17seconds
root of all aliai
I was thinking Emmy nomination watching thatThis may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.
I was thinking Emmy nomination watching thatThis may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.
agree. this thread only gets better weekly.Awesome, I feel bad for those who bailed after the first episode.![]()
I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
No, but we were told it's a problem.did you throw a pizza on the roof?I've been to the White house.
I hear its a great way to meet Jonathan Banks though.No, but we were told it's a problem.did you throw a pizza on the roof?I've been to the White house.
I know!After Monday night's episode, kind of disappointed this season is only 10 episodes.
Really getting good.
Vince
Not the same thing at all.I sincerely hope that people who thought a show about a high school chem teacher building a drug empire was plausible and entertaining aren't getting hung up on how old one dude looks in a prequel series.
Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
Correlation is not causation. I don't think people think this was the best episode because Chuck wasn't in it.Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
Well, I would venture a guess and say that if the entire episode featured Chuck and his storyline as opposed to Mike and his, we wouldn't have the overwhelming opinion that this was the best episode yet.Correlation is not causation. I don't think people think this was the best episode because Chuck wasn't in it.Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
We have to bicker about something. There's only so much you can say about Mike's age and Gilligan's crappy writing.I'm shocked that Chuck's storyline is so polarizing.
I don't want to go against the current or be too negative but most of the arguments in here aren't grounded in realism.We have to bicker about something. There's only so much you can say about Mike's age and Gilligan's crappy writing.I'm shocked that Chuck's storyline is so polarizing.
He didn't ask us not to throw spaghetti & meatballs on the roof thoughI hear its a great way to meet Jonathan Banks though.No, but we were told it's a problem.did you throw a pizza on the roof?I've been to the White house.
I got it the first time.I don't want to go against the current or be too negative but most of the arguments in here aren't grounded in realism.We have to bicker about something. There's only so much you can say about Mike's age and Gilligan's crappy writing.I'm shocked that Chuck's storyline is so polarizing.
I might be biased since I like Michael McKean. And I trust Vince Gilligan, the greatest show runner in the history of show runners, to make the character pay off.kutta said:Well, I would venture a guess and say that if the entire episode featured Chuck and his storyline as opposed to Mike and his, we wouldn't have the overwhelming opinion that this was the best episode yet.Jack White said:Correlation is not causation. I don't think people think this was the best episode because Chuck wasn't in it.kutta said:Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
Not really a plot hole. They could use hidden cameras that the character is unaware of.Officer Pete Malloy said:
Right. If Chuck not being in something were sufficient to make it great, The Walking Dead would be tied for the best show ever.Jack White said:Correlation is not causation. I don't think people think this was the best episode because Chuck wasn't in it.kutta said:Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
I'm excited for the Space Blanket spinoff showOfficer Pete Malloy said:I'm shocked that Chuck's storyline is so polarizing.
He would sense it because of his illness.Not really a plot hole. They could use hidden cameras that the character is unaware of.Officer Pete Malloy said:
Didn't mean to get you all charged up.Raider Nation said:I got it the first time.Officer Pete Malloy said:I don't want to go against the current or be too negative but most of the arguments in here aren't grounded in realism.flysack said:We have to bicker about something. There's only so much you can say about Mike's age and Gilligan's crappy writing.Officer Pete Malloy said:I'm shocked that Chuck's storyline is so polarizing.
That's really a stretch. Good try though.Right. If Chuck not being in something were sufficient to make it great, The Walking Dead would be tied for the best show ever.Jack White said:Correlation is not causation. I don't think people think this was the best episode because Chuck wasn't in it.kutta said:Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
Makes a lot of sense though.That's really a stretch. Good try though.Right. If Chuck not being in something were sufficient to make it great, The Walking Dead would be tied for the best show ever.Jack White said:Correlation is not causation. I don't think people think this was the best episode because Chuck wasn't in it.kutta said:Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.This may have been Banks' best work so far, and that's a mouthful.![]()
Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
well lets cut out the cancer alreadyI thought it was overstated before, but this really is the worst thread in the FFA.
I haven't actually been in the timschochet thread or the soccer thread, but no way this one is worse.I thought it was overstated before, but this really is the worst thread in the FFA.
I'm hoping Jimmy just about gets Chuck to admit his delusion when he, Jimmy, does something shady, causing Chuck to revert to the space blanket catatonia state, and that Jimmy then says "Curses, foiled again!"
Done.Nathan R. Jessep said:can we give this thread the ***OFFICIAL*** space blanket?
Have you ever been to Philly?I would think she'd want to stay in Philly until her husband's case was solved or at least until the body is cold. It's only been 6 months at that point (which would mean she left very nearly after he was killed).huh? Why is that strange to want to get a new beginning somewhere else?How/why did DIL wind up in NM? Mike send her away? He plan this whole thing out? Doesn't seem like she has family there. Strange for a woman to pack up and move after her husband has died.
It doesn't. It's like saying that the Colts' offense got good when Richardson didn't play. But if Richardson not playing were sufficient to make it good, then the Bucs would have a great offense.Makes a lot of sense though.That's really a stretch. Good try though.Right. If Chuck not being in something were sufficient to make it great, The Walking Dead would be tied for the best show ever.Jack White said:Correlation is not causation. I don't think people think this was the best episode because Chuck wasn't in it.kutta said:Well, it's pretty unaminous that this was the best episode yet, and Saul wasn't in it much, and the brother not at all. This brother subplot better result in something really stellar because it appears as though everyone pretty much agrees the show is better when he's not in it.I agree. Seems like whatever goes down with Chuck will be intimately related with Jimmy becoming Saul. These writers aren't going to spend that much time and attention on a character like Chuck as a lark.I predict you will eat those words about the Chuck storyline.Best episode so far. It's telling that the brother wasn't in it at all, and it was mostly Mike. Hopefully they do away with the silly plot line with the brother and focus on Mike for awhile.Yeah, I don't think we'll be hearing much from those guys this week.Any of you fools still want to say this show is disappointing?
Have you visited The Game of Thrones TV only thread?He was bleeding in the cab after he saw his DIL the first day he arrived in New Mexico. He wasn't bleeding at any time he saw Saul.Right.I thought he had only been in NM for a week or so.yeah, that makes sense and about what I thought (although time between son killed and dirty cops killed I thought was shorter).I thought Mike left for NM the day after shooting the dirty cops and dropped the line to the bartender at closing that he was leaving the next day for NM to leave a trail explaining why he was leaving (ie not skipping town after a murder but as part of long-standing plan). I heard the timeline as Mike killed the cops 6 months after his son is killed. The DIL left during that 6 months for NM and Mike arrived the day after the shooting with the still bleeding wound. I thought the scene at night with the DIL was months later just prior to the Philly cops interview. I seem to remember the cops mentioning working the case of the dirty cops for several months prior to coming out to NM. I may of missed something but this timeline would work mesh with what we have seen, giving Mike at least a couple months or so to work at the parking lot.I'm a bit confused on the timeline as well.I assume that this occurred:They said he left town the following week after his son died so that didn't surprise me.I was kinda confused by the timing of the scenes. I'm assuming the train stop scene / backyard pushing kid in swing scene was weeks/months before he meets Jimmy/Saul. But the Philly cops don't talk to him until AFTER he meets Jimmy and has his matchbook?Anyone else confused as to why his gun shot shoulder wound is still bleeding wayyyy after the event actually happened?
1. His Son dies
2. A week later he leaves for New Mexico
3. In the span of a week or so he meets Saul and has a few run-ins
4. Philly cops show up 2 weeks after his son dies, and a week or so after the dirty cops die
Current time. But it does seem strange that all of Sauls progression as a lawyer/interactions with Mike have happened within a weeks span.
But for cops to wait months to talk to somebody about a killing doesn't seem realistic. Especially when the victims are cops.
I get that the time between his son dying and the dirty cops dying could be months (likely is) but was he not still bleeding from his shoulder wound after the meeting with the detectives from philly? Which is well after he met Saul?
Would that not mean everything Saul has gone through thusfar has only taken a week or so of time? Doesn't seem right.
Or is this just trolling? I feel like half the people here do not pay attention at all during shows.
Trent Richardson looked a lot older last year than he did three years ago.It doesn't. It's like saying that the Colts' offense got good when Richardson didn't play. But if Richardson not playing were sufficient to make it good, then the Bucs would have a great offense.
I did feel the same.Might have missed it, but anyone else think the actress playing the daughter in law was horrendous? I don't think it was just about the difficulty in acting along with Banks. Rare casting miss IMO.