In general, I had inferred that some posters were surprised that Fred Jackson is still playing a large role in the offense. My impression was that some people seemed to think that preseason coach comments like "he's going to get the ball until he pukes" (paraphrasing) meant that he would be getting ~25-30 touches/game as an undisputed RB1 and that Fred Jackson would be on the bench all game as the clear RB2. And for that, some posters were now upset that Spiller's workload has hovered around 20 touches/game (ignoring the injury-shortened 3rd game). If my reading comprehension was poor, I apologize.Okay, but what does any of this have to do with "hearing what you want to hear" from the coaches comments?
Was offered Trent for Spiller in one league and Sjax for him in another.In a heartbeat.Spiller owners in redraft, would you take T-rich for him straight up?Injury seems minor. I might see what I could get for him.
If I were a betting man (outside of FF), I'd be putting my money on we'll be starting Spiller with no hesitation come playoff time. I'll take his talent in the long run over most in the league.Yep us spiller owners are in deep Shi% but this has been a weird year for FFootball and by the time the playoffs come around we may be starting Bilal Powell as a rb1...![]()
Now that's an offensive lowball offerOffered Wilson for Spiller
When the masses panic, I like to pounce.Everyone buying spiller now?
Yeah. I got spiller but im hholding.you think he will bounce back?When the masses panic, I like to pounce.Everyone buying spiller now?
No doubt in my mind. Far too much talent not to. If they change the play calling up to get him space, you could see it as early as this week. If they keep the play calling the same, he'll eventually make plays on his own.Yeah. I got spiller but im hholding.you think he will bounce back?When the masses panic, I like to pounce.Everyone buying spiller now?
This is kind of a tangent, but my reply was to your "hear what they want to hear" comment. What you're saying now is that they should have taken what the coach said with a grain of salt, which is different.In general, I had inferred that some posters were surprised that Fred Jackson is still playing a large role in the offense. My impression was that some people seemed to think that preseason coach comments like "he's going to get the ball until he pukes" (paraphrasing) meant that he would be getting ~25-30 touches/game as an undisputed RB1 and that Fred Jackson would be on the bench all game as the clear RB2. And for that, some posters were now upset that Spiller's workload has hovered around 20 touches/game (ignoring the injury-shortened 3rd game). If my reading comprehension was poor, I apologize.Okay, but what does any of this have to do with "hearing what you want to hear" from the coaches comments?
ETA - and I'd LOVE to see him getting ~30 touches on a regular basis. The Bills need to be doing more with him. But I find it hard to believe that any team with a #2 like Fred Jackson will let him ride the pine all day, no matter how good their #1 is. And Spiller is a great player, 100%. If they can get both players significant touches, that'd be fantastic.
Yeah. He is kind of hard to bench.No doubt in my mind. Far too much talent not to. If they change the play calling up to get him space, you could see it as early as this week. If they keep the play calling the same, he'll eventually make plays on his own.Yeah. I got spiller but im hholding.you think he will bounce back?When the masses panic, I like to pounce.Everyone buying spiller now?
This is better wording and more along the lines of what I was trying to say.This is kind of a tangent, but my reply was to your "hear what they want to hear" comment. What you're saying now is that they should have taken what the coach said with a grain of salt, which is different.
Benched him this week. While he can single handedly win you weeks, he can single handedly lose you weeks and the way the first three have gone, he very likely has lost you weeks. Don't be afraid to make the decision! We're in this together, man! Don't let the Buffalo Bills defeat you! You must defeat the Buffalo Bills!I just can't bench the guy, he's still capable of winning a week for you single handedly.
Similar to Chris Johnson last year, lost his grandmother. Hopefully Spiller will have the second half surge that Johnson didAnyone think his mind isn't on football due to his grandfathers issues (the murder suicide).
He just seems lost out there this season.
I think Spiller's value is pretty darn low. I would gladly trade him for TRich or A Morris...So what's Spiller's value ?
TRich ?
A Morris ?
I'm thinking of selling, don't like the usage, don't like the backup, don't like the offense and don't like the schedule.
Already have Sproles, MJD, Pierce and Boldin so I have a little depth.
I would also take Alf in a heartbeat. How low would you guys go on Spiller? I'm really trying to deal this dude. Gio seems like a good comp to me, but I already have him, so... Would you guys deal him for: DeMarco Murray? Reggie Bush? Chris Johnson? Steven Ridley?Godsbrother said:I think Spiller's value is pretty darn low. I would gladly trade him for TRich or A Morris...Sir Psycho said:So what's Spiller's value ?
TRich ?
A Morris ?
I'm thinking of selling, don't like the usage, don't like the backup, don't like the offense and don't like the schedule.
Already have Sproles, MJD, Pierce and Boldin so I have a little depth.
I'm a Spiller owner who seems to be a little more optimistic than most. I'd take Morris for him but not T-Rich.RushHour said:As I said in the T-Rich thread, there was a T-Rich for Spiller trade straight up in one of my leagues (redraft). That seems about right to me and as a Spiller owner in another league I would probably lean towards doing that. I wouldn't trade him for Morris though.
Spiller was universally ranked top 5. Dodds had him at number 4. You were probably considering him with your first pick. It is absolutely absurd that he fell to the second round (~pick 15?)Was it though? I mean, true, knowledge I had at the time... and if Spiller was putting up 15-20 points a week (PPR), I wouldn't be complaining... but RB-RB when it's Charles-Spiller vs. RB-TE when it's Charles-Graham? After all, I thought Graham went late too; isn't he a legitimate round one pick as well? I guess what I was saying with "lesson learned" was "I shouldn't be a slave to the RB-RB-WR-WR-TE/QB drafting formula". But maybe I'm wrong about that, too. I'm new at this, so "lesson learned" was as much of a vent as a declaration of intent for next year.What lesson is that? When a player universally ranked in the top 5 falls to you in the second round it is a no-brainer? But it still might not work out because hey, variance?You wanna hear something sick? I was fifth in the draft, I got Charles in round one and Spiller in round two. The very next pick, and it could have been mine if I wasn't so blindly committed to RB-RB? Jimmy freakin' Graham. I thought I was soooo clever grabbing Spiller and I couldn't believe he wasn't snatched up by then.
Maybe Spiller will pay off later in the season - he's quite talented, no question. But I should have had Jimmy Graham <_<
Well, it's my first year doing Fantasy Football, so lesson learned.
Don't be results oriented. That is an obvious pick. I have both Spiller and Graham on the same auction-draft team. I paid $70some for Spiller and $40some for Graham.
With the knowledge you had at that time- Spiller was the value pick.
Buffalo Bills RB C.J. Spiller (thigh) has been frustrated with the lack of a running game through three games. Spiller rushed only 10 times for nine yards before leaving with an injury. "They pretty much put a lot of people in the box and dared our passing game to beat them," Spiller said. Rookie QB EJ Manuel was just 19-for-42 and was sacked eight times in the loss to the New York Jets in Week 3.
Ya totally agree Spiller was top 5 consensus pick J.graham was 2nd to 3rd round guy what is this guy talking about... He said he was a rookie then tried to justify that as the reason he picked spiller when really the reason he wants J.graham over spiller shows he is a rookieSpiller was universally ranked top 5. Dodds had him at number 4. You were probably considering him with your first pick. It is absolutely absurd that he fell to the second round (~pick 15?)Was it though? I mean, true, knowledge I had at the time... and if Spiller was putting up 15-20 points a week (PPR), I wouldn't be complaining... but RB-RB when it's Charles-Spiller vs. RB-TE when it's Charles-Graham? After all, I thought Graham went late too; isn't he a legitimate round one pick as well? I guess what I was saying with "lesson learned" was "I shouldn't be a slave to the RB-RB-WR-WR-TE/QB drafting formula". But maybe I'm wrong about that, too. I'm new at this, so "lesson learned" was as much of a vent as a declaration of intent for next year.What lesson is that? When a player universally ranked in the top 5 falls to you in the second round it is a no-brainer? But it still might not work out because hey, variance?You wanna hear something sick? I was fifth in the draft, I got Charles in round one and Spiller in round two. The very next pick, and it could have been mine if I wasn't so blindly committed to RB-RB? Jimmy freakin' Graham. I thought I was soooo clever grabbing Spiller and I couldn't believe he wasn't snatched up by then.
Maybe Spiller will pay off later in the season - he's quite talented, no question. But I should have had Jimmy Graham <_<
Well, it's my first year doing Fantasy Football, so lesson learned.
Don't be results oriented. That is an obvious pick. I have both Spiller and Graham on the same auction-draft team. I paid $70some for Spiller and $40some for Graham.
With the knowledge you had at that time- Spiller was the value pick.
Don't overthink it. You do it again- you make the same choice.
Dude, are you having conversations with yourself?I wouldn't stress out to much about that
Not really. He was top 5 for a lot of people, but it wasn't universal. He wasn't even in my top 10, and even a lot of people who were high on him didn't have him top 5 ahead of guys like AP, Megatron, Martin, Charles, Foster and Rice.Spiller was universally ranked top 5.
I agree that he is a buy rather than a sell, but did you watch the game?Spiller should be bought not sold right now. teams won't be able to stack the line forever. when that offense finds balance again, he'll be what he has been the last 2 years.
No doubt that Spiller has not been at his best thus far but just looking at stills doesnt really tell us much.The holes were there, Spiller is not running well. There is no doubt there were some runs where the line was blown up. But he did a very poor job and turned a lot of 3 yard runs into no-gains. This is probably why Fred is averaging more than him.
Example 1
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49431542@N00/9926655993/
He is in OK shape here, #70 is about to come off his block and get to the next level. He needs to hit this hole with authority or bounce outside. Instead he stutter steps up behind #74, the Jets get off their blocks and he has no momentum and is tackled for no gain.
Example 2
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49431542@N00/9926513286/
Hitting either spot will be a short gain. The left most hole is probably better as there is a chance that the lineman can move up to the next level and squeak out a few extra yards. Instead he stutter steps up behind his lineman again and his indecisiveness leads him nowhere.
Example 3
http://www.flickr.com/photos/49431542@N00/9926655483/
This one is the worst. Look at the gaping hole. He is looking and running to the outside from the beginning and wastes it. You can't necessarily fault him if that is the play design, but I also wonder whether he knows the play. They are running the hurry up, it is entirely possible he is having a hard time getting the play call and doesn't know the blocking scheme and what hole he is supposed to hit?
Seems like a classic buy high sell low on your part. Anything is possible and it could work out but, 3 weeks into the season, that's a head scratcher to me.Just traded Spiller for Gordon in a redraft league.