Nathan R. Jessep
Footballguy
mailbox is lined with its own special little space blanket
It's a better visual.So why hasn't everyone just kept their phones, watches, etc. in their cars instead putting them in the mailbox?
it's possible Chuck has every bit of understanding about the implications (maybe not the codes so much, but involving himself a full partner at HHM into the proceedings). Maybe he wants to use it as a chance to try to justify bringing Jimmy into HHM. I have to imagine that Jimmy's spotty history and lack of pedigree (U. of American Samoa) was plenty of reason for the other partners to shoot Chuck down when he proposed it. We have no idea how vigorously, if at all, Chuck fought for Jimmy. He certainly wouldn't tell Jimmy that was the angle, because Jimmy hates HHM. But this find and the work he's doing can hardly be ignored if you're asked to re-consider Jimmy for HHM.kentric said:I was a bit surprised at this as well. First, that Chuck would suggest it. Second, that Jimmy agrees to it.RUSF18 said:I thought Jimmy would have been a bit more alert to the potential issues with using Chuck's code, considering in the first or second episode, he called Hamlin out for sending Chuck documents and sending him checks to make it seem like he was still working for the firm from home, in response to Jimmy's demands that he get bought out.
I would think that Jimmy would reap more of a financial reward in getting half of the take. Assuming they settle for $2 mil, 50% of that goes to the lawyers which would net Jimmy $500k. Not only that, it would make him a much more attractive lawyer where he'd be able to go out on his own. While he would forego the good feeling of his brother's acceptance into HHM, there wouldn't be anything preventing the other partners from either kicking him out (unless it would require a unanimous decision) or giving him the shaft in other ways.it's possible Chuck has every bit of understanding about the implications (maybe not the codes so much, but involving himself a full partner at HHM into the proceedings). Maybe he wants to use it as a chance to try to justify bringing Jimmy into HHM. I have to imagine that Jimmy's spotty history and lack of pedigree (U. of American Samoa) was plenty of reason for the other partners to shoot Chuck down when he proposed it. We have no idea how vigorously, if at all, Chuck fought for Jimmy. He certainly wouldn't tell Jimmy that was the angle, because Jimmy hates HHM. But this find and the work he's doing can hardly be ignored if you're asked to re-consider Jimmy for HHM.kentric said:I was a bit surprised at this as well. First, that Chuck would suggest it. Second, that Jimmy agrees to it.RUSF18 said:I thought Jimmy would have been a bit more alert to the potential issues with using Chuck's code, considering in the first or second episode, he called Hamlin out for sending Chuck documents and sending him checks to make it seem like he was still working for the firm from home, in response to Jimmy's demands that he get bought out.
"We agree to transfer the case to HHM on the condition that James McGill is brought onboard HHM as an associate." At which point Jimmy sees this as his only way to cash in.
Of course he would. But I am not sure I know what Chuck's motivations are. Doesn't seem like it's money. Anyway, I am just idly speculating.I would think that Jimmy would reap more of a financial reward in getting half of the take. Assuming they settle for $2 mil, 50% of that goes to the lawyers which would net Jimmy $500k. Not only that, it would make him a much more attractive lawyer where he'd be able to go out on his own. While he would forego the good feeling of his brother's acceptance into HHM, there wouldn't be anything preventing the other partners from either kicking him out (unless it would require a unanimous decision) or giving him the shaft in other ways.it's possible Chuck has every bit of understanding about the implications (maybe not the codes so much, but involving himself a full partner at HHM into the proceedings). Maybe he wants to use it as a chance to try to justify bringing Jimmy into HHM. I have to imagine that Jimmy's spotty history and lack of pedigree (U. of American Samoa) was plenty of reason for the other partners to shoot Chuck down when he proposed it. We have no idea how vigorously, if at all, Chuck fought for Jimmy. He certainly wouldn't tell Jimmy that was the angle, because Jimmy hates HHM. But this find and the work he's doing can hardly be ignored if you're asked to re-consider Jimmy for HHM.kentric said:I was a bit surprised at this as well. First, that Chuck would suggest it. Second, that Jimmy agrees to it.RUSF18 said:I thought Jimmy would have been a bit more alert to the potential issues with using Chuck's code, considering in the first or second episode, he called Hamlin out for sending Chuck documents and sending him checks to make it seem like he was still working for the firm from home, in response to Jimmy's demands that he get bought out.
"We agree to transfer the case to HHM on the condition that James McGill is brought onboard HHM as an associate." At which point Jimmy sees this as his only way to cash in.
Got to love idle speculation. ;-)Of course he would. But I am not sure I know what Chuck's motivations are. Doesn't seem like it's money. Anyway, I am just idly speculating.I would think that Jimmy would reap more of a financial reward in getting half of the take. Assuming they settle for $2 mil, 50% of that goes to the lawyers which would net Jimmy $500k. Not only that, it would make him a much more attractive lawyer where he'd be able to go out on his own. While he would forego the good feeling of his brother's acceptance into HHM, there wouldn't be anything preventing the other partners from either kicking him out (unless it would require a unanimous decision) or giving him the shaft in other ways.it's possible Chuck has every bit of understanding about the implications (maybe not the codes so much, but involving himself a full partner at HHM into the proceedings). Maybe he wants to use it as a chance to try to justify bringing Jimmy into HHM. I have to imagine that Jimmy's spotty history and lack of pedigree (U. of American Samoa) was plenty of reason for the other partners to shoot Chuck down when he proposed it. We have no idea how vigorously, if at all, Chuck fought for Jimmy. He certainly wouldn't tell Jimmy that was the angle, because Jimmy hates HHM. But this find and the work he's doing can hardly be ignored if you're asked to re-consider Jimmy for HHM.kentric said:I was a bit surprised at this as well. First, that Chuck would suggest it. Second, that Jimmy agrees to it.RUSF18 said:I thought Jimmy would have been a bit more alert to the potential issues with using Chuck's code, considering in the first or second episode, he called Hamlin out for sending Chuck documents and sending him checks to make it seem like he was still working for the firm from home, in response to Jimmy's demands that he get bought out.
"We agree to transfer the case to HHM on the condition that James McGill is brought onboard HHM as an associate." At which point Jimmy sees this as his only way to cash in.
Breaking into a car is a petty state crime; breaking into a mailbox is a federal felony.I say the same thing every time they do it. I don't get the whole putting it in the mailbox thing. Seems like a good way to get your watch and phone stolen.So why hasn't everyone just kept their phones, watches, etc. in their cars instead putting them in the mailbox?
The best way I can explain it is that RICO (which casts a very broad and wide net as compared to other criminal statutes) is a federal charge and it's very likely there is no New Mexico state law equivalent. However, in order for there to be federal jurisdiction (and therefore RICO can come into play), there needs to be some level or action, regardless of how tiny, of the crime to have been involved with interstate commerce to trigger federal jurisdiction and therefore. So, since the objects of which the nursing home is likely fraudulently overcharging for were bought from another state, the jurisdictional requirement needed to trigger RICO has likely been satisfied.So its the resale factor. If they were overcharging in New Mexico that would be OKThey're not violating an "Interstate Commerce Act." They're engaging in interstate commerce and fraudulently charging for those items.Definitely think the copy code will do Jimmy in. Whether Chuck doesnt share or Howard takes it is the question.
How is buying syringes in another state a violation of the Interstate Commerce Act. I buy things from other states all the time. Woz, explain this in a way a 5 year old will understand.
I dont want to clutter up this thread so Ill move it to the lawyer thread if need be. But it is something I would like to understand
Funny. I just though Chuck and Jimmy wanted the caselaw as fast as possible regardless of it was obtained.Got to love idle speculation. ;-)Of course he would. But I am not sure I know what Chuck's motivations are. Doesn't seem like it's money. Anyway, I am just idly speculating.I would think that Jimmy would reap more of a financial reward in getting half of the take. Assuming they settle for $2 mil, 50% of that goes to the lawyers which would net Jimmy $500k. Not only that, it would make him a much more attractive lawyer where he'd be able to go out on his own. While he would forego the good feeling of his brother's acceptance into HHM, there wouldn't be anything preventing the other partners from either kicking him out (unless it would require a unanimous decision) or giving him the shaft in other ways.it's possible Chuck has every bit of understanding about the implications (maybe not the codes so much, but involving himself a full partner at HHM into the proceedings). Maybe he wants to use it as a chance to try to justify bringing Jimmy into HHM. I have to imagine that Jimmy's spotty history and lack of pedigree (U. of American Samoa) was plenty of reason for the other partners to shoot Chuck down when he proposed it. We have no idea how vigorously, if at all, Chuck fought for Jimmy. He certainly wouldn't tell Jimmy that was the angle, because Jimmy hates HHM. But this find and the work he's doing can hardly be ignored if you're asked to re-consider Jimmy for HHM.kentric said:I was a bit surprised at this as well. First, that Chuck would suggest it. Second, that Jimmy agrees to it.RUSF18 said:I thought Jimmy would have been a bit more alert to the potential issues with using Chuck's code, considering in the first or second episode, he called Hamlin out for sending Chuck documents and sending him checks to make it seem like he was still working for the firm from home, in response to Jimmy's demands that he get bought out.
"We agree to transfer the case to HHM on the condition that James McGill is brought onboard HHM as an associate." At which point Jimmy sees this as his only way to cash in.
But there's no fee agreement between Jimmy's clients and HHM. It's likely that Jimmy's fee agreement permits him to consult or obtain help from other attorneys, but nothing with HHM. And, technically speaking, Jimmy has no agreement with Chuck so really this is all on Chuck.Thorn said:Because Jimmy clearly doesn't have the resources to pursue a federal class action suit on his own. Hell he doesn't even have access to Westlaw to do simple research. Also, Chuck is not a free agent. He is a partner at HHM, so he is likely not free to pursue his own cases. Since HHM (through Chuck) would be doing most of the heavy lifting, they are entitled to most of the dollars the case generates.James Daulton said:But Jimmy found the case, how could HHM steal the majority from him if he found it and did a lot of the work? I get the whole code thing indicates HHM has a kind of right to some of the case but how can they get most of it?
Lawyers screwing lawyers isn't the worst though.
Is your nickname, Rico?I thought the whole Nebraska invoice thing was going to lead up to "mail fraud" like in "The Firm".*
*I am not a lawyer.
Only when I wear a diamond.Is your nickname, Rico?I thought the whole Nebraska invoice thing was going to lead up to "mail fraud" like in "The Firm".*
*I am not a lawyer.
I'm guessing there's no fee agreement at all. HHM can approach these clients directly and explain why they're the better option, just like they did with the Kettlemans.But there's no fee agreement between Jimmy's clients and HHM. It's likely that Jimmy's fee agreement permits him to consult or obtain help from other attorneys, but nothing with HHM. And, technically speaking, Jimmy has no agreement with Chuck so really this is all on Chuck.Thorn said:Because Jimmy clearly doesn't have the resources to pursue a federal class action suit on his own. Hell he doesn't even have access to Westlaw to do simple research. Also, Chuck is not a free agent. He is a partner at HHM, so he is likely not free to pursue his own cases. Since HHM (through Chuck) would be doing most of the heavy lifting, they are entitled to most of the dollars the case generates.James Daulton said:But Jimmy found the case, how could HHM steal the majority from him if he found it and did a lot of the work? I get the whole code thing indicates HHM has a kind of right to some of the case but how can they get most of it?
Lawyers screwing lawyers isn't the worst though.
I would think the remedy available to HHM is to sue Chuck under some violation of his agreement with HHM if there's like a non-compete or something.
We don't know how many partners there are. As powerful as Chuck was at the firm, it's still possible enough other partners were apprehensive to not want to rush in to such an arrangement. Remember that the doosh (don't remember his name) who told Jimmy he wasn't getting hired as an attorney also said they'd revisit in 6 months. So it wasn't a flat out no but a wait and see type of thing.So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
Piers?So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day.
Could also be the other partners didn't want another McGill in the mix which could eventually dilute their influence/power in the firm.We don't know how many partners there are. As powerful as Chuck was at the firm, it's still possible enough other partners were apprehensive to not want to rush in to such an arrangement. Remember that the doosh (don't remember his name) who told Jimmy he wasn't getting hired as an attorney also said they'd revisit in 6 months. So it wasn't a flat out no but a wait and see type of thing.So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
I've seen/heard of this before in big firms. First, some firms have an anti-nepotism policy. Second, there are some firms that have strict standards to avoid these kinds of issues, that basically say that unless you have a huge book of business, if you didn't go to the right school and have the right grades, you don't get a job, end of discussion. This is done specifically to avoid favoritism type issues.So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
That sounded like beard lawyer was blowing smoke up Chuck's ###. Buttering him up. The Supreme Court line wouldn't be taken seriously by any lawyer.So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
I think it's likely that his partners flat out said yes to him.You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
yep we're going to find out Chuck was the bad guy and the other partner was actually looking out for himI think it's likely that his partners flat out said yes to him.It's just that the question wasn't "Can we please hire my brother?" It was "Let's not hire my brother, but can you be the one to tell him?"You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
I agree. His reaction when Jimmy asked Chuck if he was proud when he passed the bar supports that. The case ends up being a huge windfall for HHM, Chuck ends up screwing over his brother in order to get his life in the firm back.I think it's likely that his partners flat out said yes to him.You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
It's just that the question wasn't "Can we please hire my brother?" It was "Let's not hire my brother, but can you be the one to tell him?"
Spot onI think it's likely that his partners flat out said yes to him.You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
It's just that the question wasn't "Can we please hire my brother?" It was "Let's not hire my brother, but can you be the one to tell him?"
Six months never arrives in situations like these. Disingenuous at best, malicious lie at worst.We don't know how many partners there are. As powerful as Chuck was at the firm, it's still possible enough other partners were apprehensive to not want to rush in to such an arrangement. Remember that the doosh (don't remember his name) who told Jimmy he wasn't getting hired as an attorney also said they'd revisit in 6 months. So it wasn't a flat out no but a wait and see type of thing.So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
I don't think Chuck went to bat for him really. Did you see his reaction to when he was asked about a job there?So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
I didn't see it that way, but maybe you are onto something.I don't think Chuck went to bat for him really. Did you see his reaction to when he was asked about a job there?So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
Chuck doesn't trust Jimmy/Saul at all. They showed the scene early where their mom had Chuck bail Jimmy out of jail. It was mentioned at that time that they had not spoken in awhile. He did the brotherly thing and got him a job in the mailroom, but everything I've seen even in their current relationship shows that Chuck thinks of Jimmy as a screw-up. I don't think he'd want Jimmy actually practicing law at his firm.I didn't see it that way, but maybe you are onto something.I don't think Chuck went to bat for him really. Did you see his reaction to when he was asked about a job there?So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
:HectorSalamanca:I think it's likely that his partners flat out said yes to him.You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
It's just that the question wasn't "Can we please hire my brother?" It was "Let's not hire my brother, but can you be the one to tell him?"
That goes to the time difference too. Back then it would have been a big deal. Now, I pay a flat monthly fee for Lexis and hardly ever print. I pull up the case, cut and paste the language I want into my brief (it automatically adds the citation), then save a pdf copy of the case to my working file.Yea I don't want to Woz this thread up but that was unrealistic to me. Most non-legal people wouldn't pick up on it though which will probably make it a big surprise. I told my wife there is no way in hell you would go into Lexus or west law that lackadaisically. When I worked for a firm using that was a pretty significant deal.Edit: of course chuck can use his but then you are using firm resources which both would be really aware of.RUSF18 said:I thought Jimmy would have been a bit more alert to the potential issues with using Chuck's code, considering in the first or second episode, he called Hamlin out for sending Chuck documents and sending him checks to make it seem like he was still working for the firm from home, in response to Jimmy's demands that he get bought out.
Another aspect that's not discussed is that not just anyone can be appointed class counsel in federal court. You have to have experience in class action cases. Especially if it turns out to be as big as Chuck thinks.Not just Chuck, but Saul's fling did the research while "at work"... Thus two "employees" of HHM worked on this lawsuit.. Have a feeling, as others mentioned above, this case is the beginning of Saul.RUSF18 said:I thought Jimmy would have been a bit more alert to the potential issues with using Chuck's code, considering in the first or second episode, he called Hamlin out for sending Chuck documents and sending him checks to make it seem like he was still working for the firm from home, in response to Jimmy's demands that he get bought out.Maybe this is what sinks Jimmy? Seemed like they made a scene of it.
I didn't quite understand why Hamlin would have a claim to this case? Is it simply that Chuck is working on it while employed by HH&M? I thought it was Jimmy's case and Chuck was pro bono? Guessing that defense won't fly?![]()
I did. Chuck didn't even have any respect for Jimmy as a lawyer in present day up until he came up with the class action case.I didn't see it that way, but maybe you are onto something.I don't think Chuck went to bat for him really. Did you see his reaction to when he was asked about a job there?So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
I think I've mentioned this before but I really recommend the Better Call Saul podcast to anybody who is a fan of the show. If nothing else, then for Gilligan who is on each episode. They covered this scene with the actor who plays Hamlin. Good stuff.What Howard said to Jimmy:
"We don't have any associate positions open right now, and my hands are tied. I wish we could help you. It's really great that you've done this, but it's not going to happen right now. Well we'll think about it again in six months." this is the proof: https://www.yahoo.com/tv/better-call-saul-gordon-smith-interview-rico-114490318520.html
That's what they claimed on the show. I have no idea whether that is accurate.Am I misremebering, or was RICO the key to the door that opened up treble damages? I thought that was the reasoning behind bringing it up.The best way I can explain it is that RICO (which casts a very broad and wide net as compared to other criminal statutes) is a federal charge and it's very likely there is no New Mexico state law equivalent. However, in order for there to be federal jurisdiction (and therefore RICO can come into play), there needs to be some level or action, regardless of how tiny, of the crime to have been involved with interstate commerce to trigger federal jurisdiction and therefore. So, since the objects of which the nursing home is likely fraudulently overcharging for were bought from another state, the jurisdictional requirement needed to trigger RICO has likely been satisfied.So its the resale factor. If they were overcharging in New Mexico that would be OKThey're not violating an "Interstate Commerce Act." They're engaging in interstate commerce and fraudulently charging for those items.Definitely think the copy code will do Jimmy in. Whether Chuck doesnt share or Howard takes it is the question.
How is buying syringes in another state a violation of the Interstate Commerce Act. I buy things from other states all the time. Woz, explain this in a way a 5 year old will understand.
I dont want to clutter up this thread so Ill move it to the lawyer thread if need be. But it is something I would like to understand
For Jimmy's purposes, a RICO claim or violation may provide a vehicle for his clients to have a much stronger lawsuit against the offending actor(s) in order to collect civil damages. In short, it's likely more powerful from Jimmy's side of things to be able to say "hey, you guys are violating this very serious federal crime and pay us or we will complain" rather than "we think you have been violating this state criminal statute that really more so focuses on individuals and may not carry the same potential penalties as RICO".
I didn't see it that way, but maybe you are onto something.I don't think Chuck went to bat for him really. Did you see his reaction to when he was asked about a job there?So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
What Howard said to Jimmy:
"We don't have any associate positions open right now, and my hands are tied. I wish we could help you. It's really great that you've done this, but it's not going to happen right now. Well we'll think about it again in six months." this is the proof: https://www.yahoo.com/tv/better-call-saul-gordon-smith-interview-rico-114490318520.html
What Howard said to Jimmy:
"We don't have any associate positions open right now, and my hands are tied. I wish we could help you. It's really great that you've done this, but it's not going to happen right now. Well we'll think about it again in six months." this is the proof: https://www.yahoo.com/tv/better-call-saul-gordon-smith-interview-rico-114490318520.html
I think the full front on kiss on the lips when he passed the bar, pretty much explained their relationship.I was a little under the influence upon watching the latest episode, but I kinda felt like perhaps the ######## partner guy was slighting Jimmy out of a lawyer position because of an affection to the blonde chick maybe? A way of putting him in his place. They still haven't revealed exactly what that relationship was about.
The brother not trusting him and putting dbag partner up to breaking the news makes more sense, but that was the vibe I got when initially watching.
Slippin' Jimmy? It was pretty obvious Chuck wasn't into it.So Sauls older brother was thought so highly of that his successful piers thought he would argue in front of the Supreme Court one day. He is obviously a bad ### lawyer, and a highly powerful one at his firm.
His brother passes the bar.
You telling me his partners wouldn't find Sual a job working on parking tickets in the basement? We supposed to belive his partners flat out said no to him?
Sorry, not buying it. That's a big hole in the story to me.
I thought he just wanted to surprise him and he expected Chuck to be super proud. Had he actually gone to Georgetown, he might have beenThe fact that Jimmy didn't tell Chuck (but did tell Lawyerette) he was taking classes and the bar imo also tells us who's decision it was.
Why wouldn't Jimmy tell him? My guess is he expected Chuck to dash his hopes of joining the team before he started the classes.
Yea.. may be my own perspective on that one. I've at times not told somebody I was going to do something just so they wouldn't try to talk me out of it first. That's how I took that scene, guess it's off to the podcast for me!I thought he just wanted to surprise him and he expected Chuck to be super proud. Had he actually gone to Georgetown, he might have beenThe fact that Jimmy didn't tell Chuck (but did tell Lawyerette) he was taking classes and the bar imo also tells us who's decision it was.
Why wouldn't Jimmy tell him? My guess is he expected Chuck to dash his hopes of joining the team before he started the classes.
American Samoa, meh