What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*Official 2015 Philadelphia Eagles* - Winning when it doesnt count (2 Viewers)

For those that are interested, shady is going to be on 97.5 with Mikey Miss at 4:45 this afternoon
With Westbrook as a guest host.
So what did he say
I didn't listen to the end, but Westbrook kind of derailed the whole thing. He and Mike each asked a question about Chip to start, then Westbrook moves on to a question about the upcoming game. Mike tries to get to back to the Chip stuff, and Shady is not saying much, but then Westbrook tries to go back to the upcoming game again.

Then Mike kind of gets Shady going a little bit, bringing up quotes from the past about Chip not understanding people of a certain culture and the fact that Shady said that Rex doesn't care what kind of car the players drive. He's winding Shady up a bit, trying to get him to compare the two coaches and really specify the problems with Chip. But Westbrook keeps talking over Shady and giving standard PR type answers for him, like "sometimes two people just don't see eye to eye" and "players like players' coaches".

I guess that Westbrook was trying to save Shady, out of players' loyalty or something, and I don't really care about all the mudslinging, but it just seemed like Westbrook was not going to let Mike create "good radio".
BWest was basically Shady's mentor. Maybe just instinct to look out for him.

 
So the past couple days Mikey Miss has been stating that if the Eagles finish 7-9 and win their first playoff game, that would be a successful season. I strongly disagree and have my reasons but I'm curious what actual knowledgeable Eagles fans think.

 
If we win a playoff game I don't care what our regular season record was
But why would you call that a success? Should the standard be winning a playoff game? Here are some reasons why I wouldn't call this season a success (assuming they finish 7-9):

1. They've regressed in each of the 3 years that Chip has been here. Have teams figured him out?

2. So what does one playoff win really mean if it compromises their draft pick by 10+ slots?

3. False sense of hope that this team doesn't have a lot of holes to fix

 
Last edited by a moderator:
So the past couple days Mikey Miss has been stating that if the Eagles finish 7-9 and win their first playoff game, that would be a successful season. I strongly disagree and have my reasons but I'm curious what actual knowledgeable Eagles fans think.
I think it's a success. Playoff wins are the measuring stick. If Chip wins one, that's a step forward. Despite the turmoil and the terrible division, if we take advantage of the bad situation and win then we can build off of that. Carolina was 7-8-1 last year and undefeated this year. Seattle was 7-9 in 2010 and used that playoff win to start their run.

Playoff wins are what the whole season is about. Doesn't matter how you get there.

 
Wouldn't be shocked to see the team drop to 5-9 after a pair of home losses to BUF and ARI. Buffalo is a very good team and matches up well with PHI IMO. Arizona is a top-3 team IMO and they get 10 days off before we face them. But, then again, I never thought they would win at Foxborough, and the D/ST made huge plays to get that one in the win column.

Even at 5-9, though, they can likely win the two division games and still get in at 7-9. And if they do raise an NFC East and can win a playoff game, then yes it's a successful 2015. Seattle and Carolina, in recent years, got in at 7-9 or 7-8-1, won a game, and used that as a springboard to an outstanding following season.

Of course, let's just beat Buffalo before anything else. Think we have our hands full with Taylor/McCoy/Watkins et al. I think we need a D/ST impact play again. Should be a close game either way.

 
What might work in our favor is that Buffalo is the most undisciplined team in the NFL. If we play strong on D and ST and don't make mistakes on O, that might be enough because BUF will make plenty of mistakes.

 
What might work in our favor is that Buffalo is the most undisciplined team in the NFL. If we play strong on D and ST and don't make mistakes on O, that might be enough because BUF will make plenty of mistakes.
You are correct. Those penalties might determine the winner in this close game. Being at home, we really need to win

 
Let's see if we can beat Buffao first.
Thats the funny thing. Somehow, Missinelli thinks we're going to 5-9 first. Like people won't lose their #### if that happens.
So he says we lose the next two but win the last two? I don't know schedules and/or tiebreakers but wouldn't that require additional help to win the division at 7-9? Doesn't sound like controlling their own destiny for the division or any guarantee they get in at 7-9.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's see if we can beat Buffao first.
Thats the funny thing. Somehow, Missinelli thinks we're going to 5-9 first. Like people won't lose their #### if that happens.
So he says we lose the next two but win the last two? I don't know schedules and/or tiebreakers but wouldn't that require additional help to win the division at 7-9? Doesn't sound like controlling their own destiny for the division or any guarantee they get in at 7-9.
They can't do that. Have to go 3-1 imo

 
Let's see if we can beat Buffao first.
Thats the funny thing. Somehow, Missinelli thinks we're going to 5-9 first. Like people won't lose their #### if that happens.
So he says we lose the next two but win the last two? I don't know schedules and/or tiebreakers but wouldn't that require additional help to win the division at 7-9? Doesn't sound like controlling their own destiny for the division or any guarantee they get in at 7-9.
They can't do that. Have to go 3-1 imo
At 7-9 assuming the Eagles 2 wins are against Giants and Redskins, they will win all tiebreakers. Does anyone think the Giants or Redskins can go 3-1? That was Mikey Miss's point. I tend to agree.

 
Let's see if we can beat Buffao first.
Thats the funny thing. Somehow, Missinelli thinks we're going to 5-9 first. Like people won't lose their #### if that happens.
So he says we lose the next two but win the last two? I don't know schedules and/or tiebreakers but wouldn't that require additional help to win the division at 7-9? Doesn't sound like controlling their own destiny for the division or any guarantee they get in at 7-9.
They can't do that. Have to go 3-1 imo
At 7-9 assuming the Eagles 2 wins are against Giants and Redskins, they will win all tiebreakers. Does anyone think the Giants or Redskins can go 3-1? That was Mikey Miss's point. I tend to agree.
Yeah guess u r right

 
Jordan Matthews added to the injury report and listed as questionable with back issues.

Good god the horror if he can't play. :X

Look for Sproles and Matthews to be involved heavily without Jordan.

 
Let's see if we can beat Buffao first.
Thats the funny thing. Somehow, Missinelli thinks we're going to 5-9 first. Like people won't lose their #### if that happens.
So he says we lose the next two but win the last two? I don't know schedules and/or tiebreakers but wouldn't that require additional help to win the division at 7-9? Doesn't sound like controlling their own destiny for the division or any guarantee they get in at 7-9.
They can't do that. Have to go 3-1 imo
2-2 gets us in if we win the last 2 almost surely.

Wash/NYG would have to go 3-1 to get in, which means with the 1 loss to us each, they'd need to go 3-0 to get in.

I really do think we go 0-2 then 2-0. Hoping otherwise of course, but those last two are far more important then these two. These two games are somehow not even that important.

Wash needs to go 3-0 vs: Chicago, Buffalo, Dallas

NYG needs to go 3-0 vs: Miami, Carolina, Minny

 
Jordan Matthews added to the injury report and listed as questionable with back issues.

Good god the horror if he can't play. :X

Look for Sproles and Matthews to be involved heavily without Jordan.
Ya this was a weird one, just saw it. Not sure how he did it, but don't like that he's questionable and not probable. If we beat the Bills with good coaching from Chip, and good numbers by Cooper, Shady is going to explode.

 
A playoff win is absolutely a successful season. Think we win tomorrow, lose to Arizona and win the the last two. If that happens and we win a host playoff game, I don't know how that can't be considered a success.

 
Wow I'm shocked that all of you would consider a playoff win (at 7-9) a successful season. They've regressed this year and one potentially flukey win in the playoffs doesn't change that fact. Yes they could be the next Seattle or Carolina. I'm sure there are also a lot of examples of teams that won a crap division and stunk the following year. :shrug:

 
Wow I'm shocked that all of you would consider a playoff win (at 7-9) a successful season. They've regressed this year and one potentially flukey win in the playoffs doesn't change that fact. Yes they could be the next Seattle or Carolina. I'm sure there are also a lot of examples of teams that won a crap division and stunk the following year. :shrug:
Going 7-9 and winning a playoff game is more successful then going 6-10 and getting a higher draft pick. Our standards of success obviously change weekly. Heading into the season I bet we all would be let down if we were told we'd go 7-9 and win one playoff game then be done. Right now, at THIS POINT, a playoff win would be an enormous success.

 
I see a lot of people calling for a 3-point game and I just don't see it. We don't play well at home, don't play well against attacking D's and McCoy has been on fire lately. I'm thinking Bills win 27-13

I just hope I'm wrong

 
Hey guys did any you catch the comments on 94 yesterday around 11:30 that reporters said Mathews seemed leery about his abilities today? I think it was the Ray and Glen show (I was flipping back and forth with 97.5). The report suggested that Mathews didn't display much confidence but then Ray, I believe said he doesn't say much no matter what. I posted this in the Murray thread since people are looking for a ray of hope,to play him. It's possible Mathews won't have much of a roll (not that we expected a lot of touches anyway.)

 
Hey guys did any you catch the comments on 94 yesterday around 11:30 that reporters said Mathews seemed leery about his abilities today? I think it was the Ray and Glen show (I was flipping back and forth with 97.5). The report suggested that Mathews didn't display much confidence but then Ray, I believe said he doesn't say much no matter what. I posted this in the Murray thread since people are looking for a ray of hope,to play him. It's possible Mathews won't have much of a roll (not that we expected a lot of touches anyway.)
You're talking Ryan, right?

 
Hey guys did any you catch the comments on 94 yesterday around 11:30 that reporters said Mathews seemed leery about his abilities today? I think it was the Ray and Glen show (I was flipping back and forth with 97.5). The report suggested that Mathews didn't display much confidence but then Ray, I believe said he doesn't say much no matter what. I posted this in the Murray thread since people are looking for a ray of hope,to play him. It's possible Mathews won't have much of a roll (not that we expected a lot of touches anyway.)
You're talking Ryan, right?
Yes. Not Jordan. I was surprised at this. Hey not to stir #### but does anyone think it's Ryan who's the player that's "injured and doesn't trust playing for Chip" per that Jersey.com report?

 
Boys on NF network reporting that Murray will be fourth on the depth chart today. They even thought about not dressing him. Whether it has to do with performance, going to Lurie, or a combo of both they don't know but don't expect to see a lot of Murray from they're saying.

 
Sproles or Mathews to get the bulk? Thought I read that Mathews was sounding iffy. Seems to be setting up for a potential big day for Sproles...or barner.

 
What a train wreck - how do you bring in the league leading rusher and get here in just 14 weeks? If I'm Lurie you tell Chip that it's over. The bitterness of players that have left and now the ones that are there indicates real issues going forward. Any chances of long term success are gone with Chip remaining.

 
What a train wreck - how do you bring in the league leading rusher and get here in just 14 weeks? If I'm Lurie you tell Chip that it's over. The bitterness of players that have left and now the ones that are there indicates real issues going forward. Any chances of long term success are gone with Chip remaining.
Then you obviously don't know Lurie. He's just about the most patient owner in the league. Chip has a 5 year contract and will get his full 5 years. Whether he gets an extension or not depends on the next 2+ years.

 
What a train wreck - how do you bring in the league leading rusher and get here in just 14 weeks? If I'm Lurie you tell Chip that it's over. The bitterness of players that have left and now the ones that are there indicates real issues going forward. Any chances of long term success are gone with Chip remaining.
Every other running back on the roster, even Barner, is performing better?

 
Yeah everyone saying Sproles playing with Mathews mixed in based on conditioning/legs. And you know what? Based on merit I'm 100% on board.

Good call by coaches. The other backs have been better. Not changing schemes at this point. Play the better players. Chip wants to win, and it's the right call.

 
What a train wreck - how do you bring in the league leading rusher and get here in just 14 weeks? If I'm Lurie you tell Chip that it's over. The bitterness of players that have left and now the ones that are there indicates real issues going forward. Any chances of long term success are gone with Chip remaining.
The past 13 weeks happened. A good coach is going to put players on the field based on that ,not who led the league last season.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top