PatriotJohn
Footballguy
It's a terrible part of every woman's lifeDid everyone get that really #### menopause ad?
It's a terrible part of every woman's lifeDid everyone get that really #### menopause ad?
oops, i was jumbling a few separate memories... bell's best game of year was week 14, 12.12.04 against MIA...17 rushes for 123 yards (7.2 YPC) with 2 TDs17 IND 16 91 5.7 0 2 16 8.0 Are you sure you arent think of Griffin's 03 game?bell returns to the scene of the crime... that was one of his best games last season (in the regular season, i mean... not the playoffs)... i think he had a few TDs & busted a long pass play. that game, as much as maybe any other, put him on the map in 2004.
I was waiting for a punchline or maybe for it to turn into a Geico commercial but it was not to be.It's a terrible part of every woman's lifeDid everyone get that really #### menopause ad?
Tony's about to be 0-2 on the replay challenges.
What's his lifetime record on these? Maybe 6-22?Tony's about to be 0-2 on the replay challenges.What's his lifetime record on these? Maybe 6-22?
the Dungy Challenge system.I think Brown's still out with the elbow (?) issue, but those DL's are shedding blocks like good prom dates shed dresses.maybe skeletor knows thing or two about FA DL after all...
he was nearly universally ridiculed for brown-coes DL... if they were bad b4, they must be bad in future... that doesn't account for people doing better in more positive and winning environment.
they had NO chance of super bowl run B4... now they have legit chance to make deep playoff run... for EVERY DL, they could be the one who's effort puts team over top for a game... a season... that might tend to cause them to play with greater intensity & consistency...
we'll see how they do in-season... rap on warren was always that he can't sustain effort game in & game out... brown can't stay healthy... BTW, is courtney brown playing, or is he still out for another week or two?
I think so too. But the entire offense is different with Stokely, and the Colts offense has been shaky the whole pre-season. But it's still just the pre-season.I think it's the pass protection.This Colts offense doesn't look the same without Stokely.
nice... like that metaphor... you should be a staff writer... or better, at a prom.I think Brown's still out with the elbow (?) issue, but those DL's are shedding blocks like good prom dates shed dresses.maybe skeletor knows thing or two about FA DL after all...
he was nearly universally ridiculed for brown-coes DL... if they were bad b4, they must be bad in future... that doesn't account for people doing better in more positive and winning environment.
they had NO chance of super bowl run B4... now they have legit chance to make deep playoff run... for EVERY DL, they could be the one who's effort puts team over top for a game... a season... that might tend to cause them to play with greater intensity & consistency...
we'll see how they do in-season... rap on warren was always that he can't sustain effort game in & game out... brown can't stay healthy... BTW, is courtney brown playing, or is he still out for another week or two?
Anyone else considering Edge over Priest at 1.03 starting to doubt?
edit to add, Lots of touches, but he looks a tad slower than I remember.
Coach V ... I was thinking the same thing. He doesn't look very light on his feet.They were looking real good on this series until Wayne's turnover. Good mix of the pass and the running game with Edge.I think so too. But the entire offense is different with Stokely, and the Colts offense has been shaky the whole pre-season. But it's still just the pre-season.I think it's the pass protection.This Colts offense doesn't look the same without Stokely.
but in dynasty, he will prove to be gold, jerry!If you take away that run the Denver offense hasn't done much.Of course, you can't take away the run. dungy threw a red flag and asked, the refs said no.I really hate the "If you take away ..." but ... if you take away Anderson's 93-yard TD run he hasn't done much at all. He hasn't been able to generate much with his other runs and he's not showing he can gain yardage after the initial contact.
Kennison = value once again.It's more than a little silly how undervalued this guy continues to be.Kennison: 3 for 57
Rasta = 8 for 42 and a TDBrown = fumble lostI think there are a lot more people here than watching Seahawks-Chiefs, so here's an update off NFL.com:
Trent Green: 5/5, 76 yards
Kennison: 3 for 57
Kris Wilson: 1 for 15
Tony Gonzalez: 1 for 4, TD
I noticed this as well, think he'l get in a bit in the second quarter?Mike Anderson has been the RB in every package so far...no sign of Bell
That's why I said I hate the whole "If you take away" line of thinking.If you take away that run the Denver offense hasn't done much.Of course, you can't take away the run. dungy threw a red flag and asked, the refs said no.I really hate the "If you take away ..." but ... if you take away Anderson's 93-yard TD run he hasn't done much at all. He hasn't been able to generate much with his other runs and he's not showing he can gain yardage after the initial contact.
But I do think we can probably agree that 93-yard TD runs won't be the norm for Anderson (or any other RB) this season. So seeing how he can produce with his other carries is a valid form of analysis. And so far he hasn't been impressive with his other runs.sorry if this is old news, but why is willie roaf not playing tonite? Is he hurt?I think there are a lot more people here than watching Seahawks-Chiefs, so here's an update off NFL.com:
Trent Green: 5/5, 76 yards
Kennison: 3 for 57
Kris Wilson: 1 for 15
Tony Gonzalez: 1 for 4, TD
Not sure.sorry if this is old news, but why is willie roaf not playing tonite? Is he hurt?I think there are a lot more people here than watching Seahawks-Chiefs, so here's an update off NFL.com:
Trent Green: 5/5, 76 yards
Kennison: 3 for 57
Kris Wilson: 1 for 15
Tony Gonzalez: 1 for 4, TD
The DB was all over him...tough catch.Clark should've caught that TD from Manning. It went right through his hands.
Make a tough catch then. Show me something.The DB was all over him...tough catch.Clark should've caught that TD from Manning. It went right through his hands.

Well anyone of the Bronco RBs could have run through that huge hole. That was just a busted play. Do you really think that run was based on Anderson talent?I am sure Bell owners will be in here shortly telling us how old and slow Anderson is anyway.there goes Mike Andreson.. 93 yards for a TD
there goes Bell's value
He's had THREE other runs!That's why I said I hate the whole "If you take away" line of thinking.If you take away that run the Denver offense hasn't done much.Of course, you can't take away the run. dungy threw a red flag and asked, the refs said no.I really hate the "If you take away ..." but ... if you take away Anderson's 93-yard TD run he hasn't done much at all. He hasn't been able to generate much with his other runs and he's not showing he can gain yardage after the initial contact.But I do think we can probably agree that 93-yard TD runs won't be the norm for Anderson (or any other RB) this season. So seeing how he can produce with his other carries is a valid form of analysis. And so far he hasn't been impressive with his other runs.
But that 93-yard TD was damn impressive. No doubt about it.

Actually, a back would have had to be on the field. That means they would need to have started, so only one back could have run through that hole. The one who did, Anderson.Well anyone of the Bronco RBs could have run through that huge hole. That was just a busted play. Do you really think that run was based on Anderson talent?I am sure Bell owners will be in here shortly telling us how old and slow Anderson is anyway.there goes Mike Andreson.. 93 yards for a TD
there goes Bell's value
He's had 5 for 10 yards. Not very impressive.And just so you know, I like Anderson. I'm not surprised to see him stake a claim to the starting job.He's had THREE other runs!That's why I said I hate the whole "If you take away" line of thinking.If you take away that run the Denver offense hasn't done much.Of course, you can't take away the run. dungy threw a red flag and asked, the refs said no.I really hate the "If you take away ..." but ... if you take away Anderson's 93-yard TD run he hasn't done much at all. He hasn't been able to generate much with his other runs and he's not showing he can gain yardage after the initial contact.But I do think we can probably agree that 93-yard TD runs won't be the norm for Anderson (or any other RB) this season. So seeing how he can produce with his other carries is a valid form of analysis. And so far he hasn't been impressive with his other runs.
But that 93-yard TD was damn impressive. No doubt about it.![]()
Plummer has a whole 27 yards passing., The whole offense looks poor tonight, save that one play by Anderson.He's had 5 for 10 yards. Not very impressive.And just so you know, I like Anderson. I'm not surprised to see him stake a claim to the starting job.He's had THREE other runs!That's why I said I hate the whole "If you take away" line of thinking.If you take away that run the Denver offense hasn't done much.Of course, you can't take away the run. dungy threw a red flag and asked, the refs said no.I really hate the "If you take away ..." but ... if you take away Anderson's 93-yard TD run he hasn't done much at all. He hasn't been able to generate much with his other runs and he's not showing he can gain yardage after the initial contact.But I do think we can probably agree that 93-yard TD runs won't be the norm for Anderson (or any other RB) this season. So seeing how he can produce with his other carries is a valid form of analysis. And so far he hasn't been impressive with his other runs.
But that 93-yard TD was damn impressive. No doubt about it.![]()
You obviously haven't been watching during punt coverage.Mike Anderson has been the RB in every package so far...no sign of Bell
You can't base anything on five runs. NFL RBs get 20-25 carries a game, with plenty of runs that gain only a few yards. Just like you can't base anything on one big run. But what you can assume is that since he's been the #1 all camp, has played well in the games and has played all of the first half in what is considered the final tune-up game with the first-unit, he's the starter. And he has mucho value if he is.He's had 5 for 10 yards. Not very impressive.And just so you know, I like Anderson. I'm not surprised to see him stake a claim to the starting job.He's had THREE other runs!That's why I said I hate the whole "If you take away" line of thinking.If you take away that run the Denver offense hasn't done much.Of course, you can't take away the run. dungy threw a red flag and asked, the refs said no.I really hate the "If you take away ..." but ... if you take away Anderson's 93-yard TD run he hasn't done much at all. He hasn't been able to generate much with his other runs and he's not showing he can gain yardage after the initial contact.But I do think we can probably agree that 93-yard TD runs won't be the norm for Anderson (or any other RB) this season. So seeing how he can produce with his other carries is a valid form of analysis. And so far he hasn't been impressive with his other runs.
But that 93-yard TD was damn impressive. No doubt about it.![]()
Who cares whether or not the play had to do with Anderson's talent level or not. The fact is that play just further solidified his position as the starter in denver, which leads to big time stats/fantasy production. Which is all that really matters to anyone in the shark pool.. Bell's value is below anderson's right now as far as i'm concerned...Well anyone of the Bronco RBs could have run through that huge hole. That was just a busted play. Do you really think that run was based on Anderson talent?I am sure Bell owners will be in here shortly telling us how old and slow Anderson is anyway.there goes Mike Andreson.. 93 yards for a TD
there goes Bell's value
Didn't you see the part where I said I liked Anderson? You don't have to convince me. I'm just pointing out the facts is all with regards to tonight's game.You can't base anything on five runs. NFL RBs get 20-25 carries a game, with plenty of runs that gain only a few yards.
Just like you can't base anything on one big run. But what you can assume is that since he's been the #1 all camp, has played well in the games and has played all of the first half in what is considered the final tune-up game with the first-unit, he's the starter. And he has mucho value if he is.
What facts? All I'm saying is basing anything on five carries is pointless.Didn't you see the part where I said I liked Anderson? You don't have to convince me. I'm just pointing out the facts is all with regards to tonight's game.You can't base anything on five runs. NFL RBs get 20-25 carries a game, with plenty of runs that gain only a few yards.
Just like you can't base anything on one big run. But what you can assume is that since he's been the #1 all camp, has played well in the games and has played all of the first half in what is considered the final tune-up game with the first-unit, he's the starter. And he has mucho value if he is.