KiddLattimer
Footballguy
####ty ending to an otherwise great match... I'm sure I'm in the minority on this one
WHEN MY HAND GOES UP YOUR MOUTH GOES SHUT!!! - Love the way Miz works a crowdlol.....That was amusing. Miz gave one of his better heel promos and Big Show didn't say a word. Perfect.I was worried we wouldn't get to see Big Show tonight... YES! YES! YES!![]()
I thought Rollins did about as well as one was going to do against Lesnar. He kept it entertaining.Rollins just isn't believable against Lesnar IMO![]()
Glad they went the screwjob route. Not like every other Rollins match hasn't been that way the past 6 months. And Taker's a lot more interesting than Kane & Jabroni security.
I thought they were going to have Sheamus try and cash in in the middle....and then promptly get his ### kicked.So, is the match over? Can Sheamus come and cash in on Brock since the match is still going on? Did Rollins and the ref just vanish into thin air? So many questions.
I disagree 100%. R-Truth could be believable against Lesnar if the booking/presentation is right, its just the story they tell makes it seem like it isn't the case. They couldn't have booked this Rollins title run worse, its kind of embarrassing really. He's gotten one chance to have a great title defense, had an excellent match at MITB against Ambrose, and has basically been an empty vessel otherwise. Complete waste of probably the best talent in the company.Rollins just isn't believable against Lesnar IMO![]()
Glad they went the screwjob route. Not like every other Rollins match hasn't been that way the past 6 months. And Taker's a lot more interesting than Kane & Jabroni security.
I think they're going to say its because of what happened to Kane. But yeah, I have no interest in seeing Taker-Brock. First one stunk, second one will probably be worse and I don't need to worry about some old guy getting seriously injured. That's not entertaining. Kevin Owens, I know you're awesome but get in line behind Wyatt and Rusev. You were built up just to, once again, make Cena look super. Vince can #### off with this formula.Always cool to see Taker, but why now? How come he didn't want revenge shortly after WM30? Or maybe even at WM 31? Why are they going back to that storyline over a year later, when Taker has wrestled in between? Doesn't make sense at all.
I thought he looked better than at wrestlemania. He did appear to have a strugle getting Brock up one timeMan, Taker looked rough just on those easy set ups. Can't imagine him in a full match
Wyatt/Reigns went a bit long in my opinion, but it worked for everything you want to accomplish. Wyatt got a much needed win, Harper back with Wyatt is huge, and Reigns gets yet another quality hard worked match under his belt.Virgil @TheRealVirgil 15h
15 hours ago
A lot of black people on #Battleground tonight. Your all welcome.
Most over guy on the everyday roster and they can't come up with anything for him. Amazing. Why isn't Ambrose the IC champ again?
I'm alright with Ambrose getting a show off. It keeps guys from getting over-exposed / "shoved down our throats".The answer is: Because he gets a rub from the fans cheering for the freak/oddball chasing a belt. See Steele, George "The Animal"
Most over guy on the everyday roster and they can't come up with anything for him. Amazing. Why isn't Ambrose the IC champ again?
I think you are misreading the Reigns stuff, the crowd has been against him lately, because they have been putting him up against people that are more popular than he is. Bray Wyatt has a huge fanbase among adults, and obviously Lesnar does too. People weren't booing Reigns when he was fighting Sheamus.The IWC out of side one of mouth: "we miss the attitude era, where weird stuff and surprise appearances happened all the time"
The IWC out of side two of mouth: "the Undertaker surprise appearance was lame"
Here is the key question - Is Undertaker a heel? He attacked the top babyface, helped Seth Rollins, and threw a low blow.
I really liked Wyatt vs Reigns, but I wish the crowd would drop the Roman hate and acknowledge that he's been really, really good since Mania. Those guys were working really stiff, but the crowd kept booing Roman's comebacks, and that took the fun out of it.
I'm thinking it'll be more along the lines of Wyatts v. Reigns/Sting.Just realized we probably get Wyatt/Harper v. Reigns/Ambrose at SummerSlam. I can get behind that.
I saw a Reigns/Sting combo as well, but why?I'm thinking it'll be more along the lines of Wyatts v. Reigns/Sting.Just realized we probably get Wyatt/Harper v. Reigns/Ambrose at SummerSlam. I can get behind that.
They couldn't run with a Taker/Lesnar storyline after WM30 b/c Taker was too banged up from the match (suffered a severe concussion and maybe some other injuries).Always cool to see Taker, but why now? How come he didn't want revenge shortly after WM30? Or maybe even at WM 31? Why are they going back to that storyline over a year later, when Taker has wrestled in between? Doesn't make sense at all.
I never fully bought into Lesnar as a face to begin with, so I don't have a huge problem with cheering for Undertaker as a face.The IWC out of side one of mouth: "we miss the attitude era, where weird stuff and surprise appearances happened all the time"
The IWC out of side two of mouth: "the Undertaker surprise appearance was lame"
Here is the key question - Is Undertaker a heel? He attacked the top babyface, helped Seth Rollins, and threw a low blow.
I really liked Wyatt vs Reigns, but I wish the crowd would drop the Roman hate and acknowledge that he's been really, really good since Mania. Those guys were working really stiff, but the crowd kept booing Roman's comebacks, and that took the fun out of it.
This doesn't fit the IWC narrative at all. Wyatt's BURIED too deep because he lost to John Cena and the Undertaker. Nobody cares about him at all anymore, and it's all the WWE's fault.I think you are misreading the Reigns stuff, the crowd has been against him lately, because they have been putting him up against people that are more popular than he is. Bray Wyatt has a huge fanbase among adults, and obviously Lesnar does too. People weren't booing Reigns when he was fighting Sheamus.The IWC out of side one of mouth: "we miss the attitude era, where weird stuff and surprise appearances happened all the time"
The IWC out of side two of mouth: "the Undertaker surprise appearance was lame"
Here is the key question - Is Undertaker a heel? He attacked the top babyface, helped Seth Rollins, and threw a low blow.
I really liked Wyatt vs Reigns, but I wish the crowd would drop the Roman hate and acknowledge that he's been really, really good since Mania. Those guys were working really stiff, but the crowd kept booing Roman's comebacks, and that took the fun out of it.
I think the attitude era was overrated, but it didn't have 50 year old guys showing up and dropping the top guy in the company, and making the champ look like a chump. WWE has taken the worst memories of that era, and assumed that was what made it popular. Imagine if the Rock was defending the title against Austin, and then the Ultimate Warrior came out and beat up everyone.
What made the attitude era popular wasn't weird stuff and surprises, it was constantly promoting younger wrestlers and fresh matchups, Weird stuff and surprises is what put WCW out of business.
I can't imagine why anyone, anywhere would be interested in Lesnar/Taker. Taker was gassed after doing two moves.
You guys keep talking about how "weak" Rollins' title reign has been... folks, this is how heels win: THEY CHEAT.I think you are misreading the Reigns stuff, the crowd has been against him lately, because they have been putting him up against people that are more popular than he is. Bray Wyatt has a huge fanbase among adults, and obviously Lesnar does too. People weren't booing Reigns when he was fighting Sheamus.The IWC out of side one of mouth: "we miss the attitude era, where weird stuff and surprise appearances happened all the time"
The IWC out of side two of mouth: "the Undertaker surprise appearance was lame"
Here is the key question - Is Undertaker a heel? He attacked the top babyface, helped Seth Rollins, and threw a low blow.
I really liked Wyatt vs Reigns, but I wish the crowd would drop the Roman hate and acknowledge that he's been really, really good since Mania. Those guys were working really stiff, but the crowd kept booing Roman's comebacks, and that took the fun out of it.
I think the attitude era was overrated, but it didn't have 50 year old guys showing up and dropping the top guy in the company, and making the champ look like a chump. WWE has taken the worst memories of that era, and assumed that was what made it popular. Imagine if the Rock was defending the title against Austin, and then the Ultimate Warrior came out and beat up everyone.
What made the attitude era popular wasn't weird stuff and surprises, it was constantly promoting younger wrestlers and fresh matchups, Weird stuff and surprises is what put WCW out of business.
I can't imagine why anyone, anywhere would be interested in Lesnar/Taker. Taker was gassed after doing two moves.
Wyatt and Regins both rely on punches too much, but I thought their match came together well. It got mixed reviews on Straight Shoot last night (https://youtu.be/5_65N35fzZo). Brennan Williams liked it a lot, and he watched it without sound.I never fully bought into Lesnar as a face to begin with, so I don't have a huge problem with cheering for Undertaker as a face.The IWC out of side one of mouth: "we miss the attitude era, where weird stuff and surprise appearances happened all the time"
The IWC out of side two of mouth: "the Undertaker surprise appearance was lame"
Here is the key question - Is Undertaker a heel? He attacked the top babyface, helped Seth Rollins, and threw a low blow.
I really liked Wyatt vs Reigns, but I wish the crowd would drop the Roman hate and acknowledge that he's been really, really good since Mania. Those guys were working really stiff, but the crowd kept booing Roman's comebacks, and that took the fun out of it.
And I thought the Wyatt/Reigns match was mediocre at best. Reigns is still limited by a tiny move set (punch, kick, samoan drop, repeat) and needs to rely on his opponent to absolutely carry him (Wyatt couldn't).
I think you debut balor winning itSo when does Cena drop the belt? I maybe can see a Cesaro, Owens, Cena triple threat at SS.
Owens still going after the NXT title hurts IMO.
I'm not really that bent on Cena going over last night. First, I don't know that this feud is over (maybe it is, maybe it isn't). Second, Owens' profile was infinitely raised by it win or lose and he should be a major force going forward. Unlike Wyatt or Rusev (previous Cena victims), Owens doesn't need a strong story behind his angles - he can simply get over on his in-ring work... thus no rub on him by the loss.Wyatt and Regins both rely on punches too much, but I thought their match came together well. It got mixed reviews on Straight Shoot last night (https://youtu.be/5_65N35fzZo). Brennan Williams liked it a lot, and he watched it without sound.I never fully bought into Lesnar as a face to begin with, so I don't have a huge problem with cheering for Undertaker as a face.The IWC out of side one of mouth: "we miss the attitude era, where weird stuff and surprise appearances happened all the time"
The IWC out of side two of mouth: "the Undertaker surprise appearance was lame"
Here is the key question - Is Undertaker a heel? He attacked the top babyface, helped Seth Rollins, and threw a low blow.
I really liked Wyatt vs Reigns, but I wish the crowd would drop the Roman hate and acknowledge that he's been really, really good since Mania. Those guys were working really stiff, but the crowd kept booing Roman's comebacks, and that took the fun out of it.
And I thought the Wyatt/Reigns match was mediocre at best. Reigns is still limited by a tiny move set (punch, kick, samoan drop, repeat) and needs to rely on his opponent to absolutely carry him (Wyatt couldn't).
Here's a tangent ... the IWC is really going crazy about Cena going over last night. If fans had embraced Reigns' ascension to the top, he could have won at Mania, become the top guy, and Cena's story could be more flexible. Instead, fans rejected Reigns, and WWE has to stick with Cena.
Cena dropping it in a triple-threat match at SS (between him, Cesaro and Owens) makes too much sense. He can lose the strap without getting pinned and Owens and Cesaro could be propelled into a new angle together that could last until Survivor Series.So when does Cena drop the belt? I maybe can see a Cesaro, Owens, Cena triple threat at SS.
Owens still going after the NXT title hurts IMO.
As much at HHH has to want Balor on the main roster, I think he needs to hold up NXT until at least Itami and/or Zayn come back. Although I have to admit, I binge watched NXT this weekend and was surprised at just how deep the roster seems.Smack Tripper said:I think you debut balor winning itGottabesweet said:So when does Cena drop the belt? I maybe can see a Cesaro, Owens, Cena triple threat at SS.
Owens still going after the NXT title hurts IMO.
I hope they don't go the route of Taker wanting to avenge his defeat. I'd rather he look for revenge for what Brock did to his "brother" last week. It would work better given the timing. Otherwise, Taker looks like a bitter old man mad about a defeat 18 friggin' months ago.Always cool to see Taker, but why now? How come he didn't want revenge shortly after WM30? Or maybe even at WM 31? Why are they going back to that storyline over a year later, when Taker has wrestled in between? Doesn't make sense at all.
Did they announce it for SS tonight? I was hoping this would be a long, slow tease to WM.The more I think about Brock vs. Taker at SummerSlam, the more I don't like it. Brock gets nothing out of a win, and Taker getting a win hurts this monster you have been building for three years now.
Can we start a Kickstarter to get Cole to quit saying "Vintage"?
The slingshot into the RKO was pretty badass, I must admit. And the hometown fans go home super happy.
It's for SummerSlam. Would have been better as a long tease, but man did they shoot their load tonight.Did they announce it for SS tonight? I was hoping this would be a long, slow tease to WM.The more I think about Brock vs. Taker at SummerSlam, the more I don't like it. Brock gets nothing out of a win, and Taker getting a win hurts this monster you have been building for three years now.
Can we start a Kickstarter to get Cole to quit saying "Vintage"?
The slingshot into the RKO was pretty badass, I must admit. And the hometown fans go home super happy.
I am right there with you. Best thing going.I feel like I'm in the minority, but I care more about the women's division right now, than anything else in the show.