Great stuff, chook! What were you doing for Fulham?
US and Australia seem like pretty comparable soccer countries: focus on other sports (Aussie Rules, Rugby, Cricket, Baseball, US Football, Basketball), not a lot of history in the sport (I'm speaking out of my ### here- I don't know much of anything about Australian soccer history), but a lot of good athletes and potential for the future. Do you watch any MLS? How does it compare to the... is it ASL? AFL?
A-League (I think that's it, right?)?
McBride- you totally nailed it. The guy lays it all out there every game, regardless who he's playing for or against. He'd never get mistaken for world-class, but he's got enough skills and vision to do what needs to be done on the field and more importantly, always make his team and team-mates better. I don't think there are many US players who can say the same thing. IIRC, he a devout born-again Jeebus guy- might explain the tea-totalling.
Italian soccer- #### 'em.
Marketing exec.And I can't mention the 'S' word. But
football in Australia has been reborn over the past couple of years with the A-League's invention. Melbourne Victory already pulled regular crowds of 40,000 - 50,000+ at the Telstra Dome, and that shows no sign of fading.
The problem for us was that the domestic game was founded by the different ethnic groups spread around the country. South Melbourne Hellas, Sydney Olympic, Melbourne Croatia, Adelaide Juventus, etc.
Eventually those team names were changed to things like South Melbourne, Sydney United, Melbourne Knights, Adelaide City, etc., however nothing changed - Melbourne Knights vs South Melbourne was just an excuse for about 5000 testosterone-filled kids from Croatian & Greek heritage to try and fight each other.
Parents didn't want to take their kids to that and for people like me who weren't tied to any of the ethnic groups aligned with the clubs, it was hard to feel part of a club or feel passionate about them. The A-League got rid of all teams from the previous NSL and made cities bid for the new licences. This way people simply support their city, as I do with Melbourne Victory.
The old NSL also had too many teams. The A-League has changed that with only 8 teams, each team playing the other seven three times during the season. While ridding many fringe players of a team to play for, the concentrated talent pool has resulted in a higher standard of play. Couple this with better stadia, marketing & a new TV deal and the league has been very successful thus far.
The national side making it to the World Cup for the first time since '74 was a huge boost also. Cricket & Rugby Union (a sport only played in 2 1/2 states) were our nation's only major international team sports before that, and either team shirt was the closest we had to a 'national shirt'. That has changed. As it is almost everywehere else around the world (except over there in the States of course), the 'Socceroos' top has clearly become the 'national' top to wear, expecially for expats overseas.
I'm actually looking into working for the Melbourne Victory as we speak, however am also considering work with Cricket Australia at the same time. While I would love nothing more than to continue to pioneer football to the forefront of this country's national imagination, it's still going to be a while before the good $$ can be made in our domestic league.
As for an MLS comparison? No idea. There's minimal coverage over here on ESPN sometimes, but I've only ever seen tiny pieces of it. I think Becks, if nothing else will bring attention to the game over there which can only be good for you guys. However I'd hate it if it became the norm for players poached from European Leagues to be given absurd amounts of money to prop MLS up. I know league rules prevent that from hapenning, but I fear the day is nearing when players will be bought at a young age (pre-international) with help from companies such as Nike, with a view to them one day representing the USA in a World Cup.