What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2014 World Cup Thread*** (2 Viewers)

One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
In the Euros, Rooney was supposed to do that. There are clips of Hart screaming at him to do it.

I'd be surprised if Bradley doesn't man mark Moutinho on Sunday.
I am not talking about generic man marking.

Bradley can't do what I am suggesting because he is too important offensively to the team.

I know many teams man mark, but my question was much more strict than a typical man markers responsibility.
Yeah - you would really have to take Beckerman out of the middle to keep any semblance of defensive shape, and tell him he goes where Ronaldo goes, and he should be thinking elephant walk the entire game.

 
One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
This definitely happens. I don't know why England didn't do it to Pirlo, but teams will man-mark opponents to limit their space. Usually it's a DM on a playmaker from what I can tell.
So tough to tell watching on TV screen. I've seen guys keep an eye on key players, but it still seems like they keep to their zonal/tactical shape and don't man-mark... at least in the sense that I think Andy and I are talking about.

I played in a 3-5-2 in college my senior year. One game against lower competition, they had one guy who was amazing. I played one of the central MFs- coach told me to man-mark him... screamed at me for taking a couple touches forward with the ball when space opened up in front of me- didn't want me to leave the guy's side EVEN when we/I had the ball.
United has used Park and Welbeck to mark players like Xavi and Pirlo in the past.That makes more sense than using a DM now that I think about it. It keeps the defensive shape intact.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian. Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland). :shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans. Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
Diego Costa was another big name coming into the tournament. He was born in Brazil but plays for Spain.

I am disappointed when articles or announcers point out the US is using dual nationals and then leave out that it happens in other countries as well.

 
One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
In the Euros, Rooney was supposed to do that. There are clips of Hart screaming at him to do it.

I'd be surprised if Bradley doesn't man mark Moutinho on Sunday.
I am not talking about generic man marking.

Bradley can't do what I am suggesting because he is too important offensively to the team.

I know many teams man mark, but my question was much more strict than a typical man markers responsibility.
You were asking about "marking a man out of the game".

 
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian.Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland).

:shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?

 
One more question... £

So Real Madrid paid ~£80MM Transfer fee couple years ago... now has Ronaldo on contract for £11MM/yr w/ £1B buyout.

That transfer was solely for the rights, correct? Team to team payment with zero going to Ronaldo?

Let's say this injury is bad (for sake of arguement). Real Madrid CAN'T be happy about him risking his career to play for WC Portugal, no? In the US the primary team could tell the player not to. Does that not work that way in Soccer?

Thanks again.
True, RM wont be happy. There is an extremely intense Club vs Country fight and this would add major fuel to the fire. Clubs are often accused of fabricating injuries to keep a top player out of international games due to upcoming club schedules. Usually around friendlies. As NR said, for major tournaments country usually wins with no fight.
I remember Chandler always had "injuries" to miss friendlies and then would play for his club team shortly after.

This is a very difficult situation for younger players because all the team has to say is "sure go away to the friendly, your back up looks ready to fill your shoes with no issues"
Wasn't there speculation that Chandler wanted to keep his Germany options open, though? Or was it his club holding him out?
Both were rumors.

 
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
cough....cough... Giuseppe ####### Rossi

 
One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
In the Euros, Rooney was supposed to do that. There are clips of Hart screaming at him to do it.I'd be surprised if Bradley doesn't man mark Moutinho on Sunday.
I am not talking about generic man marking.Bradley can't do what I am suggesting because he is too important offensively to the team.

I know many teams man mark, but my question was much more strict than a typical man markers responsibility.
You were asking about "marking a man out of the game".
I know what I was asking :) I was asking specifically about sacrificing an offensive player entirely to do nothing but man mark the entire game. I don't see any possibility of the US sacrificing Bradley this way but maybe I am way off base here.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
In the Euros, Rooney was supposed to do that. There are clips of Hart screaming at him to do it.

I'd be surprised if Bradley doesn't man mark Moutinho on Sunday.
I am not talking about generic man marking.

Bradley can't do what I am suggesting because he is too important offensively to the team.

I know many teams man mark, but my question was much more strict than a typical man markers responsibility.
Yeah - you would really have to take Beckerman out of the middle to keep any semblance of defensive shape, and tell him he goes where Ronaldo goes, and he should be thinking elephant walk the entire game.
wait... tell Beckerman to go where Ronaldo goes? Who pays for the golf cart he'd be driving to keep up with CRO?

 
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian.Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland).

:shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
You have to be a citizen of the country. Every country has different citizenship rules.

The US has players who lived here almost their entire life but can't represent the US and also has players who never stepped foot in the US playing for them because they were born US citizens.

 
One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
In the Euros, Rooney was supposed to do that. There are clips of Hart screaming at him to do it.I'd be surprised if Bradley doesn't man mark Moutinho on Sunday.
I am not talking about generic man marking.Bradley can't do what I am suggesting because he is too important offensively to the team.

I know many teams man mark, but my question was much more strict than a typical man markers responsibility.
Yeah - you would really have to take Beckerman out of the middle to keep any semblance of defensive shape, and tell him he goes where Ronaldo goes, and he should be thinking elephant walk the entire game.
Unless someone grafts Yedlins legs onto Beckerman, that is a recipe for a disaster :)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian.Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland).

:shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
:coffee:

I have no idea... but I think rules of citizenship- in regards to eligibility- are different for each country.

 
Anyone think we might see something completely different with Altidore out, Portugal's back line in shambles, and the challenge of dealing with Ronaldo?
Radically different? No - but maybe more of a flatter 4-4-2, with Dempsey and Bacon both up top, instead of having a lone striker.
Did someone say Bacon?
:lmao:

Love it!!
The best thing is that no one is even looking at him. He's just having a good time in Johannssonville.

 
One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
In the Euros, Rooney was supposed to do that. There are clips of Hart screaming at him to do it.

I'd be surprised if Bradley doesn't man mark Moutinho on Sunday.
I am not talking about generic man marking.

Bradley can't do what I am suggesting because he is too important offensively to the team.

I know many teams man mark, but my question was much more strict than a typical man markers responsibility.
Yeah - you would really have to take Beckerman out of the middle to keep any semblance of defensive shape, and tell him he goes where Ronaldo goes, and he should be thinking elephant walk the entire game.
Unless someone graphs Yedlins legs onto Beckerman, that is a recipe for a disaster :)
An error occurredYou have reached your quota of positive votes for the day
 
Really looking forward to the Italy/CR game here. Not looking for a specific result, just hoping for a great match.
Italy is my second favorite team but would be just as happy to see CONCACAF continue its good play. I can't lose today unless the game sucks.

 
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
FIFA rule...per WIki:

In the 20th century, FIFA allowed a player to represent any national team, as long as the player held citizenship of that country. In 2004, in reaction to the growing trend towards naturalisation of foreign players in some countries, FIFA implemented a significant new ruling that requires a player to demonstrate a "clear connection" to any country they wish to represent. FIFA has used its authority to overturn results of competitive international matches that feature ineligible players. [. . .] An emergency FIFA committee ruling judged that players must be able to demonstrate a "clear connection" to a country that they had not been born in but wished to represent. This ruling explicitly stated that, in such scenarios, the player must have at least one parent or grandparent who was born in that country, or the player must have been resident in that country for at least two years

[. . .]

The relevant current FIFA statute, Article 17: Acquisition of a new nationality, states:[18]



Any Player who ... [assumes] a new nationality and who has not played international football [in a match ... in an official competition of any category or any type of football for one Association] shall be eligible to play for the new representative team only if he fulfills one of the following conditions:

(a) He was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

(b) His biological mother or biological father was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

© His grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

(d) He has lived continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18 on the territory of the relevant Association.

 
One thing I never understood in soccer in all my years watching is why teams won't try a shadow marker on a key opponent player.

Sacrifice one player offensively and tell him never to leave his mark at any time.

In the England Italy game it struck me how much free space Pirlo had all game and we are not talking about the worlds most mobile player here. Pirlo dominated that game because he got the ball when ever he wanted.

It must not work tactically because no one ever tries it.
In the Euros, Rooney was supposed to do that. There are clips of Hart screaming at him to do it.I'd be surprised if Bradley doesn't man mark Moutinho on Sunday.
I am not talking about generic man marking.Bradley can't do what I am suggesting because he is too important offensively to the team.

I know many teams man mark, but my question was much more strict than a typical man markers responsibility.
You were asking about "marking a man out of the game".
I know what I was asking :) I was asking specifically about sacrificing an offensive player entirely to do nothing but man mark the entire game. I don't see any possibility of the US sacrificing Bradley this way but maybe I am way off base here.
I should hope so! ;)

I dont see the us doing it, esp with Ronaldo whos pace and license to go everywhere would confuse the hell out of the US defensively.

The US needs to vocally pass players off and make sure they stay very disciplined as CR moves around the field. Almost a zone/man set up. As he moves a player stays with him until he goes into another area then he gets passed to the next guy who marks until he moves on.... Obvious and standard I know but they have to be on top of their game for this....

 
Last edited by a moderator:
One more question... £

So Real Madrid paid ~£80MM Transfer fee couple years ago... now has Ronaldo on contract for £11MM/yr w/ £1B buyout.

That transfer was solely for the rights, correct? Team to team payment with zero going to Ronaldo?

Let's say this injury is bad (for sake of arguement). Real Madrid CAN'T be happy about him risking his career to play for WC Portugal, no? In the US the primary team could tell the player not to. Does that not work that way in Soccer?

Thanks again.
There was a really nasty instance of this last World Cup. The ever-brittle Arjen Robben played through an injury he really shouldn't have for Holland, then missed a couple months for Bayern Munich.

Bayern was pissed and demanded that Holland compensate them. In the end they agreed to play a friendly together.

 
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian.Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland).

:shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
You have to be a citizen of the country. Every country has different citizenship rules.

The US has players who lived here almost their entire life but can't represent the US and also has players who never stepped foot in the US playing for them because they were born US citizens.
I just think that's a false distinction. Presumably every player has a responsibility with the ball and without the ball. I don't think you need to sacrifice offense in order to have an advanced midfielder mark a deep-lying playmaker out of the game. You do have to sacrifice defensive shape in the middle of the field, particularly if the play-maker is clever enough to just move out to the flank the way Pirlo does when he's man-marked.

 
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
FIFA rule...per WIki:

In the 20th century, FIFA allowed a player to represent any national team, as long as the player held citizenship of that country. In 2004, in reaction to the growing trend towards naturalisation of foreign players in some countries, FIFA implemented a significant new ruling that requires a player to demonstrate a "clear connection" to any country they wish to represent. FIFA has used its authority to overturn results of competitive international matches that feature ineligible players. [. . .] An emergency FIFA committee ruling judged that players must be able to demonstrate a "clear connection" to a country that they had not been born in but wished to represent. This ruling explicitly stated that, in such scenarios, the player must have at least one parent or grandparent who was born in that country, or the player must have been resident in that country for at least two years

[. . .]

The relevant current FIFA statute, Article 17: Acquisition of a new nationality, states:[18]



Any Player who ... [assumes] a new nationality and who has not played international football [in a match ... in an official competition of any category or any type of football for one Association] shall be eligible to play for the new representative team only if he fulfills one of the following conditions:

(a) He was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

(b) His biological mother or biological father was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

© His grandmother or grandfather was born on the territory of the relevant Association;

(d) He has lived continuously for at least five years after reaching the age of 18 on the territory of the relevant Association.
Interesting. Appreciate the post. :thumbup:

 
So, if the US were to actually get the WC in 2022 - where would it be staged:

Brazil is using 12 stadiums, South Africa used 10, in 1994 US used 9 stadiums, for 24 teams.

My first guess was 12 cities/regions:

Miami

Washington

Boston

New York

Chicago

Dallas

Kansas City

Atlanta

Los Angeles

San Francisco

Seattle

Denver

Official Cities used in Bid:

Philadelphia - Lincoln Financial

Tampa - Raymond James

Boston - Gillette

Washington - FedEx Field

New York East Rutherford - MetLife Stadium

Miami - Sun Life Stadium

Atlanta - Georgia Dome

Baltimore - M&T

Houston - Reliant Stadium

Kansas City - Arrowhead

Indianapolis - Lucas Oil

Dallas - Cotton Bowl and Cowboys Stadium

Nashville - LP Field

San Diego - Qualcomm

Seattle - Husky Stadium and CenturyLink

Phoenix - U of Phoenix Stadium

Denver - Mile High

Los Angeles - Rose Bowl and Memorial Coliseum

Only real surprise for me is nothing in Chicago - seems like a natural place to host games. Also, not sure where FIFA is with FieldTurf - a number of stadiums have it - did see that Georgia Dome was listed as being able to install grass field, I suppose like Detroit did.
Fixed.

-QG

 
Was there a gif made of the hit on Pereira yesterday? I missed it and I can't seem to find a working link to the hit. I heard it was bad but never saw it.

TIA

 
It would be quite something if the Round of 16 had a game featuring Cote D'...sorry - I mean Ivory Coast (for irked about such things) taking on the unheralded Ticos of Rich Coast.

-QG

 
Why am I getting an authorization error for italy match on Watch ESPN? Watched matches yesterday...

Alternate places to watch?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian.Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland).

:shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
You have to be a citizen of the country. Every country has different citizenship rules.

The US has players who lived here almost their entire life but can't represent the US and also has players who never stepped foot in the US playing for them because they were born US citizens.
I just think that's a false distinction. Presumably every player has a responsibility with the ball and without the ball. I don't think you need to sacrifice offense in order to have an advanced midfielder mark a deep-lying playmaker out of the game. You do have to sacrifice defensive shape in the middle of the field, particularly if the play-maker is clever enough to just move out to the flank the way Pirlo does when he's man-marked.
1) you quoted the wrong post I think :)

2) it is not a false distinction because I am just asking a question about a tactic that is rarely if ever used to generate some conversation. I understand the responsibilities of players. I am not saying to sacrifice defensive shape at all. I am saying pretend you have a red card and are playing with 10 men. Lineup defensively as you would in that case to keep defensive shape and use the extra man to shadow a player who could control the game if he saw too much of the ball.

 
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian.Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland).

:shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
You have to be a citizen of the country. Every country has different citizenship rules.

The US has players who lived here almost their entire life but can't represent the US and also has players who never stepped foot in the US playing for them because they were born US citizens.
I just think that's a false distinction. Presumably every player has a responsibility with the ball and without the ball. I don't think you need to sacrifice offense in order to have an advanced midfielder mark a deep-lying playmaker out of the game. You do have to sacrifice defensive shape in the middle of the field, particularly if the play-maker is clever enough to just move out to the flank the way Pirlo does when he's man-marked.
1) you quoted the wrong post I think :)

2) it is not a false distinction because I am just asking a question about a tactic that is rarely if ever used to generate some conversation. I understand the responsibilities of players. I am not saying to sacrifice defensive shape at all. I am saying pretend you have a red card and are playing with 10 men. Lineup defensively as you would in that case to keep defensive shape and use the extra man to shadow a player who could control the game if he saw too much of the ball.
And when we say that tactic is not at all uncommon, you say we're misunderstanding you. Teams do that. But they only do that when they don't have the ball. Because it would make no sense to do that when they do have the ball.

 
Just realized that some of the guys on the US team have accents. Not as homegrown as I had pictured in my head, I guess.
Jermaine Jones, John Brooks, Fabian Johnson, and Tim Chandler are all born-and-bred Germans. Mix Diskerud is born-and-bred Norwegian.Julian Green and Aron Johansson were both born in the US but raised elsewhere (Green in Germany; Johansson in Iceland).

:shrug:
It is a confusing system for both old and new fans.

Then you look at two players who could have made the team this year like Diego Fagundez and Darlington Nagbe, who are both as American as one can possibly be and yet they can't play for the US because of various citizenship laws.
It's not unique to the US either. There are plenty of players that could play for more than one country.Some examples from Germany:

Miroslav Klose - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 8.

Lukas Podolski - born in Poland and moved to Germany when he was 2.

Jerome Boateng - born in Germany, but his father is from Ghana. His half brother plays for Ghana.
So it's not like the Olympics? What is the determining factor of what team you can play for? Is it different for each country or is it a FIFA rule?
You have to be a citizen of the country. Every country has different citizenship rules.

The US has players who lived here almost their entire life but can't represent the US and also has players who never stepped foot in the US playing for them because they were born US citizens.
I just think that's a false distinction. Presumably every player has a responsibility with the ball and without the ball. I don't think you need to sacrifice offense in order to have an advanced midfielder mark a deep-lying playmaker out of the game. You do have to sacrifice defensive shape in the middle of the field, particularly if the play-maker is clever enough to just move out to the flank the way Pirlo does when he's man-marked.
1) you quoted the wrong post I think :)

2) it is not a false distinction because I am just asking a question about a tactic that is rarely if ever used to generate some conversation. I understand the responsibilities of players. I am not saying to sacrifice defensive shape at all. I am saying pretend you have a red card and are playing with 10 men. Lineup defensively as you would in that case to keep defensive shape and use the extra man to shadow a player who could control the game if he saw too much of the ball.
And when we say that tactic is not at all uncommon, you say we're misunderstanding you. Teams do that. But they only do that when they don't have the ball. Because it would make no sense to do that when they do have the ball.
Floppo understood what I was specifically asking which is not what you are saying. I know teams do what you said obviously, that is a very common tactic.

Lets drop it. We are not even reading the same book much less on the same page. :)

 
One more question... £

So Real Madrid paid ~£80MM Transfer fee couple years ago... now has Ronaldo on contract for £11MM/yr w/ £1B buyout.

That transfer was solely for the rights, correct? Team to team payment with zero going to Ronaldo?

Let's say this injury is bad (for sake of arguement). Real Madrid CAN'T be happy about him risking his career to play for WC Portugal, no? In the US the primary team could tell the player not to. Does that not work that way in Soccer?

Thanks again.
There was a really nasty instance of this last World Cup. The ever-brittle Arjen Robben played through an injury he really shouldn't have for Holland, then missed a couple months for Bayern Munich.

Bayern was pissed and demanded that Holland compensate them. In the end they agreed to play a friendly together.
Very FM of them...

 
Teams do that. But they only do that when they don't have the ball. Because it would make no sense to do that when they do have the ball.
If teams reliably kept the ball forever, I'd agree with you. But I can imagine how it might make sense to play "defense" against a particularly dangerous player even when his team didn't have the ball, to prevent the possibility of a quick counterattack.

 
teams reliably kept the ball forever, I'd agree with you. But I can imagine how it might make sense to play "defense" against a particularly dangerous player even when his team didn't have the ball, to prevent the possibility of a quick counterattack.
One of the reasons Pirlo always has so much space is no one pays attention to him when the opposing team has the ball. As soon as the ball turns over he is always open.

It would be a huge offensive sacrifice to shadow a player but you could starve a player like Pirlo. Obviously though as I said in my original question, it must be too big a sacrifice for the possible benefits.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top