HA!Jose can you see?
@otb_lifer - just a tip if you are inclined to make these kind of wagers - but I'd put a little money on Pochettino to be the first manager to leave/be fired...
it's a huuuuge step down from that top two, but, Gunners are top of next tier, imo - they're gonna score a ton going forward once all the signees are acclimated and on the same page - another fun team to watch.
I don't gamble on sports much any more, and never did go all-in even when I had a couple accounts, but I've always thought the lines on Euro footy are probably a bit sharper than purely American sports like helmet-football just because of the massive number of betters and betting houses that offer different lines for those games. Betting on European soccer games has been legal and extremely popular for many decades. I think over half the shirt sponsors in the EPL and Championship are gambling companies. It is so ingrained in the sport, I've always assumed its a more efficient market.has not been easy making bank thus far - but i am ahead of the game thanks to Liverpool and Pookie and Barnes (none of those three have let me down yet)
spot on - it's a plethora of props and 'caps and teases and fixtures - such a varied slate ... hell, the EPL matches usually feature 300+ markets to choose from, at least.CletiusMaximus said:I don't gamble on sports much any more, and never did go all-in even when I had a couple accounts, but I've always thought the lines on Euro footy are probably a bit sharper than purely American sports like helmet-football just because of the massive number of betters and betting houses that offer different lines for those games. Betting on European soccer games has been legal and extremely popular for many decades. I think over half the shirt sponsors in the EPL and Championship are gambling companies. It is so ingrained in the sport, I've always assumed its a more efficient market.
https://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/next-manager-to-leave-postotb_lifer said:HA!
i wish i could prop that,
sure, the Euro books will market what PePe had for dinner last nighthttps://www.oddschecker.com/football/english/premier-league/next-manager-to-leave-post
You can still get 25-1 odds in some places...
I wouldn't put a lot of coin on it - but I am hearing about rumblings from within about "lost the dressing room" - from which you can almost never recover. Poch's discontent has been going on for a year now, and it just seems to be growing.
Bolded may be true for the EPL, maybe, but the market is in no way as near efficient as it is for the NFL simply due to sheer volume.CletiusMaximus said:I don't gamble on sports much any more, and never did go all-in even when I had a couple accounts, but I've always thought the lines on Euro footy are probably a bit sharper than purely American sports like helmet-football just because of the massive number of betters and betting houses that offer different lines for those games. Betting on European soccer games has been legal and extremely popular for many decades. I think over half the shirt sponsors in the EPL and Championship are gambling companies. It is so ingrained in the sport, I've always assumed its a more efficient market.
Yeah, something I am finding out in the EPL fantasy league.There is massive market inefficiencies to be found in soccer as the injury table is much less transparent than the NFL.
hate to belabor this, so, indulge a quasi rant here, thanksthat being said ... with such great association and participation come opportunities for great malfeasance and shennanigans- not saying it's all rigged, and i'm not crying over lost coin - i've been the beneficiary of some real head scratchers, as well ... to quote Vermeil after the Herm Edwards "Miracle of the Meadowlands" victory "sure, we won a couple we shouldn't have ... but we also lost a few we should've won"
i've been betting the ponies pretty religiously for 30+ years, so i am no stranger to having a short memory/thick skin when it comes to getting the #### over bad beats and moving on with it ... but i'm also wise enough to know that expecting all to be on the "up and up" and square is a pipe dream ... the key is in knowing where/when to strike. i won't touch any South/Central American matches, nor any more of the bullring Eastern Euro leagues ... ditto for China - trends are obvious, wagering is foolish.
fair enuff, but the context of how i couched the post i quoted illuminates the shadiness.And that's why they play the game.
CL football for the 3rd(?) year running, r/u in the league two years ago and the CL last year -- and he's lost the locker room? You'd think they love the guy.but I am hearing about rumblings from within about "lost the dressing room" - from which you can almost never recover. Poch's discontent has been going on for a year now, and it just seems to be growing.
I love that 3000Real Betis scores against Barca.
Messi's son gets confused on who to cheer for.
Suarez sets him straight![]()
https://twitter.com/TroIISports/status/1165982147968004096?s=20
And they won the ICC!CL football for the 3rd(?) year running, r/u in the league two years ago and the CL last year -- and he's lost the locker room? You'd think they love the guy.
I can understand why he might not be happy, but the team and ownership seem like they should be pleased.
That has nothing to do with "match fixing". If "folks" are plunking coing on Dundalk to hit for 5 or 6, that sounds like a lack of understanding of football.hate to belabor this, so, indulge a quasi rant here, thanks![]()
perfect example of dodgy goings on yesterday in the Irish Premier League - heavy fave Dundalk is off the board for any straight action vs Uni College Dublin (Dundalk the farrrrr superior squad, joke of a matchup) - ergo, the only way for punters to get a piece of this was via props - hell, ya couldn't even wager Dundalk for clean sheet (also off the board).
so ya pop the spread (-3.5 at -110), Dundalk total goals (o3.5 at -125, o4.5 at +170) and sit back.
Dundalk comes out the gate on fire, up 3-nil at the 36' mark - the cash is in the bag, right? the wagered props hitting are fait accompli - in spades.
can definitely see folks plunking tons of live coin on Dundalk to hit for 5 or 6, etc ... droppingd shekels like fools.
but, wait a second here .... the second half is dragging on, and ... nada. 70' still 3-nil ... and on we go, surely they pop another to cover the spread at least, no?
3-nil final.
the books cleaned the #### up. dirty pool here.
Dundalk only made ONE sub, and that was shortly after their first goal ... not like they emptied the bench "good show, lads, now take the afternoon off!" nope.
your telling me that, for the better part of 60', this team was all of a sudden neutered? put the cue in the rack and decided to play tiddlwinks?
something was amiss there, those Dundalk boys took a dive. of this i'm certain.
/rant.
meh.
orly?That has nothing to do with "match fixing". If "folks" are plunking coing on Dundalk to hit for 5 or 6, that sounds like a lack of understanding of football.
Linkorly?
set aside the plunking on 5 or 6 ... we talkin' about not covering the spread after notching THREE in the first 35 minutes ... sorry, that's flat out nonsense.
"hey, 'Dalky ... ya cover that spread Monday and yer fookin' nephew Seamus winds up fookin' legless up in fookin' Sligo! YA FOLLOW?"
"i follow"
mah bad, fellas ... in the history of sports/wagering there has never been a case of fixing or point shaving, etc.
I think you may have a gambling problemhate to belabor this, so, indulge a quasi rant here, thanks![]()
perfect example of dodgy goings on yesterday in the Irish Premier League - heavy fave Dundalk is off the board for any straight action vs Uni College Dublin (Dundalk the farrrrr superior squad, joke of a matchup) - ergo, the only way for punters to get a piece of this was via props - hell, ya couldn't even wager Dundalk for clean sheet (also off the board).
so ya pop the spread (-3.5 at -110), Dundalk total goals (o3.5 at -125, o4.5 at +170) and sit back.
Dundalk comes out the gate on fire, up 3-nil at the 36' mark - the cash is in the bag, right? the wagered props hitting are fait accompli - in spades.
can definitely see folks plunking tons of live coin on Dundalk to hit for 5 or 6, etc ... droppingd shekels like fools.
but, wait a second here .... the second half is dragging on, and ... nada. 70' still 3-nil ... and on we go, surely they pop another to cover the spread at least, no?
3-nil final.
the books cleaned the #### up. dirty pool here.
Dundalk only made ONE sub, and that was shortly after their first goal ... not like they emptied the bench "good show, lads, now take the afternoon off!" nope.
your telling me that, for the better part of 60', this team was all of a sudden neutered? put the cue in the rack and decided to play tiddlwinks?
something was amiss there, those Dundalk boys took a dive. of this i'm certain.
/rant.
meh.
oh no- I'm sure you've got this all figured out and it's impossible for a team to score three times and then not again for another 60 minutes. highly fishy. highly unusual. dastardly. pernicious. pernicious knids.mah bad, fellas ... in the history of sports/wagering there has never been a case of fixing or point shaving, etc.
thanks.
meh.I think you may have a gambling problem![]()
yes. i already copped to my misstep earlier ... should i publicly flog myself with a rubber hose?oh no- I'm sure you've got this all figured out and it's impossible for a team to score three times and then not again for another 60 minutes. highly fishy. highly unusual. dastardly. pernicious. pernicious knids.
should we start a go-fund me on the bored?The deadline has passed for League 1 Bury and Bolton. Both clubs from Greater Manchester face expulsion from the Football League unless new ownership can be found.
Not at all, but some of the posters in this thread have played football at a high level, some may have watched the game for 40+ years, and some have a lot more experience in the gambling world. We don't really care about the gambling aspect in here, generally, but we do care about the beautiful game.yes. i already copped to my misstep earlier ... should i publicly flog myself with a rubber hose?
asking for a friend![]()
Maybe if they were in a more appetizing part of the country we could buy them for the FFA?should we start a go-fund me on the bored?
depends... what will you be wearing?yes. i already copped to my misstep earlier ... should i publicly flog myself with a rubber hose?
asking for a friend![]()
and i've called it beautiful up in here, because it is.Not at all, but some of the posters in this thread have played football at a high level, some may have watched the game for 40+ years, and some have a lot more experience in the gambling world. We don't really care about the gambling aspect in here, generally, but we do care about the beautiful game.
and i've called it beautiful up in here, because it is.
don't finger wag my ###, pal ... i can post what/wherever i choose, tyvm.
i highly doubt there are people in here with more gambling experience ... again, take your condescension and stick it elsewhere.
anyone who has wagered in their life and who doesn't see the possibility of fixing here is a damn fool.
OK, you got it figured out. I'm not wasting anymore time on this.black nike boots, 2012 USMNT home kit, el tri colored underwear with pre-fab piss stains and post-fab skid marks...depends... what will you be wearing?![]()
fixes happen.and i've called it beautiful up in here, because it is.
and don't finger wag my ###, pal ... i can post what/wherever i choose, tyvm.
and i highly doubt there are people in here with more gambling experience ... again, take your condescension and stick it elsewhere.
anyone who has wagered in their life and who doesn't see the possibility of fixing here is a damn fool.
now im'ma stick around more. thnx.
if you go back to yesterday's posts, you'll see that there was a discussion on how huge the wagering is in Europe, so much so that there are sponsorships from certain books.fixes happen.
but explain to me how it happened here? I see more reasons for why the game wouldn't see more goals that make sense than for any that get me to match-fixing. 22 guys on the field, 4 refs, coaches, subs... takes a lot to get all of that lined up perfectly to somehow intentionally not score any more goals on either side. but based on your post, you're the guy in the know more than the rest of us damn fools in here.
yeah. ok.if you go back to yesterday's posts, you'll see that there was a discussion on how huge the wagering is in Europe, so much so that there are sponsorships from certain books.
i followed up by saying it opens the door for impropriety- then after the Dundalk match i cited that as a potential case of the pratfalls.
i didn't scream or shout or cry "FIX!!!" .. i bought it up in a way that lamented the possibility, not condemned it.
i wasn't in here screaming FIX!! about United or TotSpur ... #### happens.
but to totally dismiss the example i cited as falderol or ignorance is short sighted and naive ... that's the way i see it.
feel free to pm and set up discussing this in person ... i'm in the City 4 days a week, anytime you wanna make it happen.yeah. ok.
think about how many games are going. think about how much it takes to fix a soccer game.
I'd be genuinely interested if you took this energy and found previous examples of proved match-fixing, and then gave some kind of evidence comparing those to this. because "a team stopped scoring goals" isn't remotely close to proof for me and is short-sighted, naive and yes- ignorant- to immediately make any kind of jump without. even if you've watched a couple weeks of this league and now consider yourself an expert.
much better teams lose. much better teams stop scoring goals. these things happen week in, week out, since the beginning of time.
you've used a lot of words on this in here... without really presenting anything "proofy". not sure why a meeting or pm changes that- just post your thoughts here.feel free to pm and set up discussing this in person ... i'm in the City 4 days a week, anytime you wanna make it happen.
i've posted enough thoughts here ... as i said, edumicate me live, perhaps during a match. open invite.you've used a lot of words on this in here... without really presenting anything "proofy". not sure why a meeting or pm changes that- just post your thoughts here.
and I'm for the cornhole- but am disinterested in gambling... but if this was some kind of geraldo's capone's vault thing- I'm ####### there.
CL for 4th year running, but...CL football for the 3rd(?) year running, r/u in the league two years ago and the CL last year -- and he's lost the locker room? You'd think they love the guy.
I can understand why he might not be happy, but the team and ownership seem like they should be pleased.
tbh- you posted a conspiracy theory, without a theory.i've posted enough thoughts here ... as i said, edumicate me live, perhaps during a match. open invite.
There's no doubt match-fixing happens in professional soccer, including at the highest levels. There's a ton written on it that is easily found. Generally, I think the authorities who track this find the evidence for match-fixing in abnormal betting patterns, rather than by watching what happens on the field. Goalkeepers make howlers, refs make bad calls and superior teams don't always keep their foot on the gas after the game is in hand. What makes those events in interesting is when they correspond with an anomalous betting spike.i've posted enough thoughts here ... as i said, edumicate me live, perhaps during a match. open invite.
thanks for seeing the side i'm presenting ... my issue is the "foot off the gas" you cited, which doesn't take complicity from Uni Dub nor the refs.There's no doubt match-fixing happens in professional soccer, including at the highest levels. There's a ton written on it that is easily found. Generally, I think the authorities who track this find the evidence for match-fixing in abnormal betting patterns, rather than by watching what happens on the field. Goalkeepers make howlers, refs make bad calls and superior teams don't always keep their foot on the gas after the game is in hand. What makes those events in interesting is when they correspond with an anomalous betting spike.
if that's the standard, you're in for a lot of eyebrow raising gb.thanks for seeing the side i'm presenting ... my issue is the "foot off the gas" you cited, which doesn't take complicity from Uni Dub nor the refs.
more gist gor the mill:
Dundalk: 65 leeg pts - 55 for, 13 conceded for +42.
Uni Dub: 29 leeg pts - 18 for, 62 conceded for -44.
Dundalk rips a 3-nil lead before their socks are dirty (roughly 35' in) ... spread is 3.5
then nada for the next 60'
to say that doesn't merit eyebrow raising is ludicrous.
simple enough.
np with that ... won't be the last bet i ever lose, but it will be the last bet i ever lose wagering on IPLif that's the standard, you're in for a lot of eyebrow raising gb.