What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Soccer Discussion Thread*** (3 Viewers)

Torres to Milan on a two year deal? Agent talking "severance" package with Chelsea to get him off the books? All transfer betting now cancelled?

Is this really happening? Our long national nightmare might finally come to an end? :cry:

 
Question. How does the video game FIFA 14 (or 15 which is coming out soon) compare to FM14 in terms of depth? Obviously it's not going to be as deep, as FM14 is ridiculous. But is it close?

 
Question. How does the video game FIFA 14 (or 15 which is coming out soon) compare to FM14 in terms of depth? Obviously it's not going to be as deep, as FM14 is ridiculous. But is it close?
Not nearly close imo, but I barely play FIFA manager mode anymore. Sebowski will know more on FIFA manager mode

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think 'Pool will win the CL, and the 20-1 odds are ridiculous (40-1 or 50-1 would be more accurate), but not surprising given peoples willingness to throw away money in the off chance of having a winning ticket in tournament play. For me, this season is all about getting the CL $$$ and the exposure of CL football to attract marquee signing(s) for the next transfer window, while reestablishing the club in Europe.

There's lengthy discussion elsewhere breaking down the financials and a CL knockout round place, even if you go out in the first round, is worth more money than winning the Europa League.

 
Question. How does the video game FIFA 14 (or 15 which is coming out soon) compare to FM14 in terms of depth? Obviously it's not going to be as deep, as FM14 is ridiculous. But is it close?
Not nearly close imo, but I barely play FIFA manager mode anymore. Sebowski will know more on FIFA manager mode
It's not nearly as deep, but it's probably deep enough for someone who's just learning the game. In some ways, a neophyte might like it better. The difference is that tactical changes, although still important, are somewhat blunted when you're making every pass.

 
I don't think 'Pool will win the CL, and the 20-1 odds are ridiculous (40-1 or 50-1 would be more accurate), but not surprising given peoples willingness to throw away money in the off chance of having a winning ticket in tournament play. For me, this season is all about getting the CL $$$ and the exposure of CL football to attract marquee signing(s) for the next transfer window, while reestablishing the club in Europe.

There's lengthy discussion elsewhere breaking down the financials and a CL knockout round place, even if you go out in the first round, is worth more money than winning the Europa League.
I'd be very happy this year if they get out of the group stage of the CL, finish 4th in the league and make a deep FA Cup run. Basically just consolidate last year's step forward and figure out which of the new signings are CL-class players.

Feels far from a sure thing though.

 
I don't think 'Pool will win the CL, and the 20-1 odds are ridiculous (40-1 or 50-1 would be more accurate), but not surprising given peoples willingness to throw away money in the off chance of having a winning ticket in tournament play. For me, this season is all about getting the CL $$$ and the exposure of CL football to attract marquee signing(s) for the next transfer window, while reestablishing the club in Europe.

There's lengthy discussion elsewhere breaking down the financials and a CL knockout round place, even if you go out in the first round, is worth more money than winning the Europa League.
I'd be very happy this year if they get out of the group stage of the CL, finish 4th in the league and make a deep FA Cup run. Basically just consolidate last year's step forward and figure out which of the new signings are CL-class players.

Feels far from a sure thing though.
I'm reading as much Mario Balotelli propaganda as possible, so I've convinced myself he's about to become the world's premier striker and lead Pool to a Championship.

 
Torres to Milan on a two year deal? Agent talking "severance" package with Chelsea to get him off the books? All transfer betting now cancelled?

Is this really happening? Our long national nightmare might finally come to an end? :cry:
Ignoring all Torres noise until I see a picture of him in Milan holding the shirt. Even then, I'll probably be skeptical for a few days.

 
Torres to Milan on a two year deal? Agent talking "severance" package with Chelsea to get him off the books? All transfer betting now cancelled?

Is this really happening? Our long national nightmare might finally come to an end? :cry:
Ignoring all Torres noise until I see a picture of him in Milan holding the shirt. Even then, I'll probably be skeptical for a few days.
Its like an accident scene - cant look away.

If Costa is really injured we may have to keep Torres which is like a double punch in the gut.

 
I don't think 'Pool will win the CL, and the 20-1 odds are ridiculous (40-1 or 50-1 would be more accurate), but not surprising given peoples willingness to throw away money in the off chance of having a winning ticket in tournament play. For me, this season is all about getting the CL $$$ and the exposure of CL football to attract marquee signing(s) for the next transfer window, while reestablishing the club in Europe.

There's lengthy discussion elsewhere breaking down the financials and a CL knockout round place, even if you go out in the first round, is worth more money than winning the Europa League.
I don't think it's that outlandish (fwiw bodog has them at 25-1). Unless they draw PSG from Pot 2 they'll be favored to advance with a 50/50 shot of being the favorite to qualify as #1 (based on odds they'd be favored over Athletic, Porto, Benefica). If they do in fact win the group, they'd get a #2 who'd they'd presumably be favored over. It would only be when they'd reach the final 8 that they'd face someone seemingly better than them. Granted that would probably be one of Bayern, RM, Barca, or PSG, but at that point you take your chances.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I don't think 'Pool will win the CL, and the 20-1 odds are ridiculous (40-1 or 50-1 would be more accurate), but not surprising given peoples willingness to throw away money in the off chance of having a winning ticket in tournament play. For me, this season is all about getting the CL $$$ and the exposure of CL football to attract marquee signing(s) for the next transfer window, while reestablishing the club in Europe.

There's lengthy discussion elsewhere breaking down the financials and a CL knockout round place, even if you go out in the first round, is worth more money than winning the Europa League.
I'd be very happy this year if they get out of the group stage of the CL, finish 4th in the league and make a deep FA Cup run. Basically just consolidate last year's step forward and figure out which of the new signings are CL-class players.

Feels far from a sure thing though.
Yeah, this is where I am at as well. I think those are the minimum expectations on the team from management too.

This is a long project IMO. We can't compete with the rich(er) clubs on financials anymore, and getting back to the top echelon is not a quick fix. After H&G almost left us in ruins, we had to start over, and it's only been 4 years. Since that coincided with Hodgson (*shudder*), it made the situation extra dire, and at least we are on the right path IMO. Pretty crazy that we were in danger of going bankrupt, to this, with 100+m signings in a window, books back in black, and finally plans in progress for expanding Anfield. Last season was clearly well over expectations, but the manager and management has a good plan in place IMO.

 
Torres to Milan on a two year deal? Agent talking "severance" package with Chelsea to get him off the books? All transfer betting now cancelled?

Is this really happening? Our long national nightmare might finally come to an end? :cry:
Ignoring all Torres noise until I see a picture of him in Milan holding the shirt. Even then, I'll probably be skeptical for a few days.
Its like an accident scene - cant look away.

If Costa is really injured we may have to keep Torres which is like a double punch in the gut.
This will all come good imo. Its going to be a fun ending to the transfer window with Arsenal and Chelsea both looking for a CF.

Imagine how Lukaku feels. He forced his way out last year because he didn't want to compete with Eto'o or Ba. Now he's in Everton with Eto'o, and Chelsea are desperate for a striker.

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:

 
I was just looking at some MLS attendance data and some of it is staggering the improvement in the details.

In 2005, 30% of the games played in front of a crowd under 10k. 15% were played in front of a crowd over 20k

In 2014, 6% of the game are played in front of a crowd under 10k. 40% are played in front of a crowd of over 20k

And the 6% under 10k in 2014 is almost entirely due to the Chivas USA mess.

MLS is on pace to have both its best average and best median attendance ever.

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
I agree with this. I don't think SAF is to blame for the current issues. Maybe you can criticize him for the state of the youth system, but even that is dubious, since it's really hard to predict how youngsters develop. How many of the hundreds of players at La Masia have turned out to be stars? If it was that "easy" Barca wouldn't have had to spend 75m on bringing in Suarez, or RM wouldn't have had to spend hundreds of millions the last 5 years.

I think one of SAFs obvious strengths was on the tactical side, and how to make the most out of what was given him. He also had the benefit of many many years of instilling his way of playing in the team. For anyone to come in afterwards and try to change things, it is going to take time.

ETA: I do not agree on Woodward though. I think he is a major issue for United, along with the current ownership group.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
It's a boring cliche, but the answer has to be in the middle. Yes, he won the league. In part because of performances from Vidic, and Ferdinand in the back (with Evans as a capable third choice CB which appears to be his big club ceiling). SAF bought a next wave of CBs. He picked Jones and Smalling and he has to share some blame for the fact that neither appear to be good enough to start at CB for any other team in the top 4.

On the other side of the coin, Carrick played great for SAF (of course, Carrick is always going to be an injury risk). Cleverly seemed adequate under Ferguson as well. So even though everyone said that United had a giant hole in CM under Ferguson, maybe we can see why he felt he had cover there.

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
I agree with this. I don't think SAF is to blame for the current issues. Maybe you can criticize him for the state of the youth system, but even that is dubious, since it's really hard to predict how youngsters develop. How many of the hundreds of players at La Masia have turned out to be stars? If it was that "easy" Barca wouldn't have had to spend 75m on bringing in Suarez, or RM wouldn't have had to spend hundreds of millions the last 5 years.

I think one of SAFs obvious strengths was on the tactical side, and how to make the most out of what was given him. He also had the benefit of many many years of instilling his way of playing in the team. For anyone to come in afterwards and try to change things, it is going to take time.

ETA: I do not agree on Woodward though. I think he is a major issue for United, along with the current ownership group.
Yeah, the bolded was a huge part of his success imo.

As far as Woodward goes, he was able to get one of the greatest players in the world without the promise of CL football. That's got to count for something. Let's see what he can do in the next few days...

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
It's a boring cliche, but the answer has to be in the middle. Yes, he won the league. In part because of performances from Vidic, and Ferdinand in the back (with Evans as a capable third choice CB which appears to be his big club ceiling). SAF bought a next wave of CBs. He picked Jones and Smalling and he has to share some blame for the fact that neither appear to be good enough to start at CB for any other team in the top 4.

On the other side of the coin, Carrick played great for SAF (of course, Carrick is always going to be an injury risk). Cleverly seemed adequate under Ferguson as well. So even though everyone said that United had a giant hole in CM under Ferguson, maybe we can see why he felt he had cover there.
SAF was also trotting Giggs and Scholes at the end there as well. I don't know who was responsible for transfers in that 2007-13 timeframe, but whoever it was has to shoulder most of the blame. They basically went the entire time without a meaningful signing for the club. They tried to cheap out and buy mid tier talent hoping to hit and it never did.

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
It's a boring cliche, but the answer has to be in the middle. Yes, he won the league. In part because of performances from Vidic, and Ferdinand in the back (with Evans as a capable third choice CB which appears to be his big club ceiling). SAF bought a next wave of CBs. He picked Jones and Smalling and he has to share some blame for the fact that neither appear to be good enough to start at CB for any other team in the top 4.

On the other side of the coin, Carrick played great for SAF (of course, Carrick is always going to be an injury risk). Cleverly seemed adequate under Ferguson as well. So even though everyone said that United had a giant hole in CM under Ferguson, maybe we can see why he felt he had cover there.
SAF was also trotting Giggs and Scholes at the end there as well. I don't know who was responsible for transfers in that 2007-13 timeframe, but whoever it was has to shoulder most of the blame. They basically went the entire time without a meaningful signing for the club. They tried to cheap out and buy mid tier talent hoping to hit and it never did.
SAF's method was to overpay in the middle of the market, IMO. Which worked pretty well when City and even Chelsea were still coming to terms with how to use their money correctly. But City in particular doesn't really miss all that often anymore. Even players who don't really make it with them (like, say, Milner) don't necessarily play badly. The competition is just super steep. Once City and Chelsea started hitting much more often than missing, United (and Arsenal) lost the luxury of just "buying smart." To compete in the BPL, you have to shop in the luxury stores a bit.

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
It's a boring cliche, but the answer has to be in the middle. Yes, he won the league. In part because of performances from Vidic, and Ferdinand in the back (with Evans as a capable third choice CB which appears to be his big club ceiling). SAF bought a next wave of CBs. He picked Jones and Smalling and he has to share some blame for the fact that neither appear to be good enough to start at CB for any other team in the top 4.

On the other side of the coin, Carrick played great for SAF (of course, Carrick is always going to be an injury risk). Cleverly seemed adequate under Ferguson as well. So even though everyone said that United had a giant hole in CM under Ferguson, maybe we can see why he felt he had cover there.
SAF was also trotting Giggs and Scholes at the end there as well. I don't know who was responsible for transfers in that 2007-13 timeframe, but whoever it was has to shoulder most of the blame. They basically went the entire time without a meaningful signing for the club. They tried to cheap out and buy mid tier talent hoping to hit and it never did.
They won the Champions League and 5 league titles during that time. :mellow:

 
I was just looking at some MLS attendance data and some of it is staggering the improvement in the details.

In 2005, 30% of the games played in front of a crowd under 10k. 15% were played in front of a crowd over 20k

In 2014, 6% of the game are played in front of a crowd under 10k. 40% are played in front of a crowd of over 20k

And the 6% under 10k in 2014 is almost entirely due to the Chivas USA mess.

MLS is on pace to have both its best average and best median attendance ever.
great stuff, andy- thanks for sharing that.

given a couple of teams' high attendance, it's easy to think that they skew the numbers in MLS's favor. The numbers you just posted show the reality far better, IMO. For me, it's those games under 10k that are the best part of this improvement.

 
No shame in throwing Scholes and Giggs out there for much of that 2007-13 period. At least until 2011 or so. When people say that United didn't find a replacement for Scholes (or that Arsenal never found a replacement for Viera) I always wonder why people think those players grow on trees. I like Rakitic a lot, but I suspect we'll hear more than a few times in the coming years that Barca "never found a replacement for Xavi." I think that says more about Xavi than about Barca.

 
I was just looking at some MLS attendance data and some of it is staggering the improvement in the details.

In 2005, 30% of the games played in front of a crowd under 10k. 15% were played in front of a crowd over 20k

In 2014, 6% of the game are played in front of a crowd under 10k. 40% are played in front of a crowd of over 20k

And the 6% under 10k in 2014 is almost entirely due to the Chivas USA mess.

MLS is on pace to have both its best average and best median attendance ever.
great stuff, andy- thanks for sharing that.

given a couple of teams' high attendance, it's easy to think that they skew the numbers in MLS's favor. The numbers you just posted show the reality far better, IMO. For me, it's those games under 10k that are the best part of this improvement.
Yeah, average attendance is likely the most meaningless stat to see how the league is doing as a whole.

The median attendance is the one to focus on since it helps remove the outliers of Seattle and Chivas.

The under 10k number might go to almost 0% if they sell Chivas and when SJ's new stadium opens next year.

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
I agree with this. I don't think SAF is to blame for the current issues. Maybe you can criticize him for the state of the youth system, but even that is dubious, since it's really hard to predict how youngsters develop. How many of the hundreds of players at La Masia have turned out to be stars? If it was that "easy" Barca wouldn't have had to spend 75m on bringing in Suarez, or RM wouldn't have had to spend hundreds of millions the last 5 years.

I think one of SAFs obvious strengths was on the tactical side, and how to make the most out of what was given him. He also had the benefit of many many years of instilling his way of playing in the team. For anyone to come in afterwards and try to change things, it is going to take time.

ETA: I do not agree on Woodward though. I think he is a major issue for United, along with the current ownership group.
Yeah, the bolded was a huge part of his success imo.

As far as Woodward goes, he was able to get one of the greatest players in the world without the promise of CL football. That's got to count for something. Let's see what he can do in the next few days...
ADM? The same guy that was forced out of RM? For 59.7m pound?

 
I wish Nashville would get an MLS team.
That might be a long time. I never see them listed as an expansion site.

All the talk revolves around Sacramento, Las Vegas, San Antonio and Minnesota right now.

Miami is still up in the air because Becks is having problems getting a stadium deal done. If that falls through, it should open up a slot for some other city.

The best scenario for a city like Memphis is to get a USL Pro team and just really kill it off the field and make the case to move up. That is how Seattle, Orlando, Portland and Montreal all got into MLS.

 
This is a very cursory opinion, but to me it seems like MU's mess has been a perfect storm of SAF leaving, United needing a fair amount of reinforcements/quality to replace older players, and Woodward's ineptitude. Perhaps most of all. Any one of those things on its own seems like it could be overcome with United's deep coffers.
There's a back and forth going on in the United related parts of the interweb about whether or not SAF is to blame for the current dip. Some saying that SAF didn't leave the team prepared. I think it's silly; the guy won the league his last year. He had "his guys" that played well for him, he can't help it if another coach can't get the same out of them. The team we point and giggle at now beat Arsenal 8-2 under him. How could he not think that the team was set?

Bottom line, I just don't see how it was possible to see any of this coming. Either way, it's clear that the traditional way of doing things is out the window and they need an overhaul. Woodward finally seems to be getting the hang of things, so hopefully they're well on their way. :2cents:
I agree with this. I don't think SAF is to blame for the current issues. Maybe you can criticize him for the state of the youth system, but even that is dubious, since it's really hard to predict how youngsters develop. How many of the hundreds of players at La Masia have turned out to be stars? If it was that "easy" Barca wouldn't have had to spend 75m on bringing in Suarez, or RM wouldn't have had to spend hundreds of millions the last 5 years. I think one of SAFs obvious strengths was on the tactical side, and how to make the most out of what was given him. He also had the benefit of many many years of instilling his way of playing in the team. For anyone to come in afterwards and try to change things, it is going to take time.

ETA: I do not agree on Woodward though. I think he is a major issue for United, along with the current ownership group.
Yeah, the bolded was a huge part of his success imo.

As far as Woodward goes, he was able to get one of the greatest players in the world
:lol:

United paid over the odds despite being the only team bidding, he's on huge wages to help make the move.

Literally the only reason he's at United is because nobody else in the CL wanted to pay for him.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top