What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official 2018 Stanley Cup playoffs thread: Caps and Mystics to raise banners together in October. Congrats DC!!!!!!! (1 Viewer)

MAF is on some kind of run.  Sharks just wilted after they should have been up at least a few goals in that 1st.  he's not exactly stealing games by himself but he's definitely the difference.  you're not going to beat him without a bounce/deflection or great pass.

Hertl and Sorensen were very impressive in both series'.  I always thought Hertl was kind of overrated, never realized he could be that dominant of a player.  Burns was always erratic in MN which he showed in this series.  took a few games off, including last night.
Kane looked pretty terrible. said he was playing with dislocated shoulder and MCL injury.

 
he was very bad.  last three games he was a liability.
I posed that question earlier in the playoffs right after McAvoy came back and his knee clearly still wasn’t right. At what X percent of health is having a “better” player in the lineup more of a liability than one of your Black Aces?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
2nd round pick says  :bye:
that's what I always assumed the return would be anyway, but there were reports I read that said they'd love to re-sign him and don't care about giving up the 1st to do so. I'm sure he'd like to wind up back in Vancouver but who knows what they are going to do. I'm also guessing he wants to play on a good team for a change, so may not just go to the highest bidder.

who gives a #### though. we got Dahlin! :excited:

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I posed that question earlier in the playoffs right after McAvoy came back and his knee clearly still wasn’t right. At what X percent of health is having a “better” player in the lineup more of a liability than one of your Black Aces?
I think it depends on the player and the team depth.  obviously Kane has a good shot but so much of his game is creating that shot which he clearly had issues with.  with the Bs it's the one spot they don't have a lot of depth, particularly with Krug going down.  probably all moot anyway since pretty much every coach is going to defer to the guy if he says he can go.

 
oh look, Kaprizov is going to score a bunch more goals and probably lead the tourney at worlds.  maybe he can sign to stay in Russia even longer.

 
I think it depends on the player and the team depth.  obviously Kane has a good shot but so much of his game is creating that shot which he clearly had issues with.  with the Bs it's the one spot they don't have a lot of depth, particularly with Krug going down.  probably all moot anyway since pretty much every coach is going to defer to the guy if he says he can go.
Yeah, I was gonna say that McAvoy still looked better compared to the other defensemen for the Bruins, but that's just an observation and not heavy analysis.  Still played top pair.  

 
Yeah, I was gonna say that McAvoy still looked better compared to the other defensemen for the Bruins, but that's just an observation and not heavy analysis.  Still played top pair.  
No doubt he was better as the playoffs went on, but he looked shaky/rusty when he first came back. I was at Game 5 vs. Toronto and he looked either tentative because of the knee or uncomfortable because of the brace. Obviously mistakes get magnified so much more at this time of year.

I don't think Riley Nash ever looked right after he came back.

I just thought it was an interesting topic for debate. We're so used to guys playing with limbs falling off and guts spilling out, like the Black Knight from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, because they're hockey players and it's the playoffs. But when do you reach the point of actually hurting your team more by being out there?

 
Capella said:
:lmao:  I’m rooting for that too 

but for real, why the hell did they give up Miller? He’s so young. 
Vesey, Hayes, and Miller were all set to be RFAs together and it always seemed to be the plan that one of those guys would have been moved. I always liked Miller the most and thought it would/should have been Hayes that was moved but I expected the eventual decision would come back to value in vs value out in any deal, as opposed to saying this guy is the one we're shipping. 

Considering the package you guys ultimately sent seemed way more appropriate for just McD, that's where I've had a problem with it. I'd be shocked to learn that splitting those two up in deals wouldn't have yielded more from two teams. But Gorton seems to be a big believer in the guys that came back in the deal, even if some across the league aren't and that's fine, but he left himself absolutely no margin for error. Those guys have to get to like 90% of their ceiling to justify it, and that includes Vladimir Na-me, na-ma, na-gonna end up being much here anyway most likely. 

 
Vesey, Hayes, and Miller were all set to be RFAs together and it always seemed to be the plan that one of those guys would have been moved. I always liked Miller the most and thought it would/should have been Hayes that was moved but I expected the eventual decision would come back to value in vs value out in any deal, as opposed to saying this guy is the one we're shipping. 

Considering the package you guys ultimately sent seemed way more appropriate for just McD, that's where I've had a problem with it. I'd be shocked to learn that splitting those two up in deals wouldn't have yielded more from two teams. But Gorton seems to be a big believer in the guys that came back in the deal, even if some across the league aren't and that's fine, but he left himself absolutely no margin for error. Those guys have to get to like 90% of their ceiling to justify it, and that includes Vladimir Na-me, na-ma, na-gonna end up being much here anyway most likely. 
Vladdy is going to be a RFA though and he’s gonna get paid. That’s particularly what I don’t understand. And miller is a much better player imo. 

The Bolts prospects guys I follow liked Howden a lot, but felt like there were 2-3 better forward prospects in the system. Vladdy is fine and the d-man seems like a middle 6 guy at best. I dunno, still seems weird to me.  

 
MAF is on some kind of run.  Sharks just wilted after they should have been up at least a few goals in that 1st.  he's not exactly stealing games by himself but he's definitely the difference.  you're not going to beat him without a bounce/deflection or great pass.

Hertl and Sorensen were very impressive in both series'.  I always thought Hertl was kind of overrated, never realized he could be that dominant of a player.  Burns was always erratic in MN which he showed in this series.  took a few games off, including last night.  but that's kind of how his season went this year.
Sharks played 2 inspired periods these last 2 games: 3rd period game 5, 1st period of game 6.  Knights too good to play only a 3rd of the game against.  Burns and Kane were so much better vs. Anaheim.  Hertl was great down low. Needed more of that from others. 

I didn't follow the expansion draft, so how did James Neal end up on Vegas?  Bad year last year?  Guy was a playoff beast in 2016.

 
Sharks played 2 inspired periods these last 2 games: 3rd period game 5, 1st period of game 6.  Knights too good to play only a 3rd of the game against.  Burns and Kane were so much better vs. Anaheim.  Hertl was great down low. Needed more of that from others. 

I didn't follow the expansion draft, so how did James Neal end up on Vegas?  Bad year last year?  Guy was a playoff beast in 2016.
Nashville had to protect their 4 dmen so that only left 4 forward spots to hold onto. Neal had 1 year left on his deal before becoming a UFA. No surprise they went with Johansen, Arvidsson, Forsberg as their top 3 and they kept Jarnkrok for the last spot because he's signed until 2022 at a very team-friendly $2MM cap hit.

 
Sharks played 2 inspired periods these last 2 games: 3rd period game 5, 1st period of game 6.  Knights too good to play only a 3rd of the game against.  Burns and Kane were so much better vs. Anaheim.  Hertl was great down low. Needed more of that from others. 

I didn't follow the expansion draft, so how did James Neal end up on Vegas?  Bad year last year?  Guy was a playoff beast in 2016.


Nashville had to protect their 4 dmen so that only left 4 forward spots to hold onto. Neal had 1 year left on his deal before becoming a UFA. No surprise they went with Johansen, Arvidsson, Forsberg as their top 3 and they kept Jarnkrok for the last spot because he's signed until 2022 at a very team-friendly $2MM cap hit.
and almost every team had a unique situation like this and wound up giving up a decent player.  Wild gave them two players.

Neal was drafted and expected to be traded at the deadline for future picks when the team was formed.   And then the team meshed very quickly to start the season. Bonded in a huge way due to the tragedy. Just the perfect storm for starting a team.  They are fun to watch because they roll 4 lines that are just relentless on the puck. Make a mistake. It's in the net.  It was really amazing to see them score 3-4 goals in like 5-6 minute periods about two dozen times this year.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know Bettman has already stated the Seattle expansion process would be the same, but I can't wait to see how much this VGK run gets the other owners to fight back on it. 

 
Nashville had to protect their 4 dmen so that only left 4 forward spots to hold onto. Neal had 1 year left on his deal before becoming a UFA. No surprise they went with Johansen, Arvidsson, Forsberg as their top 3 and they kept Jarnkrok for the last spot because he's signed until 2022 at a very team-friendly $2MM cap hit.
You think they tighten up the expansion draft rules for Seattle? Make it a smaller pool to choose from? I can’t imagine some of the incompetent teams like this too much. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vegas' success encourages expansion.  expansion makes the league money.  owners like money. 

I think these expansion rules will continue.

 
My favorite thing about the Bolts 

Stankos - 28 years old 

Kuch - 24

Miller - 25

Palat - 27

Point - 22

Johnson - 27

Killorn - 28

Gourde - 26

Cirelli - 20 

Hedman - 27

Sergachev - 19

Vasy - 24 

:wub:  

 
You think they tighten up the expansion draft rules for Seattle? Make it a smaller pool to choose from? I can’t imagine some of the incompetent teams like this too much. 
Vegas paid $500 million.

Seattle is paying $650 million. They have to get the same rules imo. Pretty sure they won't be nearly as successful though as teams will (a) learn from prior mistakes, and (b) this is basically a complete fluke imo anyway.

 
Vegas paid $500 million.

Seattle is paying $650 million. They have to get the same rules imo. Pretty sure they won't be nearly as successful though as teams will (a) learn from prior mistakes, and (b) this is basically a complete fluke imo anyway.
650M omg. They should be given an all-star roster. 

 
Vegas just played the rules perfectly is all, plus they got a bunch of future picks. 

Pens are gonna score 10 goals tonight, Holtby pulled after 1. 

 
They were talking about this on NHL Network on Sirius XM earlier today. Exactly, the big difference is how the other NHL teams learn from their protection processes (i.e. Florida not protecting Marchessault in exchange for cap relief from Reilly Smith). Minnesota gave up both Tuch and Haula. They think teams are going to be much more hesitant about those kinds of pre-arranged deals with Seattle.

Vegas also is the first expansion team in the cap era, and the only expansion team to come in solo (others in the past like Nashville and AtlantaPeg came in alone, but as part of a wave of expansion over several seasons).

The Knights also had, by far, the most beneficial protection rules. In the Nashville-Atlanta-Columbus-Minnesota draft, teams could protect 10 skaters and two goalies (or 15 + 1), which is the closest to last year's 7-3-1 or 4-4-1 formats. In past drafts, 14-15 skaters each was the norm.

Someone probably linked this here last year, but McIndoe had a great piece last year about the history of expansion drafts. Make sure you've had a couple of cocktails before you start trying to wrap your head around the NHL-WHA merger. 

 
They were talking about this on NHL Network on Sirius XM earlier today. Exactly, the big difference is how the other NHL teams learn from their protection processes (i.e. Florida not protecting Marchessault in exchange for cap relief from Reilly Smith). Minnesota gave up both Tuch and Haula. They think teams are going to be much more hesitant about those kinds of pre-arranged deals with Seattle.

Vegas also is the first expansion team in the cap era, and the only expansion team to come in solo (others in the past like Nashville and AtlantaPeg came in alone, but as part of a wave of expansion over several seasons).

The Knights also had, by far, the most beneficial protection rules. In the Nashville-Atlanta-Columbus-Minnesota draft, teams could protect 10 skaters and two goalies (or 15 + 1), which is the closest to last year's 7-3-1 or 4-4-1 formats. In past drafts, 14-15 skaters each was the norm.

Someone probably linked this here last year, but McIndoe had a great piece last year about the history of expansion drafts. Make sure you've had a couple of cocktails before you start trying to wrap your head around the NHL-WHA merger. 
I’m not sure how you learn from not being able to protect everyone.  if you’re a good/deep team or are saddled with no movement clauses you’re going to lose something of value.  sure there were some bonehead moves but you have to take into account the reason those moves were made at the time and now having the benefit of hindsight.  I don’t think anyone liked what Florida did but I doubt few also could have predicted Reilly Smith becoming a useful player again and that was an awful contract they were looking at.  and the smartest GM in the league, even though he has no cups and is therefore horrible at his job, also let Marchessault walk the year before.  I also didn’t like what the Wild did at the time but were otherwise going to lose Dumba which in hindsight is still a fine tradeoff (40 goal Staal was left unprotected by the way).  

 
I’m not sure how you learn from not being able to protect everyone.  if you’re a good/deep team or are saddled with no movement clauses you’re going to lose something of value.  sure there were some bonehead moves but you have to take into account the reason those moves were made at the time and now having the benefit of hindsight.  I don’t think anyone liked what Florida did but I doubt few also could have predicted Reilly Smith becoming a useful player again and that was an awful contract they were looking at.  and the smartest GM in the league, even though he has no cups and is therefore horrible at his job, also let Marchessault walk the year before.  I also didn’t like what the Wild did at the time but were otherwise going to lose Dumba which in hindsight is still a fine tradeoff (40 goal Staal was left unprotected by the way).  
They brought up the Dumba example as well ... basically saying teams might be more willing to leave one better player unprotected rather than give up two.

No question, Vegas hit several big home runs with some of the picks. No one could have predicted how it all came together so fast. But they weren't exactly in the same situation as the Capitals when they came in.

Notable oddity: The 22 players picked by the Capitals had combined for 40 NHL goals in the 1973–74 season. This is how you end up skating a garbage can around like the Stanley Cup after your first and only road win.

 
They brought up the Dumba example as well ... basically saying teams might be more willing to leave one better player unprotected rather than give up two.

No question, Vegas hit several big home runs with some of the picks. No one could have predicted how it all came together so fast. But they weren't exactly in the same situation as the Capitals when they came in.
oh I see, and I agree.  never made sense to me to trade Scandella to salary dump instead of exposing both and just lose one.  Chuck really screwed that up. 

Reilly Smith was never really that bad I guess, just a really long deal.  and he’s still young. just Talon being dumb.  I also didn’t think Marchessault was this good though.  

 
So many examples. Karlsson had 15 career goals entering this season. No way CBJ could have projected he would go on to score 43.

 
I’m not sure how you learn from not being able to protect everyone.  if you’re a good/deep team or are saddled with no movement clauses you’re going to lose something of value.  sure there were some bonehead moves but you have to take into account the reason those moves were made at the time and now having the benefit of hindsight.  I don’t think anyone liked what Florida did but I doubt few also could have predicted Reilly Smith becoming a useful player again and that was an awful contract they were looking at.  and the smartest GM in the league, even though he has no cups and is therefore horrible at his job, also let Marchessault walk the year before.  I also didn’t like what the Wild did at the time but were otherwise going to lose Dumba which in hindsight is still a fine tradeoff (40 goal Staal was left unprotected by the way).  
Technically Y offered Marchessault a contract but Florida beat it and offered more playing time. 

 
@Limericking on twitter

There is a peculiar Bruin,
And licking is what he is doin’.
At game time, he traces
His tongue across faces,
Engendering audience booin’.

 
Caps better win this game, otherwise they will get inside their own heads and lose game 7 at home. You can almost set your watch to it. 

 
Barcelona fans probably loving this third period. Ton of possession, cycling puck, short passes and 6 shots combined in 12 minutes.

 
Holy crap this Caps fourth line. 

With so many players injured/suspended this is one of the grittiest most un-Caps like game I’ve had the pleasure to see. Playing tough and trying to steal one 

 
Pens have really played a conservative game. Do they know that if they lose they are out? Or do they just assume they beat Caps in an elimination game? 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top