Bigboy10182000
Footballguy
@ByDavidMurphy: Sam Bradford's best attribute might be that he is not Jake Locker.
Oh ok. I'm stretching the McCoy trade as a ripoff. It was fairly fair and only time will tell who comes out on top.Twice?The Bills would've given more for Foles. Why couldn't they have ripped off Chip twice?It was fairly obvious that Chip didn't like him.....but I would have thought Foles' value would have been a bit higher around the league.Foles stinks. I don't like Bradford much but if he meets the second round conditions he's an upgrade from Foles who is back peddling to St. Louis as we speak.![]()
:X
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
@RapSheet 15s
15 seconds ago
I wouldn’t. RT @CowboysNation: I think we can end the Mariota to Philly talk.
You're on crack. Foles has accomplished more in 3 years than Bradford has his whole career.Foles stinks. I don't like Bradford much but if he meets the second round conditions he's an upgrade from Foles who is back peddling to St. Louis as we speak.
And certainly not a 2nd round pick AND A BETTER ####### QB!An always injured underperforming QB with a horrible contract ... shouldn't he have been worth a single mid-round draft pick at best?
But if the Titans reallllly like him over a rookie.....And certainly not a 2nd round pick AND A BETTER ####### QB!An always injured underperforming QB with a horrible contract ... shouldn't he have been worth a single mid-round draft pick at best?
If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
But in this scenario, the team acquiriing Bradford keeps their first round pick, so that doesn't help get Mariota.This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
The problem though is the money. Bradford's salary is going to be a sticking point in regards to moving up. Realistically...you're (probably at the least) looking at:This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
NFL executives..... really ?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
Would Eagles get the conditional 3rd pick back from Rams for Bradford playing less than 50% of games for Philly if they trade him?The problem though is the money. Bradford's salary is going to be a sticking point in regards to moving up. Realistically...you're (probably at the least) looking at:This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
2015 1,2
2015 1 (2 to St. Louis )
Bradford
another couple of mid level picks over the next two/three years.
They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
I have to think so. Bringing Bradford in with the sudden lack of skill players doesn't help the team. I imagine most had Foles (in some capacity) moving in the trade to move up. As it stands, if a team likes Bradford...I don't see why they wouldn't take him and whatever picks they're giving. The second to St. Louis obviously hurts......but maybe there was a team that valued Bradford a lot more than Foles.....to the point that the second will be negligible.Wait, we're still doing the Mariota thing?
And what QB would the Rams get. Clearly they would prefer Foles.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
Case Keenum? Marcus mariota?And what QB would the Rams get. Clearly they would prefer Foles.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
Do the Rams feel they are close to competing?....If they did with Bradford....it wouldn't make much sense to move him for a pick and be without a QB.Case Keenum? Marcus mariota?And what QB would the Rams get. Clearly they would prefer Foles.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."![]()
You don't think a top 10 pick is enough for Bradford by itself?
For real! They're the guys that are usually in charge. HTH.NFL executives..... really ?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
And the Rams dont like Winston or Mariota.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
Lol...nobody else is trading for Sam...what do you think a fan base would do if their team planned to trade for Sam flipping Bradford... I'll tell you what they would do. They would flock to a message board and post that the reason they traded for Sam was just because other teams really want him more so wait and see what we get for him...lol...chip Kelly...chooo chooo...
LOL!Lol...nobody else is trading for Sam...what do you think a fan base would do if their team planned to trade for Sam flipping Bradford... I'll tell you what they would do. They would flock to a message board and post that the reason they traded for Sam was just because other teams really want him more so wait and see what we get for him...lol...chip Kelly...chooo chooo...
You are missing the point. THEY wanted Foles over any of the QBs in the draft and didnt have to give up their first and got a 2nd back. Its a huge win for the Rams.Case Keenum? Marcus mariota?And what QB would the Rams get. Clearly they would prefer Foles.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."![]()
You don't think a top 10 pick is enough for Bradford by itself?
Hey! Slap us in the face with reality in other threads. Let us have this one to cling to a shred of hope! In Chip we trust or get out!Lol...nobody else is trading for Sam...what do you think a fan base would do if their team planned to trade for Sam flipping Bradford... I'll tell you what they would do. They would flock to a message board and post that the reason they traded for Sam was just because other teams really want him more so wait and see what we get for him...lol...chip Kelly...chooo chooo...
He showed them.@Jeff_McLane: The Browns were one. RT @SI_PeterKing: There were other teams, multiple, involved in the chase for Bradford.
Shumer getting back at his old team
I hear you. I'm done. Hope it works out for you.Hey! Slap us in the face with reality in other threads. Let us have this one to cling to a shred of hope! In Chip we trust or get out!Lol...nobody else is trading for Sam...what do you think a fan base would do if their team planned to trade for Sam flipping Bradford... I'll tell you what they would do. They would flock to a message board and post that the reason they traded for Sam was just because other teams really want him more so wait and see what we get for him...lol...chip Kelly...chooo chooo...
They like Foles better than both those guys? Says who? Is Kelly the only guy who likes mariota?And the Rams dont like Winston or Mariota.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
LOL, Here's hoping there's another piece to this madness that lands us Mariota.I hear you. I'm done. Hope it works out for you.Hey! Slap us in the face with reality in other threads. Let us have this one to cling to a shred of hope! In Chip we trust or get out!Lol...nobody else is trading for Sam...what do you think a fan base would do if their team planned to trade for Sam flipping Bradford... I'll tell you what they would do. They would flock to a message board and post that the reason they traded for Sam was just because other teams really want him more so wait and see what we get for him...lol...chip Kelly...chooo chooo...
Says the team that just traded for him?They like Foles better than both those guys? Says who? Is Kelly the only guy who likes mariota?And the Rams dont like Winston or Mariota.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
It doesn't matter anyways because no team would have traded a 1st for Bradford. We can speculate ifs all day long.
Says the team that just traded for him?They like Foles better than both those guys? Says who? Is Kelly the only guy who likes mariota?It doesn't matter anyways because no team would have traded a 1st for Bradford. We can speculate ifs all day long.And the Rams dont like Winston or Mariota.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
Exactly. So the Rams get a QB they like AND keep the 10th overall. That's good for them, right?It doesn't matter anyways because no team would have traded a 1st for Bradford.And the Rams dont like Winston or Mariota.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."
I never said it wasn't. I just doubted that any team at the top draft really preferred Bradford enough to pursue him.Exactly. So the Rams get a QB they like AND keep the 10th overall. That's good for them, right?It doesn't matter anyways because no team would have traded a 1st for Bradford.And the Rams dont like Winston or Mariota.They have a top 10 pick.Because they had nothing to offer as far as QB goes to the Rams.If that was true why didn't of any of those teams trade for Sam?This is calming me down a litte bit...
http://www.nj.com/eagles/index.ssf/2015/02/nfl_team_prefer_sam_bradford_over_marcus_mariota.html"This is really fascinating because there are teams that are sitting at the top of the draft, according to executives that I've talked to, who would believe that they would prefer to have Sam Bradford, who's 27 and coming off basically missing the last year and a half of his career -- that they would rather have then take a chance on, say, somebody like Marcus Mariota or Jamies Winston because they have seen what Bradford can do. One caveat to this is: is Bradford healthy or not coming off of two ACL surgeries? But the belief is: take a shot with Bradford and save your first round draft pick and take somebody else."