What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*** OFFICIAL *** In-Season Dynasty Trade Thread (1 Viewer)

Over the last month, revamped my dynasty team. 1st year league, 12 team, PPR, 1qb, 1 rb, 1 wr, 1 te, (3 flex). Made up of all FBG members. Had 2nd overall pick and went with Trent ... now you now why went in different direction. Drafting with intention on going for championship for 2-3 yrs, then rebuilding again around Trent. Damn Trent ruined those plans.

Original Now

Brees Brees

Romo Romo

Richardson Forte

MJD Jennings

Vereen

B Marshall B Marshall

V Jackson Desean Jackson

D Bowe Percy Harvin

M Austin M Colston

M Jones D Bowe

V Davis V Davis

T Gonzalez D Pitta

M Bennett B Pettigrew

Real happy with my team now ... leaves me a little thin at rb, but only need to start one and can go with the 4 wrs

here is how I got there in trades ...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Team FF trades

Trent Richardson, Shane Vereen and another teams early 2nd

Team A trades

Matt Forte and Reuben Randle

(couldn't get to the trade offer fast enough to accept this one.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

Phillip River and Tony Gonzalez

Team B trades

Brandon Pettigrew and 1st round pick (not theirs and right now 6th pick)

(wanted that 1st round pick in order to deal for a wr .. so this one started the whole process. Team B is a playoff team and needed the upgrade at both qb and te.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

Reuben Randle and my own 2nd rounder

Team C trades

Marcus Colston and Dennis Pitta

(I wanted to team up Brees and Colston and had intentions of trading Bennett, so needed went after Pitta as a backup after dealing Gonzo. May have lost out on the potential of Randle, but Pitta was a key for the future with PPR te production.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

MJD, Marcellus Bennet and 1st round pick received above

Team D trades

Desean Jackson

(extremely happy to get younger at wr and Desean has turned a new leaf this year, not just in production, but in attitude. still had thoughts to move VJax to get even younger and stronger)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

Vincent Jackson, Miles Austin, and Marvin Jones

Team E trades

Percy Harvin and Chris Givens

(nice cherry to top off the trades above. wasn't expecting to get two younger wr studs in DJax and PHarvin, and was quite pleased)

 
Team FF trades

Trent Richardson, Shane Vereen and another teams early 2nd

Team A trades

Matt Forte and Reuben Randle

(couldn't get to the trade offer fast enough to accept this one.)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

Phillip River and Tony Gonzalez

Team B trades

Brandon Pettigrew and 1st round pick (not theirs and right now 6th pick)

(wanted that 1st round pick in order to deal for a wr .. so this one started the whole process. Team B is a playoff team and needed the upgrade at both qb and te.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

Reuben Randle and my own 2nd rounder

Team C trades

Marcus Colston and Dennis Pitta

(I wanted to team up Brees and Colston and had intentions of trading Bennett, so needed went after Pitta as a backup after dealing Gonzo. May have lost out on the potential of Randle, but Pitta was a key for the future with PPR te production.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

MJD, Marcellus Bennet and 1st round pick received above

Team D trades

Desean Jackson

(extremely happy to get younger at wr and Desean has turned a new leaf this year, not just in production, but in attitude. still had thoughts to move VJax to get even younger and stronger)

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Team FF trades

Vincent Jackson, Miles Austin, and Marvin Jones

Team E trades

Percy Harvin and Chris Givens

(nice cherry to top off the trades above. wasn't expecting to get two younger wr studs in DJax and PHarvin, and was quite pleased)
The first trade I'd probably rather have the Vereen side but overall seems ok. I might be a lot higher on Vereen but feel like if he can manage to stay healthy, he can easily avg 15 ppg.

The 2nd trade you definitely killed it.

The 3rd trade I hate. Would much rather have Randle/2nd than Colson. Would guess Pitta could be had relatively cheap.

The 4th one I don't like either. Would rather have the early to mid 1st than DeSean by himself.

Last trade I like. Get young with Harvin and get rid of Miles who seems to be a waste of a roster spot at this point.

 
12 team PPR league, 6 points per passing or rushing TD

Start 1 QB and up to 4 WR

Traded away Marquise Lee, Eli Manning, and Jeff Cumberland

Traded for Andrew Luck, Mark Ingram, and Jermaine Gresham

I had only Andy Dalton, Eli Manning, and Joe Flacco at QB, but was pretty loaded at WR with AJ Green, Dez Bryant, DeSean Jackson, and Vincent Jackson plus some solid depth.

 
12 team PPR league, 6 points per passing or rushing TD

Start 1 QB and up to 4 WR

Traded away Marquise Lee, Eli Manning, and Jeff Cumberland

Traded for Andrew Luck, Mark Ingram, and Jermaine Gresham

I had only Andy Dalton, Eli Manning, and Joe Flacco at QB, but was pretty loaded at WR with AJ Green, Dez Bryant, DeSean Jackson, and Vincent Jackson plus some solid depth.
Very cheap for luck

 
By your own post here, the other owner has RGIII, so Glennon becomes a backup. The fact that Smith and Boldin are in the other team's lineup this week is immaterial IMO... his team is out of the playoffs for this year. Will Boldin be a long term starter? No. So a realistic view of the trade for next year and beyond is that it was Glennon (backup) and Smith (starter) for Stafford. Doesn't seem even close to worth it for the other team IMO.
He didn't need Stafford and added a top 15 dynasty WR.
:goodposting:

Four of the last five staffers to update their dynasty rankings have Torrey Smith in their top 15 (disclosure: I'm the one who doesn't, as I have him... all the way down at 17th). WRs are more valuable than QBs in leagues that only start 1 QB. I can easily see why someone would give Smith+change for Stafford... but I can just as easily see why someone would give Stafford for Smith+change.

 
Short term, sure. Really don't see Tate as a future stud. Lattimore can be.
Lattimore's a 4th rounder competing with some pretty talented backs. He might be great, or he might never be the same again. Or he might be the same again, but it might turn out that "as good as he was before the injury" wasn't nearly as good as everyone thought (hence the 4th round draft pick). Lattimore's got a lot of potential, but as they say, potential is just shorthand for "hasn't done anything".

Ben Tate next year is going to be a 26-year old starting RB with a 4.9 career ypc average. Maybe he's not the next Michael Turner. Maybe he's only LaMont Jordan, instead. That's not the end of the world- LaMont Jordan finished 7th (in just 14 games) in Oakland before he fell off the cliff. And who knows, maybe Tate *IS* the next Michael Turner. He's got some pretty good production to his name already. He leads the NFL in yards per carry after contact this year.

If Lattimore were more like a Willis McGahee, who was drafted in the 1st despite his injury, I'd find it easier to get excited for him. As it stands, he was drafted in the 4th. That tells me something about how NFL franchises felt about him, and it's not good.

 
Adam, I hear what you're saying but even if lattimore was seen equal to McGahee before injury, the times have changed enough that he would drop more anyway. He probably wasn't a top 5 pick pre injury but that has at least as much to do with the value of running backs as talent.

It's a risky move, but I think he has top 10 talent. Tate is more likely a rb2.

Time will tell.

 
32 team league, salary cap.

Green, A.J. CIN WR

Sanders, Emmanuel PIT WR

Austin, Miles DAL WR

Harvin, Percy SEA WR

Year 2014 Round 2 Draft Pick (~#39)

Year 2015 Round 1 Draft Pick

The cap make it difficult to keep Harvin or Green, Sanders salary is reasonable. Austin is almost dropable. Team trading green is out of the playoffs, other team has a bye the first round and had a top 4 team before getting green.

 
Two trades in 10 team dynasty (QB/2RB/4WR/1Flex)

The heist:

Team A (playoff team) receives Ben Tate, Jason Witten

Team B (non playoff team) receives Doug Martin, Michael Crabtree

Rebound for team A

Team A receives Knowshon Moreno

Team B receives 1st round rookie pick

 
Two trades in 10 team dynasty (QB/2RB/4WR/1Flex)

The heist:

Team A (playoff team) receives Ben Tate, Jason Witten

Team B (non playoff team) receives Doug Martin, Michael Crabtree

Rebound for team A

Team A receives Knowshon Moreno

Team B receives 1st round rookie pick
Is it the playoff teams first? If so, I like it. The other seems a classic overpay for a better chance to win this year.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Two trades in 10 team dynasty (QB/2RB/4WR/1Flex)

The heist:

Team A (playoff team) receives Ben Tate, Jason Witten

Team B (non playoff team) receives Doug Martin, Michael Crabtree

Rebound for team A

Team A receives Knowshon Moreno

Team B receives 1st round rookie pick
Is it the playoff teams first? If so, I like it. The other seems a classic overpay for a better chance to win this year.
Great move for team receiving Martin and Crabtree
 
Two trades in 10 team dynasty (QB/2RB/4WR/1Flex)

The heist:

Team A (playoff team) receives Ben Tate, Jason Witten

Team B (non playoff team) receives Doug Martin, Michael Crabtree

Rebound for team A

Team A receives Knowshon Moreno

Team B receives 1st round rookie pick
Is it the playoff teams first? If so, I like it. The other seems a classic overpay for a better chance to win this year.
Yes, team A is the same playoff bound team in both cases. Won Superbowl last year, had Peterson, Martin, Foster but obviously hit with injuries. I think the Moreno deal was very good for him, the Tate deal....well he better win the Superbowl and even then it just seems like an overpay.

 
By your own post here, the other owner has RGIII, so Glennon becomes a backup. The fact that Smith and Boldin are in the other team's lineup this week is immaterial IMO... his team is out of the playoffs for this year. Will Boldin be a long term starter? No. So a realistic view of the trade for next year and beyond is that it was Glennon (backup) and Smith (starter) for Stafford. Doesn't seem even close to worth it for the other team IMO.
He didn't need Stafford and added a top 15 dynasty WR.
:goodposting: Four of the last five staffers to update their dynasty rankings have Torrey Smith in their top 15 (disclosure: I'm the one who doesn't, as I have him... all the way down at 17th). WRs are more valuable than QBs in leagues that only start 1 QB. I can easily see why someone would give Smith+change for Stafford... but I can just as easily see why someone would give Stafford for Smith+change.
Guess it depends on how you value Torrey, he probably wouldnt crack top 20 on my list. Although once you get past the first 10-15 it gets pretty murky for everyone and probably comes down to personal preferences.

I'm a QB minimalist thru and thru but elite scoring studs regardless of position are more valuable in 10 teamers than fringe starters at any other IMO. Yes there are a ton of QB's available in a 10 teamer, but there are also tons of WR's. Especially in the low end WR2 range when they are only separated out by maybe 1 or 2 PPG's difference and you are likely playing matchups week to week.

 
Two trades in 10 team dynasty (QB/2RB/4WR/1Flex)

The heist:

Team A (playoff team) receives Ben Tate, Jason Witten

Team B (non playoff team) receives Doug Martin, Michael Crabtree

Rebound for team A

Team A receives Knowshon Moreno

Team B receives 1st round rookie pick
Is it the playoff teams first? If so, I like it. The other seems a classic overpay for a better chance to win this year.
Great move for team receiving Martin and Crabtree
That kind of seems like a deal I made in a league I wanted to revamp my team. I'm 5-6 in the 6th spot of the playoffs currently, somehow 4th in points. Did the trade about 3-4 weeks ago when DMC was going off and got offered Martin/Cobb for DMC/Marshall. Snap accepted. Pretty happy I still have a shot to make the playoffs, even though it won't matter to me if I win or lose this year.

 
16 Team 1 PPR Can Start 1QB, 2-3 RB, 2-3WR, 1TE, 1PK, 1 D/ST. 1 IR slot (3 round rookie/FA draft)

Team A (5-6 record, out of playoff hunt) (other notable players Lacy, J. Gordon, Jeffery, Shorts)

Gives: Reggie Bush, Knowshon Moreno, Jermaine Kearse, 3rd round pick

Team B (5-5-1 record, trying to push in to playoffs) (other notable players AP, S. Smith, Colston)

Gives: Justin Blackmon, Ben Tate, Arian Foster, 2nd round pick

 
16 Team 1 PPR Can Start 1QB, 2-3 RB, 2-3WR, 1TE, 1PK, 1 D/ST. 1 IR slot (3 round rookie/FA draft)

Team A (5-6 record, out of playoff hunt) (other notable players Lacy, J. Gordon, Jeffery, Shorts)

Gives: Reggie Bush, Knowshon Moreno, Jermaine Kearse, 3rd round pick

Team B (5-5-1 record, trying to push in to playoffs) (other notable players AP, S. Smith, Colston)

Gives: Justin Blackmon, Ben Tate, Arian Foster, 2nd round pick
Is B new to dynasty?

 
Combination of 4 trades. 12 team ppr.

Give: Forte, Bush, 2 late 1sts, Olsen, Golden Tate, TBMW

Get: TRich, Vereen, CJ0k, Rice, Woodhead, Boykin, Rivera, early 2nd, mid 3rd

 
The Bandit said:
Adam Harstad said:
By your own post here, the other owner has RGIII, so Glennon becomes a backup. The fact that Smith and Boldin are in the other team's lineup this week is immaterial IMO... his team is out of the playoffs for this year. Will Boldin be a long term starter? No. So a realistic view of the trade for next year and beyond is that it was Glennon (backup) and Smith (starter) for Stafford. Doesn't seem even close to worth it for the other team IMO.
He didn't need Stafford and added a top 15 dynasty WR.
:goodposting: Four of the last five staffers to update their dynasty rankings have Torrey Smith in their top 15 (disclosure: I'm the one who doesn't, as I have him... all the way down at 17th). WRs are more valuable than QBs in leagues that only start 1 QB. I can easily see why someone would give Smith+change for Stafford... but I can just as easily see why someone would give Stafford for Smith+change.
Guess it depends on how you value Torrey, he probably wouldnt crack top 20 on my list. Although once you get past the first 10-15 it gets pretty murky for everyone and probably comes down to personal preferences.

I'm a QB minimalist thru and thru but elite scoring studs regardless of position are more valuable in 10 teamers than fringe starters at any other IMO. Yes there are a ton of QB's available in a 10 teamer, but there are also tons of WR's. Especially in the low end WR2 range when they are only separated out by maybe 1 or 2 PPG's difference and you are likely playing matchups week to week.
:goodposting:

I suppose I must be lower on Torrey Smith than most others, and that's why the trade seemed lopsided to me. And I'm also probably biased since my team is the current #2 seed and the current #1 seed added Stafford to shore up its only weakness.

 
djmich said:
Two trades in 10 team dynasty (QB/2RB/4WR/1Flex)

The heist:

Team A (playoff team) receives Ben Tate, Jason Witten

Team B (non playoff team) receives Doug Martin, Michael Crabtree

Rebound for team A

Team A receives Knowshon Moreno

Team B receives 1st round rookie pick
I think Knowshon is worth more than a very late 1st in dynasty, but I definitely empathize with the plight of the Knowshon Moreno owners who are rebuilding and stuck trying to get fair value for him. I spent half the season sending out offers and starting discussions before I was finally able to get what I believed was mid-1st round value for him. With time running out on the season, the pressure to settle for less only mounts.

 
16 Team 1 PPR Can Start 1QB, 2-3 RB, 2-3WR, 1TE, 1PK, 1 D/ST. 1 IR slot (3 round rookie/FA draft)

Team A (5-6 record, out of playoff hunt) (other notable players Lacy, J. Gordon, Jeffery, Shorts)

Gives: Reggie Bush, Knowshon Moreno, Jermaine Kearse, 3rd round pick

Team B (5-5-1 record, trying to push in to playoffs) (other notable players AP, S. Smith, Colston)

Gives: Justin Blackmon, Ben Tate, Arian Foster, 2nd round pick
Is B new to dynasty?
Don't think it was that bad of a trade. Moreno and Tate are pretty much a wash (both are going to be dependent on where they land in free agency- I'd prefer Tate long term, but obviously Moreno is much better in the short term), and I'd prefer Bush to Foster in PPR by a decent margin (RB11 vs. RB17 in my last rankings update). That means team B is giving up Blackmon and a 2nd for a huge increase in production for the rest of the season (plus the upgrade from Foster to Bush long-term). I think it's ill-advised for a 5-5-1 team to be making too many "win now" moves out of desperation, but if you're going to be making them, that's a pretty good one to make, imo.

Then again, I'm way down on Blackmon in dynasty (WR35, currently). If you still have him ranked in the top 20, that trade looks a lot different.

 
Short term, sure. Really don't see Tate as a future stud. Lattimore can be.
Lattimore's a 4th rounder competing with some pretty talented backs. He might be great, or he might never be the same again. Or he might be the same again, but it might turn out that "as good as he was before the injury" wasn't nearly as good as everyone thought (hence the 4th round draft pick). Lattimore's got a lot of potential, but as they say, potential is just shorthand for "hasn't done anything".

Ben Tate next year is going to be a 26-year old starting RB with a 4.9 career ypc average. Maybe he's not the next Michael Turner. Maybe he's only LaMont Jordan, instead. That's not the end of the world- LaMont Jordan finished 7th (in just 14 games) in Oakland before he fell off the cliff. And who knows, maybe Tate *IS* the next Michael Turner. He's got some pretty good production to his name already. He leads the NFL in yards per carry after contact this year.

If Lattimore were more like a Willis McGahee, who was drafted in the 1st despite his injury, I'd find it easier to get excited for him. As it stands, he was drafted in the 4th. That tells me something about how NFL franchises felt about him, and it's not good.
After yesterday's games, do you still like this trade?

 
Short term, sure. Really don't see Tate as a future stud. Lattimore can be.
Lattimore's a 4th rounder competing with some pretty talented backs. He might be great, or he might never be the same again. Or he might be the same again, but it might turn out that "as good as he was before the injury" wasn't nearly as good as everyone thought (hence the 4th round draft pick). Lattimore's got a lot of potential, but as they say, potential is just shorthand for "hasn't done anything".

Ben Tate next year is going to be a 26-year old starting RB with a 4.9 career ypc average. Maybe he's not the next Michael Turner. Maybe he's only LaMont Jordan, instead. That's not the end of the world- LaMont Jordan finished 7th (in just 14 games) in Oakland before he fell off the cliff. And who knows, maybe Tate *IS* the next Michael Turner. He's got some pretty good production to his name already. He leads the NFL in yards per carry after contact this year.

If Lattimore were more like a Willis McGahee, who was drafted in the 1st despite his injury, I'd find it easier to get excited for him. As it stands, he was drafted in the 4th. That tells me something about how NFL franchises felt about him, and it's not good.
After yesterday's games, do you still like this trade?
Sure. I doubt Ben Tate's short-term outlook was the reason for the trade. As always, it's going to hinge on what happens in Free Agency.

 
12 teams, 4 pt passing TDs:

Contender gives Brady, 2014 2nd

Doormat gives Peyton
Horrible value for Manning
Disagreed, if the doormat is a real doormat. All Peyton is doing this season is making his rookie pick worse, and there's no guarantee Peyton's even back next year (I'd say it's extremely likely, but if he wins a league MVP and a superbowl, you never know). Even if Manning comes back next year, he'll still be a year older and a year closer to the end than Brady.I think people are quick to forget just how amazing Brady has been since 2007, and too quick to assume that his recent production is the new normal going forward. I like that trade for an out-of-contention team.
 
Had team officially get eliminated from playoffs this week so made two moves today with two different owners.

12 team league, FFPC scoring and lineup,but not an FFPC league.

Gave Coby Fleener and got Kyle Rudolph.

Than the big one:

Gave Demaryius Thomas, Chris Johnson and Carson Palmer for Julio Jones, Ben Tate and 2014#1 which figures to be very late.

 
14 Team PPR QRRWWWTF. Wasnt involved, but team A is a massive bronco fan and has been starting Jared Cook all year at TE. Team B doesnt have any real needs but took the best player in the deal longterm. Both teams are still contending

Team A - Knowshon Moreno, Montee Ball, Jordan Reed, Aaron Dobson, early 2014 2nd

Team B - LeSean McCoy, Chris Polk, Kenny Stills, Delanie Walker, 2014 4th

 
A couple weeks ago

16 team tiered PPR + full IDP

Team A gave:

Josh Gordon

Team B gave:

Dennis Pitta

Eric Reid

2014 1st (mid)

 
whoDATT said:
14 Team PPR QRRWWWTF. Wasnt involved, but team A is a massive bronco fan and has been starting Jared Cook all year at TE. Team B doesnt have any real needs but took the best player in the deal longterm. Both teams are still contending

Team A - Knowshon Moreno, Montee Ball, Jordan Reed, Aaron Dobson, early 2014 2nd

Team B - LeSean McCoy, Chris Polk, Kenny Stills, Delanie Walker, 2014 4th
If you're going to break a single stud into multiple pieces, you could certainly do a lot worse. Of course, I'm generally not a fan of breaking a single stud into multiple pieces, so give me the McCoy + spare change side.

Edit: In terms of the recent mocks I'm seeing, that's like trading a top 3-5 pick (McCoy), a 9th rounder (Stills), and pocket lint for a late 3rd (Reed), a trio of 6th rounders (Ball, Moreno, Dobson), and the future 2nd as a kicker (typically I figure future 2nd rounders have value somewhere in the 10th-13th round range of a startup). Again, not the worst trade. Using a couple of pick value calculators, they're suggesting both sides are within 10% either way, but they lean towards the pieces and parts side over the McCoy side. I could see going either way depending on what the rest of my team looked like, but in a vacuum, I feel like I'd probably rather have McCoy locking down one spot and then worry about filling in all the rest of the holes.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
12 Team PPR

Team A gave

Lamar Miller, Danny Amendola, Julius Thomas

Team B gave:

Jimmy Graham, Santonio Holmes, Andre Holmes
§ 14-72. Larceny of property; receiving stolen goods or possessing stolen goods.

(a) Larceny of goods of the value of more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) is a Class H felony. The receiving or possessing of stolen goods of the value of more than one thousand dollars ($1,000) while knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe that the goods are stolen is a Class H felony. Larceny as provided in subsection (b) of this section is a Class H felony. Receiving or possession of stolen goods as provided in subsection © of this section is a Class H felony. Except as provided in subsections (b) and © of this section, larceny of property, or the receiving or possession of stolen goods knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe them to be stolen, where the value of the property or goods is not more than one thousand dollars ($1,000), is a Class 1 misdemeanor. In all cases of doubt, the jury shall, in the verdict, fix the value of the property stolen.

(b) The crime of larceny is a felony, without regard to the value of the property in question, if the larceny is any of the following:

(1) From the person.

(2) Committed pursuant to a violation of G.S. 14-51, 14-53, 14-54, 14-54.1, or 14-57.

(3) Of any explosive or incendiary device or substance. As used in this section, the phrase "explosive or incendiary device or substance" shall include any explosive or incendiary grenade or bomb; any dynamite, blasting powder, nitroglycerin, TNT, or other high explosive; or any device, ingredient for such device, or type or quantity of substance primarily useful for large-scale destruction of property by explosive or incendiary action or lethal injury to persons by explosive or incendiary action. This definition shall not include fireworks; or any form, type, or quantity of gasoline, butane gas, natural gas, or any other substance having explosive or incendiary properties but serving a legitimate nondestructive or nonlethal use in the form, type, or quantity stolen.

(4) Of any firearm. As used in this section, the term "firearm" shall include any instrument used in the propulsion of a shot, shell or bullet by the action of gunpowder or any other explosive substance within it. A "firearm," which at the time of theft is not capable of being fired, shall be included within this definition if it can be made to work. This definition shall not include air rifles or air pistols.

(5) Of any record or paper in the custody of the North Carolina State Archives as defined by G.S. 121-2(7) and G.S. 121-2(8).

(6) Committed after the defendant has been convicted in this State or in another jurisdiction for any offense of larceny under this section, or any offense deemed or punishable as larceny under this section, or of any substantially similar offense in any other jurisdiction, regardless of whether the prior convictions were misdemeanors, felonies, or a combination thereof, at least four times. A conviction shall not be included in the four prior convictions required under this subdivision unless the defendant was represented by counsel or waived counsel at first appearance or otherwise prior to trial or plea. If a person is convicted of more than one offense of misdemeanor larceny in a single session of district court, or in a single week of superior court or of a court in another jurisdiction, only one of the convictions may be used as a prior conviction under this subdivision; except that convictions based upon offenses which occurred in separate counties shall each count as a separate prior conviction under this subdivision.

© The crime of possessing stolen goods knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe them to be stolen in the circumstances described in subsection (b) is a felony or the crime of receiving stolen goods knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe them to be stolen in the circumstances described in subsection (b) is a felony, without regard to the value of the property in question.

(d) Where the larceny or receiving or possession of stolen goods as described in subsection (a) of this section involves the merchandise of any store, a merchant, a merchant's agent, a merchant's employee, or a peace officer who detains or causes the arrest of any person shall not be held civilly liable for detention, malicious prosecution, false imprisonment, or false arrest of the person detained or arrested, when such detention is upon the premises of the store or in a reasonable proximity thereto, is in a reasonable manner for a reasonable length of time, and, if in detaining or in causing the arrest of such person, the merchant, the merchant's agent, the merchant's employee, or the peace officer had, at the time of the detention or arrest, probable cause to believe that the person committed an offense under subsection (a) of this section. If the person being detained by the merchant, the merchant's agent, or the merchant's employee, is a minor under the age of 18 years, the merchant, the merchant's agent, or the merchant's employee, shall call or notify, or make a reasonable effort to call or notify the parent or guardian of the minor, during the period of detention. A merchant, a merchant's agent, or a merchant's employee, who makes a reasonable effort to call or notify the parent or guardian of the minor shall not be held civilly liable for failing to notify the parent or guardian of the minor. (1895, c. 285; Rev., s. 3506; 1913, c. 118, s. 1; C.S., s. 4251; 1941, c. 178, s. 1; 1949, c. 145, s. 2; 1959, c. 1285; 1961, c. 39, s. 1; 1965, c. 621, s. 5; 1969, c. 522, s. 2; 1973, c. 238, ss. 1, 2; 1975, c. 163, s. 2; c. 696, s. 4; 1977, c. 978, ss. 2, 3; 1979, c. 408, s. 1; c. 760, s. 5; 1979, 2nd Sess., c. 1316, ss. 11, 47; 1981, c. 63, s. 1; c. 179, s. 14; 1991, c. 523, s. 2; 1993, c. 539, s. 34; 1994, Ex. Sess., c. 24, s. 14©; 1995, c. 185, s. 2; 2006-259, s. 4(a); 2012-154, s. 1.)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
A couple weeks ago

16 team tiered PPR + full IDP

Team A gave:

Josh Gordon

Team B gave:

Dennis Pitta

Eric Reid

2014 1st (mid)
I don't think Gordon is a top-10 WR (production on the field warrants it, but you have to price in the risk), but I think that's way too little to be getting in return for him.

 
12 Team PPR

Team A gave

Lamar Miller, Danny Amendola, Julius Thomas

Team B gave:

Jimmy Graham, Santonio Holmes, Andre Holmes
I can understand why someone would make that trade. They probably just believe that Julius is 90% of Graham, so they might as well get two other quality pieces to make that downgrade.

Just because I can understand it doesn't mean I think it's right.

 
Win this week and I get a 1st Round Bye ... I think its good move not only rest of this year but for future as well

Gave: Decker/Wayne/2014 2nd Round Pick (late #11-14)

Got: Cruz

Thoughts?

 
14 team PPR. Devy league. Only need to start 1 RB, can start up to 4 WR's.

Probably overpaid, but don't care.

Gave:

Doug Martin

Michael Floyd

Late 2014 1st (devy league, devalued)

Got:

Calvin Johnson

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top