Apple Jack
Footballguy
Though in true Snyder/organization fashion, wouldn't be suprised to wake up one morning to news of his car ending up in the reflecting pool with a dead hooker in the trunk.
Ha I too am holding my breath for the inevitable story about the growing rift between owner and GM come training camp. Crossing my fingers that everyone stays happy and this works out for a whileThough in true Snyder/organization fashion, wouldn't be suprised to wake up one morning to news of his car ending up in the reflecting pool with a dead hooker in the trunk.
Thanks for the link that was a good read.Impossible not to read this and get excited about this guy: http://espn.go.com/espn/feature/story/_/id/12014699/scot-mccloughan-nfl-best-talent-scout-self-employed-living-farm
http://espn.go.com/blog/washington-redskins/post/_/id/14465/thoughts-on-scot-mccloughanthayman said:He's not a old buddy of Allen's so I'm optimistic.
- Like others, I’d heard that Bruce Allen and McCloughan are friends. Here’s a deeper connection: McCloughan’s dad, Kent, played for Oakland and was a scout with them at the same time Allen was employed by the Raiders. They would have worked together from 1995-2003.
Heard Albert Breer on the radio. He said it's not done yet because of the Rooney Rule. He also said he has been close with John Gruden in the past. Albert wasn't sure if he was already close to Jay or not, but there was already a connection to the Gruden family.Ted Mullins said:Looks like a few people (notably La Canfora, Kevin Sheehan from 980 who said he spoke to Scot personally, and Mike Jones from WaPo) saying it isn't totally done yet? They are not pessimistic about it all, just claiming everything isn't totally settled yet.
This seems like it'd be a huge development as they finally seem to be showing some self-awareness of a glaring weakness. I would imagine he would come in and clean house on this bad roster.
It's also a move that can't really be judged for a few seasons.Heard a lot of people today praising this move because "this time it's different". Pretty sure we've said that before. Not that I think that makes this a bad move, but I am personally going to temper my excitement and expectations. It sure seems like a move in the right direction and I hope it works. But, as amazing as Snyder is at making big moves like this, he can also f it up.
Yeah, me and him both. Only I also drink liquor.Good move. Though reports are he still drinks but now it's only Beer....
He retains the title of "president", will work with agents and contracts, the PR stuff, alumni stuff, etc.so is allen gone or is he just stepping away fro personell stuff? im out of the loop today.
No, I mean it would be a mistake by Wade. I like Wade. Him and Gruden are nothing alike.I think Wade would be ideal candidate. Already connection on the staff. Isn't looking to be a head coach anymore. Proven track record. Bring it.Be a mistake. Gruden out if he has one more bad season. Wade out if he doeshttp://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2015/01/04/report-wade-phillips-to-interview-with-washington/
Washington interviewing Wade Phillips for DC...
Huge for RedskinsMattFancy said:
Emmanual Benton @Manny_PPI
McCloughan will have full power over the #Redskins personnel department, per source. That includes adding/subtracting the actual evaluators.
And once again the Redskins wait till the fans are on the verge of mutiny, then find one change to make (Gruden, Griffin trade, Shanny and Son, Haynesworth, etc.) that convinces fans that "things will change," and they climb back on the bandwagon.ConnSKINS26 said:This is amazing. This is literally the only thing Snyder could have done at any point in the next five years to get my hopes up in a real meaningful way.
apples and oranges, assuming the reports and details are true.And once again the Redskins wait till the fans are on the verge of mutiny, then find one change to make (Gruden, Griffin trade, Shanny and Son, Haynesworth, etc.) that convinces fans that "things will change," and they climb back on the bandwagon.ConnSKINS26 said:This is amazing. This is literally the only thing Snyder could have done at any point in the next five years to get my hopes up in a real meaningful way.
Why would anyone think THIS offseason signing will end up any different?
Honestly, I don't "expect" it to be any different. I "hope" that it will be different this year.And once again the Redskins wait till the fans are on the verge of mutiny, then find one change to make (Gruden, Griffin trade, Shanny and Son, Haynesworth, etc.) that convinces fans that "things will change," and they climb back on the bandwagon.ConnSKINS26 said:This is amazing. This is literally the only thing Snyder could have done at any point in the next five years to get my hopes up in a real meaningful way.
Why would anyone think THIS offseason signing will end up any different?
I hope he stays involved with the Charitable Foundation. That is where he has done the most "winning" and I'd hate to lose his considerable skill set there.He retains the title of "president", will work with agents and contracts, the PR stuff, alumni stuff, etc.so is allen gone or is he just stepping away fro personell stuff? im out of the loop today.
Agreed! Many other fans were responding to this signing with skepticism, but I'm hopeful that a personnel first guy will be a good start to turning the team around.This to me is different than previous moves because it signals a change at the top of the organization. For years, we haven't had a true personnel guy at the top. This guy isn't some big name, he's just very well respected around the league. McCloughan isn't some guy that's past his prime, he's 43 y/o. This isn't bringing back Gibbs after 12 years away, this isn't brining in Shanny in his 60s. This isn't signing the biggest name in FA. This finally seems to be Snyder understanding that he needs a real football mind in charge.
Will it work out? Who knows. But it certainly seems to be a step in the right direction. And for a team that has seemingly lost its path in recent years, there is reason for some optimism. Not saying he's going to come in and fix everything in 1 year, it's a process, but I feel like we may finally have the right guy for that process.
So you're not familiar with Scot McLoughen?And once again the Redskins wait till the fans are on the verge of mutiny, then find one change to make (Gruden, Griffin trade, Shanny and Son, Haynesworth, etc.) that convinces fans that "things will change," and they climb back on the bandwagon.ConnSKINS26 said:This is amazing. This is literally the only thing Snyder could have done at any point in the next five years to get my hopes up in a real meaningful way.
Why would anyone think THIS offseason signing will end up any different?
I hate to be Debbie Downer, but this is what everyone said when Shanahan was hired and supposedly assured unfettered control over the team. Pretty much verbatim. It's been repeated in response to other front office moves too- hiring Gibbs (Snyder wouldn't dare meddle with the franchise's greatest icon!), replacing Snyder lackey Cerrato with Allen, the 2011 draft where they stockpiled picks and focused on defense in the early rounds, and others. I'll believe it when I see change sustained over multiple seasons.This to me is different than previous moves because it signals a change at the top of the organization. For years, we haven't had a true personnel guy at the top. This guy isn't some big name, he's just very well respected around the league. McCloughan isn't some guy that's past his prime, he's 43 y/o. This isn't bringing back Gibbs after 12 years away, this isn't brining in Shanny in his 60s. This isn't signing the biggest name in FA. This finally seems to be Snyder understanding that he needs a real football mind in charge.
Will it work out? Who knows. But it certainly seems to be a step in the right direction. And for a team that has seemingly lost its path in recent years, there is reason for some optimism. Not saying he's going to come in and fix everything in 1 year, it's a process, but I feel like we may finally have the right guy for that process.
And that's fine, because it's true. Again, I have no idea if this is going to work. But it seems to be something different in terms of how the Skins FO works.I hate to be Debbie Downer, but this is what everyone said when Shanahan was hired and supposedly assured unfettered control over the team. Pretty much verbatim. It's been repeated in response to other front office moves too- hiring Gibbs (Snyder wouldn't dare meddle with the franchise's greatest icon!), replacing Snyder lackey Cerrato with Allen, the 2011 draft where they stockpiled picks and focused on defense in the early rounds, and others. I'll believe it when I see change sustained over multiple seasons.This to me is different than previous moves because it signals a change at the top of the organization. For years, we haven't had a true personnel guy at the top. This guy isn't some big name, he's just very well respected around the league. McCloughan isn't some guy that's past his prime, he's 43 y/o. This isn't bringing back Gibbs after 12 years away, this isn't brining in Shanny in his 60s. This isn't signing the biggest name in FA. This finally seems to be Snyder understanding that he needs a real football mind in charge.
Will it work out? Who knows. But it certainly seems to be a step in the right direction. And for a team that has seemingly lost its path in recent years, there is reason for some optimism. Not saying he's going to come in and fix everything in 1 year, it's a process, but I feel like we may finally have the right guy for that process.
Agreed. I think Scot gets full control at first. But, the only thing that will allow him to keep that control is either quick success or patience from Snyder. What are the probabilities of each? What happens if we still don't make the playoffs the next three seasons? How will fans react and how will Snyder react to the fans' reactions? Does Snyder step in and force a trade or a big FA splash? Does he clean house and call Vinny and Pepper? Will he be ok if the plan is to totally strip the team down to nothing and build from scratch? That takes time.I hate to be Debbie Downer, but this is what everyone said when Shanahan was hired and supposedly assured unfettered control over the team. Pretty much verbatim. It's been repeated in response to other front office moves too- hiring Gibbs (Snyder wouldn't dare meddle with the franchise's greatest icon!), replacing Snyder lackey Cerrato with Allen, the 2011 draft where they stockpiled picks and focused on defense in the early rounds, and others. I'll believe it when I see change sustained over multiple seasons.This to me is different than previous moves because it signals a change at the top of the organization. For years, we haven't had a true personnel guy at the top. This guy isn't some big name, he's just very well respected around the league. McCloughan isn't some guy that's past his prime, he's 43 y/o. This isn't bringing back Gibbs after 12 years away, this isn't brining in Shanny in his 60s. This isn't signing the biggest name in FA. This finally seems to be Snyder understanding that he needs a real football mind in charge.
Will it work out? Who knows. But it certainly seems to be a step in the right direction. And for a team that has seemingly lost its path in recent years, there is reason for some optimism. Not saying he's going to come in and fix everything in 1 year, it's a process, but I feel like we may finally have the right guy for that process.
C'mon, what organization would be dumb enough to make a trade like that?Agreed! Many other fans were responding to this signing with skepticism, but I'm hopeful that a personnel first guy will be a good start to turning the team around.This to me is different than previous moves because it signals a change at the top of the organization. For years, we haven't had a true personnel guy at the top. This guy isn't some big name, he's just very well respected around the league. McCloughan isn't some guy that's past his prime, he's 43 y/o. This isn't bringing back Gibbs after 12 years away, this isn't brining in Shanny in his 60s. This isn't signing the biggest name in FA. This finally seems to be Snyder understanding that he needs a real football mind in charge.
Will it work out? Who knows. But it certainly seems to be a step in the right direction. And for a team that has seemingly lost its path in recent years, there is reason for some optimism. Not saying he's going to come in and fix everything in 1 year, it's a process, but I feel like we may finally have the right guy for that process.
It'll be interesting to see what he does with our QB situation and how well the draft goes this year. With such a high draft pick I wonder if he'll take a top talent at 5, or look to trade back. Perhaps with a team that needs a QB, like the Rams, who might be willing to offer a ridiculous amount, like 3 first round picks and a 2nd?
Doesn't he run his own scouting business? I would think he could take people from his business and use them.As for this year's draft, I heard Albert Breer discussing how changes in scouting staff works. While coaches tend to change in January, scouts don't usually move around until after the draft. If he wants people that are already employed elsewhere, those teams are unlikely to let them go before the draft this year. They'll have too much insider knowledge that they can share with their new team. So, the next couple months are supposedly an evaluation time of those currently in Ashburn. We'll know come May how McCloughan thinks they performed.
Yep. And fortunately, or unfortunately, the Skins immediate needs are so clear that drafting this year should be a bit more straightforward than most.Doesn't he run his own scouting business? I would think he could take people from his business and use them.As for this year's draft, I heard Albert Breer discussing how changes in scouting staff works. While coaches tend to change in January, scouts don't usually move around until after the draft. If he wants people that are already employed elsewhere, those teams are unlikely to let them go before the draft this year. They'll have too much insider knowledge that they can share with their new team. So, the next couple months are supposedly an evaluation time of those currently in Ashburn. We'll know come May how McCloughan thinks they performed.
You can draft any position outside of WR and fill a need.Yep. And fortunately, or unfortunately, the Skins immediate needs are so clear that drafting this year should be a bit more straightforward than most.Doesn't he run his own scouting business? I would think he could take people from his business and use them.As for this year's draft, I heard Albert Breer discussing how changes in scouting staff works. While coaches tend to change in January, scouts don't usually move around until after the draft. If he wants people that are already employed elsewhere, those teams are unlikely to let them go before the draft this year. They'll have too much insider knowledge that they can share with their new team. So, the next couple months are supposedly an evaluation time of those currently in Ashburn. We'll know come May how McCloughan thinks they performed.
It also takes time to evaluate the scouting department and make changes. Like the Redskins roster, it is easy to say who needs to be replaced. It is much more difficult to find good people to replace them.As for this year's draft, I heard Albert Breer discussing how changes in scouting staff works. While coaches tend to change in January, scouts don't usually move around until after the draft. If he wants people that are already employed elsewhere, those teams are unlikely to let them go before the draft this year. They'll have too much insider knowledge that they can share with their new team. So, the next couple months are supposedly an evaluation time of those currently in Ashburn. We'll know come May how McCloughan thinks they performed.
Identifying the team needs is probably the easy part. It is finding the gems in the middle rounds of the draft and developing them that is the hard part.Yep. And fortunately, or unfortunately, the Skins immediate needs are so clear that drafting this year should be a bit more straightforward than most.Doesn't he run his own scouting business? I would think he could take people from his business and use them.As for this year's draft, I heard Albert Breer discussing how changes in scouting staff works. While coaches tend to change in January, scouts don't usually move around until after the draft. If he wants people that are already employed elsewhere, those teams are unlikely to let them go before the draft this year. They'll have too much insider knowledge that they can share with their new team. So, the next couple months are supposedly an evaluation time of those currently in Ashburn. We'll know come May how McCloughan thinks they performed.
Some with greater impact than others. OT > LB > S, in that order, as far as putting out fires, imo. All achilles heel type areas.You can draft any position outside of WR and fill a need.
I'm sure that's possible. But, my guess is many people are working for a "scouting business" and not the NFL for a reason. Maybe they aren't as good? And even if they are good, I don't recall seeing anything about how many people he employs. It may not be enough people to turn over an NFL scouting staff.Doesn't he run his own scouting business? I would think he could take people from his business and use them.As for this year's draft, I heard Albert Breer discussing how changes in scouting staff works. While coaches tend to change in January, scouts don't usually move around until after the draft. If he wants people that are already employed elsewhere, those teams are unlikely to let them go before the draft this year. They'll have too much insider knowledge that they can share with their new team. So, the next couple months are supposedly an evaluation time of those currently in Ashburn. We'll know come May how McCloughan thinks they performed.
Oh I have no idea. I just remember reading in that Wickersham story yesterday that he had his own scouting business and teams were paying him $75k to get his inputs. No idea if these are former scouts or what.I'm sure that's possible. But, my guess is many people are working for a "scouting business" and not the NFL for a reason. Maybe they aren't as good? And even if they are good, I don't recall seeing anything about how many people he employs. It may not be enough people to turn over an NFL scouting staff.Doesn't he run his own scouting business? I would think he could take people from his business and use them.As for this year's draft, I heard Albert Breer discussing how changes in scouting staff works. While coaches tend to change in January, scouts don't usually move around until after the draft. If he wants people that are already employed elsewhere, those teams are unlikely to let them go before the draft this year. They'll have too much insider knowledge that they can share with their new team. So, the next couple months are supposedly an evaluation time of those currently in Ashburn. We'll know come May how McCloughan thinks they performed.
What you say may make sense. I was just passing on what I heard Breer say when asked about changes to the Redskins scouting department. He didn't think we'd see immediate changes.