Doubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
this is the thing. It's not like franchise quarterbacks are easy to acquire. Short of tanking and winning one game or two all season, you aren't getting one in the draft unless you get lucky and find a diamond in the rough. And once a team has won, they're not parting with him.This is why I had no problem whatsoever with chip going after Bradford. He had potential to be a franchise quarterback. And we certainly didn't have one on the current roster. It doesn't look like he's going to turn out to be the savior, but I bet he's better than anyone that will be available in the offseason.Doubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
I'm not touting him. I'm saying that's Chips last hope that he'll jump for.I can't believe the number of people touting Kaep. Have they seen him the past 2 seasons?
I mean he was benched for Blaine effing Gabbert.
They're better off rolling the dice with some mediocre college QB.
Well, one not named Hackenberg at least.
Unfortunately, this isn't likely to happen. More likely is the Eagles win a couple games as a road dog, teasing us with the potential. They'll probably go into week 17 with a chance to take the division at 8-8.Lose like crazy and get a top 3 pick. Being mediocre won't get us anything. If we are going to be bad, gotta be really bad
Chip can't stand players with Kaepernick's personality/attitude. I just can't see him bringing in a guy to be the face of the franchise who wears straight-brimmed caps and Dr. Dre earphones around his neck at a press conference.I can't believe the number of people touting Kaep. Have they seen him the past 2 seasons?
I mean he was benched for Blaine effing Gabbert.
They're better off rolling the dice with some mediocre college QB.
Well, one not named Hackenberg at least.
Agreed. Wouldn't touch Kaep with a ten foot poleI can't believe the number of people touting Kaep. Have they seen him the past 2 seasons?
I mean he was benched for Blaine effing Gabbert.
They're better off rolling the dice with some mediocre college QB.
Well, one not named Hackenberg at least.
Being in the middle is the worst. You gotta be great or be really bad. No in betweenUnfortunately, this isn't likely to happen. More likely is the Eagles win a couple games as a road dog, teasing us with the potential. They'll probably go into week 17 with a chance to take the division at 8-8.To me, that just makes everything so much worse, because we'll be wanting to cheer for them even knowing it just means an even lower draft pick. It's a worst case scenarioLose like crazy and get a top 3 pick. Being mediocre won't get us anything. If we are going to be bad, gotta be really bad
I guess Bill Davis wasn't.Anyone else worried about Winston having a breakout day?
I agree and I think that's what's hurt us since moving on from McFlabb. Usually you go through 3-4 years of sucking but acquiring significant talent with high draft picks. We have stayed relevant through finding Vick and then Chip's system I believe catching teams off guard but now here we are without a lot of top talent on the roster. The good news is in todays game you can turnover a roster pretty quick but we need some talent. Who thought Carolina would be 10-0 you know. Have to have a QB though, and just a couple years ago Cam was getting destroyed by the media.Being in the middle is the worst. You gotta be great or be really bad. No in betweenUnfortunately, this isn't likely to happen. More likely is the Eagles win a couple games as a road dog, teasing us with the potential. They'll probably go into week 17 with a chance to take the division at 8-8.To me, that just makes everything so much worse, because we'll be wanting to cheer for them even knowing it just means an even lower draft pick. It's a worst case scenarioLose like crazy and get a top 3 pick. Being mediocre won't get us anything. If we are going to be bad, gotta be really bad
Only in the NFL can you keep your job after being the worst (pass D) in 2013, 2nd worst in 2014 and give up 500+ yards to last years worst team. That was one of the worst showings on D I have ever seen.I guess Bill Davis wasn't.Anyone else worried about Winston having a breakout day?![]()
Thayman, I generally don't like when you post in here, because you are usually trolling, but I can't disagree with this comment. Reading this thread is almost impossible, not because the Eagles are so bad, but a few posters are making it unreadable. At least Redskins fans are civil to each other. A happy Thanksgiving to you sir, and I hope you enjoy a disappointing Eagles performance on Turkey day. I can't see any reason why, right now, it won't be disappointing (for Eagles fans).Eagles fans are weird. No other team thread rambles for pages upon pages with posters having **** measuring contests on who's actually an "Official" fan.
I don't think I've ever seen one worse. Replacing Johnson was an impossible task, but we've seen Juan Castillo and Billy Davis since JJ. Davis staying on staff for 43 games and counting is a headscratcherOnly in the NFL can you keep your job after being the worst (pass D) in 2013, 2nd worst in 2014 and give up 500+ yards to last years worst team. That was one of the worst showings on D I have ever seen.I guess Bill Davis wasn't.Anyone else worried about Winston having a breakout day?![]()
The short week could get him an extension, but if the defense looks bad this week, and they lose again, firing him would be a way for Chip to act like he's trying to do something about it. And deflecting the heat.yeah, I wouldn't be surprised if he gets clipped in the next week.
So it's not just me seeing this with Murray
One anonymous Eagles player has questioned the effort of DeMarco Murray.
At the end of a short-yardage run against the Dolphins last week, Murray had an opportunity to run over or around 185-pound CB Brice McCain. Instead of finishing his run, Murray slid at McCain's feet. "Well, when you see DeMarco sliding before getting hit, you tell me. Was that giving full effort?" said the anonymous Eagles player. "You see that [expletive] and it makes you wonder." It comes on the heels of Sunday's argument between Mark Sanchez and Darren Sproles, who were seen bickering after a screen pass was intercepted. The Philly Inquirer counted "at least a dozen missed tackles" by Eagles players as Doug Martin ran for 235 yards in Week 11. Dating back to last season, the Eagles have lost nine of their last 14 games.
And we've been favored in every loss this season.Eagles favored by 1.5 @DET.
Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense"Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
I would think C is letting Bradford walk, drafting a QB and letting Sanchez be a placeholder until drafted QB can play, or new QB can play from day 1 and Sanchez is backup again. Sanchez is already under contract next year, so why commit extra money/years to Bradford if he isn't the answer?Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense"Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
I'd says its:
A) Bradford. Unless he has a significant injury. Fact is that he was getting better each week. I know, I know. But he was. I'll be interested to see how he finishes the season
B) Keep Bradford and hit the Draft. I didn't think we'd be bad enough to get a legit shot at a qb. This may be the year and there should be at least 2 top 10 guys.
I don't see a 'C'. He would never go into a season with Sanchez starting. We'd have a better shot at resigning Foles or getting RG3 than Sanchez starting.
Like it or not Bradford will be the best of a crappy bunch this off season. So to keep him they'll have to pony up around $18mil per year. Alex Smith is making $17mil per till 2017. Bradford is getting more than that just for the scarcity. Does Chip really want to double down on a QB he hasn't seen run his offense since the preseason?Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense" I'd says its:Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
A) Bradford. Unless he has a significant injury. Fact is that he was getting better each week. I know, I know. But he was. I'll be interested to see how he finishes the season
B) Keep Bradford and hit the Draft. I didn't think we'd be bad enough to get a legit shot at a qb. This may be the year and there should be at least 2 top 10 guys.
I don't see a 'C'. He would never go into a season with Sanchez starting. We'd have a better shot at resigning Foles or getting RG3 than Sanchez starting.
Exactly, you have to keep him in place and hope he gets better but look hard for the next option at the same time.Like it or not Bradford will be the best of a crappy bunch this off season. So to keep him they'll have to pony up around $18mil per year. Alex Smith is making $17mil per till 2017. Bradford is getting more than that just for the scarcity. Does Chip really want to double down on a QB he hasn't seen run his offense since the preseason?Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense"I'd says its:Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
A) Bradford. Unless he has a significant injury. Fact is that he was getting better each week. I know, I know. But he was. I'll be interested to see how he finishes the season
B) Keep Bradford and hit the Draft. I didn't think we'd be bad enough to get a legit shot at a qb. This may be the year and there should be at least 2 top 10 guys.
I don't see a 'C'. He would never go into a season with Sanchez starting. We'd have a better shot at resigning Foles or getting RG3 than Sanchez starting.
I understand your point but my point would all be predicated on what kind of deal he gets. If he gets a deal similar to Dalton's and Kaep's where its basically year-to-year Im fine with that. You would then have a rookie to step in if/ when he gets hurt or struggles. Or if the rookie shows promise you could cut Bradford after a year. Starting Sanchez does nothing. I believe his deal is very incentive based and could get pretty high too depending on how many starts he has. Not to mention we probably wouldn't win a game he starts.I would think C is letting Bradford walk, drafting a QB and letting Sanchez be a placeholder until drafted QB can play, or new QB can play from day 1 and Sanchez is backup again. Sanchez is already under contract next year, so why commit extra money/years to Bradford if he isn't the answer?Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense"Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
I'd says its:
A) Bradford. Unless he has a significant injury. Fact is that he was getting better each week. I know, I know. But he was. I'll be interested to see how he finishes the season
B) Keep Bradford and hit the Draft. I didn't think we'd be bad enough to get a legit shot at a qb. This may be the year and there should be at least 2 top 10 guys.
I don't see a 'C'. He would never go into a season with Sanchez starting. We'd have a better shot at resigning Foles or getting RG3 than Sanchez starting.
Who are you talking about here?Like it or not Bradford will be the best of a crappy bunch this off season. So to keep him they'll have to pony up around $18mil per year. Alex Smith is making $17mil per till 2017. Bradford is getting more than that just for the scarcity. Does Chip really want to double down on a QB he hasn't seen run his offense since the preseason?Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense"I'd says its:Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
A) Bradford. Unless he has a significant injury. Fact is that he was getting better each week. I know, I know. But he was. I'll be interested to see how he finishes the season
B) Keep Bradford and hit the Draft. I didn't think we'd be bad enough to get a legit shot at a qb. This may be the year and there should be at least 2 top 10 guys.
I don't see a 'C'. He would never go into a season with Sanchez starting. We'd have a better shot at resigning Foles or getting RG3 than Sanchez starting.
Kelly would quit if that happened, wouldn't he?Is there any chance that Lurie pushes General Manager Chip (GMC) out and brings in a guy like Polian to redirect this mess? I think I read that he has a consulting company now.
Zero Chance. He let Ray Rhodes have 1998. Kelly is here till his contract is up unless Kelly decides otherwise.Is there any chance that Lurie pushes General Manager Chip (GMC) out and brings in a guy like Polian to redirect this mess? I think I read that he has a consulting company now.
No doubt, not many coaches would take that well and he could get a raise to go back to NCAA.Kelly would quit if that happened, wouldn't he?Is there any chance that Lurie pushes General Manager Chip (GMC) out and brings in a guy like Polian to redirect this mess? I think I read that he has a consulting company now.
Sanchez would = Doug Pederson in that situation......except we wouldn't have a franchise QB on the bench.I understand your point but my point would all be predicated on what kind of deal he gets. If he gets a deal similar to Dalton's and Kaep's where its basically year-to-year Im fine with that. You would then have a rookie to step in if/ when he gets hurt or struggles. Or if the rookie shows promise you could cut Bradford after a year. Starting Sanchez does nothing. I believe his deal is very incentive based and could get pretty high too depending on how many starts he has. Not to mention we probably wouldn't win a game he starts.I would think C is letting Bradford walk, drafting a QB and letting Sanchez be a placeholder until drafted QB can play, or new QB can play from day 1 and Sanchez is backup again. Sanchez is already under contract next year, so why commit extra money/years to Bradford if he isn't the answer?Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense"Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCDoubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
I'd says its:
A) Bradford. Unless he has a significant injury. Fact is that he was getting better each week. I know, I know. But he was. I'll be interested to see how he finishes the season
B) Keep Bradford and hit the Draft. I didn't think we'd be bad enough to get a legit shot at a qb. This may be the year and there should be at least 2 top 10 guys.
I don't see a 'C'. He would never go into a season with Sanchez starting. We'd have a better shot at resigning Foles or getting RG3 than Sanchez starting.
Franchise QB is misleading--Very misleading actually.Sanchez would = Doug Pederson in that situation......except we wouldn't have an OKfranchiseQB on the bench.
Bradford. He's running some kind of offense out there but its the vanilla form of Chip's fast break offense. Does Chip pony up 2-3 years for $18+mil to see if Bradford can get it down any faster?Bigboy10182000 said:Who are you talking about here?Insein said:Like it or not Bradford will be the best of a crappy bunch this off season. So to keep him they'll have to pony up around $18mil per year. Alex Smith is making $17mil per till 2017. Bradford is getting more than that just for the scarcity. Does Chip really want to double down on a QB he hasn't seen run his offense since the preseason?Bigboy10182000 said:Can't see Kaep going anywhere as a starter. If so it may be to like Cleveland or something. This is just another runner in the long line of "QB's who run the Chip Kelly offense"I'd says its:Insein said:Chips plan? A) Kaep B) Draft with Sanchez as the stop gap. C) USCGoBirds said:Doubt it, who else is out there? Hope Ryan Fitzpatrick comes available?Insein said:Bottom line though, Bradford is gone as well this off season unless it suddenly clicks for him and he can run the tempo.
A) Bradford. Unless he has a significant injury. Fact is that he was getting better each week. I know, I know. But he was. I'll be interested to see how he finishes the season
B) Keep Bradford and hit the Draft. I didn't think we'd be bad enough to get a legit shot at a qb. This may be the year and there should be at least 2 top 10 guys.
I don't see a 'C'. He would never go into a season with Sanchez starting. We'd have a better shot at resigning Foles or getting RG3 than Sanchez starting.
I wish I could find of the game tape reviews of him from the Redskins writers last season when he was with Washington. Each week it was basically "he has no idea where to go". I haven't followed him this year though.YoUnG GuNz said:Surprised to see no one has mentioned the absolutely #### play of ej biggers. Guy is a massive dump in the slot.
I saw more variation in what Sam did the past few weeks than what I saw from Sanchez yesterday. Sanchez just doesn't have the arm (as you saw yesterday) to throw certain routes. A ton of them actuallyBradford. He's running some kind of offense out there but its the vanilla form of Chip's fast break offense. Does Chip pony up 2-3 years for $18+mil to see if Bradford can get it down any faster?Bigboy10182000 said:Who are you talking about here?Insein said:Like it or not Bradford will be the best of a crappy bunch this off season. So to keep him they'll have to pony up around $18mil per year. Alex Smith is making $17mil per till 2017. Bradford is getting more than that just for the scarcity. Does Chip really want to double down on a QB he hasn't seen run his offense since the preseason?
I believe it was Shah who said it...coming into Sunday we were top 10 in points allowed. Almost every bullet you have points back to coaching IMOI don't subscribe to the whole "the D was the only good thing we had this year" thinking.
- Horrible 3rd down conversions allowed
- Couldn't get key stops in game-on-the-line situations against ATL, WSH and DAL
- Too many, mostly dumb, penalties
- Maxwell has been dogged all season, Carroll has sometimes looked over-matched
- I know he doesn't get paid to have soft hands, but Jenkins drops at least one easy pick per game
- Frustrating missed tackles (sometimes because going for the strip, others because they just can't tackle)
- If getting into the backfield on a run but still giving up positive yardage were a stat, we probably lead the league in it
- All 3 "starting" ILBs going into the season have been injured and/or looked lost
- Both OLBs disappear for games at a time
I think we have a few play-makers on D that have impact-causing ability that did just enough to mask how bad the unit is playing and getting out-coached. All of the flaws this defense has been showing this year just all showed up on the same day yesterday.
Not comparing to Sanchez. He's better talent wise than Sanchez. Is he good for this offense or just running some kind of offense that Chip has dumbed down? If Chip has to dumb down his offense for a guy, does he want to commit a larger portion of his dwindling cap space towards him?I saw more variation in what Sam did the past few weeks than what I saw from Sanchez yesterday. Sanchez just doesn't have the arm (as you saw yesterday) to throw certain routes. A ton of them actuallyIf you just mean the speed of the offense, Sanchez may run the offense faster but I don't think its that big a deal. I believe we were first getting plays off with Sam at QBBradford. He's running some kind of offense out there but its the vanilla form of Chip's fast break offense. Does Chip pony up 2-3 years for $18+mil to see if Bradford can get it down any faster?Bigboy10182000 said:Who are you talking about here?Insein said:Like it or not Bradford will be the best of a crappy bunch this off season. So to keep him they'll have to pony up around $18mil per year. Alex Smith is making $17mil per till 2017. Bradford is getting more than that just for the scarcity. Does Chip really want to double down on a QB he hasn't seen run his offense since the preseason?
It's either 18 million for 2-3 years or what alternative? If its the same as we outlined above you pony the money up.