What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

***Official Vikings Packers Game Thread Week 2*** (1 Viewer)

sho nuff said:
Meh...Clay played a pretty good game.  Defnitely far better than last.
Two tackles and one assist and one bone-headed penalty that cost us a win, and that against a backup tackle for much of the game. I'm not seeing a pretty good game there.  I am going to respectfully disagree.

I don't think it should have been a penalty, but you don't give the refs the chance to make that call, not in that position.  It was stupid.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
My only gripe is why run on 1st down when there was only 5 seconds until the 2 min warning.  Should’ve passed there run on 2nd and take your shot on 3rd down.

i don’t mind the play calling otherwise.  They came within inches of getting a TD and icing the game.  Had they ran 3 straight times and the game ended up like it did Pack fans would be screaming about MM being too conservative.  

Put the ball in your best players hands.  I’m cool with that.
Running the ball at that late in the game is not conservative. Running the ball forces Vikings to use timeouts, that they had to move the ball down the field. Packers ran the ball pretty good at times during the game and once again McCarthy goes away from it. McCarthy gives a lot of lips service to the run game, but quickly goes to the pass game. IF Rodgers is switching the plays then he needs to be educated on clock management and not to switch to pass plays. 

People are all over Matthews for a very thin line call, but McCarthy needs the heat on him for a poor second half performance by this team. Win today and they had a great start to make some distance between them and rest of division.

 
Running the ball at that late in the game is not conservative. Running the ball forces Vikings to use timeouts, that they had to move the ball down the field. Packers ran the ball pretty good at times during the game and once again McCarthy goes away from it. McCarthy gives a lot of lips service to the run game, but quickly goes to the pass game. IF Rodgers is switching the plays then he needs to be educated on clock management and not to switch to pass plays. 

People are all over Matthews for a very thin line call, but McCarthy needs the heat on him for a poor second half performance by this team. Win today and they had a great start to make some distance between them and rest of division.
I disagree when you have a below average running game and the best QB in the game it is.  If Kendrick’s doesn’t make a great play in the end zone they ice the game away, And I’m no MM apologist I think he’s overrated and made his career off Rodgers.

 
As a Packer fan I am getting a bit tired, also, of the announcers touting Mike Daniels.  Maybe wait until he makes a play.  Yeah, he had a good year in a contract year two years ago.  Since then, well not so impactful.

 
For Pete’s sake.  If reading the back and forth about being able to tackle a QB in the act of throwing is what the NFL wants its game to become, I’ll pass.  I’m not interested in this new product they are peddling.

 
Two tackles and one assist and one bone-headed penalty that cost us a win, and that against a backup tackle for much of the game. I'm not seeing a pretty good game there.  I am going to respectfully disagree.

I don't think it should have been a penalty, but you don't give the refs the chance to make that call, not in that position.  It was stupid.
Penalty was officiating more than boneheaded and he had preset ethat led to other sacks or quick grows on other plays.

 
No dog in the fight but that has to be one of the worst calls I have even seen. Watch it frame by frame as the NFL does..Matthews is making contact just as ball is released. Plus it was a clean hit.  And I hate the Packers!!

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Man, both team's offense and defense were playing great today but unfortunately, both are marred by late field goal miss.  I still can't believe we have another tied game in second consecutive game.  I mean, aren't the rule changes to OT supposed to prevent this kind of thing? 

 
I'm really glad that we didn't lose today, even though this should have been a "W".   Can't say how much I hate the Vikings.  Or the players.  Or the coaches.  Or the fans.   Except some of the fans on this board. ;)

 
I'm really glad that we didn't lose today, even though this should have been a "W".   Can't say how much I hate the Vikings.  Or the players.  Or the coaches.  Or the fans.   Except some of the fans on this board. ;)
At least it wasn’t in Minnesota with that stupid horn.

 
I don't like the "Aaron Rodgers fragile baby" rule either. It was overly called on both sides in this game. Use some discretion refs. You gotta look at severity of the hit IMO.

 
Heatman said:
Calls missed on both sides. They missed a down by contact call that would have killed a drive for Minnesota earlier among the many many bad/missed calls. 
Sure, but not equally.  Jimmy Graham non-PI call, Davante Adams phantom push off.  And let's be honest here, this poor call changed the game from a Packers win to a tie.  

 
Man, both team's offense and defense were playing great today but unfortunately, both are marred by late field goal miss.  I still can't believe we have another tied game in second consecutive game.  I mean, aren't the rule changes to OT supposed to prevent this kind of thing? 
They make rules and see what happens now.  Kind of like Nascar did about 15 years ago.  How'd that work out? 

 
Sure, but not equally.  Jimmy Graham non-PI call, Davante Adams phantom push off.  And let's be honest here, this poor call changed the game from a Packers win to a tie.  
Actually if you want to be honest, we still have no idea how the game would have ended.  That's why they play it out.

 
Wait, there are people now that are saying the call against Matthews was justified? That it was anything other than ridiculous? Seriously??

 
Wait, there are people now that are saying the call against Matthews was justified? That it was anything other than ridiculous? Seriously??
I do not think the call was justified... but neither was the "low" or late hit on Rodgers at the end of the first half that kept that drive going and lead to a FG.  He tackled him a the waist and did not hit him with his helmet.  I think both calls stunk and NFL needs to figure this out.  The officials are determining the outcome of games and that blows.

Also - I thought they were going to blow plays dead when offsides/encroachment penalty takes place.  The free play stuff blows - especially when it is specifically designed to pick up a pass interference penalty...  seems cheap to me.  Some will call it a "crafty" veteran plan.  If a false start stops the play so should encroachment/offsides imho.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I do not think the call was justified... but neither was the "low" or late hit on Rodgers at the end of the first half that kept that drive going and lead to a FG.  He tackled him a the waist and did not hit him with his helmet.  I think both calls stunk and NFL needs to figure this out.  The officials are determining the outcome of games and that blows.

Also - I thought they were going to blow plays dead when offsides/encroachment penalty takes place.  The free play stuff blows - especially when it is specifically designed to pick up a pass interference penalty...  seems cheap to me.  Some will call it a "crafty" veteran plan.  If a false start stops the play so should encroachment/offsides imho.
The call on the Vikings was closer to a true "roughing the passer" moment.   In that case, the defender actually drove Rodgers into the ground.  Clearly.

Of course, guys were shoving him backward late over and over, but that wasn't called -- the two times I noticed it, I thought at least one would be called.  Nope.

The offensive PI on Adams was a far worse call.  DB was tugging on him, Adams gave a little shove, shocker, offensive PI.  Worst case that was a foul on both guys.  Shouldn't have been called at all.  Another game changer.

Whatever though, this game went the way it did because our doughboy coach can't manage the clock.  Should have fired him two years ago.

 
The call on the Vikings was closer to a true "roughing the passer" moment.   In that case, the defender actually drove Rodgers into the ground.  Clearly.

Of course, guys were shoving him backward late over and over, but that wasn't called -- the two times I noticed it, I thought at least one would be called.  Nope.

The offensive PI on Adams was a far worse call.  DB was tugging on him, Adams gave a little shove, shocker, offensive PI.  Worst case that was a foul on both guys.  Shouldn't have been called at all.  Another game changer.

Whatever though, this game went the way it did because our doughboy coach can't manage the clock.  Should have fired him two years ago.
I mostly agree Alex - It was closer, but I think they called it a low hit.  I could be wrong on that.  Either way - just like Clay, neither could hold up.  I think they are both no calls.

Agree on the offensive PI call.  That made no sense.

The game went the way it did because of failed blocking assignment on a punt and a field goal kicker who can't get it done.  I agree the play calling at the end of the game was insane....  Two ties in two weeks must be some kinds of a record.

 
I do not think the call was justified... but neither was the "low" or late hit on Rodgers at the end of the first half that kept that drive going and lead to a FG.  He tackled him a the waist and did not hit him with his helmet.  I think both calls stunk and NFL needs to figure this out.  The officials are determining the outcome of games and that blows.

Also - I thought they were going to blow plays dead when offsides/encroachment penalty takes place.  The free play stuff blows - especially when it is specifically designed to pick up a pass interference penalty...  seems cheap to me.  Some will call it a "crafty" veteran plan.  If a false start stops the play so should encroachment/offsides imho.
The call against Minnesota didn’t keep a drive going.  It was the first play of the drive...and there was a defensive holding cal in that play too.

 
As a Packer fan I am getting a bit tired, also, of the announcers touting Mike Daniels.  Maybe wait until he makes a play.  Yeah, he had a good year in a contract year two years ago.  Since then, well not so impactful.
He's not getting into the backfield, getting sacks or TFL's like he did in 2016, but he does draw a crowd.  Opposing OL's are always focused on him, and it seems he never takes a play off, always fighting.

 
He's not getting into the backfield, getting sacks or TFL's like he did in 2016, but he does draw a crowd.  Opposing OL's are always focused on him, and it seems he never takes a play off, always fighting.
True.  I just want a splash play or two every other game or so.  Same with Wilkerson.  I thought he would be more impactful, but maybe its coming.

 
So, the Packers are not the only team in the North with a Q.B.  All four teams seem to have this sorted out, for now.  What a rare thing.
You must not have watched the low lights of Stafford so far this year..

:Ducks incoming shoes from Lion fans: ;)  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You must not have watched the low lights of Stafford so far this year..

:Ducks incoming shoes from Lion fans: ;)  
I'm hoping he maintains his current level of play when the Packers face the Lions.  The thing is, he will likely et things squared away again.

I thought cousins looked good yesterday, 3even real good.  I thought Trubisky looked as if he was developing the week before.  This is a rare confluence.  (Granted, it is usually the Bears dragging the group average down and not so much a Vikings issue, but you have to admit, this is something.)

 
I'm hoping he maintains his current level of play when the Packers face the Lions.  The thing is, he will likely et things squared away again.

I thought cousins looked good yesterday, 3even real good.  I thought Trubisky looked as if he was developing the week before.  This is a rare confluence.  (Granted, it is usually the Bears dragging the group average down and not so much a Vikings issue, but you have to admit, this is something.)
I mean Tommy Kramer would be the second best Q.B. in Bears history, had he been a Bear.

 
I mean Tommy Kramer would be the second best Q.B. in Bears history, had he been a Bear.
:lol: I worked at the Horse track (Canterbury Downs) in Minnesota nearing the end of the Tommy days...

The things I saw and heard from him there explained his downhill roll...

hint .. he was DEFINITELY the guy on the right  :suds:

 
:lol: I worked at the Horse track (Canterbury Downs) in Minnesota nearing the end of the Tommy days...

The things I saw and heard from him there explained his downhill roll...

hint .. he was DEFINITELY the guy on the right  :suds:
I partied with a few of those Vikings back in those days.  The eighties were a weird decade, frankly no one was sober for the entire decade except those a-holes who really needed to get drunk and get blown, Donald Rumsfeld types.

 
I'm hoping he maintains his current level of play when the Packers face the Lions.  The thing is, he will likely et things squared away again.

I thought cousins looked good yesterday, 3even real good.  I thought Trubisky looked as if he was developing the week before.  This is a rare confluence.  (Granted, it is usually the Bears dragging the group average down and not so much a Vikings issue, but you have to admit, this is something.)
Common theme:  despite ditching Don Capers, opposing QBs have a career day versus our defense

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top