What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Pure Squistion Entertainment (formerly the Colin Kaepernick thread) (2 Viewers)

Kaep Sitting for Anthem


  • Total voters
    397
Status
Not open for further replies.
You are missing the point.  Kaeprnick is not crapping on America by kneeling during the anthem, he is using the moment to highlight what he sees as a flaw in our society.  His protest was noticed and it has now achieved a part of what Kaep intended, a  conversation on the flaw and a hope that a fix can be found.
He is taking away from a moment that is meant to honor America and those who fought for it.  It is akin to screaming during a moment of silence.  

 
What a bunch of race-baiting cow manure.   There are plenty of black Americans who don't support Kaep.  Are they uneducated and prejudice too?   Or are they just a bunch of African Americans who don't like fros?   Just a bunch of over the top rhetoric which only serves to stir up hate.  Go spread your #### elsewhere.  
Hahaha race-baiting? I bet you have that monogrammed on a pillow somewhere. I'm sorry that you're so offended by freedom, but that too is your right. Peace, brother. I hope you find a cure for your hate. 

 
Goes back to a meme a saw when this all first started.

White guy: Black people need to learn to protest peacefully.

*Kaepernick kneels peacefully during National Anthem

White guy: No, not like that.

 
He is taking away from a moment that is meant to honor America and those who fought for it.  It is akin to screaming during a moment of silence.  
He is showing his disagreement with the path the country is on during a redundant and contrived moment of hyper patriotism meant to increase the commercial viability of the NFL.  Commerce is king in America but at it's core nothing is more American than standing up to the man and affecting change.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although many respondents disagree with Kaepernick's stance, 64 percent of all the people who were surveyed agreed that Kaepernick has a constitutional right to protest and shouldn't be punished by the NFL.

More important numbers from that cbssports piece.

And I'm not sure what bothers me more, people that think he's being unpatriotic while exercising his constitutional right, or that 36% appear to think that he doesn't have the constitutional right to do what he's doing.
I wouldn't put much stock in that poll. 

 
Why does it bother you that people think his actions are unpatriotic?   Isn't that his point?  
Because, for the general populace, there are few and far things to me that are more patriotic that exercising your constitutional rights. Obviously serving your country, in some capacity, brings a level of patriotism that far exceeds that, but back to the general populace which Kaep is part of...

That US Constitution, which Kaep's utilizing the rights bestowed upon him by, is far more important than the flag that he's supposedly disrespecting. And using those constitutional rights, in an effort to make this country a better place, to me, is patriotism personified 

 
Hahaha race-baiting? I bet you have that monogrammed on a pillow somewhere. I'm sorry that you're so offended by freedom, but that too is your right. Peace, brother. I hope you find a cure for your hate. 
Calling an intentional act against patriotism as unpatriotic is not hate, it is descriptive.   Calling everyone who disagrees with you as ignorant and prejudice (an arguement which falls immediately on its face) is just stirring up hate. Blankety throwing out the race card is the epitome of race-baiting.  

 
Because, for the general populace, there are few and far things to me that are more patriotic that exercising your constitutional rights. Obviously serving your country, in some capacity, brings a level of patriotism that far exceeds that, but back to the general populace which Kaep is part of...

That US Constitution, which Kaep's utilizing the rights bestowed upon him by, is far more important than the flag that he's supposedly disrespecting. And using those constitutional rights, in an effort to make this country a better place, to me, is patriotism personified 
You have a bizarre definition of patriotism.   By your definition an ISIS terrorist who just killed a thousand Americans would be a true patriot for exercising his Constitutional rights to take the 5th.   When your definition fails that badly, perhaps it is time to rethink.  Most Americans agree that it is Kaep's right, they just don't think it is the right time to be sending it.  Why do you support Kaep's opinion, but get so damn spun up when most Americans express an opinion contrary to that. 

 
You have a bizarre definition of patriotism.   By your definition an ISIS terrorist who just killed a thousand Americans would be a true patriot for exercising his Constitutional rights to take the 5th.   When your definition fails that badly, perhaps it is time to rethink.  Most Americans agree that it is Kaep's right, they just don't think it is the right time to be sending it.  Why do you support Kaep's opinion, but get so damn spun up when most Americans express an opinion contrary to that. 
:lmao: :lmao:  

 
The guy(s) that kill 1,000 of people just left the old 'general populace' portion of society.

I'll respect his right to take the 5th, that's the slippery slope of this whole Constitution thing, but let's not be silly here because these hypothetical terrorists weren't taking these hypothetical actions to make America a better place.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The guy(s) that kill 1,000 of people just left the old 'general populace' portion of society.

I'll respect his right to take the 5th, that's the slippery slope of this whole Constitution thing, but let's not be silly here 
It is not silly.  It just points out that even people who hate this country and are the most unpatriotic people imagineable, have Constitutional rights.   It is not the exercising of those rights which is patriotic (your definition), it is the recognition that those values expressed by the Constitution is what makes this country great. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You are missing the point.  Kaeprnick is not crapping on America by kneeling during the anthem, he is using the moment to highlight what he sees as a flaw in our society.  His protest was noticed and it has now achieved a part of what Kaep intended, a  conversation on the flaw and a hope that a fix can be found.
In all reality the guy could be doing it for some pooty tang or for one last "look at me". Nobody really knows his true motivations. 

 
I believe you can question Kaepernick's motives all you want. This is as much your right as it is Kaep's to voice his opinion. However, he's neither wrong in message nor actions. Kaep, in reference to Dilfer's ridiculous commentary, for example, is becoming a (the) spokesperson for a group of people who can't/don't/won't speak for themselves. All the evidence one would need would be the uncomfortability shown by massive swaths of white America as he continues to make his feelings known and refuses to back down from his growing position of power. And that's where it really gets tricky. His power grows and the uneducated, ignorant and prejudiced masses writhe and stumble through their own sordid commentary in bars and on message boards across America and beyond. 

Plainly, if you don't understand just how American it is that Kaepernick is using his position of relative power and absolute exposure to discuss injustices and inequalities and further the discussion to a national commentary that has long left out those without the ways and means to speak for themselves, you're doing it wrong. And the sad part is that you probably know you are. Are the socks cheap shots? Maybe. Is the afro a bit much? I suppose it could be. But it's working. And isn't that the point? 
So the end justifies the means?

My take: I think his intentions are genuine. I respect what he believes in and what he's trying to do. I don't like the vehicle he's using to convey that message. I understand that is likely why this vehicle was chosen (i.e. it's polarizing and gets people talking) but he's pissing down the back of a lot of people in the process. Doing something that shows disrespect (intended or not) is not the way to get something done IMO.

 
where are we at on the following

1) the bed-ridden, infirm or those in wheelchairs.  aren't they showing ultimate disrespect of America by being so weak that they can't even ####### stand to salute the country that made it possible for them to still be alive? in other countries they would be euthanized. should they not show respect by at least trying to stand????

these are the types that make me angriest. look, i get it, you got hit by a Mack truck on your way to work. it happens. that doesn't mean you get the right to sit during the national ####### anthem. this is America. you owe it to the troops that fought for your freedom to allow that American made truck to hit you. you damned well better salute the flag and thank them for dropping those cluster bombs on Laos so that our truck production didn't move there in the 70s.

2) how do we feel about foreign nationals standing for the anthem? all those Dominicans and Japs and other browns playing baseball that stand for the national anthem... i mean, seriously. have some self respect. it's not even your flag. as an American i sure as hell don't stand for the Canadian anthem.. or the Swedish anthem.. just like i don't dance with someone else's wife at a wedding. it's flat disrespectful to do. if i had the nerve to take the hand of someone else's girl i'd expect to get taken out back and beat up.

maybe that's what we need. round up all these clowns from other countries that are sucking on the American teat by taking good American baseball jobs.. take them out back and beat the tar out of them. then they'll learn not to be so weak as to salute another country's flag.

or they can just go back to their own country and poop outside like the rest of non-America.

 
So the end justifies the means?

My take: I think his intentions are genuine. I respect what he believes in and what he's trying to do. I don't like the vehicle he's using to convey that message. I understand that is likely why this vehicle was chosen (i.e. it's polarizing and gets people talking) but he's pissing down the back of a lot of people in the process. Doing something that shows disrespect (intended or not) is not the way to get something done IMO.
Its been brought up before and it will be brought up again.

Rosa Parks was being 'disrespectful' to those that opposed where she plopped her ### down on public transportation

Oliver Brown was being 'disrespectful' to some people by sending his daughter to the public school in his neighborhood.

 
http://footballscoop.com/news/dabo-swinney-speaks-players-kneeling-national-anthem/

This is really good! Criticized by some for bringing MLK into the conversation because he was arrested and disruptive. When you dig deeper and see what MLK was arrested for and you might  disagree. What MLK did took great courage but he never disrespected the flag. Had he and I believe there would be no day set aside for him. 
I know Dabo didn't offer his insights but all these coaches are getting asked this question about sharing their thoughts on the Kaepernick protest story.  Offering personal points of view only opens a coach up to criticism, no matter what he says.  

You agree with his right to protest and share his beliefs, you get hit by one group of people.  You disagree with his right to protest, like Tony LaRussa or Jerry Jones, you get hit by another group of people.  You try to stay neutral and say you agree with his right to protest but tend to disagree with his methods or choice of platform, you get hit by another group of people who call you a "white moderate."   If you quote MLK or bring up the name MLK, and are white, you get hit by a mixture of the previous groups of people.  

Coach, you can't win.  Best to keep your personal thoughts out of the press conference and just say something like "I respect his constitutional right to protest"... and move on to the next question.  

 
Its been brought up before and it will be brought up again.

Rosa Parks was being 'disrespectful' to those that opposed where she plopped her ### down on public transportation

Oliver Brown was being 'disrespectful' to some people by sending his daughter to the public school in his neighborhood.
You can bring it up as many times as you want but they aren't the same. The examples you cited above are people who were rallying around "thee" item causing the injustice.

Colored people can't ride on buses. Screw em, I'm riding on the bus.

Colored people can't go to the local public school? Screw em, I'm sending my child.

Colored people are treated fairly in this country? I'm not standing for the flag because it represents that injustice. Not the same as the two above. If you don't understand it then I can't help you.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Limp Ditka said:
Its been brought up before and it will be brought up again.

Rosa Parks was being 'disrespectful' to those that opposed where she plopped her ### down on public transportation

Oliver Brown was being 'disrespectful' to some people by sending his daughter to the public school in his neighborhood.
 Kaep is not Rosa Parks.  HTH. 

 
mr. furley said:
2) how do we feel about foreign nationals standing for the anthem? all those Dominicans and Japs and other browns playing baseball that stand for the national anthem... i mean, seriously. have some self respect. it's not even your flag. as an American i sure as hell don't stand for the Canadian anthem.. or the Swedish anthem.. just like i don't dance with someone else's wife at a wedding. it's flat disrespectful to do. if i had the nerve to take the hand of someone else's girl i'd expect to get taken out back and beat up.

maybe that's what we need. round up all these clowns from other countries that are sucking on the American teat by taking good American baseball jobs.. take them out back and beat the tar out of them. then they'll learn not to be so weak as to salute another country's flag.

or they can just go back to their own country and poop outside like the rest of non-America.
Love this analogy. I married into a Catholic family and, out of respect to my wife and inlaws, have attended far too many Catholic ceremonies, masses, etc (including our wedding).

However, when attending these events, I purposely don't go through the stand, sit, kneel, taking communion rituals that comes with a Catholic mass out of that same respect. I'm not one of them, I'm not religious, and if I were, I most certainly wouldn't be Catholic. If I went through the motions, I know my inlaws wouldn't think twice about me doing it, but I also know that they respect my choice not to.

 
:lmao:

OK, jon.

Given the chance to be in that place and time, and this platform, I have no doubt in my mind that you'd be here #####ing about her.
"We have rules for a reason and who is she to see herself as special or above these rules? So disrespectful to the troops who died so that we could have those rules. Do you think I like riding the bus? No."

 
Limp Ditka said:
Although many respondents disagree with Kaepernick's stance, 64 percent of all the people who were surveyed agreed that Kaepernick has a constitutional right to protest and shouldn't be punished by the NFL.
Of course he has the right to do this. There is no law in place that you have to stand for the National Anthem, hence "'please' rise for the National Anthem and remove your hat."

Hard to argue that it isn't his constitutional right and I don't think a single person here would disagree with that. Don't know what point you're trying to make.

 
Of course he has the right to do this. There is no law in place that you have to stand for the National Anthem, hence "'please' rise for the National Anthem and remove your hat."

Hard to argue that it isn't his constitutional right and I don't think a single person here would disagree with that. Don't know what point you're trying to make.

Limp Ditka said:
Although many respondents disagree with Kaepernick's stance, 64 percent of all the people who were surveyed agreed that Kaepernick has a constitutional right to protest and shouldn't be punished by the NFL.
yet 36% of the people seem to  be doing exactly that.

 
In your opinion, are kneeling down and standing with raised fist during the anthem the same thing?  
IDK about the same, but I do find them both disrespectful.

We're all Americans, stand there for 2 minutes like everyone else, breathe it in, relax, and appreciate it IMO.

 
Limp Ditka said:
Its been brought up before and it will be brought up again.

Rosa Parks was being 'disrespectful' to those that opposed where she plopped her ### down on public transportation

Oliver Brown was being 'disrespectful' to some people by sending his daughter to the public school in his neighborhood.
AND LOOK WHAT IT HAS DONE TO THIS COUNTRY!!

 
Racists hiding behind flag ceremonies, now more American than peaceful dissent

We're sure getting somewhere in here, huh?  jon_mx :lmao:

 
I see the kneeling as a peaceful protest and I believe Kaep, or anyone else, has the right to do that.  I'm not as sure about the raised fist.  That has the connotation of standing for black power, as opposed to simply being a symbol of solidarity.  

I think that could be more offensive than kneeling.  Would anyone be offended if, during the anthem, a white player stood there and raised a hand that had a confederate flag painted on it?  

 
Buzzbait said:
You can bring it up as many times as you want but they aren't the same. The examples you cited above are people who were rallying around "thee" item causing the injustice.

Colored people can't ride on buses. Screw em, I'm riding on the bus.

Colored people can't go to the local public school? Screw em, I'm sending my child.

Colored people are treated fairly in this country? I'm not standing for the flag because it represents that injustice. Not the same as the two above. If you don't understand it then I can't help you.
wat

 
IDK about the same, but I do find them both disrespectful.

We're all Americans, stand there for 2 minutes like everyone else, breathe it in, relax, and appreciate it IMO.
why?

forced pride, forced salute, forced glorification is not American. we see reports from North Korea and think "how could those people possibly stand there and salute Kim Jong-Il?? are they blind???" but then demand the same from free Americans.

 don't question the dear leader. do as you are told. do it the right way. do it at the right time and there won't be trouble.. you see?

 
I see the kneeling as a peaceful protest and I believe Kaep, or anyone else, has the right to do that.  I'm not as sure about the raised fist.  That has the connotation of standing for black power, as opposed to simply being a symbol of solidarity.  

I think that could be more offensive than kneeling.  Would anyone be offended if, during the anthem, a white player stood there and raised a hand that had a confederate flag painted on it?  
well, they were insurrectionists and lost.. so... unless we're calling slavery a lost war and counting black americans as the enemy... 

that does make me think, though. people have frequently said that the Confederate flag is a sign of dissent, of rebellion (it's called the ####### Rebel flag for chrissakes) that it's the "true American" way of giving the middle finger to government... it saw a resurgence in popularity in defiance of the new Islamic President Hussein Obama.

but...... white America is mostly okay with it :shrug:  "it's their right to fly the flag on trucks, on shirts, in stadiums, etc." we say. :shrug:

but a quiet raised fist represents black power and that's disrespectful?

isn't saluting the Confederate flag... they did nearly destroy the United States... more disrespectful than people saying "maybe this whole freedom for everyone thing isn't exactly being evenly applied and i don't want to pay homage for these 2 minutes"?

there's no questioning that a guy flying two giant Confederate flags on his pickup loves America. but a guy who won't be forced to salute the American flag hates America.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
:lmao:

OK, jon.

Given the chance to be in that place and time, and this platform, I have no doubt in my mind that you'd be here #####ing about her.
I can speculate that given the chance you would partake in gay sex.   Not sure what that has to do with anything.  I am not even sure what the arguement is at this point.   I think all reasonable people can agree: 

1.  He has the right

2.  It is disrespectful, whether you can rationalize it or not because of his cause is opinion.  

At this point, I am not sure what point it is you want to make.  It seems like the 'national anthem sucks' crowd just want to carry on calling everyone a racist or stupid if you don't agree.  Carry on with the tantrums, but it seems kind of a whacky fringe movement.  

 
Make assumptions much? 
Sure I called you racists last week too

In all your fury about how offended everybody - especially we veterans - must be about a tradition that's not in any way, shape or form meant to be a service memorial, can you go over your specific thoughts about his message again?  

For example here's what I think.. you can't change people's viewpoints in a day or a week or a year, but a lot could be solved by prosecuting the "bad apples" as they are described by their own departments/representatives, who recklessly kill or otherwise assault unarmed citizens.  Wouldn't that go a long way toward addressing these issues of perceived systematic injustice?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
why?

forced pride, forced salute, forced glorification is not American. we see reports from North Korea and think "how could those people possibly stand there and salute Kim Jong-Il?? are they blind???" but then demand the same from free Americans.

 don't question the dear leader. do as you are told. do it the right way. do it at the right time and there won't be trouble.. you see?
Yep.  America is just like North Korea.  Damn, thanks fir the insight.  

 
I can speculate that given the chance you would partake in gay sex.   Not sure what that has to do with anything.  I am not even sure what the arguement is at this point.   I think all reasonable people can agree: 

1.  He has the right

2.  It is disrespectful, whether you can rationalize it or not because of his cause is opinion.  

At this point, I am not sure what point it is you want to make.  It seems like the 'national anthem sucks' crowd just want to carry on calling everyone a racist or stupid if you don't agree.  Carry on with the tantrums, but it seems kind of a whacky fringe movement.  
Because GAY people!

 
why?

forced pride, forced salute, forced glorification is not American. we see reports from North Korea and think "how could those people possibly stand there and salute Kim Jong-Il?? are they blind???" but then demand the same from free Americans.

 don't question the dear leader. do as you are told. do it the right way. do it at the right time and there won't be trouble.. you see?
This is an awful analogy, we aren't saluting one person. Doctor Detroit had a great quote last week about standing for something that is bigger than any one person, which I absolutely agree with. 

I don't feel forced to stand, I do it out of respect and appreciation.

Sure I called you racists last week too
Stopped right here, no need to continue

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top