Sorry, typo, meant to type Jackie BADASStleUpdate?.....although I think they take the TD away from him.Jackie BADtle
Sorry, typo, meant to type Jackie BADASStleUpdate?.....although I think they take the TD away from him.Jackie BADtle
No, in all seriousness, all joking aside, really... the guy stinks. He had one, maybe two above-average runs all night.I'm putting him on the block first thing in the morning in the hopes my fellow owners DIDN'T see the game.so in all seriousness...
Battle looked slow when running straight into the line. When he has some blocking he gains a head of steam and is tough to bring down. KC has a good OLine. He played a TON of snaps. This is barely a RBBC now. He has no role in the passing game but from everything I saw hes very good at picking up the blitz. He may be the goal line back. With all the injuries the only way Id sell him is if you can get RB1 value for him. He is CLEARLY a RB2 right now. Hes this years LaGarret Blount IMO
I think you are over reacting. If there are 3 guys behind the line of scrimmage, then yeah, he doesn't do well..But given a hole, he is taking advantage of it..No, in all seriousness, all joking aside, really... the guy stinks. He had one, maybe two above-average runs all night.I'm putting him on the block first thing in the morning in the hopes my fellow owners DIDN'T see the game.so in all seriousness...
Battle looked slow when running straight into the line. When he has some blocking he gains a head of steam and is tough to bring down. KC has a good OLine. He played a TON of snaps. This is barely a RBBC now. He has no role in the passing game but from everything I saw hes very good at picking up the blitz. He may be the goal line back. With all the injuries the only way Id sell him is if you can get RB1 value for him. He is CLEARLY a RB2 right now. Hes this years LaGarret Blount IMO
the truth is somewhere in the middle I think. he is a guy who should get 15-18 carries a game and get 4 YPC with a .4-.5 TDs a game. 9-10 PPG, a flex option/RB3. no one is going to give you better value than that for him and you should not toss him away for Nate Washington or Heyward Bey eitherNo, in all seriousness, all joking aside, really... the guy stinks. He had one, maybe two above-average runs all night.I'm putting him on the block first thing in the morning in the hopes my fellow owners DIDN'T see the game.so in all seriousness...
Battle looked slow when running straight into the line. When he has some blocking he gains a head of steam and is tough to bring down. KC has a good OLine. He played a TON of snaps. This is barely a RBBC now. He has no role in the passing game but from everything I saw hes very good at picking up the blitz. He may be the goal line back. With all the injuries the only way Id sell him is if you can get RB1 value for him. He is CLEARLY a RB2 right now. Hes this years LaGarret Blount IMO
I have nobody specific in mind. I send out the "On the Block" alert via Sportsline, and we'll see what offers come rolling in.Hoping for LaRod Stephens-Howling.Raider, who would you try to sell him for anyway..
I have no choice but to hold him for a bit longer now that TANK Mathews is dead again.You guys go ahead and "sell high". I am perfectly ok with holding onto battle as an every week flex start.
Pick a side, please.so in all seriousness...Battle looked slow when running straight into the line. When he has some blocking he gains a head of steam and is tough to bring down. KC has a good OLine. He played a TON of snaps. This is barely a RBBC now. He has no role in the passing game but from everything I saw hes very good at picking up the blitz. He may be the goal line back. With all the injuries the only way Id sell him is if you can get RB1 value for him. He is CLEARLY a RB2 right now. Hes this years LaGarret Blount IMO
Do it now, and then run for the choppaI have nobody specific in mind. I send out the "On the Block" alert via Sportsline, and we'll see what offers come rolling in.Hoping for LaRod Stephens-Howling.Raider, who would you try to sell him for anyway..
The guy is getting 15 to 20 touches per game, including goal line carries. Throw him a couple balls a game, and Battle is a lock to be a top 12 RB from here on out, not too many guys in the league get those kind of touches. He is a legitimate low-end RB1. If you have to option to use him as a flex, you have some pretty good guys in front of him. Should be a starter on most teams unless you are loaded with three top RBsNFL's 8th leading rusher the last 3 weeks.
Same here as I lost jahvid best. Battle has been an admirable replacement IMO.I have no choice but to hold him for a bit longer now that TANK Mathews is dead again.You guys go ahead and "sell high". I am perfectly ok with holding onto battle as an every week flex start.
He ended the 1st half with 6 carries for 12 ydsHe had like 1-2 carries per drive in the first half. Ended the first half with around 7 carries for 22 yards but never got enough to really put some runs together.
is this a keeper league? Are you nuts?Jackie got the slows, man, and there ain't no cure.
Sent an offer out this morning to the guy in my league who always sets his lineup and posts to our forum around 5:30 a.m. (e.g., no way the dude ever sees a late game).
Battle for Torrey Smith
Kind of love the idea of trading away one the slowest straight line runners for a speedster who kind of only knows how to run fast in a straight line.
Short bench redraft. No.I could hijack to justify why it makes sense, but come on, man - this is the Battle Stations thread!is this a keeper league? Are you nuts?Jackie got the slows, man, and there ain't no cure.
Sent an offer out this morning to the guy in my league who always sets his lineup and posts to our forum around 5:30 a.m. (e.g., no way the dude ever sees a late game).
Battle for Torrey Smith
Kind of love the idea of trading away one the slowest straight line runners for a speedster who kind of only knows how to run fast in a straight line.
torrey smith is barely roster worthyShort bench redraft. No.I could hijack to justify why it makes sense, but come on, man - this is the Battle Stations thread!is this a keeper league? Are you nuts?Jackie got the slows, man, and there ain't no cure.
Sent an offer out this morning to the guy in my league who always sets his lineup and posts to our forum around 5:30 a.m. (e.g., no way the dude ever sees a late game).
Battle for Torrey Smith
Kind of love the idea of trading away one the slowest straight line runners for a speedster who kind of only knows how to run fast in a straight line.
How he performs the rest of the year will determine how much competition KC brings in at RB over the offseason. While Charles should be back next year, It would be foolish to expect more than 200 carries from him. In this offense, that still leaves a fair number of carries for whoever else is sharing the load. If Battle finishes strong and, more importantly doesn't get hurt and miss time, they would likely not invest so strongly in another RB during the draft. If he falters, I see KC brining in a mid-round pick at RB.It is interesting to hear all the talk of him being slow. While he does not appear quick, he does appear fast and exactly how quick do you expect a 6' 2", 240 lb RB to be? Regardless, he has been productive and there is a long list of big not so quick RBs that have been productive in the NFL. Moving forward he makes an interesting potential pairing with Charles and McCluster. If Battle can take over the Thomas Jones role in that offense he could continue to be productive for a few years as it would seem clear Battle would be the vulture. Sell short if you want to guys, I'm going to hold for at least a while longer on Battle.
I have R. Rice - Matthews - Best in a no Flex start 3 WR in in which injuries have decimated...oh, come on man...seriously...stop trying to hijack.Battle is nothing special, Samkon Gado for folks who need it, trade bait if you have depth. Unfortunately it's not like a WW pickup is going to warrant Vince Jackson.torrey smith is barely roster worthyShort bench redraft. No.I could hijack to justify why it makes sense, but come on, man - this is the Battle Stations thread!is this a keeper league? Are you nuts?Jackie got the slows, man, and there ain't no cure.
Sent an offer out this morning to the guy in my league who always sets his lineup and posts to our forum around 5:30 a.m. (e.g., no way the dude ever sees a late game).
Battle for Torrey Smith
Kind of love the idea of trading away one the slowest straight line runners for a speedster who kind of only knows how to run fast in a straight line.
If you don't see yourself using him, or aren't in the running for the title then this is probably a smart move. I need him for at least this week as my flex, and possibly down the road week 11 or as an injury replacement, else I would be more willing to move him. Week 14, the Jets have a really weak run D. But on the road, in the playoffs-- I don't think I would be able to pull the trigger unless an injury cropped up.I picked him up in my main dynasty league thanks in large part to the buzz here in the SP () . Personally, I'm putting him out there to see if anyone is high on him and wants to ante up thinking that maybe he's the next Arian Foster. He looks like a plodder to me, and while he does run effectively, he doesn't have a well-rounded game. Whenever KC falls behind, he's going to be neutralized, and I don't think he has a high ceiling.
If I owned him in a redraft league and relied on him as an RB3/flex, then beautiful, keep him. But dynasty-wise, I don't see it, and I'm looking to sell - if I can get anything with dynasty staying power, that'll be huge for a FA pick up.
Yep.I love how rotoworld makes it a point to focus on all on my player's shortcomings as much as possible.
RotoworldAside from being a big body that knows to hit the hole and fall forward, he is easily the slowest and least elusive lead back in the league.
Cedric Benson has value, even in a PPR. This guy is basically Benson. Also, you are cherry picking in those stats a bit, and if you placed the time period on when he started recieving carries (week 5), he is RB20 in a PPR over that stretch.Average PPG in PPRLast 5 Weeks: RB32Last 3 Weeks: RB26Pretty hard to see anyone paying you a premium for this guy in PPR.
Weird, my PPR rankings:Wk5: RB11Wk7: RB29Wk8: RB14Avg: RB18Not sure why you'd go 5 weeks back since he's only been regularly used in the last 3 Chiefs games.I think the guy stinks, but he's doing well with his opportunities.Average PPG in PPRLast 5 Weeks: RB32Last 3 Weeks: RB26Pretty hard to see anyone paying you a premium for this guy in PPR.
Not intentionally, it just so happens our league site has a drop down menus for 3 or 5 weeks.I'm in agreement he's a low end RB2 with little competition on 1st/2nd/GL downs. McCluster is strictly a receiver, and Jones doesn't look effective anymore. But it's very, very hard to sell a WW pickups to other savvy owners. And WW pickups who don't have a receiving role are an especially tough sell in PPR.Cedric Benson has value, even in a PPR. This guy is basically Benson. Also, you are cherry picking in those stats a bit, and if you placed the time period on when he started recieving carries (week 5), he is RB20 in a PPR over that stretch.Average PPG in PPR
Last 5 Weeks: RB32
Last 3 Weeks: RB26
Pretty hard to see anyone paying you a premium for this guy in PPR.
Oh, well if the drop down menu in your league works that way, must be a meaningful statistic. Carry on.Not intentionally, it just so happens our league site has a drop down menus for 3 or 5 weeks.Cedric Benson has value, even in a PPR. This guy is basically Benson. Also, you are cherry picking in those stats a bit, and if you placed the time period on when he started recieving carries (week 5), he is RB20 in a PPR over that stretch.Average PPG in PPR
Last 5 Weeks: RB32
Last 3 Weeks: RB26
Pretty hard to see anyone paying you a premium for this guy in PPR.
He is certainly on the field on a fair amount of passing downs, though usually not in obvious 3rd and long passing downs. He appeared to do decent in his blocking, and stayed in most times.With regard to Battle's receiving ability, it's hard to say whether he really can't catch the ball, or Haley just likes McCluster and/or McClain more in that role. If Haley trusts him enough to stay on the field in obvious passing situations and he gets a couple of throws, that would obviously improve his value.Maybe the homers can chime in on this one...
Same thing that happens to all the other RB's in the league that aren't involved in the passing game heavily? Just a guess.He appears to be "the closer", getting most of his yardage late in the two most recent games.What happens if the Chiefs fall behind early though?
Sounds like Michael turner. Beastso in all seriousness...Battle looked slow when running straight into the line. When he has some blocking he gains a head of steam and is tough to bring down. KC has a good OLine. He played a TON of snaps. This is barely a RBBC now. He has no role in the passing game but from everything I saw hes very good at picking up the blitz. He may be the goal line back. With all the injuries the only way Id sell him is if you can get RB1 value for him. He is CLEARLY a RB2 right now. Hes this years LaGarret Blount IMO
But those other RBs could have already put up some stats early before they had to move to the more pass-oriented offense.Battle seems like he doesn't get going until the 2nd half. Anyway, it's only a 2 game sample size, so maybe it isn't a pattern.Same thing that happens to all the other RB's in the league that aren't involved in the passing game heavily? Just a guess.He appears to be "the closer", getting most of his yardage late in the two most recent games.What happens if the Chiefs fall behind early though?
Agreed, except I think his floor is lower than most others. He's still splitting touches with 2 other RBs and a FB, so in games where they fall behind early it's likely he only gets 10-12 total touches. Take last night for example- they were leading the entire game, it went into overtime, and he still only had 19 touches. The other 3 had 16 combined. The week before he had less than 50% of RB touches and they had a huge lead the entire time as well.Definitely a nice WW find, but he's going to have a few awful ff games the rest of the way IMO.Same thing that happens to all the other RB's in the league that aren't involved in the passing game heavily? Just a guess.He appears to be "the closer", getting most of his yardage late in the two most recent games.What happens if the Chiefs fall behind early though?
I guess I just see a player who will be used similarly to Turner, Greene, Blount, BJGE, etc. None are involved in the passing game to any great degree and if their team falls behind early all are unlikely to be heavily involved.I think Battle is playing for a coach where he is going to have to earn some trust before he starts seeing a higher percentage of carries, and he seems to be in the process of doing that. He touched the ball on 2 of the first 3 snaps last night. He got the GL look. His percentage vs. Jones went up. McCluster fumbled twice and was utterly ineffective.I agree that he's a very average NFL talent, and I see zero dynasty value assuming Charles comes back healthy. However, this season at least, his situation is shaping up very favorably...but that said if his team falls behind early he's not going to put up a bunch of FF points, I agree.But those other RBs could have already put up some stats early before they had to move to the more pass-oriented offense.Battle seems like he doesn't get going until the 2nd half. Anyway, it's only a 2 game sample size, so maybe it isn't a pattern.Same thing that happens to all the other RB's in the league that aren't involved in the passing game heavily? Just a guess.He appears to be "the closer", getting most of his yardage late in the two most recent games.What happens if the Chiefs fall behind early though?
You have to take schedule into account- they have 2 games they should win coming up, but then they have a brutal stretch- @NE, Pitt, @Chi, @NYJ, and GB right in a row.Another important factor here -- the Chiefs are starting too look awful good. To the extent the team does well and continues gaining steam, I think Battle becomes an even better fantasy force. Now you've got them moving the ball, putting him in position to score. You've got them protecting leads. If he is playing on a 2-6 team, I don't think he's nearly as promising. Now they're 4-3 -- off a four-game winning streak. And the more he starts, the more he plays and helps them win games, the confidence they'll have in him and the more they'll feed him the ball.Battle could be more exceptional in fantasy this year than people realize.
Brutal on paper, but that's why they play the games.You have to take schedule into account- they have 2 games they should win coming up, but then they have a brutal stretch- @NE, Pitt, @Chi, @NYJ, and GB right in a row.Another important factor here -- the Chiefs are starting too look awful good. To the extent the team does well and continues gaining steam, I think Battle becomes an even better fantasy force. Now you've got them moving the ball, putting him in position to score. You've got them protecting leads. If he is playing on a 2-6 team, I don't think he's nearly as promising. Now they're 4-3 -- off a four-game winning streak. And the more he starts, the more he plays and helps them win games, the confidence they'll have in him and the more they'll feed him the ball.Battle could be more exceptional in fantasy this year than people realize.