More money for sugar pills. He still won’t beat the 49ers in the playoffs.He's earned that paycheck. Congrats to Packer fans.
But good to know he is back this year. Looks like im keeping Sunday Ticket another seasonAs usual, we have to be patient and wait for the details. This could be another 1 year deal, a one-year-and-trade deal like last year, or something else.
Maybe. Could have done a Howie Roseman thing and add like 4 'dead' years to the deal to spread the hit out.Horrendous. Can’t wait for him to complain when packers can’t sign other players like Davante.
Packers had chance to jump start rebuild and made things even worse.
Umm...him restructuring with a longer term deal (we don't know the numbers yet...McAfee saying the Rappaport numbers are not accurate)...but him doing that makes it more manageable to sign Davante.Horrendous. Can’t wait for him to complain when packers can’t sign other players like Davante.
Packers had chance to jump start rebuild and made things even worse.
Maybe...or that is what the team was thinking they had to do to get him back. Probably a bit of both...he wants the security and being "the guy" with the big contract...they want to make sure they get him back with maybe some more certainty for a few years.Happy he's back since it's a QB driven league and Love stinks. Wish he would've taken a more team friendly deal but whatever. Shows that being the highest paid player was truly important to Rodgers.
And the cap is expected to increase significantly in the coming years as revenues from the new TV contract and gambling come rolling in, which will still allow them plenty of flexibility. Shoot, Rams just paid ~45mm (20mm Stafford/~25mm Goff) to the QB position last year on a 187mm cap and won the Super Bowl. Rodgers was/is the Pack's best chance to win a SB and they went for it, smart move with not so many power teams in the NFC right now.Umm...him restructuring with a longer term deal (we don't know the numbers yet...McAfee saying the Rappaport numbers are not accurate)...but him doing that makes it more manageable to sign Davante.
I'm gonna guess the full "guaranteed amount" isn't money immediately into Rodgers' bank account right now. Probably more of a total money guaranteed each year. That way the Packers don't get hosed if ARod decides to retire a year, or two, from now.FWIW,
Replies don’t seem to be coming up at the minute, but under Ian Rapoport’s tweet breaking the news Pat McAfee straight up said the reported contract is false.
McAfee is tight with Rodgers and talked with him this morning where Rodgers confirmed he is going back to GB, but McAfee is saying his “source” (lol) has said that the reported deal is false and is more team friendly.
So will be interesting to see what the actual numbers are.
Right...so if the numbers are correct (and seems there is some question about that)...even the $50 million per average would be quite a bit lower % of the cap than some are claiming.And the cap is expected to increase significantly in the coming years as revenues from the new TV contract and gambling come rolling in, which will still allow them plenty of flexibility. Shoot, Rams just paid ~45mm (20mm Stafford/~25mm Goff) to the QB position last year on a 187mm cap and won the Super Bowl. Rodgers was/is the Pack's best chance to win a SB and they went for it, smart move with not so many power teams in the NFC right now.
The $50M is with the discount DoubleRight...so if the numbers are correct (and seems there is some question about that)...even the $50 million per average would be quite a bit lower % of the cap than some are claiming.
Happy he's back since it's a QB driven league and Love stinks. Wish he would've taken a more team friendly deal but whatever. Shows that being the highest paid player was truly important to Rodgers.
Right...Rap also claiming now cap friendly first 2 years. Im sure he will report another number and another before we hear the real number.Best to wait for the real journalists to report the deal terms over the coming weeks. It could be a team-friendly deal.
But it's WI, home of the beer goggles. They don't need the hottest chick with the amount of alcohol that is drank.Best analogy I have heard about Rodgers...builds on what Barkley had said.
The Packers are the average guy...and they outkicked their coverage with one of the hottest women (Rodgers part in this analogy). Super high maintenance and you have to put up with a lot of stuff...but you reap the benefits of having that hot woman with you.
"Aaron Rodgers tweeted, "I will be playing with the @packers next year, however, reports about me signing a contract are inaccurate."Geez, Rodgers must be so mad his news was upstaged by Wilson. He's going to need to do something to fix that.
Yeah, but they got only one blue dot from him, and that was several years ago.Best analogy I have heard about Rodgers...builds on what Barkley had said.
The Packers are the average guy...and they outkicked their coverage with one of the hottest women (Rodgers part in this analogy). Super high maintenance and you have to put up with a lot of stuff...but you reap the benefits of having that hot woman with you.
"Aaron Rodgers tweeted, "I will be playing with the @packers next year, however, reports about me signing a contract are inaccurate."Geez, Rodgers must be so mad his news was upstaged by Wilson. He's going to need to do something to fix that.
That's a real quote.
What a drama queen.
 Yeah...but they have that hope of getting another...and sometimes, hope is a good thing, maybe even the best thing (or whatever it was that @Andy Dufresne said to Red)Yeah, but they got only one blue dot from him, and that was several years ago.
"Aaron Rodgers tweeted, "I will be playing with the @packers next year, however, reports about me signing a contract are inaccurate."Geez, Rodgers must be so mad his news was upstaged by Wilson. He's going to need to do something to fix that.
That's a real quote.
In that case he should be more like Brady and sign deals that give his team the best chance to win.I had a feeling this was coming, either from him or one of his media lackeys like MacAfee. He's going to bristle at the notion his contract handcuffs the team, due to the inevitable contrast with Brady. This is what drives this guy. He wants the "respect" of the biggest contract ever, but also wants the fans to admire him for being loyal and not just doing it for the money.
In that case he should be more like Brady and sign deals that give his team the best chance to win.
I'm sure Pack fans love him. I don't have much patience for him anymore after all the drama and the attitude. I don't have any doubtsthat it IS all about the money. The word "respect", when mentioned in contract discussions, seldom has anything to do with respect. And, if he wants real respect, he'll need to stop complaining about the talent around him and win when it countsI had a feeling this was coming, either from him or one of his media lackeys like MacAfee. He's going to bristle at the notion his contract handcuffs the team, due to the inevitable contrast with Brady. This is what drives this guy. He wants the "respect" of the biggest contract ever, but also wants the fans to admire him for being loyal and not just doing it for the money.
Andrew Brandt
@AndrewBrandt
Lingering issue re Aaron/Packers: All reports last year had him getting an opt-out after 2022 where he could be a FA and pick his team. Is that still in there? If so, he would be the most valuable FA in NFL history, get way past $50M/year. If not, what a massive win for GB.
Pretty much anytime someone tries to explain, "It's really NOT about the money" it sounds to me like someone explaining, "I'm the LEAST racist person you'll ever meet. No, REALLY!".Then again, with a new-money average of nearly $62 million, it’s fair to say he maximized his leverage.
I wonder when a QB gets so powerful he gets 1%, 5%, etc of franchise OWNERSHIP when signing one of these deals. It would be interesting how that played itself out in the salary cap. We have seen/heard former players try to get into ownership before.I really wonder when players will eventually figure out that winning will bring them the money that can be left on the table for the contract. Through endorsements all of that money can be made up while winning especially if the player is personable for commercials.
NFL Network's Ian Rapoport reports Aaron Rodgers "knew Davante Adams would never play for the Packers again" before negotiating his contract.
After the shock of the trade started to dissipate, it was understandable to question how Rodgers felt about his best -- and arguably only -- receiving weapon traded away, but this report along with others suggests Rodgers has accepted the situation even if he is not okay with it. For Rodgers, the question turns to who he will be throwing to in 2022. Allen Lazard and Randall Cobb are back, and perhaps Marquez Valdes-Scantling will re-sign in the wake of this news. Even so, it would be smart for the Packers to use their newfound first-round pick on one of a talented group of draft-eligible receivers.
RELATED:
Davante Adams
SOURCE: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Mar 17, 2022, 7:56 PM ET
Right…….ok Arod…..Faust said:
I think the article summary misstates Rodgers’ comments somewhat. “Green Bay Packers quarterback Aaron Rodgers said he was "surprised" by the team trading former receiver Davante Adams this offseason.” He didn’t say this. I heard his comments to mean he was surprised Adams chose the Raiders despite the Packers’ competitive offer. It’s hard to view Adams’ decision as anything other than a rejection of Rodgers in favor of Carr. I’m sure that did surprise him. It was a very surprising decision.Faust said:
Bullseye! https://www.wkow.com/news/top-stories/packers-president-mark-murphy-confirms-retirement-plan-for-2025/article_c4005e48-fa47-11ec-ae84-bf1dc379ce93.htmlStart the clock on Mark Murphy stepping down for "an opportunity too good to pass up" in 2025.