What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Official Twitter Thread (2 Viewers)

Status
Not open for further replies.
FreeBaGeL said:
So that gets that totally irrelevant source noting the guy's tweet as false, yet when Musk posts something demonstrably false/faked, it's not worthy of a note? Just doesn't seem like a useful system unless it's just a matter of the notes no longer being published on his own tweets (which is arguably even worse).

Well, if you own and run the place you can set your own rules, even if they are arbitrary or inconsistent.
why are you the way you are take that to the bank brohan
And what way am I are?
 
Much more distressing

What good is it to be the wealthiest person in the world if you have no one on your staff to tell you T-Shirt over Dress Shirt is a mistake?

Precedent for super rich guys awkwardly dancing. https://youtu.be/ojP0BO6H4Qc?si=gAsRhcsliJYQ0xj3

Haha I knew what the clip was going to be before I even clicked it.

Musk's awkward dance moves definitely fit right in with rich tech company execs/founders. I would imagine Zuckerberg would look at least equally as ridiculous if he had been programmed with a dancing subroutine.
 
Much more distressing

What good is it to be the wealthiest person in the world if you have no one on your staff to tell you T-Shirt over Dress Shirt is a mistake?

Precedent for super rich guys awkwardly dancing. https://youtu.be/ojP0BO6H4Qc?si=gAsRhcsliJYQ0xj3
I like this version with commentary...

 
Charismatic Twitter CEO, who I'm pretty sure isn't a robot or a hostage, announces Twitter/X is suing companies for not doing business with them.

They're arguing it was a conspiracy/anti-trust thing. I'll let the lawyers speak to that. As a layman, my response is "nanner nanner boo boo."

(for the record, I still use X and love it but cry me a river.)
X has cover from some government allies: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ch...ns-major-companies-shadowy-collusive-ad-group
 
Charismatic Twitter CEO, who I'm pretty sure isn't a robot or a hostage, announces Twitter/X is suing companies for not doing business with them.

They're arguing it was a conspiracy/anti-trust thing. I'll let the lawyers speak to that. As a layman, my response is "nanner nanner boo boo."

(for the record, I still use X and love it but cry me a river.)

He told advertisers to go beep themselves. Now he's suing them because they did exactly what he said. I imagine that will be big part of their defense.
 
Lmao. If you bring back the nazis under the guise of free speech you can’t be surprised when Coca Cola and Visa aren’t interested in having their ads published next to them.
 
Honestly......I can't take anything anyone over there says seriously as long as they keep calling it X.

Everyone calls it Twitter. Lets start there and maybe I'll listen to something you have to say.
 
I don’t have enough antitrust knowledge to determine whether there is merit to the suit’s claim of unlawful collusion, but I will say that the CEO’s message speaks of freedom, and choosing where and where not to spend your advertising dollars is very much an exercise in freedom. Also, for some reason opening the message with “Hey Everybody” threw me off. Just sounded weird for a CEO message.
 
Honestly......I can't take anything anyone over there says seriously as long as they keep calling it X.

Everyone calls it Twitter. Lets start there and maybe I'll listen to something you have to say.

I think it was one of the Green brothers that explained the difference as: "Twitter is the service I use to communicate with my circle and where I get information from my trusted online news sources. But the cesspool of porn bots, alt-right propaganda, and crypto scams, that is X."
 
Charismatic Twitter CEO, who I'm pretty sure isn't a robot or a hostage, announces Twitter/X is suing companies for not doing business with them.

They're arguing it was a conspiracy/anti-trust thing. I'll let the lawyers speak to that. As a layman, my response is "nanner nanner boo boo."

(for the record, I still use X and love it but cry me a river.)
Funny, she was the globalist shill that everyone was worried about when Elon hired her, that she was going to turn Twitter back into a State Propaganda and Censorship Tool or sabotage it from the inside.

Nice to see she has shed her chains.

Will be interesting to see exactly who was behind ordering these companies to pull their ads as well as who was behind the spike in bots pushing the unapproved content.

That’s the thing about litigation. If you can survive an immediate motion to dismiss, which most cases do, you get to do discovery (emails, texts, memos, etc.) and that may very well be the purpose of the lawsuit.
 
Charismatic Twitter CEO, who I'm pretty sure isn't a robot or a hostage, announces Twitter/X is suing companies for not doing business with them.

They're arguing it was a conspiracy/anti-trust thing. I'll let the lawyers speak to that. As a layman, my response is "nanner nanner boo boo."

(for the record, I still use X and love it but cry me a river.)
Funny, she was the globalist shill that everyone was worried about when Elon hired her, that she was going to turn Twitter back into a State Propaganda and Censorship Tool or sabotage it from the inside.

Nice to see she has shed her chains.

Will be interesting to see exactly who was behind ordering these companies to pull their ads as well as who was behind the spike in bots pushing the unapproved content.

That’s the thing about litigation. If you can survive an immediate motion to dismiss, which most cases do, you get to do discovery (emails, texts, memos, etc.) and that may very well be the purpose of the lawsuit.
The danger for Musk is that that goes both ways. He doesn’t seem like the most cautious guy so who knows what kind of communications from Musk might turn up.
 
hackers

@elonmusk
There appears to be a massive DDOS attack on 𝕏. Working on shutting it down.
Sure, Jan.
Probably the same online desperados that forced Linda Yaccarino to make this video.

I don't think this is a deep fake video.

Also, Musk's own Grok AI summed up his skills as an interviewer
Elon Musk's interviewing skills have been widely criticized by various social media users and commentators. Many have described him as a terrible, weak, or bad interviewer, with some specifically noting his lack of engagement, inability to control the conversation, and poor communication skills. There are also comments about his public speaking abilities, with some suggesting he is one of the worst they have heard. However, there are a few dissenting voices, with one commentator praising Musk as a great interviewer and another noting that he is at least conversational in this particular interview. Overall, the majority opinion appears to be that Elon Musk is not a skilled interviewer.
 
Last edited:
“Ferguson based his assessment on internal second-quarter figures recently obtained by the New York Times. According to this report, X booked $114 million worth of revenue in the U.S., its largest market by far. This represented a 25% drop over the preceding three months and a 53% drop over the year-ago period.

That already sounds bad. But it gets worse. The last publicly available figures prior to Musk’s acquisition, from Q2 of 2022, had revenue at $661 million. After you account for inflation, revenue has actually collapsed by 84%, in today’s dollars.


No one knows how much longer X can survive, since the company doesn’t release financial results. But in November, Musk himself admitted X could face bankruptcy due to the advertiser boycott. “



Masterful work, sir
 
“Ferguson based his assessment on internal second-quarter figures recently obtained by the New York Times. According to this report, X booked $114 million worth of revenue in the U.S., its largest market by far. This represented a 25% drop over the preceding three months and a 53% drop over the year-ago period.

That already sounds bad. But it gets worse. The last publicly available figures prior to Musk’s acquisition, from Q2 of 2022, had revenue at $661 million. After you account for inflation, revenue has actually collapsed by 84%, in today’s dollars.


No one knows how much longer X can survive, since the company doesn’t release financial results. But in November, Musk himself admitted X could face bankruptcy due to the advertiser boycott. “



Masterful work, sir
Yeah but at least he completely removed any bias from the platform and its leadership.
 
“Ferguson based his assessment on internal second-quarter figures recently obtained by the New York Times. According to this report, X booked $114 million worth of revenue in the U.S., its largest market by far. This represented a 25% drop over the preceding three months and a 53% drop over the year-ago period.

That already sounds bad. But it gets worse. The last publicly available figures prior to Musk’s acquisition, from Q2 of 2022, had revenue at $661 million. After you account for inflation, revenue has actually collapsed by 84%, in today’s dollars.


No one knows how much longer X can survive, since the company doesn’t release financial results. But in November, Musk himself admitted X could face bankruptcy due to the advertiser boycott. “



Masterful work, sir

You know, I'm starting to think this ketamine might not be good for humans. Maybe drugs created for tranquilizing horses should, you know, remain with four legged animals that weigh 1,000 Lbs.....
 
You guys don’t get it. This is about free speech in the online town square, not revenue and profits.
Not sure if this is sarcasm or not...
He means it sarcastically, but unless you own stock in Twitter or work at Twitter, it's true unironically.

Musk bought all the stock at $54/Share. Former shareholders have to feel a great sense of relief because I'm guessing the share price today would be somewhere well south of $54/Share.
 
Just straight destroying $500MM a quarter is hard to get your head around. And that doesn't include the underlying decline in value.
He's worth $236.5 Billion, he doesn't care.

Maybe, but he also has a massive ego and it seems his self-worth is substantially based on public perception, as filtered through social media.
it's frightening how many people hang on every word he says on there, they could care less that he posts 24/7 7 days a week. Some how they throw logic out that a person could live without ever sleeping, **** even meth heads crash after a few days...
 
Just straight destroying $500MM a quarter is hard to get your head around. And that doesn't include the underlying decline in value.
He's worth $236.5 Billion, he doesn't care.

Yeah, the idea that he cares about free speech is a total joke as he's proven over and over. But when you have that kind of money - who cares? If he stays in his lane with moving tech forward that's great - but nobody should take the guy seriously as he's shown what he's about.
 
But when you have that kind of money - who cares?
He's worth $236.5 Billion, he doesn't care.
Billion a year is the interest, just the interest, on paying back the purchase price for Twitter. That's before he pays back the other 40 billion or whatever that he owes.

The idea that wealthy people are fine with sucking chest wounds of bad investments because they 'can afford it' is not very realistic. It's not the way people with money behave.
 
But when you have that kind of money - who cares?
He's worth $236.5 Billion, he doesn't care.
Billion a year is the interest, just the interest, on paying back the purchase price for Twitter. That's before he pays back the other 40 billion or whatever that he owes.

The idea that wealthy people are fine with sucking chest wounds of bad investments because they 'can afford it' is not very realistic. It's not the way people with money behave.

Not sure I agree because I don't think he's a typical person with money - if he spends a billion a year and in 30 years is worth 200 Billion I don't think he would care. Either way, I imagine he'll eventually get bored with it and sell it.
 
Just straight destroying $500MM a quarter is hard to get your head around. And that doesn't include the underlying decline in value.
He's worth $236.5 Billion, he doesn't care.
Yea man billionaires famously love throwing away billions of dollars.

There's 700 something billionaires in the US - he's one of the most well known and most odd compared with his peers. Trying to make predictions on what he may or may not do is literally just guessing.
 
Just straight destroying $500MM a quarter is hard to get your head around. And that doesn't include the underlying decline in value.
He's worth $236.5 Billion, he doesn't care.
Yea man billionaires famously love throwing away billions of dollars.

There's 700 something billionaires in the US - he's one of the most well known and most odd compared with his peers. Trying to make predictions on what he may or may not do is literally just guessing.
I’m not predicting what he’ll do I have no idea at all. I do know he doesn’t like losing that kind of money though.
 
Just straight destroying $500MM a quarter is hard to get your head around. And that doesn't include the underlying decline in value.
He's worth $236.5 Billion, he doesn't care.
Yea man billionaires famously love throwing away billions of dollars.

There's 700 something billionaires in the US - he's one of the most well known and most odd compared with his peers. Trying to make predictions on what he may or may not do is literally just guessing.
I’m not predicting what he’ll do I have no idea at all. I do know he doesn’t like losing that kind of money though.

I don't think anybody think he does. But I do think he's more concerned with social and family issues than whether he loses 1 Billion this year on Twitter.
 
Most of the time billoinaires worth is wrapped up in assets and not actual cash. But Musk just got a $56bn payout from Tesla. Was that in cash? That would probably make him care a lot less about losing money on Twitter.
 
I don't think anybody think he does. But I do think he's more concerned with social and family issues than whether he loses 1 Billion this year on Twitter.

He doesn't seem particularly interested in his own family

Don’t want to veer in to discussion that’s not allowed but I’d say it’s actually shaped his worldview and why he’s doing some of this. Whether that means he’s interested or not in his own family I’ll leave up to others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top