, and Bengals left to play. And if either team is capable of blowing a division game against KC or Oakland, so far SD looks like the more likely candidate.
 
I actually think the Pittsburgh home game is very winnable for the Broncos now. McDaniels knows from his NE days how to beat the Steelers defense: Spread the field with 4 or 5 WRs and throw all day, instead of trying to force the run and putting yourself in obvious 2nd and 3rd and long situations against that 'D'. Don't think the Broncos won't do that when they play the Steelers, who aren't as good this year as they were last year.

 
I'll bet at the end of the season if they take this division I won't be able to find a single person who ever said a bad word about their ownership, management, or coaching staff.

everybody'll be out sportin' the colors.

:bye: :lmao: :loco:

this is why we're all lucky wiseass fans don't run these teams.

 
It's a good day to be a Bronco fan.
today is even better!!!Six-and-Holy Crap, we're undefeated!!!When Gruden was singing the praises of Denver tonight, I cried a little bit on the inside. After all we as fans went through this off-season, it's absolutely amazing to be on top of the football world.
 
God, I was so tired of losing to the Chargers, to win that game tonight AT San Diego felt great, and the way they won it, knocking the crap out of Rivers, felt even better.

6-0. Unbelievable. :rolleyes: :thumbup:

 
kick out a hall of fame coach that seemed to be heading in the right place with the team. check.bring in a punk 32 yr old brat as a head coach who thinks he is bill belicheck. check.lose a franchise qb and take the franchise back 13 years. check.sounds golden so far. i love denver fans. trying to act like losing cutler was a good thing. please. you'll be dreading that as bad as atlanta did for trading favre.
win first six games. check.
 
kick out a hall of fame coach that seemed to be heading in the right place with the team. check.

bring in a punk 32 yr old brat as a head coach who thinks he is bill belicheck. check.

lose a franchise qb and take the franchise back 13 years. check.

sounds golden so far.

i love denver fans. trying to act like losing cutler was a good thing. please. you'll be dreading that as bad as atlanta did for trading favre.
:rolleyes: :thumbup: No other way to put it. As a Denver fan for the past 40 years, we will not sniff the playoffs for 4 years at best. 2 years of losing records that net us top 10 picks. McDork fired. Labor problems year 3. Year 4 who knows what the league looks like and who the coach is.

I agee with Moleculo this year will be 5 wins +/-1.

But boy does Josh look cool in his hoody. I vowed not to go to a game this year, but I just might go to just hassle him or I might try and go to his coaches show at the restaurant and throw food at him. One has to have something to build on in this pathetic year.
oh good --- here's another one. :lmao: :lmao: 'mcdork'......good one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seattle Times is reporting its Denver's 1st, not Chicago's

I tap out!!!

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seah...bdraftno37.html
Denver Post says it's Chicago's.
from your keyboard to the football gods ears, please let it be
Seriously - Denver's pick will be top five, whereas the pick from Chicago will probably be 30+.
I would like to start a scrapbook of these.
 
My family has been Bronco season ticket holders for 48 straight years. This string may come to an end now. I cannot tell you how much I HATE McDaniels and Xanders right now.

Let's see:

They trade a top 10 pick (maybe top 5) in next year's draft for a slow, short cornerback in the 2nd round that quite possibly could have been available to them in the 3rd round. BRILLIANT!!!!

They trade both of their 3rd round picks for a blocking TE who caught 8, yes count them 8 passes this past season (a TE that might not have even been drafted) even though they already have Daniel Graham, one of the league's best blocking TE's. BRILLIANT!!!

They sign a rediculous number of running backs in free agency, and then draft a running back with their first pick, when they desperately need defensive help. BRILLIANT!!!

All this on top of the absolute stupidity of trading Cutler.

I can't wait to see how they screw up the second day of the draft.

BRILLIANT!!!
BRILLIANT!!!
 
Seattle Times is reporting its Denver's 1st, not Chicago's

I tap out!!!

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seah...bdraftno37.html
Denver Post says it's Chicago's.
from your keyboard to the football gods ears, please let it be
Seriously - Denver's pick will be top five, whereas the pick from Chicago will probably be 30+.
I would like to start a scrapbook of these.
yes, if you keep looking, you will find tons of other posts where I badmouthed the direction of the Broncos in April. I was not pleased back then, which makes the turn-around even more exhilarating.
 
My family has been Bronco season ticket holders for 48 straight years. This string may come to an end now. I cannot tell you how much I HATE McDaniels and Xanders right now.

Let's see:

They trade a top 10 pick (maybe top 5) in next year's draft for a slow, short cornerback in the 2nd round that quite possibly could have been available to them in the 3rd round. BRILLIANT!!!!

They trade both of their 3rd round picks for a blocking TE who caught 8, yes count them 8 passes this past season (a TE that might not have even been drafted) even though they already have Daniel Graham, one of the league's best blocking TE's. BRILLIANT!!!

They sign a rediculous number of running backs in free agency, and then draft a running back with their first pick, when they desperately need defensive help. BRILLIANT!!!

All this on top of the absolute stupidity of trading Cutler.

I can't wait to see how they screw up the second day of the draft.

BRILLIANT!!!
BRILLIANT!!!
Keep 'em comin GJ. see if you can find the one where I said Pat Bowlen should sell the team. Ha Ha I was pretty pissed. SSOG called me out, and he was right. I wouldn't say I jumped off the bandwagon, I've been on it for 37 years so far, but I was pissed and vented in the wrong way.
 
I wouldn't say I jumped off the bandwagon, I've been on it for 37 years so far, but I was pissed and vented in the wrong way.
Same here. I was royally pissed, as I was convinced Bowlen hiring McDaniels had set the team back for years. Man, was I wrong! And I happy to have been so wrong. :goodposting:
 
Moreno's is obviously the future in Denver, but I've been damn impressed with Buckhalter all season. He's still got a real nice burst. I've actually gotten him confused with Moreno on a # of runs this year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
God, I was so tired of losing to the Chargers, to win that game tonight AT San Diego felt great, and the way they won it, knocking the crap out of Rivers, felt even better. 6-0. Unbelievable. :goodposting: :lmao:
I noticed Rivers jawing all game long, too. I wonder if Yudkin is still going to insist that Rivers isn't a trash talker. ;)
I think we're gonna need a bigger bandwagon.
Yeah. We have to make room for you.Seriously, you can't show up today and say that and expect us to take you seriously. Where were you a month and a half ago, guy?
 
I think we're gonna need a bigger bandwagon.
Yeah. We have to make room for you.Seriously, you can't show up today and say that and expect us to take you seriously. Where were you a month and a half ago, guy?
I wasn't on footballguys, so I guess I was nowhere.sorry, brutha.
No problem, hop aboard, plenty of room on the bandwagon. It's a party right now, let's enjoy the here and now. The more the merrier.
 
I actually already have a team, but I am a fan of good football, smart football, team football, and the mcdaniels way.

I'd be tempted to call it the patriot way, but I'm not gonna insult josh like that.

 
I'll bet at the end of the season if they take this division I won't be able to find a single person who ever said a bad word about their ownership, management, or coaching staff.everybody'll be out sportin' the colors. :lmao: :lmao::lmao:this is why we're all lucky wiseass fans don't run these teams.
Probably. Some of us were willing to see what was on the field before jumping to conclusions. That said, none of us saw a 6-0 start on the horizon.
 
bicycle_seat_sniffer said:
The only good thing is that this will lead to Norvs firing for sure.
:hot:I know I've said it before, but I never felt the hatred for the Chargers that I do for the Raiders. I like their uniforms, I think their city is great, I've always been a Schottenheimer fan (mostly because I felt that SOMEONE had to appreciate just how great of a coach he really was), and I think Tomlinson and Gates and Merriman have just been fun players to watch. I'm starting to grow some dislike for them pretty much entirely because I hate Philip Rivers, but still, if one non-Denver AFC West team is going to succeed, I want it to be San Diego. And they were never going to succeed under Turner. Jeremy Foley, Florida's athletic director, lives by the motto that "anything that must be done eventually must be done immediately", and I think everyone knows that Turner's going to have to be fired eventually... so if this is what it takes to get it done immediately, then this is a positive step for the Chargers.
 
from a Bronco fan blog - posted in late July:

Monday, July 27, 2009

2009 Broncos remind me of 77

Welcome to my "sports in denver" blog. As a denver broncos season ticket holder since 1968 I am having a strange sense of deja vu as the Broncos open training camp this week.

This 2009 Broncos season reminds me of the atmosphere just before the miracle 1977 season.

Consider in 1977 the Broncos:

fired their most successful head coach in team history (John Ralston)

hired the New England Patriots offensive coordinator as new coach (Red Miller)

were blown out in a late season game the year before to miss the playoffs (38-14 loss to new england in week 12)

entered the season with an imbalance - great defense, bad offense

entered the season with a new veteran starting quarterback acquired by trade (Craig Morton)

Fast forward to 2009, the Broncos:

fired their most successful head coach in team history (Mike Shanahan)

hired the New England Patriots offensive coordinator as new coach (Josh McDaniels)

were blown out in a late season game the year before to miss the playoffs (52-21 loss to san diego in week 17)

entered the season with an imbalance - great offense, bad defense

entered the season with a new veteran starting quarterback acquired by trade (Kyle Orton)

Both the 1977 edition and the 2009 edition of the Broncos had very difficult schedules.

1977:

St. Louis Cardinals 10 wins 4 losses in 1976

Buffalo Bills 2 wins 12 losses in 1976

@Seattle Seahawks 2 wins 12 losses in 1976

Kansas City Chiefs 5 wins 9 losses in 1976

@Oakland Raiders 13 wins 1 loss in 1976

@Cincinnati Bengals 10 wins 4 losses in 1976

Oakland Raiders 13 wins 1 loss in 1976

Pittsburgh Steelers 10 wins 4 losses in 1976

@San Diego Chargers 6 wins 8 losses in 1976

@Kansas City Chiefs 5 wins 9 losses in 1976

Baltimore Colts 11 wins 3 losses in 1976

@Houston Oilers 5 wins 9 losses in 1976

San Diego Chargers 6 wins 8 losses in 1976

@Dallas Cowboys 11 wins 3 losses in 1976

2009:

@Cincinnati 4 wins 11 losses 1 tie in 2008

Cleveland 4 wins 12 losses in 2008

@Oakland 5 wins 11 losses in 2008

Dallas 9 wins 7 losses in 2008

New England 11 wins 5 losses in 2008

@San Diego 8 wins 8 losses in 2008

@Baltimore 11 wins 5 losses in 2008

Pittsburgh 12 wins 4 losses in 2008

@Washington 8 wins 8 losses in 2008

San Diego 8 wins 8 losses in 2008

NY Giants 12 wins 4 losses in 2008

@Kansas City 2 wins 14 losses in 2008

@Indianapolis 12 wins 4 losses in 2008

Oakland 5 wins 11 losses in 2008

@Philadelphia 9 wins 6 losses 1 tie in 2008

Kansas City 2 wins 14 losses in 2008

Outside of the AFC West the Broncos faced five teams with 10 wins or more the previous season in 1977 and will face 5 teams with 10 wins or more the prior season outside the AFC West in 2009. Yes, in 1977 there was only a 14 game schedule, but the Broncos 2009 16 game schedule is comparable considering the 2009 team will also be playing two 9 win teams (Dallas and Philly) outside the division.

The 1977 Broncos had to rebuild a shaky offense. They had 3 new starters in the offensive line to start the season (Mike Montler center, Andy Mauer left tackle, Paul Howard right guard - howard had missed the 76 season with injury). The schedule started with a difficult but winnable game - against the 10-4 Cardinals at Mile High, followed by 3 games against weaker teams before the schedule got much tougher. The 77 team team struggled in the opener but had just enough to beat the Cardinals 7-0. Three wins against inferior teams put the Broncos at 4-0 heading into Oakland in week 5. That week 5 game was one of the best in Broncos history, a stunning 30-7 Denver win over the hated Raiders. Suddenly the Broncos were 5-0, with a win against the NFL's defending Super Bowl champion. The team's confidence grew game by game and they finished with a remarkable 12-2 record.

Just like thier 1977 counterparts, I think if the 2009 Broncos can get off to a good start in the soft early part of their schedule they can surprise. The 2009 Broncos have to rebuild a shaky defense and it's going to take a few games to get that unit performing at an acceptable level. The Cincinnati opener is going to be difficult but winnable (just like the 77 opener against the Cardinals) followed by two easier games (Cleveland, Oakland) before the schedule gets really tough.

No one predicted the 1977 Broncos would have a winning record, much less a Super Bowl season. "Red Miller's going to need at least a year to get his system in place", "No way the Broncos make the playoffs with that schedule", was heard around town.

I'm hearing the same barbs about Josh McDaniels and the 2009 Broncos. This long time fan has hope for 2009. I hear McDaniels saying the Broncos were too much of a finesse team last season, and he plans to implement a more physical, hard nosed style of play. Red Miller implemented a similar change in team chemistry in 1977.

Can history repeat itself? The patched up 77 Bronco offense started shaky but by December scored 34 points in a playoff win against one of the best defenses of the decade (Pittsburgh's Steel Curtain). Maybe a shaky 2009 Denver defense will gel as the season progresses, just like that '77 offense. Even with a new quarterback the 2009 Denver offense will be fine. I expect lots of points scored with the addition of rookie rb Knowshon Moreno to an already impressive set of skill players and a solid offensive line. While I don't anticipate the 2009 Broncos to reach the Super Bowl, I think it's far too early to write off the season. Just remember what happened in 77!
some other comparisons so far:the '77 team went 6-0 before they lost their first game. At seasons end, they had the #3 scoring D, and #10 scoring O. So far, this years Broncos are the #1 scoring D and #10 scoring O.

Game by game, this years Broncos has mimicked the '77 schedule and results pretty closely - close win vs a beatable team in opening day, 3 wins vs weaker teams, and a huge win in week 5 against the Pats.

QB stats - comparing stats pre-brocno and as a bronco:

Craig Morton: year TD INT Y/A rating1976NYG 9 20 6.6 55.61977DEN 14 8 7.6 82.0Kyle Orton:year TD INT Y/A rating 2008CHI 18 12 6.4 79.62009DEN 9 1 7.6 100.1(also - Morton, Orton...same name!!) I post this to show a significant turnaround in each guys production - neither guy should have been expected to do much. both guys gained almost a whole yard in YPA and just a bit more than 20 points in QB ratings.for those whom aren't students of Bronco history, the 1977 team was the third winning team in Bronco history and the first playoff team. This team won the clubs first ever playoff game(s), and found themselves in the Superbowl.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top