I'm still singingCut to commercial just as the Wisconsin band begins playing Varsity. #### 'em Bucky.
Wisconsin is a picture perfect example of what I was talking about earlier.![]()
You're better than this
Sure, we discussed the Big Ten seeding over the last hour. But really, how jacked up was the overall seeding in this tournament?Wisconsin is a picture perfect example of what I was talking about earlier.![]()
I love the first weekend of the tourney but the best thing about finishing it is that seeding arguments stop once we get to the sweet sixteen.Sure, we discussed the Big Ten seeding over the last hour. But really, how jacked up was the overall seeding in this tournament?
You haven't watched NU hoops over the yearsPretty amazing Northwestern has never been to the dance before.
They have been decent the last couple of decades. Not nearly the pushovers they were in the 70's and 80's.You haven't watched NU hoops over the years
It was really bad.Sure, we discussed the Big Ten seeding over the last hour. But really, how jacked up was the overall seeding in this tournament?
What was bad besides Wichita (which no one seems to agree on where they should have been) and the half the Big Ten teams?It was really bad.
You'd think that but none of the programs in the state of Illinois have had much recent success.Illinois hired Brad Underwood from Oklahoma State after one year? He's getting $3M/year where Oklahoma State was $1M and change/year. Boone Pickens doesn't spend money on basketball?
Speaking of Illinois, it's ridiculous they don't win in basketball with access to talent they have.
Wichita shoulda been a 4 at worst. Wiscy shoulda been a 5 or 6. Those are really bad and unfair to the teams they played, not to mention all the overseeded teams already mentioned.What was bad besides Wichita (which no one seems to agree on where they should have been) and the half the Big Ten teams?
You were pimping KenPom the other day. Wichita would be a 2 if he seeded the tournament and Duke a 3 seed. Does that seem correct to you? It's impossible to seed 68 teams without someone #####ing about it but seems like this year was better than any other year certainly not any worse.
SMU would have been a 3. Arizona a 5.What was bad besides Wichita (which no one seems to agree on where they should have been) and the half the Big Ten teams?
You were pimping KenPom the other day. Wichita would be a 2 if he seeded the tournament and Duke a 3 seed. Does that seem correct to you? It's impossible to seed 68 teams without someone #####ing about it but seems like this year was better than any other year certainly not any worse.
If you are the number one seed shouldn't you be expected to beat the team you are playing in any round?Wichita shoulda been a 4 at worst. Wiscy shoulda been a 5 or 6. Those are really bad and unfair to the teams they played, not to mention all the overseeded teams already mentioned.
Villanova worked all year to get the best seed in the whole thing just to get railroaded by #### seeding.
That's......that's not how these things work.If you are the number one seed shouldn't you be expected to beat the team you are playing in any round?
It boggles my mind. They should be able to get enough good players, even after the big boys have taken the 5-stars.You'd think that but none of the programs in the state of Illinois have had much recent success.
i've really enjoyed Dickinson's wisdom in here, but this was about as pertinent an observation as i've seen ?Anyone ever notice that the lane with the free throw semi circle at the end looks like a big dong?
If you are the better team you beat the team you play on that day. Seeding is just a talking point for fans It shouldn't matter if you play them in the second round or the 4th round Win the game move on to the next one.That's......that's not how these things work.
You earn an easier path by playing well thru the year.If you are the better team you beat the team you play on that day. Seeding is just a talking point for fans It shouldn't matter if you play them in the second round or the 4th round Win the game move on to the next one.
I was hoping that it was my Gamecocks catching the break.I'm just happy Duke finally caught a break.
Yeah but KenPom doesn't fix the problem of bad seeds unless you're telling me Wichita is better than Duke, for example.Wichita shoulda been a 4 at worst. Wiscy shoulda been a 5 or 6. Those are really bad and unfair to the teams they played, not to mention all the overseeded teams already mentioned.
Villanova worked all year to get the best seed in the whole thing just to get railroaded by #### seeding.
The better team doesn't always win. The great thing about this tournament is the one and done format and every single team has a chance to play their way into it. But this tournament isn't 67 games of the best team winning.If you are the better team you beat the team you play on that day. Seeding is just a talking point for fans It shouldn't matter if you play them in the second round or the 4th round Win the game move on to the next one.
So it would have made the Villanova players feel better to have lost to wisconsin in the 4th round? If you are going to win a basketball tournament you beat the teams you play. No matter the path you have to win on the court.You earn an easier path by playing well thru the year.
Its a bit bigger deal to be a elite 8 team than a first round winner, yeah.So it would have made the Villanova players feel better to have lost to wisconsin in the 4th round? If you are going to win a basketball tournament you beat the teams you play. No matter the path you have to win on the court.
You do know that like a 7 point spread only equates to a probability of 75%. Crazy things happen. If it was as easy as the better team winning, my bracket would look much better.If you are the better team you beat the team you play on that day. Seeding is just a talking point for fans It shouldn't matter if you play them in the second round or the 4th round Win the game move on to the next one.
Didn't say that. Fact is Wisconson was a better team then Villanova today.The better team doesn't always win. The great thing about this tournament is the one and done format and every single team has a chance to play their way into it. But this tournament isn't 67 games of the best team winning.
That would be awesome. They could stretch it to a two hour show that would do monster ratings.Totally unrealistic but would love to see the bracket if the committee took the top team in each region and let them choose the bracket. Then we'd know what the coaches think of Wichita, or Minnesota, or whoever else.
Yeah at best Wisconsin is a 6. Nova got them two days after playing another decent team while they had a 16 seed.I also don't understand complaining about a 1 seed getting matched up with an 8 seed that should have been a 6 seed.
The bulletin board material afterwards would be totally worth it too.That would be awesome. They could stretch it to a two hour show that would do monster ratings.