Long Ball Larry said:
Billy Bats said:
Insein said:
Billy Bats said:
Jeff Passan @JeffPassan
Jackie Bradley Jr. and Anthony Ranaudo pulled from minor league games, according to
@jtomase and others. Red Sox may be up to something big.
Yep, but not with Lee. Peavy.
So if there are no big time offers for Lee, I hope Ruben has the will to hold.
For what reason though? This team is a mess, he needs to start the rebuild and dealing Lee would help move that along. I don't want to give him away, but if they could've gotten Bradley ++, but he held out for Bogaerts, then he's a fool.
Because it's not like they really need to dump salary. If you are not getting legitimate prospects with a good chance to make the team competitive again, Lee is still worth more to the team. Honestly, if Cole had pitched the way he should have this year and Halladay were healthy, the team would be in decent shape for this year. 2 years ago, the lineup was flawed and they were still able to win 102. Given that they have the money to keep Lee, they better "know" that they are getting pieces back that will build the team. A pitcher of his caliber is just worth too much.
There was a guy on 610 today who actually made a bit of sense in regards to the Phils not selling. To that, he argued that.
A rotation of Lee, Hamels, Kendrick, Gonzalez and Halladay (on a friendly deal) would be competitive with just about anyone.
That Brown and Revere are young enough to build around and can be 2/3 of a productive OF.
That if healthy...Utley is still one of the best 2B in the game.
That noone would want Rollins or Howard....but at this point the idea that they bounce back to a relative level of respecitibility next year is more valuable than any players they would have gotten. (They're 34 and 33....not young....but not ancient)
You throw in a young 3B (either Asche or Franco), you hope Galvis can become a legit bench player (at 3 positions) and you get a RH power bat for RF....and all of sudden you could be turning the team over while still being competitive.